[quote][QUOTE=Whatdafuq; 1354905]Jennifer" has skyrocketed to become my ATM
F / I[/QUOTE]Just wondering. Whose ass and whose mouth?[/QUOTE]
I pictured him swiping his card in the slot and her spitting out money. I could use one of those.
Printable View
[quote][QUOTE=Whatdafuq; 1354905]Jennifer" has skyrocketed to become my ATM
F / I[/QUOTE]Just wondering. Whose ass and whose mouth?[/QUOTE]
I pictured him swiping his card in the slot and her spitting out money. I could use one of those.
It's funny some hobbyist seem more interested in flaming other hobbyists than finding good information about escorts."Jennifer" is great and as far as I'm concerned I'd keep it a secert as she has been very fresh for me being a LVP. The sex for us has been very geniune and that ts not always easy to find. The only thing that dissuades me from keeping her a secret is that she's got a really good heart and I want her to do well. She needs to find her financial footing and she's got the whole package to do so and do so well. She just needs to come a bit more out the UTR closet so to speak and get serious about the business side of her venture. That and ridding from her life those who want to sap off her and drag her down.
In any case say and do as you please as I'm certainly not going to stop you. I just hope more hobbyists would have a little more solidarity between one another. Sometimes I really wonder how well they can be treating the escorts I care about if they can be so cruel towards one another.
Here's hoping for the best.
Sex for us has been very geniune and that ts not always easy to find.
Shouldn't this be posted in the transsexual reports?
Got to add another 2 cents story about some interaction last week.
I posted a few weeks ago that a call screener and I had a little bit of a disagreement over a review I gave one of the ladies she answers the phone for. I admit, one line in there was not very nice, but all in all, the review was spot on. She gives an ad with a photo that is supposed to be a "close representation" of what she looks like. This was certainly not the case. I was still polite, kept the appointment, and left after it was over.
The next time I called for a girl she answers the phone for, I get lambasted over being mean and cruel.
I then last week called one of my regular regulars and the phone screener this time has a familiar voice. The unhappy screener was filling in for the regular one and was very short with me. The appointment was still made, but my regular asked what I did to this screener. (hope she doesn't get scolded for telling me). I explained what happened to her and she said,"well,"K" said you were lucky that she even let you see me."
That I call Bullshit on! I know providers and screeners alike read this board. Ladies, I hope you know some of your screeners are costing you roses and reputation. This also goes to show to some mongers that 99% of these ladies do not answer their own phones. So don't get pissed at them.
Now that I have pissed off the almighty screener, there are women that I will never be able to see again. So be it, I will move on. But I had to get my rant out.
I for one am completely supportive in getting in touch with ones anger especially over bad behavior. And this whole lucky she even booked the appointment shit would have made my mind up instantly never to see her again. Almost more than a no show I hate arrogance. I'd rather my hand than fuck someone who thought so high of themselves. For me sex with a person is so much more than a body. I've slept with gorgeous women evelin there after regretted. In any case the market will sort itself out. If these ladies are relying on screeners, which I have doubts about their necessity, they'd better make sure they are excellent else they'd be loosing them business which is exactly what I sense is happening in your case.
[QUOTE=IrishLaddie; 1355574]Got to add another 2 cents story about some interaction last week.
I posted a few weeks ago that a call screener and I had a little bit of a disagreement over a review I gave one of the ladies she answers the phone for. I admit, one line in there was not very nice, but all in all, the review was spot on. She gives an ad with a photo that is supposed to be a "close representation" of what she looks like. This was certainly not the case. I was still polite, kept the appointment, and left after it was over.
The next time I called for a girl she answers the phone for, I get lambasted over being mean and cruel.
I then last week called one of my regular regulars and the phone screener this time has a familiar voice. The unhappy screener was filling in for the regular one and was very short with me. The appointment was still made, but my regular asked what I did to this screener. (hope she doesn't get scolded for telling me). I explained what happened to her and she said,"well,"K" said you were lucky that she even let you see me."
That I call Bullshit on! I know providers and screeners alike read this board. Ladies, I hope you know some of your screeners are costing you roses and reputation. This also goes to show to some mongers that 99% of these ladies do not answer their own phones. So don't get pissed at them.
Now that I have pissed off the almighty screener, there are women that I will never be able to see again. So be it, I will move on. But I had to get my rant out.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=IrishLaddie;1355574]I posted a few weeks ago that a call screener and I had a little bit of a disagreement over a review I gave one of the ladies she answers the phone for. I admit, one line in there was not very nice, but all in all, the review was spot on. She gives an ad with a photo that is supposed to be a "close representation" of what she looks like. This was certainly not the case. I was still polite, kept the appointment, and left after it was over.[/QUOTE]You didn't have a disagreement over a review. You wrote an honest review and some pimp tried to blackmail you into never doing so again.
Over, I might add, the odious practice of fraudulent advertising. I can't understand why the board erupts over a legitimate provider naming her own rate, but over and over again reviewers say "She didn't look like her pictures, but I was already there."
"Close representation"? A picture is a close representation. A picture of someone else is a lie. I don't use BP. Six of the last seven women I saw conceal their faces somewhat, but they all use pictures of themselves. That's a close representation. There's no excuse, ever, for using a pic of someone else.
If hobbyists wanted to do something for each other, alongside writing honest reviews would be walking away immediately if it ain't the girl in the picture.
[url]http://indianapolis.backpage.com/BodyRubs/massage-from-sweet-college-girl-22/5548411[/url]
Anyone seen her?
I'm a college girl looking for some company.
My name is Melissa, I'm 5'8".135 lbs, Ebony, size DD breasts and very discreet. I come to all locations across indy. I don't engage in sexual content over the phone.
Please call 317-965-8564.
Available from 4pm. 9pm.
150 / hr Outcall only. Please DO NOT send me text messages, I won't respond.
These are my real pictures
[QUOTE=B Beall; 1356558]"Close representation"? A picture is a close representation. A picture of someone else is a lie. There's no excuse, ever, for using a pic of someone else.
If hobbyists wanted to do something for each other, alongside writing honest reviews would be walking away immediately if it ain't the girl in the picture.[/QUOTE]I 1 billion percent agree.
I've been guilty, not of being taken by a BP pirate, but by a photoless esdotcom profile which listed the provider's age as roughly half that of the woman who answered the door. At which point I said to myself,"Hey, you drove 35 miles to get here." I was madder at the twenty hobbyists who'd reviewed her and said "Profile accurate? Yes" than at her. Until I heard-and can't confirm-that she was represented by a local provider/"booker" who's notorious for such, let's call them "inattentions to the truth".
I should have walked. I did immediately leave honest reviews.
It's fine by me if all the fans of Carly / Carlie / Kharlii, whichever one is notorious for using someone else's pics, find her a good provider and a good value. The point is that the practice ought to be seen as the fraud it is, and a that a good provider who engages in it is just as guilty of damaging both sides of the equation, hobbyists and fellow providers, as the outright thieves do. When I see "pics not her" in a review it means I'll never contact the provider. Too many good ones out there who are honest.
Above all, though, the degree to which reviews can be believed depends on hobbyists telling the truth. Some "booker" trying to short-circuit that can only be hoping for short-term profit over long-term safety and security for the women involved, as well as everyone else. That makes him a public enemy.
[QUOTE=Whatdafuq; 1355538]Sex for us has been very geniune and that ts not always easy to find.
Shouldn't this be posted in the transsexual reports?[/QUOTE]OK that is funny, and sorry Luchi I know you love her, but I have known her quite a while out of the hobby, and bro. 90% of the time she looks like a dude, and that is not by accident, but gives us something in common, we both like girls. That being said, between that slip and the ATM one I can't quite quit laughing, and on the other hand, I always wanted to do her anyway too. But I already had my own ATM
[QUOTE=B Beall; 1356558]"Close representation"? A picture is a close representation. A picture of someone else is a lie. I don't use BP. Six of the last seven women I saw conceal their faces somewhat, but they all use pictures of themselves. That's a close representation. There's no excuse, ever, for using a pic of someone else.
If hobbyists wanted to do something for each other, alongside writing honest reviews would be walking away immediately if it ain't the girl in the picture.[/QUOTE]I couldn't agree more, and though I've been ripped on for insisting the truth be told in the past, will continue to do so.
[QUOTE=Ilapp;1357134]OK that is funny, and sorry Luchi I know you love her, but I have known her quite a while out of the hobby, and bro. 90% of the time she looks like a dude, and that is not by accident, but gives us something in common, we both like girls. That being said, between that slip and the ATM one I can't quite quit laughing, and on the other hand, I always wanted to do her anyway too. But I already had my own ATM[/QUOTE]Glad you found that funny. If I was in a better mood at the time I'd have left a different response as I can take a roast in good humor. It is true though there are hobbyist guilty of trying to flame one another needlessly which degrades the overall culture.
Finally I disagree with you about Jennifer looking like a dude. She does have an athletic body which for me is a plus but does not look butch to me. Yes she's bi but that's another plus in my book as she'll genuinely get into doing doubles with her GF. One of the reasons I say she does not look butch to me is her gorgeous long black hair. Definitely not something a butch dike would do. Her attitude is very sweet but also somewhat raw. I think living around so many questionable characters has made her have to get tough. I've seen her all but ready to throw down with a muscular black guy trying to make her his hoe and he backed down. I had her back but I suspect she can handle her own.
Not sure if we're talking about the same gal but I definitely like the girls. I am known for typos though which I guess is a plus to the amusement of this board.
[QUOTE=B Beall; 1356558]"Close representation"? A picture is a close representation. A picture of someone else is a lie. I don't use BP. Six of the last seven women I saw conceal their faces somewhat, but they all use pictures of themselves. That's a close representation. There's no excuse, ever, for using a pic of someone else.
If hobbyists wanted to do something for each other, alongside writing honest reviews would be walking away immediately if it ain't the girl in the picture.[/QUOTE]I would love it if the providers would provide a real picture up front so I know exactly what to expect. However, this is the "BP Advertiser Reviews" forum and is used to review people who advertise on BP. I know very few that actually use a real picture on that advertising sight. Yes, it sucks. We all know that BP is the last resort for free ads and free searching and that there is always a good chance that the provider is not the one in the pics, not really a provider but rather a lure for a pay site, potential rip off, or even a legal trap waiting for one of us to walk thru the door. But there is no use complaining about it but just accept it as part of doing business, kind of like having to pay employment taxes for legitimate business owners.
I frequent the other sites and usually see more accurate pictures (even for one of the ladies who uses fake pics on BP). I see hobbyist write that there are so many choices out there so stay away from the ones who false advertise. Being someone that has made over 100 unique friends over the last several years, I don't see the large variety of tried and true proven providers right now as there used to be with several other sites. So taking chances on BP girls or others, even with "representative" pics, is not the perfect scenario, but for the sake of variety and maybe even the thrill of the unknown is why it is still allowed to happen.
Let us not forget, those that were around in the edot days, that one of the best providers around here, K. C. (the real real one) never used a picture of herself but we all found her to be very attractive.
I think those of us who have been around know better than to get our hopes up too high for any new provider based on a picture to avoid a let down. Once someone has a review, then it can say real pics or representative. We know what that means.
OK, it's been highly reported that her place is a dump and the her bed is disgusting. I figured, whatever. When I was a teen I would have sex in the woods with no blanket. Plus her photos make her hot as hell. I love that tiny look.
Anyway, I had no idea what I was in store for. You leave there afraid you'll have fleas or lice. If she relocated to a gas station bathroom it would be a step up in cleanliness.
Quite honestly I had a difficult time overcoming the dirty environment and enjoying myself. As in staying hard. At one point during the massage she's pushing her kitty (and it did look nice) into my face but I couldn't help but think of other cleanliness. If her place looks like it's never been cleaned in years what about her kitty? I told her to cut that out. She seemed put off by it. Things went downhill from there and she just focused on getting me off and getting me out the door. I don't blame her because I know I was giving off a shitty vibe. I was pissed at myself for not heeding other's warnings and trying to decide if I just get up and toss down a few bills and leave or "ride it out" so to speak.
I left and (like some other reviewer) went to work and took the longest shower of my life in what had to be the hottest water I've ever showered in.
I cannot stress this enough fellas. It's not dirty like a teenager's room with cluttered clothes and a few dirty dishes. This is creepy, burn down the house to clean it dirty.
Just FYI. I know my handful of reviews have been negative ones. I have positive experiences but they've been with well reviewed women and I'm avoiding the overpraising sin.
Good luck hunting guys.
Though you have a certain logic that is valid I would contest that there arent many girls on BP with real photo. Off the top of my head that I have personally seen with my own eyes that posted real pictures are Andrea, Gabriella, Summer, Vannessa, Tesla, and Chelsea. I'm sure I could think of more given time. There have also been many that have been confirmed such as nevaeh, Kay, and most recently Trinity. And I'm willing to bet good money I could find at least a dozen more than I have already listed. I don't need a 100 unique friends. A dozen or so honest good providers would be more than plenty. And with every month more seem to come along so I seriously doubt hold to such values will stifle ones access to variety.
What some of us her are trying to do is create a standard that in time will create trends. As I've mentioned before about our Latin brothers down south and how things are very different down there. This did not magically appear like some creation myth but instead evolved along side the standards of the culture. And these standards are not static but are created by the individuals that adopted them. The question isn't whether we can change things but rather whether we have the will to do so. I say, yes we can.
[QUOTE=DiscreetGuy86; 1357381]I would love it if the providers would provide a real picture up front so I know exactly what to expect. However, this is the "BP Advertiser Reviews" forum and is used to review people who advertise on BP. I know very few that actually use a real picture on that advertising sight. Yes, it sucks. We all know that BP is the last resort for free ads and free searching and that there is always a good chance that the provider is not the one in the pics, not really a provider but rather a lure for a pay site, potential rip off, or even a legal trap waiting for one of us to walk thru the door. But there is no use complaining about it but just accept it as part of doing business, kind of like having to pay employment taxes for legitimate business owners.
I frequent the other sites and usually see more accurate pictures (even for one of the ladies who uses fake pics on BP). I see hobbyist write that there are so many choices out there so stay away from the ones who false advertise. Being someone that has made over 100 unique friends over the last several years, I don't see the large variety of tried and true proven providers right now as there used to be with several other sites. So taking chances on BP girls or others, even with "representative" pics, is not the perfect scenario, but for the sake of variety and maybe even the thrill of the unknown is why it is still allowed to happen.
Let us not forget, those that were around in the edot days, that one of the best providers around here, K. C. (the real real one) never used a picture of herself but we all found her to be very attractive.
I think those of us who have been around know better than to get our hopes up too high for any new provider based on a picture to avoid a let down. Once someone has a review, then it can say real pics or representative. We know what that means.[/QUOTE]