Like Beef Lolo?

[QUOTE=LarryHoover;2942643]I'm glad you said this. Some of these providers need to understand that this hobby isn't our only option to get some (at least not in my case). I've told a few women off in a not-so-nice way that I didn't need them at the end of the day. The only reason I see providers is because it's too much work to try and woo women (take them on dates, feed them, have meaningless conversations, etc) when I have a lot more productive things that I could be doing with my time.[/QUOTE]I don't care if some women call me a male chauvinist pig, or whatever. This is the reason that I see providers. To me, this is a win-win situation. We both get what we want with no strings attached (most of the time).

You just got right to the point, and tell it like it is.

[QUOTE=Fleshlight;2942926]All I'm going to say is you mongers are tipping way to much. I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but what I'm saying is tipping more is not going to get you anything more, or anymore than what I get, or make you any special. . 60 per hour, if it's a good massage with HE I'll tip $. 20 max, and that's with full roaming. BBBJ, $. 50. Legit good massage 60 min, . 20/. 25 max. 90 min, . 30 max. And this works fine. I always get my extra 70 min or 100 min session. Maybe it's because I get massages once or twice a week consistent, so the tips add up. And I usually see only 1-3 diff therapists regularly depends on whose available. Anyway I'm done with this subject. If tipping more works for you, than great. And I concur with Boxcutter. I tip base on service, not looks.

Mongers tip on, but tip wisely.

Flesh.[/QUOTE]Service is fucking subjective brah! You can't tip on service if service us subjective you idiot! If you fucking made a fucking mistake with posting, just fucking admit it! You want to dodge the fucking question about your $50 free sex threesome because you fucking lied about it? Then fuck it, just say you didn't RTFF and made a mistake and move the fuck on! If you real, just spit that shit out. Tell BoxCutter to slap the back of your fucking head if the words are stuttering deep in your fucking throat!

The bottom line here is the providers are like a store, and we are the customer. We pay we get our product we get good service we come back crap service and we will probably not return. Providers I don't care if you are the prettiest sexiest girl out there. If you can't give good service with a smile you ain't getting a return visit. I'm the customer and as long as I don't swear, yell, use racial remarks then I deserve good service with a smile. If you can't give that then you are in the wrong business.

[QUOTE=Puuhale;2942809]I don't care if some women call me a male chauvinist pig, or whatever. This is the reason that I see providers. To me, this is a win-win situation. We both get what we want with no strings attached (most of the time).

You just got right to the point, and tell it like it is.[/QUOTE]I'm sure we aren't the only mongers that feel this way, based on the PMs I get. In fact, a potential "pay for play" friend just asked me a couple hours ago why I won't just get a real gf when she saw my picture, LOL. I just don't need the extra drama in my life, so mongering is great for me.

[QUOTE=Ck813;2943831]The bottom line here is the providers are like a store, and we are the customer. We pay we get our product we get good service we come back crap service and we will probably not return. Providers I don't care if you are the prettiest sexiest girl out there. If you can't give good service with a smile you ain't getting a return visit. I'm the customer and as long as I don't swear, yell, use racial remarks then I deserve good service with a smile. If you can't give that then you are in the wrong business.[/QUOTE]Preach. I'll take a slightly above average animal over a beautiful dead fish any day. I hate providers that act as if I'm beneath them or something, when someone like me wouldn't even date them in real life because they aren't mentally on my level. Looks only get a girl so far. Men seem physically shallow (and we are to an extent), but there's a line that has to be drawn with personality.

Anyone else get irritated with this guy always asking, "does she have a Bush? Or, how does she look? Or, anyone else have a Bush? Nicebush808 go grow your own and report dude.

[blue]Why isn't he on your ignore list? Nothing wrong with you saying this here, thank you for using the fight thread. I'm always curious when guys don't use the ignore function for other members that irritate them.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=SquirtLuva69;2944358]Anyone else get irritated with this guy always asking, "does she have a Bush? Or, how does she look? Or, anyone else have a Bush? Nicebush808 go grow your own and report dude.

[blue]Why isn't he on your ignore list? Nothing wrong with you saying this here, thank you for using the fight thread. I'm always curious when guys don't use the ignore function for other members that irritate them.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]Thanks A2, forgot about that, just did.

[blue]Glad I could help, I have 100's of guys on ignore in my personal account.

A2[/blue]

[QUOTE=EroticaFan;2942795]Out of curiousity, did you have an attitude towards ALL mongers or were you a YMMV bad attitude case. In other words, were only SOME guys lucky to be with you or was it like ALL guys were lucky to be with you? I ask because this may shed light on a girlz perspective of the dynamic in a pay for play situation.[/QUOTE]I believed I responded to people's attitude toward me. I bought into the myth that approach determines response. If someone was rude to me, then they got what they deserved, I thought. But I have had a deeper revelation about the issue of attitude. Approach doesn't determine response. Approach might influence response, but ultimately I will react a certain way because of who I am. I didn't think I had an overall bad attitude, but I suspect I was not nearly as positive as I am now. Because now that I know no one determines my response, that I am free to be my highest self no matter what or who I deal with, I feel very free.

One thing I deal with is the potential for encounters to end badly. I suppose any situation could turn potentially negative, maybe even damaging or dangerous. Is this activity more risky than others. I don't think the answer is a clear-cut yes. Still, I take precautions. Since a client could potentially become something less than a friend, I decided to establish a screening system based on a systemic philosophy of dealing with rivals. I found appealing ideas in "The Art of War," an ancient Chinese classic that teaches lessons applicable to almost any situation. If I grow uncomfortable with the prospect of meeting a new person or allowing someone to return, for reasons well known to me, I do not go through with the assignation. There have been times that I have jumped the gun and prematurely cancelled a perfectly wonderful individual. When I believed I'd gotten it wrong, I gave the meeting another try, and shook my head at my own skittishness. But what else could I do? Unfortunately, sometimes caution and discretion, of necessity, trump reliabilty and predictability. If you are someone who thinks I may have gotten the wrong impression in my cheerful but flawed mind, please feel free to contact me again. Now that one and all know that there is always a method to my apparent madness.

Anyone have input about precautions? I'm always up for learning from people who know things I don't (everyone!

[blue]There you go sugarpie, see what happens when you put your commentary where it belongs?

I don't delete it.

A2[/blue]

[BLUE]This is for all the white knights that are writing me about Honolulu girl and why I delete her (and all the other chicks) posts from review threads.

The focus of the USASG has always been and always will be a place where men exchange information about women for sex. It's pretty simple, guys fuck chicks, guys write about chicks, other guys read it, if they like what has been written then they fuck the chick, then they write about fucking the chick. It's a pretty successful formula, we have registered over 400,000 users (lots of aliases, shills, and dormant accounts we know but still a lot of fucking people) with what we estimate to be about 30,000 active users and around 300,000 lurkers. It's a good thing, we like it, the guys like it, most of the chicks like having access to that market so most of them like it as well.

Years ago we weren't so quick to delete posts by chicks (we didn't even have an advertiser category, chicks got on the same ladder as the guys, regular member, then senior member blah blah blah) and it was ok until more chicks discovered the site. Then it started, a guy posted a less than stellar review the chicks responded, the guy got mean, the white knights saddled up their horses (as they always do) and TONS of threads devolved into he said/she said. Since most of us have been married, some still are, some lots of times, we have ALL seen that movie and nobody really is interested in the sequel. The forum is a place for men to exchange information about women for sex. Cut, dried, simple, works.

Honolulu Girl seems pretty cool to me, I like her content, it's not personal BUT, I let her post, then another chick posts, she's not so cool, she's not so personable, she just wants to fingerwag. Then I have to get the endless (and I mean fucking ENDLESS) emails and PM's from them and what does it say? "You let Honolulu Girl post why can't I? Wa wa fucking WA!" I have no time for it.

On nearly every fight thread on the forum the chicks have been involved, it works, they can finger wag (or post cool topical stuff like Honolulu Girl) the white knights can ride, the douchbags can fight, and most importantly, the guys who want to read reviews don't have to wade through the bullshit. The review threads remain "A place for men to exchange information about women for sex."

Yes I know, there are douchbags that post bullshit on the regular threads, I deal with them. Because they are there doesn't mean I want to add the burden of dealing with the chicks there as well. My solution is simple, delete the first two or three, maybe they get the message, if they don't I throw a flag. Then they move it here and everybody is happy.

Capiche?

A2[/BLUE]

[QUOTE=STDayue2016;2950070]Marie has all natural young cute face, tight silm body, soft white skin and lovely pink private areas that I even could not believe my eyes. We spent a wonderful full hour including hug-rest and snap. I will try to avoid her not for the $$$ tips that will make my bankrupt but falling in love with her![/QUOTE]$300 dollars tip? Is that a pimp tax?

[QUOTE=Memahu;2950640]$300 dollars tip? Is that a pimp tax?[/QUOTE]Lose money that one. She is young, early 20's, pretty, and hot but service sucks, she has many rules and many nos, also huge Pimp Tax tip up front with street walker service. She is sweet with great PRS (Public Relations Skills).

[QUOTE=EroticaFan;2953175]As coined by the doc, it means Penile Revival Skllls. When someone needs help in that area, the provider tries to boost the ego by uttering phrases to assure the participant that he is virile and fuck-worthy. It also is used to ensure repeat visits so it could be called CRS (Customer Retention Skills).[/QUOTE]For you ticaFan, (PRS) is Pussy Revival Skills! You can go back to using your saggy tits to try and fucking plug your pussy, because looks like nobody been touching you for years you old butch. Maybe you can try to fucking revive your pussy for some (CRS) **** Retard Service from you other bi-polar alias!

Where the FUCK are you ticaFan?

[QUOTE=EroticaFan;2953175]As coined by the doc, it means Penile Revival Skllls. When someone needs help in that area, the provider tries to boost the ego by uttering phrases to assure the participant that he is virile and fuck-worthy. It also is used to ensure repeat visits so it could be called CRS (Customer Retention Skills).[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Blake123;2953777]Tongue-in-cheek response but does have some merit, I think.[/QUOTE]It's more like Balls-on-YOUR-Tongue-and-Dick-Between-YOUR-Cheeks for ticaFan you homo! It has fuckin merit in FL for him.

It seems that you have drmajik's stick way up in your 'chocolate starfish'. Why are you getting so riled up when the post had nothing to do with you? Or is the doc your bang partner and you feel the need to protect your *****?

[QUOTE=Nephilim3000;2955405]It's more like Balls-on-YOUR-Tongue-and-Dick-Between-YOUR-Cheeks for ticaFan you homo! It has fuckin merit in FL for him.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=EroticaFan;2955814]It seems that you have drmajik's stick way up in your 'chocolate starfish'. Why are you getting so riled up when the post had nothing to do with you? Or is the doc your bang partner and you feel the need to protect your *****?[/QUOTE]Buahahha ha HA HA! Speak the truth you kweer ticaFan. I hate that mother fucker as much as I hate you phaggot. Go check all your post on the forum, it appears YOU ticaFan are the kweer that is obsessed with the doc. Most of your post are about the doc. You had a little ***** fight with your doc fuck buddy!? LOL. Your doing it wrong fuck head. Fantasies. LMAO you like your gaping holes filled with the stick, that's why you wrote about it! Keep eating that cheese from the crack of your ass!