Wasn't someone outed on forum recently
Not to be that guy, but wasn't a monger outed by someone with a pic posted in the GR forum no less within the last 6 months? THIS. ! This would be why people take issue with a provider wanting a photo. Throw in the even more insulting fact that same providers (CJ isn't only one known for this in GR area) use fake pics of themselves using the excuse of needing to keep their identity protected, like somehow their personal info is more important than ours. And as for a having a history of good reviews. I have seen several providers who also have accounts on this forum that require pics for admission getting generic glowing reviews of "wonderful time" "surpassed expectations" "had an amazing time". Never any details of this is what is offered, this is what isn't offered, this is what we did, this is what I paid, this particular thing was annoying or I didn't care for". No real details. Either these couple providers offer the absolute best perfect service ever known to have existed in the world of providers. Or the men know the provider is checking what they wrote and are either threatening to blackball them, or worse since they have their photos. When it sounds too good to be true. Well, you know the rest.
[QUOTE=Gene2;6683861]I share your quizzical response. CJ typically exceeds the monger expectations from a visual satisfaction perspective (as well as other sensory satisfaction perspectives). I don't recall anyone who's actually seen CJ ever complaining about the fact she uses anonymous photos to protect her privacy. I seem to recall one monger who apparently measured the size of the areola on the various photos and discerned they were from two different woman. Thats a whole new level of CSI crazy than even I possess.
Bait and switch photos are a common reality in the STG and Tryst worlds. But those situations encompass presenting a woman who looks like Salma Hayek. And when you show up, the woman who answers the door looks like Rosie O'Donnell. That's a valid concern for photo swaps.
I do understand the need for privacy. I worry about some of these pleasurable women posting photos that could reveal personal details beyond her face. Tattoos, scars, unique body features, certain clothing, piercings, hair styles, fingernail styles, background furniture, etc. All could be used to cause extreme embarrassment for the lady. And not just now, but maybe years down the road. Just because an STG post gets taken down, doesn't mean it's gone. Can you imagine the unease if one of our ladies here had her teenaged son or daughter forwarded a photo of what her mom used to do? I cringe at the thought of that.
So maybe we could think compassionately (not just passionately) about our providers. I know for me, I get nervous going to certain areas of the city to see a provider. Why? Because I know people who live in that area. Once I showed up at a house. And the next door neighbor was my old boss. I actually canceled the appointment as I knew he was retired and still lived there. I just didn't want to risk facing an awkward situation. For that reason, I know want to know exactly where I'm headed for an appointment before I leave my house. Protect my privacy and dignity.
And my unease would be nothing like what the poor provider could face. It could be life altering. So I guess it's fair to ask. Do we really need to know exactly what a woman's areola looks like, or can we survive with an accurate portrayal of an areola doppelgnger? Seems silly.
Just one man's opinion.
Protect.
G2.[/QUOTE]
