Three reasons for the quality issues
[QUOTE=MeadnMrsJones;4132911]I second this. All I can really deduce is that some mongers around here have never had the real thing, or are too cheap to seek it out. The number of times that I've booked based on glowing reviews, only to get there and drop a pair of Jacksons and say "no thanks" to what I've seen and then walked out, is pretty high.
Pretty Cameron. Pics are inaccurate, way heavier and rougher looking in person.
Taylor Nikole. Sweet girl, but incall REEKED of (animal?) urine.
LadyShay. Old enough to be my mother, dumpy incall, looks like she's been through the ringer a few times.
MaciMonroe. Obvious use, looked like she was on another planet when I walked in.
Kayla. Attractive and on time, thought I finally had a winner. But dressed in frumpy sweats even thought I'd asked for something particular, and spent 10 minutes screwing around with her phones.
These providers all had GLOWING reviews. None of them came close to being the real thing. I consider myself lucky to have only wasted a bit of time and a couple of $ and been on my way.
I'm waiting for the real deal. I've considered some of the more well reviewed talent from EE, but have not found the handler to be the easiest to communicate / schedule with.[/QUOTE]A few addendums to your reviews:
Taylor Nikole was not bad back in her Delicious Dawn days, ten years ago. But even a good provider has a shelf life. Tom Brady probably won't be quarterbacking at sixty. Likewise, I recently saw some guy raving about Sara TongueTwister. I saw her in 2009, and she was rough and over the hill then. Also a heavy smoker. No thanks.
Steve of EE sometimes requires a bit of effort on the communications. But he's in a sensitive line of work, and he needs to preserve some barriers. He really is the best we have at the moment, IMO.
There are three reasons for the quality issues here:
1.) Many guys here seem to prioritize cheapness above all else. When you're only willing to spend $80, your choices are limited.
2.) Low monger self-esteem: A certain percentage of men on the forum (and I fear they've become the dominant portion) don't feel comfortable with hotter / younger women. This comes out in many comments, like the old saw that if a provider isn't fat, old or nasty, she must have "GPS". Translation: "I feel self-conscious around attractive women. ". (As I've noted, I'm in my 50s, and I have no qualms about demanding a hot 20-something.)
3.) Low quality drives out the good: I've talked to a number of higher-end providers over the years who have taken one look at the girls raved about here, and said "I don't want to be associated with that. " Likewise, men who don't want to content themselves with "Jenny Crack and Jenny Craig" often become frustrated and go elsewhere. (I've stayed away from the board for years at a time, even though I joined in 2009.).
Again, I acknowledge the importance of diversity. But when a majority of the women in any venue are either old, obese, or using, you have a problem. And we have a problem.
The solution is to demand better. Don't see the low-end girls. When presented with a bait-and-switch, walk away, and report it on the board.
That's what I did with Pretty Cameron. I walked away and said no thanks. I have benefitted from two other guys' candid reviews of Ellie, who I almost saw. I'm not going to deal with Jenny Crack or Jenny Craig. Period.
Why respond or say you are available?
[QUOTE=GolfGuy;4142411]The fact that she has a kid, a real job, goes to school and doesn't live at her incall may have something to do with that.
Golfguy, rained out.[/QUOTE]Thats fine but why respond to a monger and make plans only to flake or take forever to respond? Lots of people have busy lives.