Comments on Torresdale and Attitude
[QUOTE= Street Steve] great post. Could you tell me what times these encounters where? I hardly see anything on Torresdale.[/QUOTE]
I used to drive on Torresdale as a way to get to Kensington in order to check it out. I never saw even ONE SW.
I have seen a few SWs on Torresdale when driving there in the evening, usually well after 6, but there aren't nearly the number there that there are on the K, and the few that are there tend to get picked up in a hurry: the law of supply and demand at work. That's why I like mongering in the day: fewer SWs to be sure, but FAR fewer mongers. I like the odds better. :)
[QUOTE= Street Steve]It is good you held your ground... Demands... you know Women have changed. There was a day when they knew how to work a Man and get you to help them solely being sweet and Fem--they did this shit almost with out effort. Now they think I'll it takes is just opening a big box of B*it*ch.[/QUOTE]
Here is my priority order for a great SW experience: 1. Cleanliness 2. Attitude 3. Performance (although a great performance seems to go hand in hand with a great attitude) 4. Looks
I am usually a nice guy to SWs, but if they want to cop a bit*chy 'tude, then they deserve the same in return.
Read my recent post about Gabrielle from Camden.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=1007247&postcount=166[/url]
It is one thing for a SW to be sweet and feminine in getting what she wants and another to be cold, ignorant, bit*chy or demanding, but the most dangerous of all is the chameleon, who seems able to turn the charm on or off like a faucet.
To Bill Buxton, the Moralist
[QUOTE= Bill Buxton]I guess the real reason I said what I said was I PLAY SAFE. With all the diseases around now I don't wanna get a lifelong problem and see it before it happens. I guess she is fine for you in the Philly area and SO NJ, that's nice. Its nothing to do with superior, it's about not stepping in front of a speeding train. I guess I was there at one time just not gonna ever admit to doing a nasty anywhere. It's easy to tell who will be getting a dose of something messing with that used up stuff. And to Post a pic, wow NOT ME EVER.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE= Street Steve]...Also I really think you (Bill Buxton) should use more discretion before you post. I did receive a PM from a very, very senior member from your home city. It read:
"Thanks for telling that pr*ck off. He's a fucking ass**ole"[/QUOTE]
You have his number, Street, and apparently so do the mongers in his home city. Maybe that's why he posts here. He is already unwelcome in his own home town... LOL.
For your future reference, Bill Buxton, what you did is a major violation of the rules of this forum. READ the following from the forum rules:
"Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads. Any such "safe sex complaints" posted in the general discussion threads will be deleted without comment.
In addition, Members may not repeatedly post or otherwise taunt other Members regarding their refusal to follow safe sex procedures. Specifically, references to having sex without a condom may be made only by incidental reference and shall not be the focus of any report. Such "safe sex taunting" reports will be deleted without comment.
If you want to criticize another member for not following what you consider to be safe sex practices, then send him a PM.
It does no good to criticize members for not following what other members may consider to be safe sex practices for the following reasons:
1. It's a disincentive for members to contribute.
2. It never serves to change any one's behavior.
3. It almost always leads to arguments.
4. It provides a "cover" for Serial Antagonists to provoke other members.
To address the usual arguments:
1. If a guy wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's his risk and his business.
2. If a girl wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's her risk and her business.
3. If YOU want to protect yourself from either or both of the aforementioned parties, then YOU should use a condom for sex all the time and thus YOU will be protected from the allegedly unsafe sex practices of the other parties."
Jezebel now expanded to a University?
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Some great stuff there, CL. Let's not neglect some education for the SWs. I recommend opening the University of Cock Sucking. I nominate myself for the Dean of Admissions, LOL. My tenured professors will be MILFs and chubby gals, who all, in my experience, can DT almost anything, and suck the nails out of boards and the chrome off trailer hitches.
BTW, I saw "Private Parts" again on cable last night, and that bit where the gal swallows a 13 inch kielbasa whole and pushes and pulls it in and out of her mouth and throat on the air while some tourists are looking in through the glass... a laugh riot and erotic as hell![/QUOTE]
I dunno SE.... I suppose we could add the College of Cock Sucking to the Jezebel College and make a combined Jezebel University? Then again, that would mean that the institution would be co-educational, and well you know what happens when you have BOTH men and women on the same College Campus....Jeez!
But Goodness, just think of the multitude of course topics for SWs?
[u]Health 101[/u] - Personal Hygenie for everday life, How to take a bath in the sink at DD, the gas station, the train station, whatever. Combs - the best friend your hair has. Kitty trimming and shaving for fun & profit. Graduate Level work requires mastery of kitty sculpting and hair removal products for that true "smooth" look.
[u]Health 500[/u] - Diseases and you. How the female anatomy is a perfect "catcher" for all kinds of diseases, regardless of spitting. When to "go bare" when to not. Info on free testing and needed frequency for testing.
[u]Phys Ed 100[/u] - cock sucking and deep throating for fun and profile. Taught by renowned cock sucking recipient Dean SE - this course focuses on techniques such as when to teeth and when not, the tongue swirl, breathing through the ears while deep throating, harnessing and banishing your gag reflex, playing with the jewels while pressing your nose into a guys belly, hand assist techniques, how to learn to relish the taste of ejaculate, swallowing as alternative nutrition and of course rimming to get that big blast!
[u]Phys Ed 200[/u] - How to tone your puzzy so it squeezes like a vice. What are Kegel exercises and why use them. Flexibility and your spine. 101 Positions for Interc0urse. How to get you date off in 5-minutes flat with just your puzzy.
[u]Phys Ed 300[/u] - Learning to say 'YES' to anal. Taught by renowned Greek Expert Fbtom, this course covers such topics as: Cleaning up with disposable enema kits, lubrication the key to success, types of lubes and why you should avoid bear grease, KY-jelly and Astroglide, best positions for maximum penetration and monger pleasure, how to handle really BIG sticks and saying, "Thank you sir, let's do it AGAIN!"
[u]Business 101[/u] - How to agree with a monger and his proposed price. Why 0.5$ is way too much to ever ask for.
[u]Photography 100[/u] - Saying "YES" to nude modeling. Standard poses for best presentation, assisting the monger getting the pictures posted on USASG, best gynocological poses for maximum exposure and requesting "action shots" with end result proof.
[u]Community Relations 100[/u] - How to avoid LE stops, what to say and not to say when dealing with LE and how to not incriminate yourself or you date when questioned by LE. Requires Laboratory - hands on role playing of various LE encounter situations.
[u]Community Relations 500[/u] - How, when, where to jump out of a car when the monger starts acting "off."
There must be others, but I'm outta brain juice right now...
Others will have to take it from here.
CL
SW Encounter of the Century!!!!
YES! I met the most amazing SW anyone is ever likely to encounter. Clean. Sexily well dressed. Perfect face. Perfect smokin' bod. Incredible attitude. Sensual and sexual skills unlike any other I have ever known!
Unfortunately, I feel an obligation to defer to my various critics, and make my report "acceptable" for the widest possible range of audience on here. Therefore, I will limit my remarks to the following:
1.To keep verbiage detail to an absolute minimum on her looks and performance: She was terrific!
2. Cups? What are they? We mostly held hands. Or did we? Positions? Yeah, I think we shared a few. It doesn't matter. You don't want to hear all those boring details. And, I would hate to have anyone who needs the little blue pills get jealous of someone whose dick gets hard whenever the wind blows.
3. Dirty talking? I have sworn off. I hear it offends the sensibilities of some members on this site. I promise henceforth to be a good boy and read the Bible to all my SW encounters.
4. Pics? Yeah, I took zillions. This was a Playboy Bunny girl-next-door type who wanted to pose raunchier than in Hustler. BJ pics? Uh huh. I even took timer pics of us in action. I would have done a colonoscopy video if I only had the equipment. But I understand that all these pics are cluttering up my thread and the pic gallery, and are quite unacceptable to some of you. So I saved you all the trouble and self-censored them... every single one.
Ratings? Who gives a shit? Most of the posts here are sans pics and ratings so I might as well get in lock step with the crowd.
YMMV :D
To Quit or Not to Quit... THAT is the Question
Any Hamlet fans out there? Given the grammar and spelling and literary ability of most posters in here (especially my detractors), I think that the last literature many have read went something like..."See Spot run....run Spot run."
Anyway, there has been a lot of criticism leveled at me in the distant and recent past for many things, including but not limited to the following:
1. My posts are too wordy.
2. My posts have too many pictures.
3. I "brag" too much (such as being hung like the proverbial horse, which I AM by the way, LMFAO, DEAL with it!)
4. My posts contain incredulous things (like cumming multiple times in a SW encounter; which I do: doubt it, envy it, whatever; some of us are just made that way )
5. My dirty talking offends (especially the term "cum piggie;" for some odd reason I can call a SW a wh*ore, a bit*ch, or a sl*ut and nobody makes a peep, but not my signature cute {the vote of virtually ALL SWs who hear it} and erotic label of "cum piggie".) GO FIGURE!
6. My predilection for MILFs and chubby gals on occasion seems a target for some to characterize such as ALL I sample from the SW menu. They selectively ignore that I have reported on a vast variety of SWs, including very best looking and performing SW gems to be found almost ANYwhere.
If you don't like any of the above, the answer is quite simple: I only post in my own thread, so don't fucking read it! However, it is not what I write that is the problem. The problem lies within those who CHOOSE to read it. I am not twisting your arm to do so, nor infringing on any other thread in this forum. If you decide to open and read my thread, full well knowing what to expect, then it is your lookout, and you should have no complaints. If you have problems with any of the above, then grousing about it will NOT get me to change. It just might induce me to pour it on "thicker" (pun INTENDED).
I considered for a bit that this wasn't worth the trouble. However, that's exactly what my critics want. They are jealous. They are so jealous that it bleeds out of them in dozens of different ways in response to my posts. But, I have carefully re-examined the sources. These are mostly newbies and/or malcontents who don't contribute much. They can hide behind a computer screen and go after a big visible target to purge their own sad inadequacies. I revel in their agitation and spit it back in their faces. If you don't like this, or think my ego is too big for my britches, then FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on!
My traducers (get out your dictionaries pea brains) will not take my suggestion to stay away from my thread. Apparently it is their written heroin: both desperately needed and cursed at the same time. Some readers here apparently do strangely and despairingly mirror the addictions of the SWs they seek.
Hamlet, Scene Three, line five
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Any Hamlet fans out there? Given the grammar and spelling and literary ability of most posters in here (especially my detractors), I think that the last literature many have read went something like. "See Spot run. Run Spot run. "
Anyway, there has been a lot of criticism leveled at me in the distant and recent past for many things, including but not limited to the following:
1. My posts are too wordy.
2. My posts have too many pictures.
3. I "brag" too much (such as being hung like the proverbial horse, which I AM by the way, LMFAO, DEAL with it!)
4. My posts contain incredulous things (like cumming multiple times in a SW encounter; which I do: doubt it, envy it, whatever; some of us are just made that way)
5. My dirty talking offends (especially the term "cum piggie; " for some odd reason I can call a SW a wh*ore, a bit*ch, or a sl*ut and nobody makes a peep, but not my signature cute (the vote of virtually ALL SWs who hear it) and erotic label of "cum piggie". GO FIGURE!
6. My predilection for MILFs and chubby gals on occasion seems a target for some to characterize such as ALL I sample from the SW menu. They selectively ignore that I have reported on a vast variety of SWs, including very best looking and performing SW gems to be found almost ANYwhere.
If you don't like any of the above, the answer is quite simple: I only post in my own thread, so don't fucking read it! However, it is not what I write that is the problem. The problem lies within those who CHOOSE to read it. I am not twisting your arm to do so, nor infringing on any other thread in this forum. If you decide to open and read my thread, full well knowing what to expect, then it is your lookout, and you should have no complaints. If you have problems with any of the above, then grousing about it will NOT get me to change. It just might induce me to pour it on "thicker" (pun INTENDED).
I considered for a bit that this wasn't worth the trouble. However, that's exactly what my critics want. They are jealous. They are so jealous that it bleeds out of them in dozens of different ways in response to my posts. But, I have carefully re-examined the sources. These are mostly newbies and/or malcontents who don't contribute much. They can hide behind a computer screen and go after a big visible target to purge their own sad inadequacies. I revel in their agitation and spit it back in their faces. If you don't like this, or think my ego is too big for my britches, then FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on!
My traducers (get out your dictionaries pea brains) will not take my suggestion to stay away from my thread. Apparently it is their written heroin: both desperately needed and cursed at the same time. Some readers here apparently do strangely and despairingly mirror the addictions of the SWs they seek.[/QUOTE]S. E.
I for one would miss your "CGI of the mind" elaborations, which I visit immediately upon each log-in.
Illegitimi non carborundum. Don't let the bastards get you down!