Sara TT and the quality of providers in the area
This conversation should probably be taken to the Octagon, but I will add my two cents. I have been doing this for awhile and feel that I have something to add to this discussion. The quality of providers in this area has been trending downward for several years. This isn't a new phenomenon.
The lack of quality providers has changed my approach to the hobby. Up until 5 years ago, I had only engaged with escorts. My focus now is primarily seeing SBs. I do this for several reasons:
1) I tend to like younger women.
2) I prefer seeing someone who is potentially low volume.
3) I feel like I get more bang for my buck.
I do see escorts occasionally and typically will see EE's girls. In my opinion, he provides some of the best options in this area. I find the local talent to be scarce. You can look at the ads posted daily and I would say that 98 percent of the ladies posting would fall in the category of " I wouldn't fuck her with your dick". I am sorry, but it is true. A lot of the women that have positive reviews on here would fall under that category. I won't mention any names. Perhaps A2 can create a forum for this topic and we can have an open discussion there. It won't resolve the issue with quality, but we need to get to a point where we are open and honest with each other.
In regards to Sara TT. I saw her in the 2000's and again a few years ago. Without a doubt, she set the bar for excellence in this area. Another one who comes to mind was Phoebe7. Sara is a great provider, but she doesn't tick the boxes for me anymore. As I previously said, I like them young. Sara has to be in her late 40's. To each his own. In the end, we all have different tastes, budgets, wants, needs and experiences. Quality is a huge factor for me and until the situation changes locally, I will continue seeking the perfect SB, while using EE as an option, when needed.
Happy Mongering.
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4149306]I saw her in 2009, when electronic cigarettes were not widely available. She came into my place in a cloud of smoke.
Which raises the question: 2009? Ten years ago? Seriously? So how old is she today? I know she was in her 30's, or close to it, in 2009, which means she's likely pushing 40 (or older) today. That's the age we should want their mothers to be, not the providers themselves.
Yes, I know: Any provider who isn't fat, gross, or ready to apply for an AARP card isn't a "good performer". That old chestnut.
Now, I would agree that Sara far surpasses the normal fare here. I didn't see any signs of drug use, or visible rolls of fat. That qualifies her as a perfect 10 in this venue. I would take Sara over Pretty Cameron (who literally sent me running in fear from the appointment site) any day of the week.
But however you look at it, none of the girls raved about here are MIss Universe material. So, no.
A few of them are "not bad". Sara was "not bad" in the first year of the Obama administration. Silk, RIP, a sweet person, was "not bad" for a time. But there, too, you were dealing with someone who was on the rough side.
Do any of you old-timers remember Climaxx Girls, circa 1999 or 2000? Every one of the girls I saw through that agency was a nine or a ten.
Check out Bianca Carlilse on Eros, or Serenity Snow. Those two are awesome, and they're almost certainly legit. So why are there 1,435 reviews of obese Cameron, and not one single review of Serenity Snow?
That was my original point: The widespread preference here seems to be for old, fat, rough and cheap. And I'm not the only one who feels that way, based on some of the previous remarks.[/QUOTE]
Quality of local providers
[QUOTE=Willow1535;4149507]This conversation should probably be taken to the Octagon, but I will add my two cents. I have been doing this for awhile and feel that I have something to add to this discussion. The quality of providers in this area has been trending downward for several years. This isn't a new phenomenon.
The lack of quality providers has changed my approach to the hobby. Up until 5 years ago, I had only engaged with escorts. My focus now is primarily seeing SBs. I do this for several reasons:
1) I tend to like younger women.
2) I prefer seeing someone who is potentially low volume.
3) I feel like I get more bang for my buck.
I do see escorts occasionally and typically will see EE's girls. In my opinion, he provides some of the best options in this area. I find the local talent to be scarce. You can look at the ads posted daily and I would say that 98 percent of the ladies posting would fall in the category of " I wouldn't fuck her with your dick". I am sorry, but it is true. A lot of the women that have positive reviews on here would fall under that category. I won't mention any names. Perhaps A2 can create a forum for this topic and we can have an open discussion there. It won't resolve the issue with quality, but we need to get to a point where we are open and honest with each other.
In regards to Sara TT. I saw her in the 2000's and again a few years ago. Without a doubt, she set the bar for excellence in this area. Another one who comes to mind was Phoebe7. Sara is a great provider, but she doesn't tick the boxes for me anymore. As I previously said, I like them young. Sara has to be in her late 40's. To each his own. In the end, we all have different tastes, budgets, wants, needs and experiences. Quality is a huge factor for me and until the situation changes locally, I will continue seeking the perfect SB, while using EE as an option, when needed.
Happy Mongering.[/QUOTE]I've never used Eros or P411 because they're beyond my money limits. But I find it a little surprising that these discussions haven't included Lady J. No, she wasn't a 10 on the looks, but she was definitely attractive. And, no, she wasn't a 20-something but she certainly wasn't old. Her combination of looks, attitude, cleanliness, skills and affordability were hard to beat. Man, I miss her.
