Tried the same thing to me.
[QUOTE=UOnlyLiveOnce;4137300]Am talking about this one:
[URL]http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classifieds/index.php?view=showad&adid=77495&cityid=350[/URL]
I texted her about a week ago, at which time she told me her rates. But, between personal stuff and lousy weather, I couldn't go see her last week.
Fast forward to today, we texted back and forth a bit, talked on the phone, and in the process I told her how long I was looking for and when I thought I'd get there. I get to her exit and see I have 3 texts from her. One text had the address, the 2nd text asked when I was going to get there and how long I wanted (I had just told her this, but I suspect she was nervous because her schedule was too tight), and the 3rd text says by the way, my rates have gone up and she told me what they are now.
I told her she should have informed me of the new rates earlier in the process and I cancelled the appointment. I don't know whether she was trying to play me for a sucker, if she was disorganized, or both. I wasn't about to go find out.
As always, YMMV. Stay safe out there.[/QUOTE]Story time. My last few visits with various providers have been so terrible that I've seriously considered taking a step back. My streak of crappy visits started with her back in early November when she was with Rachel under a different name. According to Rachel, I was the first to see her. From the description I was given, she sounded exactly like what I was looking for. For reference I was told by Rachel "she is built just like me. Super busty." I've been seeing Rachel for a long time so I trust her. I'm thinking jackpot.
The crap started about 1. 5 hours prior to my appt. I get a text saying she wants nearly double what we had agreed upon. My immediate reaction was to cancel. Within a few minutes of canceling I got another text agreeing to the old rate. I arrive to see someone that is not as described. She was big in the wrong places and not at all what I like. Big hips / thighs, flabby arms, small upstairs (b cup). I left the room to talk to Rachel because her appearance didn't match. Rachel claimed she mixed Roxy up with her other partner. (I should state, I haven't been to see Rachel since all this happened because I feel like she misled me and broke my trust).
At the time, I chalked a lot of what went down to her being new, but having read recent reports it may be her MO. The performance was terrible. I've had better bjs from a sock. Dry, no spit / lube, no rhythm, no suction, just a whole lot of nothing. It became clear that my pleasure was the last thing on her mind.
Afterwards I spoke to Rachel and expressed my disappointment in:
1) The visit itself. See above.
2) Rachel hyped her up to me. Extensively. From appearance to performance it was the antithesis of what had been described. I flat told her that nothing she had told me was accurate.
3) A short while later I got a text saying they were no longer working together and the reason.
Nominal increase and people go crazy? WTF?
[QUOTE=UOnlyLiveOnce;4137999]Allurah's increase wasn't anything crazy like that. The increase was pretty nominal, actually. The amount of money wasn't the issue, it was the principle and the timing.[/QUOTE]You should have stated the increase was nominal in your initial report. She didn't double the rate or anything crazy. I do agree she should not change after it is set. But now you got the el cheapo crowd that dominates this market going crazy. No wonder hot chicks bypass Cincy often as they go to Columbus and Cleveland without fail.
Guys listen, pay for what you can afford and leave better looking, better performing. Better, better, better for those of us that can.
I have met Allurah once and will go back. And especially since she is a smart enough as a business person to understand supply and demand. Her product is in demand she can ask for more. God Bless America!
I have seen Kookie, and yes
[QUOTE=ToddCincy;4136874]Just so we can avoid some of the misunderstandings that arose about "pretty Cameron".
This woman has multiple ads, and they seem to convey different angles. At least one I saw depicts a woman with rolls of fat and cellulite. In another one, her face looks kind of rough.
Maybe this one is better avoided, especially given her legal troubles?[/QUOTE]I'm certain she would not meet Todd Cincy's exacting standards. She doesn't even meet my far lower standards. I just happened to see her because she was sharing space with another provider. I'm not really interested in strictly twentysomethings with perfect bodies, because my experience is that they're more likely to suffer from GPS and less likely to actually be fun in the sack. I like a wide variety of women who may not be perfect looking, or even far from perfect, but I feel some chemistry with. On the other hand, I want to be attracted to them, and BadKookie or however you spell her handle, is another one where I think the raves have gotten ahead of the reality maybe. But it's a YMMV world, and I'm not doubting that other guys have had a good time.
Minimal standards, and the direction of the board
[QUOTE=WhereDreamsGo;4138766]I'm certain she would not meet Todd Cincy's exacting standards. I'm not really interested in strictly twentysomethings with perfect bodies, because my experience is that they're more likely to suffer from GPS and less likely to actually be fun in the sack. I like a wide variety of women who may not be perfect looking, or even far from perfect, but I feel some chemistry with. On the other hand, I want to be attracted to them, and BadKookie or however you spell her handle, is another one where I think the raves have gotten ahead of the reality maybe. But it's a YMMV world, and I'm not doubting that other guys have had a good time.[/QUOTE]I think it's good to acknowledge that there is some diversity in what individual men prioritize in a provider. I, too, am sensitive on price. There is presently a really hot escort on Eros, Bianca Carlilse. She is exactly my type: a high-end twenty something. But at $500 per hour, I am hesitant to pull the trigger. (I notice that most of the more expensive escorts have to travel, because when you're charging that kind of coin, you have a limited market in any given area.).
That said, I think it would be unfortunate if USAG were to degenerate into an exclusively low-end venue, filled with obese and rough-looking girls. That's a race to the bottom.
Historically, I think Steve of EE strikes a good balance: His girls have been reasonably thin, reasonably young, and moderately priced. I remember his girl Cat, of a few years ago. She wasn't an aloof supermodel. But she *was* a slender, drug-free young woman who performed enthusiastically. Why assume that a provider has to be old, fat, or an obvious addict in order to be a good performer? Steve has proved otherwise many times. (Cherry Daquari proves that, too.).
In summary, then, I don't think we need "exacting standards". We don't need supermodels, and we're unlikely to get supermodels here, anyway. But I would make the case for "minimal standards": I would wager that most of us don't want the extreme low-end of the market. We want more of what EE provides.