Escort Reports

Met up with a massive breasted white girl tonight in Elmwood Park. She had been advertising on BP, but the ads seem to be gone now. Anyhow:

Offers massage and a series of add-ons: HJ, BBBJ, FS. Very clean and private location. Easy to find, but also incognito enough to make the drive up stress-free. "

Greeted at the door in a flattering black dress; she's about 5'9", full-figured, but very proportioned. In no way even a BBW, really. Short, dark hair that suits her well. Has a beautiful smile that sets a guy right at ease, greets with a hug and shows you to a private apartment, nicely furnished and comfortable, with candles, etc. She goes out of her way to make it a relaxing and sensually inviting environment. Very friendly, very easy to talk to. Half and full hours offered, I took the half and got a nice massage with pleasant talk meant to enhance the mood. Moved on to the BJ option (. 80) and she offered a few options of where I might feel comfy for the event. Was receptive to Russian, which was just awesome, as you might imagine soft, natural 36G's feeling. Afterward, even offered a shower if I wanted to get the massage lotion off.

Overall, a classy, comfortable and erotic experience. Just what I needed after a string of lousy experiences with other "providers". This one is a keeper. I'll trade info for a real quality tip. Trust me, it will be worth it.

Hottie!

[url]http://chicago.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/pretty-polish-girl-25/6486002[/url]

I am very likely going to be seeing this one on Thursday or Friday

[url]http://chicago.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/amazing-russianasian-beauty-visiting-chicago-22/6487327[/url]

but was just wondering if anyone else has and know if its bs before i do. She looks almost too good to be true.

[QUOTE=Deizel5]I am very likely going to be seeing this one on Thursday or Friday

[url]http://chicago.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/amazing-russianasian-beauty-visiting-chicago-22/6487327[/url]

but was just wondering if anyone else has and know if its bs before i do. She looks almost too good to be true.[/QUOTE]


I think you didn't use tineye on the pics

[url]http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/29/Canada-Prostitution/[/url]

A _female_ Superior Court judge in Canada issued a 130+ page decision that concluded that the laws against prostitution are "largely ineffective" and that the law against "communicating for the purpose of prostitution" was not "protecting public safety".

Congratulations to both the women that challenged the law and to this judge who showed a level of courage and common sense that is lacking in our country for some reason.

Her ruling - if you read it - argues the reason the laws are unconstitutional mainly because they do more harm than good. I wish she had put in stronger wording that the laws are also unconstitutional because they are a blatant violation of civil rights.

Look at what the Attorney General argues. "The Attorney General of Ontario submits that all sexual gratification in exchange for payment is inconsistent with respect for human decency of the seller of those services". That is a thoughtless, unsubstantiated, indefensible position for about 57 different reasons.

[QUOTE=Chigod7]Hottie!

[url]http://chicago.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/pretty-polish-girl-25/6486002[/url][/QUOTE]The pics are from old adds for a girl named Mandy, Summer and another name that escapes me. Recent posts on BP say this girl is not the one you will see. The Phone number is new, but it smells the same.

[QUOTE=Moejoo]I think you didn't use tineye on the pics[/QUOTE]

i did on one of them...but fuck that sucks. Well good thing I didn't spend money I didn't really have.

[QUOTE=Nudus81]I first went to TP early this year. I had an out of world experience with Vivian since then, my multiple visits have been rushed and unfullfulling. I was there this month again (very convenient to my office) and met Mary. She was extremely attractive, but was all about getting finshed.

I have decided to no longer patronize TP because they always seem to rush. Unfortunately, the girls are really hot. I just wished they would take their time.[/QUOTE]

Is it just this round of girls doing this?

[QUOTE=Rubenme2]Is it just this round of girls doing this?[/QUOTE]Last time I was @ TP, I had the same type of service. Even had hands 'gently guided' away from certain areas.

[QUOTE=Datsurman]Look at what the Attorney General argues. "The Attorney General of Ontario submits that all sexual gratification in exchange for payment is inconsistent with respect for human decency of the seller of those services". [/QUOTE]I feel the same about software development, yet no one is rushing to my defense.

Where does it end? Is it worse to exploit your body for money or your mind? Is someone going to protect NFL players from trading their bodies for money?

Have recently enjoyed two of the most beautiful ladies I have ever had the chance to encounter. Based on my experiences the photo's of the gals listed in the Eros guide with the $160 flat rate ( incall only ) are the real deal. Same beautiful girls. Have fun and stay safe!

[QUOTE=Dazhiba]Have recently enjoyed two of the most beautiful ladies I have ever had the chance to encounter. Based on my experiences the photo's of the gals listed in the Eros guide with the $160 flat rate ( incall only ) are the real deal. Same beautiful girls. Have fun and stay safe![/QUOTE]

Well, some are real, most are not. You found a real one, care to tell which one?

[QUOTE=Rubenme2]Is it just this round of girls doing this?[/QUOTE]I have had the exact same issues. Its hard to complain with the price and the girls being mostly very attractive. But when Ive been used to such non rushed service in the past its hard not to. I dont know if this is accurate but I feel like many of the same girls are coming back vs new ones. Maybe they are worn out.

[QUOTE=Moejoo]I think you didn't use tineye on the pics[/QUOTE]She has 2 reviews on another site. One soso the other pretty good but could be fake.

[QUOTE=Datsurman][url]http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/09/29/Canada-Prostitution/[/url]

A female Superior Court judge in Canada issued a 130+ page decision that concluded that the laws against prostitution are "largely ineffective" and that the law against "communicating for the purpose of prostitution" was not "protecting public safety".

Congratulations to both the women that challenged the law and to this judge who showed a level of courage and common sense that is lacking in our country for some reason.

Her ruling - if you read it - argues the reason the laws are unconstitutional mainly because they do more harm than good. I wish she had put in stronger wording that the laws are also unconstitutional because they are a blatant violation of civil rights.

Look at what the Attorney General argues. "The Attorney General of Ontario submits that all sexual gratification in exchange for payment is inconsistent with respect for human decency of the seller of those services". That is a thoughtless, unsubstantiated, indefensible position for about 57 different reasons.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that's great and all but that is Canada for you.

You might as well be talking about the Moon!