One more thing regarding caution
To finish my previous post one more thing regarding precautions and be. S. Posts: I generally do not trust any reports from newbies even if there are no red flags. I just don't know if its a sting or some kind of dubious situation or setup.
[QUOTE=Alintas; 1623282]You know what? Darn good points. I hadn considere psycho scenarios; only LE ones. And you are probably right about the Way the LE scenarios might play out. Some of this I did not know and I regret nyx revealing stuff. I suppose "I've got good reAsons which I can't divulge" or even "thems the rules if you don't like them go elsewhere nobodys forcingu" would be good enough answers tht any of us ought to respect. In fact nyx provided a polite version of the "thems the rules" answer and that was good enough for me but since someone mentioned the coffee thing (and I was naie enough to think hardly anyone would ever suggest this!) I found it interestin (again naively unaware that yes nyx and others have thought this thru and it doesn't suit or address their safety needs) I'm grateful forthe explanation (thank you, Nyx) while also lamentin the revealing of trade secrets in case some low lifes use info to then somehow one up or dupe a provider.
Similarly I have cringed slightly when posters call be. S. On a fAke advertisement and then mention various red flags. Aside from discussing tineye type searches it might be wise to simply call be. S. And not reveal why. This way LE or pimps or unscrupulous people don't become educated in what constitutes a red flag and thereby eventually learn to creat more perfect deceptions puttin mongers or anyone at risk. Perhaps folks could share more sophisticated detection red flags via PM.
I'm not accusing anyone. This is just a thought but without judgemet asto any who have or might in the future give admittedly helpful explanations regardin how they knew a post was be. S.
While I'm posting on more thin on yet a third topic.[/QUOTE]
Well said-both sides of verification
Not to clutter with posts but I do want to say IMHO this post summarizes the main jist of both sides of the issue extremely well and succinctly and comes to what I think is an extremely sensible and respectful conclusion (oi mean the posters stance on the matter). Frickin well said.
[QUOTE=Gansett; 1623033]By now it is easy to figure where I stand on screening, my personal info is just that. It's my personal info. When banks, retailers and government agencies can be hacked for info a providers computer is not going to be a challenge. I realize our SS number won't be on the providers computer but our name and work number, unless self employed, is. Just one over zealous reporter trying to make their name can cause a lot of grief. Forget LE, ask the guys waiting for the other shoe to drop who took zumba "classes" when names etc are released and published and the TV crew is in their driveway.
On the other hand there's a lot of freakin' whackos out there that providers need to avoid, they feel screening is the way to do so.
We aren't going to change their business model, they aren't going to change ours, or at least mine. Don't like the game rules you don't have to play on that court, there are others.[/QUOTE]
Screening / Agreement with Gansett
I myself think screening is very risky for the monger and it doesn't really offer much protection to the provider. LEO can set up complete ids if they want to. They have access to all sorts of information that the general public does not. I think its a personal choice if someone wants be to transparent and put all their info out there that is certainly there choice. I would much rather just use review sites and go to AMPs than give out my personal info.
Zumba Girl, Gina you're an idiot!
You have no clue what you're talking about, pull your head out of your a$$! I've kept quite up to this point, but you've put me over the edge. How would you know, did you have an appointment with her? Don't think so!
I have a very, very good friend who saw her multiple times and before their first visit she did screen him, she used the PI to confirm the screening information the guy gave her.
What you read in the papers we've all read and it's inaccurate.
Also, show me where she sold video's on-line. She posted over 100 video's on-line for everyone to see for free, so before you open your f'ing trap again know what you're talking about.
Honestly, we've all had enough of you, go away from this forum because you have no credibility about knowing anything. I was told about you from a very well known lady who is now retired and everything she told me about you is right on point.
SERIOUSLY, GO AWAY, GO AWAY AND ONE MORE TIME, GO AWAY!
And by the way, you're upscale?? Really, how many times a week do you post on BP, that's upscale???
[QUOTE=GinaInTheMorni;1626125]The Zumba girl didn't screen, she just video taped them and sold the tapes online. All you had to do was call her ad, and she told you to come on over and gave the address. She had a private investigator that ran the guys tag numbers once they pulled into the parking lot. This goes to show escorts who don't screen have issues, are desperate and are more likely to get you arrested or rip you off. So keep talking about the Zumba girl and screening at the same time, they have nothing to do with each other. Nobody expects you to screen Gansett, but why are you ok with putting all the other guys in danger with your bad advice, we all know girls who don't screen get arrested more often, which means the client may be there and get arrested too. So when bashing the screening process that any upscale escort nationwide requires please try to at least link it too a relevant story, rather than the Zumba girl.[/QUOTE]
Kassie at concierge service
[QUOTE=Cpcdman; 1627583]I have no info on her, but I think she was also posting on BP maybe 3 to 4 times a day. I haven't seen her post lately though.
I did call her a couple of times to try and get some info she never picked up nor did she return a voicemail if it is indeed the same girl.
Did I say girl, looking at her pictures I would say she's more like 33 not 23.
Also, for her to say she's "new" and ask for the rates she's seeking I'd stay away, far away. Just doesn't ad up to me.[/QUOTE]Thanks I looked up the BP posting and it had a different phone number 617 451-5700 and I looked at the reviews under that and it is for the escort agency concierge. So she works for them I guess. The eros ad had different phone number.
[url]http://boston.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/auburn-goddess-dont-waste-your-money-on-rushed-companionship-25/21335455[/url]
Unfortunately the reviews on another site are for another one of their girls, so no idea still on this one. Thanks for your effort
Screening: Mosquitoes are not stopped
[QUOTE=Hobby Horse;1626519]Without restarting the whole debate again, I agree with Gansett. Considering the risks for both are equal, to me it seems downright stupid for a monger to give a provider any personal information for screening purposes. I know some argue that it's done for provider safety but to me that's too much of a risk for mongers privacy. The provider and monger both take safety risks in this venture; can anyone guarantee the monger won't hurt the provider even after screening? Or that the provider is not going to sell, lose, or exploit the mongers info? No one can. So like Gansett said, if you're OK with screening then go ahead but there are plenty of other options out there. As for me, no thanks.[/QUOTE]Everyone has to figure out what risks they're willing to take in the pursuit of greenbacks and de pootie-tang. Most ladies are not crazy or corrupt and most guys are not psycho. But we remain strangers to each other even if we hold certain info about each other, right? So why would I give a stranger info about my personal life, especially the fact that I pay for the pootie-tang? Maybe when we meet I'll physically remind her of her ex-boyfriend, who abused her, and she use a reverse-lookup site to find out my address, workplace, etc. Or maybe she'll swear to delete my phone number once I've been verified, but of course she won't. Think about it: how does she kniw not to verify you the next time you call her? . It's because your number is on her phone and / or computer contact list. Not so bade, unless she annotates your personal preferences and one day the list goes public."Mr. Jones likmes to sniff smelly feet while pretending he's a sheep and going baaa-baaa!" Yikes. So you can move on or take the small risk. Is there anything more to say?
My mistake on website address.
Sorry fellas. I had my girlfriend put the thing about my website. (my internet was down) anyways.
She had put in the address wrong. Silly girl. Should have just waited untill I got my internet back up and running.
Well anyways.
Here is the info you need. There should be no issues viewing it. Some of the photo albums are premium members only.
BUT the VIDEO you should be able to view once you become registered. It does not cost anything to become a basic memeber.
Temptingmisstiffany. Escort-site. Com