[QUOTE=JohnGeste;5307506]I tried to send you her number but your in box is full. May I take it that you have her number now?[/QUOTE]Emptied inbox. Still need it.
Thanks.
Printable View
[QUOTE=JohnGeste;5307506]I tried to send you her number but your in box is full. May I take it that you have her number now?[/QUOTE]Emptied inbox. Still need it.
Thanks.
[QUOTE=BoatGuy72;5304298]I got the same quote, crazy.[/QUOTE]You guys actually responded to her? She contacted me and I looked at her and said hard no and didn't even respond.
[QUOTE=Det51;5308068]Emptied inbox. Still need it.
Thanks.[/QUOTE]Sent the number.
[QUOTE=JoeDocks11;5298304]Do a varieties of visa gift card work?[/QUOTE]I have never known gift cards to work on the site. Also, isn't it reasonable to assume that if someone really wanted to track you they easily could? So, does never using one's real info include never getting a hotel with one's real ID, never using anything like Google that might track one's location, emails, etc. ? Or Priceline, or anything else? Is there more public shame and condemnation upon revelation for a man who uses the site in contrast with a woman? If you're single and can't find a woman on earth who will spend a moment with you unless you line her pockets somehow, isn't one's willingness to lower one's bank balance a compliment to the sometimes fairer sex and aren't the sanctimonious discoverers of the most blatant, universally conspicuous realities of human nature being fake and disingenuous when they advertise very publicly their exaggerated moral outrage upon digging through the dirt and learning that heterosexual males really, really like attractive females, and are willing to do sometimes foolish things to have the pleasure of their supine company? Now, if one is in the position of a prosecutor or to a lesser degree a congressman, whose professional standing demands a pristine trail, then I suppose walking on eggshells is a necessity. Each position has its own tradeoffs. And the existence or lack of a significant other makes a difference in public perception. If Tiger Woods had been single while going hog wild with women, would anyone have really condemned him or been surprised, aside from possibly jealous males who secretly wished they could have echoed his activities or misanthropic females whose genetics and/or lack of effort and self discipline meant they would never have celebrity status in the eyes of men? Just wandering through some thoughts.
I met a girl who is in her 30s who fits that description, for anyone who likes attractive, highly skilled blondes. And super value is applicable in comparison with others on the site.
[QUOTE=SpitzerWeiner2;5309017]I have never known gift cards to work on the site. Also, isn't it reasonable to assume that if someone really wanted to track you they easily could? So, does never using one's real info include never getting a hotel with one's real ID, never using anything like Google that might track one's location, emails, etc. ? Or Priceline, or anything else? Is there more public shame and condemnation upon revelation for a man who uses the site in contrast with a woman? If you're single and can't find a woman on earth who will spend a moment with you unless you line her pockets somehow, isn't one's willingness to lower one's bank balance a compliment to the sometimes fairer sex and aren't the sanctimonious discoverers of the most blatant, universally conspicuous realities of human nature being fake and disingenuous when they advertise very publicly their exaggerated moral outrage upon digging through the dirt and learning that heterosexual males really, really like attractive females, and are willing to do sometimes foolish things to have the pleasure of their supine company? Now, if one is in the position of a prosecutor or to a lesser degree a congressman, whose professional standing demands a pristine trail, then I suppose walking on eggshells is a necessity. Each position has its own tradeoffs. And the existence or lack of a significant other makes a difference in public perception. If Tiger Woods had been single while going hog wild with women, would anyone have really condemned him or been surprised, aside from possibly jealous males who secretly wished they could have echoed his activities or misanthropic females whose genetics and/or lack of effort and self discipline meant they would never have celebrity status in the eyes of men? Just wandering through some thoughts.[/QUOTE]Couldn't have said it better myself. What did you say?
[QUOTE=SpitzerWeiner2;5309017]I have never known gift cards to work on the site. Also, isn't it reasonable to assume that if someone really wanted to track you they easily could? So, does never using one's real info include never getting a hotel with one's real ID, never using anything like Google that might track one's location, emails, etc. ? Or Priceline, or anything else? Is there more public shame and condemnation upon revelation for a man who uses the site in contrast with a woman? If you're single and can't find a woman on earth who will spend a moment with you unless you line her pockets somehow, isn't one's willingness to lower one's bank balance a compliment to the sometimes fairer sex and aren't the sanctimonious discoverers of the most blatant, universally conspicuous realities of human nature being fake and disingenuous when they advertise very publicly their exaggerated moral outrage upon digging through the dirt and learning that heterosexual males really, really like attractive females, and are willing to do sometimes foolish things to have the pleasure of their supine company? Now, if one is in the position of a prosecutor or to a lesser degree a congressman, whose professional standing demands a pristine trail, then I suppose walking on eggshells is a necessity. Each position has its own tradeoffs. And the existence or lack of a significant other makes a difference in public perception. If Tiger Woods had been single while going hog wild with women, would anyone have really condemned him or been surprised, aside from possibly jealous males who secretly wished they could have echoed his activities or misanthropic females whose genetics and/or lack of effort and self discipline meant they would never have celebrity status in the eyes of men? Just wandering through some thoughts.[/QUOTE]The other even better part is if you can get women normally, don't want a relationship with idiots or people you don't find attractive, and would rather pay for people to go home and not stay that you don't want to be with. I pity fucked a relatively hot for her age friend I don't want to date because she had sickness in her close family that got her super depressed last night, but she just wouldn't leave after and it was the most annoying thing ever. I'd much rather spend 200 and have someone leave whenever, and I've dumped any SB that wanted to date or make it more for that reason. You start welcoming people to call you out for the hobby with that mentality.
[QUOTE=SpitzerWeiner2;5309307]I met a girl who is in her 30s who fits that description, for anyone who likes attractive, highly skilled blondes. And super value is applicable in comparison with others on the site.[/QUOTE]Yes pleas!
[QUOTE=BrandoM;5309887]The other even better part is if you can get women normally, don't want a relationship with idiots or people you don't find attractive, and would rather pay for people to go home and not stay that you don't want to be with. I pity fucked a relatively hot for her age friend I don't want to date because she had sickness in her close family that got her super depressed last night, but she just wouldn't leave after and it was the most annoying thing ever. I'd much rather spend 200 and have someone leave whenever, and I've dumped any SB that wanted to date or make it more for that reason. You start welcoming people to call you out for the hobby with that mentality.[/QUOTE]Not sure if you're criticizing or agreeing, but in my case, there are zero female options outside of ladies of the night, and I'm probably the ugliest, least charming, least successful guy on this forum, so I don't even know what it's like to have a female friend, let alone one who would voluntarily have sex with me.I'm real human garbage. Unfit for life. A real sicko. Just a creepy bastard who could and should be the poster boy for eugenics and forced sterilization. And I've only got two tiny inches of flaccid flesh that no amount of blue chews or enzyte can help.I'll stop rambling. I'm sorry, Marlon. Michael Richards is to comedy what I am to the "hobby": a disgrace.
Are you guys as tired of the flakes and junkies as I am?
I would love to partner with another guy on this site and just put a full time sugar baby on payroll.
$500 a week each would be $52 K a year for some young lady, and she would have to make herself available to us based on our schedules.
What do you guys think?
Hi there,
Wife is going out of state for a weekend coming up and I'll actually be able to host. Anyone know any good UTR girls that aren't looking for a long term arrangement and are simply down for pay-to-play? Feel free to PM if you prefer.
[QUOTE=RoyalOakGuy;5310469]Are you guys as tired of the flakes and junkies as I am?
I would love to partner with another guy on this site and just put a full time sugar baby on payroll.
$500 a week each would be $52 K a year for some young lady, and she would have to make herself available to us based on our schedules.
What do you guys think?[/QUOTE]Its more than 52 K for her, to take home 52 K she has to make around 72 K. One thing I noticed with SA girls is that they are willing to go for months without any revenue but want 5 to 10 K a month for a relationship. Maybe they are from upper / middle-class family.
[QUOTE=Jay23;5310658]Its more than 52 K for her, to take home 52 K she has to make around 72 K. One thing I noticed with SA girls is that they are willing to go for months without any revenue but want 5 to 10 K a month for a relationship. Maybe they are from upper / middle-class family.[/QUOTE]Pre pandemic I was nailing 3-4 SA girls a week. It was great. I treated it as a date, good champagne prior to dinner, dinner at a nice restaurant like Prime and Proper, or Chartreuse, then drinks post dinner, and then back to my hotel room.
I would rarely pay them, and most wouldn't even ask.
After 2-3 "dates" they would either disappear or ask for money.
If anyone wants to go in on this with me, let mw know.
[QUOTE=TullyBlanchard;5310615]Hi there,
Wife is going out of state for a weekend coming up and I'll actually be able to host. Anyone know any good UTR girls that aren't looking for a long term arrangement and are simply down for pay-to-play? Feel free to PM if you prefer.[/QUOTE]I would never have the guts to have a girl over to my house. There are simply too many crazies. Even if they seem sane when you first meet doesn't mean thay they are or, if they are, that they will stay that way. Also, there are so many ways that evidence could be left behind. Possessions, smells, hair, bodily fluids, etc. Also, it is my sense, based on only a little empirical evidence, that wives feel more betrayed if her husband screws someone in her house (or, even worse, in the marital bed). It just seems like something to avoid.
Both of these lemontarts are 400 ppm.
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/64584d7f-3f52-48d1-b9e2-3538396bd20e[/URL]
[URL]https://www.seeking.com/messages/inbox/3f0aae39-7012-43bb-8097-3b2d378a1147[/URL]