Printable View
[QUOTE=GuideMaster67;7617244]How accurate is the last active date on SA? I see guys asking about girls who haven't been on in 5-6 days. Is that feature useless or is it pretty accurate. I see some actually decent chicks but they haven't been online in weeks according to the site.[/QUOTE]SA is pretty accurate. If they are premium member, they can disable it. SB is not accurate at all. I just got back on it and I know it's off.
[QUOTE=TonySop;7616907]Any info on this one would be highly appreciated.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/03aa8445-9c4e-4681-bc95-48560fa9181d[/URL][/QUOTE]I spoke to her briefly. She might have left the platform by now. Wasn't open to any intimacy. You might have better luck though.
[QUOTE=GuideMaster67;7617244]How accurate is the last active date on SA? I see guys asking about girls who haven't been on in 5-6 days. Is that feature useless or is it pretty accurate. I see some actually decent chicks but they haven't been online in weeks according to the site.[/QUOTE]It's pretty accurate. I've actually paid close attention to it and it's as accurate as it gets.
Here's a little fun survey. What would be the top 2 dealbreakers for an SB in your respective cases:
A) Fat.
B) Butterface.
C) No Personality.
D) Too Old (27+).
E) Not good in the sack.
For me A) Fat and D) Too Old are dealbreakers.
I can't do Fat, sorry and 27+ usually too used up.
Butterface, you can always do doggy or keep the light off.
Personality, I don't really care as long as they have a hot body.
Not good in the sack, I see it as a challenge and opportunity to teach them and leave my legacy that way LOL.
[QUOTE=Mross86;7617330]Nevermind, I got it and added.[/QUOTE]You guys are not bringing anything to the forum accept increasing your post count.
Go back and read my posts for good examples of how to contribute.
No one cares about this chick and if we did, you posted enough good info!
[QUOTE=Mross86;7617357]I spoke to her briefly. She might have left the platform by now. Wasn't open to any intimacy. You might have better luck though.[/QUOTE]Yes, 100% rinser. Also, came in with unrealistic expectations. Not sure if she's still around.
[QUOTE=Pervert12;7616968]I've been out of the sugar world for a few years and jumping back in. Although the pool here seems pretty bleak from what I've read here.
Anyways, has anyone seen Sofiaaa? [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5b174e00-db29-4b6a-989e-3fcb42af3b39[/URL].
Feel free to PM me or respond here. Trying to find a fit Latina, Brazilian if possible.[/QUOTE]Welcome back brother. I messaged her but never heard from her back it saw her private photos and now I see it's been almost a week since she's been on the platform. And yes, the pool is bleak af. We are scraping the bowl full with cum buckets, delulus, fat chicks and rinsers.
[QUOTE=FatWhiteGuy;7616491]That Luna chick works at Cloakroom.
(Unrelated) - My previous sb I met off SDM also works at CR.
She not currently active and I'm not posting her profile so no need for anyone to ask.
She petite and hot AF, but spicy.
I'm just venting.
Turns out she was a rinser. Met her in Feb and she stayed over for three months straight minus a few days.
She was jobless when we met and I pushed her to find some sort of income. She choose dancing.
The sex was good month1 then died off month2 and dead at month3. She ended up basically using me with little to nothing in return.
Kicked her out after Mothers Day. I told her she could still come over to use my shower before heading to work, which she still does cause her current housing situation is crap. I figure what's the harm in hoping she'd want to bang somewhere down the line.
But seriously, fuck all these useless sugar girls.
I got booted from SDM a month ago for being to racist in the chatrooms. People are just too sensitive.
Not interested in rejoining other sites.
This dudes sugar days might be over- its been a fun one LOL.
Thankfully the "AnnaJes bangtrain" still pulls into the station.
Some of you know that drill.[/QUOTE]Bro, at least you were here during the golden ages. Now all we have left is cum buckets, rinsers and fatty. Hardly any solid under 25 gems. I've been hitting the more traditional route where at least the expectations are clear and there is no time wasting.
[QUOTE=DasHottCalla;7617818]Jesus fucking Christ.[/QUOTE]Simps, bro.
[QUOTE=TonySop;7616470]Agree 100%. Haven't paid more than 500 per pop entire year. I'm not cheap either, it's just the quality is awful. Either too chubby, too old or not easy on the eyes. The ones that are under 25 and pretty are extremely rare find.[/QUOTE]I think we are at the stage where we can safely conclude that any of the SBs off the SA or SB platforms, that want to fuck for money, especially if they are older than 25 are pretty much the equivalent of prostitutes. That's why I'm slowly leaning to that side. At least the expectations are clear, and you don't fucking waste time and effort. Don't get me wrong, there is always going to be that gem or two that's young in her early 20's, pretty and DTF but those are extreme rarity. What I see here is bunch of used up, cum buckets, with GPS mindset, some lying about their age to squeeze through our filters trying to squeeze every dollar we have.
[QUOTE=TheCurve;7617874]Simps, bro.[/QUOTE]I know, guys stop fucking giving her any more attention I beg you please. She's a cum bucket that thinks she's worth way more than she is when in reality she's just an old and chubby prostitute that's trying to portray herself as a sugar baby by lying about her age.
[QUOTE=TheCurve;7617874]Simps, bro.[/QUOTE]They're trying to turn a cum bucket into a golden bucket LOL.
My general rule is if a girl hasn't logged on in 2 weeks, she's not playing. Just my rule of thumb, and there are always exceptions.
[QUOTE=GuideMaster67;7617244]How accurate is the last active date on SA? I see guys asking about girls who haven't been on in 5-6 days. Is that feature useless or is it pretty accurate. I see some actually decent chicks but they haven't been online in weeks according to the site.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TonySop;7617616]Here's a little fun survey. What would be the top 2 dealbreakers for an SB in your respective cases:
A) Fat.
B) Butterface.
C) No Personality.
D) Too Old (27+).
E) Not good in the sack.
For me A) Fat and D) Too Old are dealbreakers.
I can't do Fat, sorry and 27+ usually too used up.
Butterface, you can always do doggy or keep the light off.
Personality, I don't really care as long as they have a hot body.
Not good in the sack, I see it as a challenge and opportunity to teach them and leave my legacy that way LOL.[/QUOTE]For me it's fat and bad personality.
I actually want to go to dinner dates since I have never been to Fine dinning restaurants so personality matters.
Butterface not a big deal if body good and nice personality.
Not good in sack I'm with you. You can always teach if you got patients or just do all the work which is my preference anyways.
[QUOTE=TonySop;7617616]Here's a little fun survey. What would be the top 2 dealbreakers for an SB in your respective cases:
A) Fat.
B) Butterface.
C) No Personality.
D) Too Old (27+).
E) Not good in the sack.
For me A) Fat and D) Too Old are dealbreakers.
I can't do Fat, sorry and 27+ usually too used up.
Butterface, you can always do doggy or keep the light off.
Personality, I don't really care as long as they have a hot body.
Not good in the sack, I see it as a challenge and opportunity to teach them and leave my legacy that way LOL.[/QUOTE]Can we add F) Cum Bucket to the list? Or that can be grouped with D in same category?