-
[QUOTE=BazookaSteve;7603290]Stumbled upon her tryst ad, also sells makes and sells content. Shes a findom provider so Im not even sure if she offers anything vanilla
Hot body but took a look through her Twitter and based on some thumbnails from her videos she looks pretty bad without makeup.
[URL]https://tryst.link/bdsm/spoiluna[/URL][/QUOTE]Thank god for social media. Most of these girls have their soc media public along with substantial online presence and as long as that's the case it's a fair game to use it for additional research IMO. We ante paying good amounting money for this and should be using all available sources, obviously legally, to validate the authenticity of what they are claiming and offering.
-
[QUOTE=Mross86;7600899]I'll share my personal experience with SB, which is very similar to what you are describing. I started using it about 5 years ago and initially in matter of 2-3 months I literally went through couple of thousand dollars (dumb af I know) buying credits and using them to initiate conversations that didn't go anywhere for most part. I started realizing that there is a ton of bots on the site, with primary objective to get your obscene as many credits as possible. So despite spending couple of grand, I was only able to connect with one girl, and that's it. So given my experience there I'll pay the SAs 150 per month anytime over the credit based system that SB has. Also, not sure if that's still an issue, but at the time these guys were based offshore and it was challenging to make payments as most CCs would block the transactions, thinking it's potential fraud.[/QUOTE]Yeah with no alternatives to CC as payment, SB is off the list.
The other one is POF.
Does anyone have experience with this?
-
[QUOTE=BrickYard;7603714]Feedback needed for. Please DM.
Geneive.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c5f4dbaf-700f-4fa0-9d24-2f446b6aa7d2[/URL]
Liya.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/58e1b392-4b66-46fc-96c1-b57a9311da3c[/URL]
Anna.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b9e96919-6b0b-4fb3-b1ee-80ea036703df[/URL][/QUOTE]Started talking to that first one over on Secret Benefits before she ghosted me. Didn't bother reaching out again when I saw her appear on Seeking.
-
Demi - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/22a4ff39-261e-4301-9161-b0fbe14c7b79[/URL].
Gave strong traveling pro vibes. Asks $1500. For an hour.
Daniella - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/b3524825-1b07-4339-bf95-15b06f080f89[/URL].
Asks for 6. Can be talked down from there. However cruising her ig will immediately give you an idea of what she's all about.
-
So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.
Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?
I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.
-
[QUOTE=Xwa521;7604666]So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.
Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?
I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.[/QUOTE]My success rate is similar to yours. I've been doing this off and on for about three years, and while I've experienced a decent amount (definitely better than Tinder LOL), I'd say maybe three or four were actually what I wanted in a steady arrangement, with one of those setting the bar extremely high.
-
[QUOTE=Xwa521;7604666]So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.
Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?
I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.[/QUOTE]I have had more success rate in terms of getting numbers and responses then you.
I'm South East Asian and 49.
Might be more your age then race.
No offense just giving you my experience.
Of course all this is subjective since might have different tastes in women and all.
Dam never thought about trying seeking when over seas.
-
[QUOTE=Xwa521;7604666]So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.
Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?
I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.[/QUOTE]Go to NYC. My success rate has been 0% in DC the past month because its a waste of energy to text / meet the beastess of DC.
I'm old and busted but I'm still mire attractive than beasts in DC. They should pay me.
-
[QUOTE=Rkoppa;7604842]I have had more success rate in terms of getting numbers and responses then you.
I'm South East Asian and 49.
Might be more your age then race.
No offense just giving you my experience.
Of course all this is subjective since might have different tastes in women and all.
Dam never thought about trying seeking when over seas.[/QUOTE]He said mid-30's. You think he's too YOUNG?
-
[QUOTE=Senbonzakura;7605077]He said mid-30's. You think he's too YOUNG?[/QUOTE]Could be.
From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.
Me personally I think its more they not consistent.
I tend to see whites and Hispanics around mid to late 20's.
But who knows doubt we seeing same girls.
I just don't think its he is Asian.
BTW I'm no Chad so it ain't looks either and I'm 20 lbs over weight.
-
[QUOTE=Xwa521;7604666]So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.
Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?
I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.[/QUOTE]My response rate is very poor. Had a membership for one month, messaged about 200 girls and had like an 8% response rate. Majority moved to text, some didn't, saw about 6 girls from the ones that did move to text. 4/6 have already been mentioned here by other members, and the remaining 2 are the ones I continue to see regularly. I'm early 30's, and also have a very low effort profile with only one picture. I've had a couple girls ask for more pics and when I tried to get around it they stopped replying.
Also I agree with Tomford. While my profile is low effort, I think the DMV area is also partly to blame. The last time I was in NYC I messaged 10 girls, got 6 replies, and they were all hotter than majority of the girls in this area and I have a 75 mile radius set. I would need to message like 50 girls to get 6 responses here.
[QUOTE=Rkoppa;7605159]Could be.
From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.
Me personally I think its more they not consistent.
[/QUOTE]This leads me to a question for the larger group about consistency. When you guys meet new girls, do you go in with the intention of seeing them consistently if you have a good time or is your goal just to hook up and move on to the next one?
-
[QUOTE=Rkoppa;7605159]Could be.
From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.
Me personally I think its more they not consistent.
I tend to see whites and Hispanics around mid to late 20's.
But who knows doubt we seeing same girls.
I just don't think its he is Asian.
BTW I'm no Chad so it ain't looks either and I'm 20 lbs over weight.[/QUOTE]Interesting. I never thought of this before. Too small of an age gap being an issue.
-
[QUOTE=BazookaSteve;7605257]My response rate is very poor. Had a membership for one month, messaged about 200 girls and had like an 8% response rate. Majority moved to text, some didn't, saw about 6 girls from the ones that did move to text. 4/6 have already been mentioned here by other members, and the remaining 2 are the ones I continue to see regularly. I'm early 30's, and also have a very low effort profile with only one picture. I've had a couple girls ask for more pics and when I tried to get around it they stopped replying.
Also I agree with Tomford. While my profile is low effort, I think the DMV area is also partly to blame. The last time I was in NYC I messaged 10 girls, got 6 replies, and they were all hotter than majority of the girls in this area and I have a 75 mile radius set. I would need to message like 50 girls to get 6 responses here.
This leads me to a question for the larger group about consistency. When you guys meet new girls, do you go in with the intention of seeing them consistently if you have a good time or is your goal just to hook up and move on to the next one?[/QUOTE]Did you keep seeing the two regularly *because* they hadn't been mentioned before?
For your second question: I go in intending to see them consistently. However if they are too pro-ish I get turned off and usually that's it (unless there's some type of novelty that draws me back a couple more times). There's some other criteria I look for too, but like I said in a previous post, I've only struck gold a couple times.
It's funny. If I put my business hat on and think for two seconds about how I would approach this game from the other side, watching the way some of these girls move boggles my mind. Who wants a flaky, dead fish in the sack who shows up late, can't fuck (or puts no effort into it), can't suck dick (or puts no effort into it), or has a multitude of "won't" to wade through? ESPECIALLY the ones who know this board exists. I'd want to be one of the ones nobody is willing to share because I'm that good, not one that's getting passed around or shit on because I'm crappy.
-
[QUOTE=TomFordModel;7605009]Go to NYC. My success rate has been 0% in DC the past month because its a waste of energy to text / meet the beastess of DC.
I'm old and busted but I'm still mire attractive than beasts in DC. They should pay me.[/QUOTE]I second this. This month has been awful and the quality of the girls around here is below average at best and it seems like it's going down. Some of them are delulu and think that they will be handed money and nice things just for being pretty (and most are that pretty either and they also lie about their age) andyhebonesbthatbare down to fuck, are just not that good at it at all. I know majority of them aren't pros but cmon, some of the performances I've experienced have been pathetic and embarrassing. Agree on NYC being way superior. Experienced that twice late last year and will be venturing out there in couple of weeks.
-
[QUOTE=Senbonzakura;7605372]Did you keep seeing the two regularly *because* they hadn't been mentioned before?
[/QUOTE]Huh? I see them because I like them LOL.
I brought up they haven't been mentioned here to highlight my lack of success as most of the girls I've managed to see are the "easy" ones that plenty of guys here have already seen.
