Grand Rapids Pugilistic Society

[QUOTE=Gene2;6518538]In reading it. Looks like the dude who saw the girl twice got pinched. And then rolled over on the dude who provided the contact for the girl. And then LE busted him. Would seem like both dudes got some legal troubles going forward. But it seems the dude arrested and charged will face the greater jeopardy because he profited from the transaction. I wonder if the "profiting from the transaction" is simply money that merits this type of prosecution. Or perhaps if he received no money, but received free services, if he would be charged to the full extent of the law. Either way, it would seem there is a lesson here to change business models if any sort of compensation or free services are involved for providing referrals, even if passwords are used.

And of course, this adds to the litany of reasons shrewd mongers avoid social media sites as hunting grounds. Even though a young woman down on her luck may appear to vulnerable, she can come to her senses quickly and realize that a pack of cigarettes exchanged for a BBJ isn't equitable and she may be ready to claw back some revenge. That's where treating women with dignity, even in this sordid world, is worth the extra cost and effort. Just my 2 cents. I'm certain there will be opposing viewpoints offered, but all us are well served to contemplate this terrible situation.

Elevate.

G2.[/QUOTE]Seriously Gene, could you please just suck Benz cock so you can get over this obsession. It's fucking exhausting Freebeern. Then to follow it with your stupid one worded summary. You actually would give decent information if you weren't such an unreadable Benz obsessed douche.

Fellatiate.

[QUOTE=UtrGuy;6519370]Seriously Gene, could I please just suck Benz cock so I can get over my obsession. It's fucking exhausting Freebeern. Then to follow it with your stupid one worded summary. I actually would give decent information if I weren't such an unreadable Benz obsessed douche.

Fellatiate.[/QUOTE]Settle down Putin. No need to be a fucktard. If you don't like his posts just use the ignore feature. Lots of us here appreciate gene and others sharing warnings. Some poor suckers are going to get busted someday without warnings like this. Benz is plenty Protected here. And we need someone besides blackfire willing to call out his bullshit.

Sure genes one word summary is goofy but less than changing the spelling of friends to make a corny clubhouse. Serious man. Get a grip. We should encourage more posts. Not discourage posts. Especially warnings. Comrade.

[QUOTE=AntBz;6519700]Settle down Putin. No need to be a fucktard. If you don't like his posts just use the ignore feature. Lots of us here appreciate gene and others sharing warnings. Some poor suckers are going to get busted someday without warnings like this. Benz is plenty Protected here. And we need someone besides blackfire willing to call out his bullshit.

Sure genes one word summary is goofy but less than changing the spelling of friends to make a corny clubhouse. Serious man. Get a grip. We should encourage more posts. Not discourage posts. Especially warnings. Comrade.[/QUOTE]The guy just started a conversation we should have based on what they popped the janitor with. How can it be really be 'safe' when dudes are voluntarily giving names and phone numbers to a stranger in hopes of front of the line or frequent flyer discounts to a guy so entrenched in this bullshit he knows locations, schedules, candy preferences and family dynamics? And even directs some of us schmucks to a store front we can commit fraud at to get a supposedly untraceable phone.

Practically building a conspiracy case for whatever agency wants it.

Let the Benz Bashing Begin again.

Laughing at idiots with half cocked theories.

Do any of you Benz Bashers play chess?

I'm willing to bet NO.

We have nothing to talk about unless you have a USCF 2 K or better.

If you can't up your game, you're Lame!

[QUOTE=Gene2;6496826]So the fictional account probably entertained some of you more acerbic members. And probably irritated the more mundane members.

So now on to the factual account with regard to the actions two weeks ago precipitating into the dual account posting.

Here's the quick answer: My username is too connected to my identity. And it offers no anonymity.

Probably best to provide a little background. As a newly divorced middle aged man with a healthy libido but a scarred psyche, I dipped my toes into the world of hobby providers almost four years ago. With no real need to hide my identity I ventured into this unknown world with some disposable income and a lust for adventure. I soon found this website and joined. I chose a username that didn't camouflage my identity because I had no S. O. To deceive. And I thrust myself into this licentious diversion from the moribund reality of post-divorce life. I soon found the niches that filled my senses and satisfied my urges.

This self discovery helped me to realize I wasn't simply seeking sexual release, although that definitely was a component of the quest. I recognize the allure of the quick fix. The blow and go. The cheap visit that only focuses on the view of the back of a woman's head. That would simply require me to be a frenz, a lemming, a man willing to grab a few 20's and head for a cheap motel or a hood neighborhood to visit a woman needing money for her next fix. But I'm not looking to be that.

Part of me wishes that would fulfill me. It would be so much easier were it that simple. But, no, I came to find that I adored connection, conversation, intellect. I needed to feel that the experience was mutually beneficial and mutually pleasing. And that has become my drug, my addiction, the dragon I chase. Granted it leaves me disappointed at times. It yields missed appointments. It yields ghosting. It yields feelings of being taken for granted. But it also brings incredible delights. When I hit a home run, the journey around the bases makes all of the missed connections and ghosted communications fade into obscurity.

I'm a pragmatic man. And I know my appeal isn't more than the financial transfer. But that's my brain. My emotions allow me to believe that my carefully honed skills are indeed top notch. Maybe they are. Maybe they aren't. But when the connection fuse is lit, I'm in ecstasy. I still remember seeing an almond eyed beauty look down at my face and utter those incredible words "you really know what you're doing. Every time. Every time. " Are those just words? Maybe. But I'll operate under the assumption they were spontaneous and accurate.

So. I soon discovered that I had no cover with my username being linked to my actual identity. And that's fine if there is no need for an exit strategy from the hobby. Or no alternative. I've come to realize that I may someday leave this pseudo world I've invaded. Or I may venture off with an almond eyed beauty. Who knows.

So I decided I needed a username that was more generic. That's it.

Simplify.

G2.[/QUOTE]Your real name is freebeerne? That is weird.

[QUOTE=Benz1;6520141]Let the Benz Bashing Begin again.

Laughing at idiots with half cocked theories.

Do any of you Benz Bashers play chess?

I'm willing to bet NO.

We have nothing to talk about unless you have a USCF 2 K or better.

If you can't up your game, you're Lame![/QUOTE]All tho I love that a few others figured your dum ass out you have to be the most transparent UTR idiot there is, your b / s of "no one knowing you" has to be in your pee brain only, you spew off about buying chocolate and "stopping" by parlours to have coffee has to be a idiotic thing to say, while you think you can troll providers trust me they troll your dum ass probably better, FYI, 90% of your "no teeth" meth heads I'm sure know too, so don't be stupid, FYI I have played chess for yrs BMOC.

Lmao.

I'd love to comment, but have been told I can't. I guess I'd have to create an alternate fake name to do that, but not sure, is that allowed? What happens when a guy has 2 names and is discovered to be deceiving the board with 2 or more names?

I would venture a large percentage of our mongers have sufficient intelligence to play chess, and do so admirably. Fortunately, they've chosen instead to play in this hobby. And then post about their adventures and recommendations here. I believe there are all sorts of chess oriented website blogs of similar layout and format to USA Sex guide that would expect members to have USCF (United States Chess Federation) rating of 2 K or higher. Fortunately, this is not one of those sites. No such ranking or rating is required. So we are all free to be members, post reviews, and share warnings when certain actions could put some or all of us at risk. Once those warnings are delivered, it's up to the reader to determine if he feels impelled to alter his course of action or not. No one is forced to stop acting in a dangerous or foolish manner. But, no one should be forced to stop sharing reviews or warnings.

If a warning of a certain behavior is viewed as "bashing," then perhaps time is better spent, not playing chess, but rather, using a dictionary. Once again, underestimating the intelligence of the monger community is what yields such "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" misdirection. We saw it. We know it. Some may choose to heed the warnings, some may chose to ignore them. I respect the right that each of us have to make our own choices. I also respect monger intellect. And I don't need to know your chess nerd rating to know you are intelligent. You've been successful enough in your career to have disposable income to play in this playground. You've been successful at keeping your activity away from prying eyes. So yeah. You're intelligent. And you don't need a chess rating to validate it. You can agree with or disagree with me. You've earned that right. As have I.

Check.

G2.

[QUOTE=Benz1;6520141]Let the Benz Bashing Begin again.

Laughing at idiots with half cocked theories.

Do any of you Benz Bashers play chess?

I'm willing to bet NO.

We have nothing to talk about unless you have a USCF 2 K or better.

If you can't up your game, you're Lame![/QUOTE]If you have to tell someone you have 'game' it's a pretty good give away you don't have any. Asking one of your street urchins if she has change for a 20 is not game.

That's it. Stop with the insults and innuendos. You're no better or worse than anyone else in here. Having 4000 posts doesn't qualify as being a subject matter 'expert'. Just means you have too much time on your hands.

[QUOTE=Gene2;6521607]I would venture a large percentage of our mongers have sufficient intelligence to play chess, and do so admirably. Fortunately, they've chosen instead to play in this hobby. And then post about their adventures and recommendations here. I believe there are all sorts of chess oriented website blogs of similar layout and format to USA Sex guide that would expect members to have USCF (United States Chess Federation) rating of 2 K or higher. Fortunately, this is not one of those sites. No such ranking or rating is required. So we are all free to be members, post reviews, and share warnings when certain actions could put some or all of us at risk. Once those warnings are delivered, it's up to the reader to determine if he feels impelled to alter his course of action or not. No one is forced to stop acting in a dangerous or foolish manner. But, no one should be forced to stop sharing reviews or warnings.

If a warning of a certain behavior is viewed as "bashing," then perhaps time is better spent, not playing chess, but rather, using a dictionary. Once again, underestimating the intelligence of the monger community is what yields such "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain" misdirection. We saw it. We know it. Some may choose to heed the warnings, some may chose to ignore them. I respect the right that each of us have to make our own choices. I also respect monger intellect. And I don't need to know your chess nerd rating to know you are intelligent. You've been successful enough in your career to have disposable income to play in this playground. You've been successful at keeping your activity away from prying eyes. So yeah. You're intelligent. And you don't need a chess rating to validate it. You can agree with or disagree with me. You've earned that right. As have I.

Check.

G2.[/QUOTE]You of all people calling him intelligent? He trolls down and out druggies for 20 $ or free BJ's or a finger in his ass, taking advantage of humans you consider that intelligent? Your as pathetic and as big a dum fuk as him, now you proclaim to know how he does or did financially? J / c your a idiot.

[QUOTE=DjBiker;6521935]You of all people calling him intelligent? He trolls down and out druggies for 20 $ or free BJ's or a finger in his ass, taking advantage of humans you consider that intelligent? Your as pathetic and as big a dum fuk as him, now you proclaim to know how he does or did financially? J / c your a idiot.[/QUOTE]I directed my post and comments to all mongers here, the collective "you". The comment about intelligence wasn't directed to any one monger. The comment about missing what "bashing" meant was directed to anyone who thought posting a warning is bashing. Everyone here has the right to make their own decisions. And that collectively, monger intelligence is higher than average intelligence. Of course, you have presented the exception to that rule. Thank you for completing the circle for us. Your input may not be understood but it is allowed.

Comprehend.

G2.

[QUOTE=Gene2;6522499]I directed my post and comments to all mongers here, the collective "you". The comment about intelligence wasn't directed to any one monger. The comment about missing what "bashing" meant was directed to anyone who thought posting a warning is bashing. Everyone here has the right to make their own decisions. And that collectively, monger intelligence is higher than average intelligence. Of course, you have presented the exception to that rule. Thank you for completing the circle for us. Your input may not be understood but it is allowed.

Comprehend.

G2.[/QUOTE]Says the idiot with 2 names and going to "run of with a provider" yea your the intelligent one, F'ing idiot.

Your so pathetic.

[QUOTE=DjBiker;6523050]Says the idiot with 2 names and going to "run of with a provider" yea your the intelligent one, F'ing idiot.

Your so pathetic.[/QUOTE]It is spelled you're (you are), not your. If you are going to insult someone at least use proper grammer so it makes sense and doesn't (does not) make you look like an ass.

[QUOTE=Arish;6524771]It is spelled you're (you are), not your. If you are going to insult someone at least use proper grammer so it makes sense and doesn't (does not) make you look like an ass.[/QUOTE]The irony here is that the word is actually spelled "grammar," not "grammer" as you stated.

[QUOTE=Arish;6524771]It is spelled you're (you are), not your. If you are going to insult someone at least use proper grammer so it makes sense and doesn't (does not) make you look like an ass.[/QUOTE]Love how the 2-3 nimrods turn it to English majors, your as big of dolt as he is.