BackPage Advertiser Reviews

Thanks to all for correcting me, what was I thinking? With my memory refreshed, I agree, its Samantha.

ARG.

[QUOTE=Skatar018;2391828]Sorry ARG I concur with the others that it's not AnnaSS is right, her name is Samantha & she worked for RSG, there are several reviews & posts on the Worcester BackPage Advertiser Reviews forum (and else where) under both Jessi & Samantha.

Here's an older post from 2012 where she is 34, 3 yrs later & she's still 34, I wonder how they stay the same age! [URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/new-sexy-sweet-milf-34/21399255[/URL].[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ARegularGuy;2394200]Thanks to all for correcting me, what was I thinking? With my memory refreshed, I agree, its Samantha.

ARG.[/QUOTE]Pics are definitely Samantha (posted about that a long time ago). She posts rather infrequently and every time she has I haven't been able to break away so don't know if it is her. If it is, I saw her a bunch of times and used to have a lot of fun with her when she was with RS.

Does anyone know if K is still providing? I will be passing through her way next week and wanted to see her. However, her most recent post on BP is from 2/12:

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/want-to-spend-some-time-with-a-hot-lady/22326868[/URL]

I also have not had any luck reaching her.

[QUOTE=JoeMuckInFutch;2392278]Anna in Leominster that now is on CLCE under WM4 M is thinner, paler and with smaller but nice boobs. I've seen Anna in the past with hubby / BF in the other room but it was one-on-one via BP. I now see their WM4 M ads on CLCE. Assume still P4 P? Is it really a threesome and if so, what are the rules / expectations?[/QUOTE]Anna and her SO are still doing business as usual, just this time they are more cautions, I guess it is been working for them like that so they do not really need to have new business, just keep the good old ones. Go ahead and book with her, if you liked before, surely will like her now.

She posted today. Have you tried calling her?

[QUOTE=MrMet6986;2396754]Does anyone know if K is still providing? I will be passing through her way next week and wanted to see her. However, her most recent post on BP is from 2/12:

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/want-to-spend-some-time-with-a-hot-lady/22326868[/URL]

I also have not had any luck reaching her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SePuede;2397369]Anna and her SO are still doing business as usual, just this time they are more cautions, I guess it is been working for them like that so they do not really need to have new business, just keep the good old ones. Go ahead and book with her, if you liked before, surely will like her now.[/QUOTE]Same contact info?

[QUOTE=Steve508;2399370]She posted today. Have you tried calling her?[/QUOTE]For all the bad things I read about K, I have to give her props to her about this.

If something good K do for you is the time with her is really yours. When you are with her, she does not answer the phone and is setup in mute mode. The clock is out of the window, her price is unheard of and this include a trip to Greece. She can teach one or to things to new providers. So yeah, she is around, If she is not answering, be glad, that could be you, having fun, uninterrupted.

SePuede.

"Mongering is a disease whose only known cure is poverty".

Well, I tried. Set up 1 hr two days in advance via txt / calls. Both of us olite, clear throughout.

Day of, radio silence, no answer to txts / calls. Color me disappointed and her unreliable. Typical young provider (shrug) .

[QUOTE=SePuede;2389155]I have a dream that I visited this gem in a motel in Leominster and I can tell you that it was worth it...
[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/young-and-sexy-blonde-bombshell/29044148[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jolem;2407951]Well, I tried. Set up 1 hr two days in advance via txt / calls. Both of us olite, clear throughout.

Day of, radio silence, no answer to txts / calls. Color me disappointed and her unreliable. Typical young provider (shrug) .[/QUOTE]I've seen her a couple of times. Very thin, pretty; the room was smoky. Small boobs (but not flat) and pretty (especially compared to the other ladies in that area), but I would guess a user. Everything is covered, all the time. Attitude was nice, maybe a little rushed, but overall easy to talk to.

Good luck!

Adobe.

Hey it's been awhile since I posted because I made the dumbe move of dating one of the girls for free but I'm going to see Meghan Friday and if you could pm the rates you talked her down to she keeps going radio silent every time we discuss rates plus I'm looking for a regular if anyone has a good cheap one they would like to share let me know I got another post I'm going to reply to to help you guys out but I'll do it separate

[QUOTE=SePuede;2389155]I have a dream that I visited this gem in a motel in Leominster and I can tell you that it was worth it. Her description of herself are down to the spot and the pictures are accurate! After I gave her the donation, we started with CBJ and then doggie. I want to tell you there were more positions but the tightness of her box beat me in a good way. I will say it was 15 min total for me. Two words of caution; bring party hats, she sent me for an errant and two, do not pay for the hour, she will rush you. $ for HHR but you can talk her down for less. All and all I definitely will try again.

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/young-and-sexy-blonde-bombshell/29044148[/URL]

Hello handsome!

My name is Meghan and I'm doing incalls In western mass off off rt 2.

My pictures are REAL. NO GAMES.

I'm 5'3 & 100 lbs with soft blonde hair and piercing green eyes I'm 420 & party friendly so let's have a good Time together! !

Don't let the cold get you down, let me warm you up! .

NO BLOCKED CALLERS; I won't answer NO LOW BALLERS; I'm worth it Let's meet! XOXO.

857.615. 0253 Ask about my special.

Poster's age: 21.

Location: Worcester, INCALLS.

Post I'd: 29044148 worcester.

SePuede.

"Mongering is a disease whose only known cure is poverty".[/QUOTE].

So Michelle, ah well she is the one that I was dating never exchanged money in anyway but her pics look nothing like her, she is full of drama she only will be on bottom in missionary position, (even when on the job her tits are extremely saggy and so is her ass and all in all once the cloths come of she is kinda gross to look at and not great in bed just telling the truth guys and she is very unreliable and will try to rip you off.

[QUOTE=Cheeckymonkey;2302090]She used to do ads for Gardner. I called / texted her a few times, but had a bad end. She stood me up, and was a ***** about it. Look back in my posts, it was the subject of one of my more vicious rants. If you end up with her, review her, I always wondered if it would have been fun.

Stay safe,

CM.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Adobe;2411248]I've seen her a couple of times. Very thin, pretty; the room was smoky. Small boobs (but not flat) and pretty (especially compared to the other ladies in that area), but I would guess a user. Everything is covered, all the time. Attitude was nice, maybe a little rushed, but overall easy to talk to.

Good luck!

Adobe.[/QUOTE]Adobe, thanks for backing me up with this one, I hope Meghan stick around in this area for a while.

SePuede.

[QUOTE=Cheeckymonkey;2302090]
If you end up with her, review her, I always wondered if it would have been fun.

Stay safe,

CM.[/QUOTE]Just my 2 cents on Michelle. I know her pretty well. I'm sure I've reviewed here somewhere. A while back she was rather unreliable but always a great time. Lately she's gotten her head together and is much better on the reliability end and still a great time. But she has very limited availability so not easy to see. Not sure she's taking any new people at all.

She just got a new review on T, was very positive. So that's my experience anyway.

I would like to give Dixie a try if any one has her info as well as looking to try some new girls not on the BP scene in The 6 price range pm me if you know anyone.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i]

White knighting is the downfall of many a great monger.

A2[/blue]