Saw Katie yesterday, nice young college girl, skinny with decent B-size breasts, OK ass, & nice legs. Slow BBBJ & nice tight pussy. Not sure I'll repeat but the overall experience was good.
Printable View
Saw Katie yesterday, nice young college girl, skinny with decent B-size breasts, OK ass, & nice legs. Slow BBBJ & nice tight pussy. Not sure I'll repeat but the overall experience was good.
[QUOTE=DeepBlueBc;5368775]Saw Avery is 4. 5* now. Too bad I missed out, out of range now.[/QUOTE]I can't even get them to respond to my emails or texts now. Website is still not done. Any info on what's going on with them?
MA finally got some real pics of Scarlett. The older ones in the bikini and on the bed are not her or are old. The new ones and the one she's holding camera is her. She's not 115 lbs by any stretch. Prob a 135-140 on 5'7 frame. Very pretty face and she's very nice and friendly. Idk why they used wrong pics at first when it just disappoints customers expecting a slim girl. She is not fat but she is not slim. She's a bit thick so they call it athletic. All firm, no jiggle but thicker. Anyway she's is a really great person and the experience was very nice with BBBJ skills that got a little too harsh for my taste. I only did L2 so not sure about the rest. But I would guess she's worth the FS. For me it's not a repeat experience as I didn't think she is my type having expected a slimmer girl and more of a GFE experience. But I would recommend her for others that like a thicker girl with a beautiful face and great personality to talk to etc. I just don't like it when agencies use photos that are fake or that are not a good exact representation. I feel it's a bit misleading given what we pay. MA is still a great agency though and quality is there so I will continue to use them.
[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5392305]MA finally got some real pics of Scarlett. The older ones in the bikini and on the bed are not her or are old. The new ones and the one she's holding camera is her. She's not 115 lbs by any stretch. Prob a 135-140 on 5'7 frame. Very pretty face and she's very nice and friendly. Idk why they used wrong pics at first when it just disappoints customers expecting a slim girl. She is not fat but she is not slim. She's a bit thick so they call it athletic. All firm, no jiggle but thicker. Anyway she's is a really great person and the experience was very nice with BBBJ skills that got a little too harsh for my taste. I only did L2 so not sure about the rest. But I would guess she's worth the FS. For me it's not a repeat experience as I didn't think she is my type having expected a slimmer girl and more of a GFE experience. But I would recommend her for others that like a thicker girl with a beautiful face and great personality to talk to etc. I just don't like it when agencies use photos that are fake or that are not a good exact representation. I feel it's a bit misleading given what we pay. MA is still a great agency though and quality is there so I will continue to use them.[/QUOTE]I totally agree with fake or heavily photo shop pictures. Veronica and Katya not there pictures. Veronica is cute little thicker not full GFE nice girl. Katya not her pics but she's very attractive. She is older not full GFE also very nice person.
Going to take the dive and hit up YWSM tomorrow.
Torn between Kylie and Grace. Kylie is more my style figure wise but I haven't heard to much about her performance. I want the true GFE they advertise but haven't heard if Kylie delivers. Anyone out there able to confirm on way or the other. Otherwise I may just have to go with Grace based on reviews.
[QUOTE=ADAvet101;5393007]Going to take the dive and hit up YWSM tomorrow.
Torn between Kylie and Grace. Kylie is more my style figure wise but I haven't heard to much about her performance. I want the true GFE they advertise but haven't heard if Kylie delivers. Anyone out there able to confirm on way or the other. Otherwise I may just have to go with Grace based on reviews.[/QUOTE]Last time I checked The other site full reviews they had good things to say about Kylie being a good GFE, but they kept saying YMMV. I'd probably recommend her.
[QUOTE=ADAvet101;5393007]Going to take the dive and hit up YWSM tomorrow.
Torn between Kylie and Grace. Kylie is more my style figure wise but I haven't heard to much about her performance. I want the true GFE they advertise but haven't heard if Kylie delivers. Anyone out there able to confirm on way or the other. Otherwise I may just have to go with Grace based on reviews.[/QUOTE]Kylie has a bunch of TER reviews. Most have her as an 8 in looks but her performance scores are pretty varied. Half 5's /6's, half 8's /9's.
Anyone else having trouble trying to get in touch with MA? I've tried p411 with Chloe, email, text, and haven't gotten any response.
[QUOTE=UnitedFan;5393267]Anyone else having trouble trying to get in touch with MA? I've tried p411 with Chloe, email, text, and haven't gotten any response.[/QUOTE]Its already been explained on this board and on their twitter page that if you don't get a response it means you were not approved.
I noticed that Scarlett / Audrey has ne pictures up with MA, but now I'm looking at next weeks schedulw at YWSM and they are getting a new girl Jenni who has the exact same pictures.
I may understand trying to get as much work as possible but is that normal for 1 girl to work for different agencies at the same time?
Decided to go with my gut and saw Kylie today. As most reviews say, she's hot but her performance varies. I can now concur. She's a solid 8, maybe even a 9 depending on tour taste. She's older than the site claims, but not overly so. Probably low 30's. But her body is that of a 22 year old. Man makes, but well done, perfect hour glass figure and a small squeezable ass. Her performance was meh. Not the best I've had but certainly not the worst. She was tired, but she wanted to please, so worthy of a repeat. Perhaps a second meet will further increase the mileage with her. Or maybe not seeing her on a Saturday morning. Either way, her body alone was worth the visit. Her performance was satisfying if not spectacular but room for improvement. Will repeat when she is back in town.
Heard through the grapevine that Kinga at ECE was fired. She isn't on the website any more so I assume it's true. Not sure what happened, she was fun.
[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5394701]I noticed that Scarlett / Audrey has ne pictures up with MA, but now I'm looking at next weeks schedulw at YWSM and they are getting a new girl Jenni who has the exact same pictures.
I may understand trying to get as much work as possible but is that normal for 1 girl to work for different agencies at the same time?[/QUOTE]It happens, or pictures get lifted from one site to another but provider is different. Also, some agency girls do a independent also.
[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5394701]I noticed that Scarlett / Audrey has ne pictures up with MA, but now I'm looking at next weeks schedulw at YWSM and they are getting a new girl Jenni who has the exact same pictures.
I may understand trying to get as much work as possible but is that normal for 1 girl to work for different agencies at the same time?[/QUOTE]It seems like some of the girls from CLM do this as well. I know Jessica from CLM went by Lexi at YWSM. New girl Isabelle at CLM goes by Gizelle at YWSM. Must not be an issue, they probably have certain clients from both groups that they want to entertain.
Anyone seen Isabella or Lindsey from Alena Chicago yet?
[QUOTE=ADAvet101;5394792]Decided to go with my gut and saw Kylie today. As most reviews say, she's hot but her performance varies. I can now concur. She's a solid 8, maybe even a 9 depending on tour taste. She's older than the site claims, but not overly so. Probably low 30's. But her body is that of a 22 year old. Man makes, but well done, perfect hour glass figure and a small squeezable ass. Her performance was meh. Not the best I've had but certainly not the worst. She was tired, but she wanted to please, so worthy of a repeat. Perhaps a second meet will further increase the mileage with her. Or maybe not seeing her on a Saturday morning. Either way, her body alone was worth the visit. Her performance was satisfying if not spectacular but room for improvement. Will repeat when she is back in town.[/QUOTE]I saw her a few weeks back too. I stayed away from YWSM girls for awhile as I seemed to always be disappointed with the girl's looks in person vs the pics on the site. Kylie was the exception. The pics are real and she is very hot. She's got that hot stripper body / vibe and is friendly but somewhat disinterested. I'm not a young stud so YMMV. I was hoping for a little more passion--even if it was faked-but it just wasn't there. And while others have mentioned getting a second shot, my experience was one and that's it. Not attempt to get another one (maybe I need to be assertive to ask for it, but it just seemed like that was it).
If her performance had matched her looks I think I might go broke, so maybe it's best I had a meh experience. Was thinking of trying Sam at YWSM. Anybody got some recent feedback on her?
[QUOTE=LuxiMudi;5395662]Heard through the grapevine that Kinga at ECE was fired. She isn't on the website any more so I assume it's true. Not sure what happened, she was fun.[/QUOTE]Its probably because the owner is weird. Surprising though since she has been there forever. I know the new girls are not lasting. Most leave within a few days. That tells you something. The pros they have are all mature and long in the game. MA has picked up a few of their younger ones. So did 262. Personally I don't use them because they don't have half hour option.
[QUOTE=Chiguyxxx;5397615]Was thinking of trying Sam at YWSM. Anybody got some recent feedback on her?[/QUOTE]Sam is hot, and her service is good. At least that's been my experience.
[QUOTE=BillFourFree;5380389]She was Mia when she was with CCG.
As I said before, she will show up with a new agency soon, keep an eye out.[/QUOTE]Aria is the most beautiful mixed Asian girl I've ever met. Hina is the second most beautiful mixed Asian girl I've ever met. They're both gorgeous, possessing Asian exotic feel and providing passionate PSE service. Since they bare resemblance, I think people who are fond of Aria should like Hina.
In comparison, their faces are both gorgeous. Aria's face shows 30% Asian. Hina's face shows 70% Asian and 30% Kim Kardashian. Hina's body is curvy and attractive while Aria's body is more curvy and more attractive. Hina is taller. Aria is younger. As for service, Hina and Aria both provide very passionate PSE, including Daty, dfk, BBBJ, cfs, cim. They're both submissive. Hina is more vivid and Aria is more graceful. Aria is a very good talker while. Hina can only speak very minimum English.
Hina works in an Asian apartment named Red Lantern. Her last day in Chicago is 20th. There are plenty infos in Asian apartments girls' thread.
Hey all:
This is a request and question, not a report: can anyone recommend any providers with hairy armpits? It's a particular like of mine. DM me if you know of any.
[QUOTE=MnCuckold;5400536]Hey all:
This is a request and question, not a report: can anyone recommend any providers with hairy armpits? It's a particular like of mine. DM me if you know of any.[/QUOTE]I think Sid Wild is in Chicago now. She used to be in Colorado. [URL]https://twitter.com/thesidwild?s=20[/URL].
Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).
[QUOTE=Falkin70;5400655]I think Sid Wild is in Chicago now. She used to be in Colorado. [URL]https://twitter.com/thesidwild?s=20[/URL].[/QUOTE]Minimum six hours and $1500. Wow, she must cater to a very specific / exclusive group.
[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5401020]Minimum six hours and $1500. Wow, she must cater to a very specific / exclusive group.[/QUOTE]Good god! Ridiculous.
[QUOTE=JoshLiban;5400777]Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).[/QUOTE]Totally agree about Estelle and Scarlett. And thank you for the warning on Nadia. I was planning to book her tomorrow but now I'm going to pass. If there is odor it is always lack of proper hygiene. Sometimes it's just before period hits which is also a no in my book because she will stain and gross. I hate it when they hide that.
So I guess I will try Veronica instead? Anyone seen her yet?
[QUOTE=JoshLiban;5400777]Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).[/QUOTE]Really? Thanks for the intel, was thinking Scarlet but now Estelle, still waiting for Inna, she was the best, but its been saying she will be back in a week or 2 for the past few weeks now.
I was planning to see Kinga at ECE, but she disappeared from website. Anyone knows where to find her?
[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5402696]Really? Thanks for the intel, was thinking Scarlet but now Estelle, still waiting for Inna, she was the best, but its been saying she will be back in a week or 2 for the past few weeks now.[/QUOTE]Agree with your reviews! Estelle is phenomenal and super sweet! Nadia tries to hustle you! Scarlet is tired of the game and heavy than her photos show. These are all true statements.
[QUOTE=JoshLiban;5400777]Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).[/QUOTE]I have seem Most of MA models and have to say I never ran into odor problem. I seen Nadia few times she was fresh and clean. That's the main reason I'm a repeat customer. Plus I love the variety that booker has now.
[QUOTE=Kyree;5403518]Agree with your reviews! Estelle is phenomenal and super sweet! Nadia tries to hustle you! Scarlet is tired of the game and heavy than her photos show. These are all true statements.[/QUOTE]I hadn't said any real reviews on these people, and I now I admit I must rethink the validity of these statements from you and Josh as the twitter feed says that these are lies from haters, considering the accounts have less than 10 posts each I think that these could just be haters trying to bring down MA.
[QUOTE=JoshLiban;5400777]Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).[/QUOTE]I agree about Scarlett, no DFK, very limited except BBBJ, rushed me out in 30 min too. Too pricey and limited services.
Don't want to get rushed or shorted on time?
Don't pay upfront.
You pay upfront she controls the session on what she will and won't do. And how much time she'll let you play. I don't understand why some of you guys let WGs control the session.
She insists on money upfront, walk out.
[QUOTE=TonyL1234;5404307]I agree about Scarlett, no DFK, very limited except BBBJ, rushed me out in 30 min too. Too pricey and limited services.[/QUOTE]Are these charlotte and summer from so many years back?
[QUOTE=ManiakFun;5327429]I don't think it's her. Audrey pic at CLM and before with MA never had these ones. They were different. Today's photo makes her look a little thicker than I had imagined from the original set. I was going to book but it made me hesitate, still sexy but maybe thicker? Kinda like INNA in that dress makes her thighs stick out thick so kept me away. I think she's pretty popular because day 1 I couldn't get an appt. But apparently those guys don't post here.[/QUOTE]Resembles Charlotte from Mce years back, and if it is, 10 extra pounds won't keep me away.
[QUOTE=Eocene;5405785]Resembles Charlotte from Mce years back, and if it is, 10 extra pounds won't keep me away.[/QUOTE]I saw / remember charlotte and saw Scarlett when she was Audrey, different women.
[QUOTE=DrPepper2976;5405949]I saw / remember charlotte and saw Scarlett when she was Audrey, different women.[/QUOTE]Cool that saves a trip. Would try if it was Charlotte. Guess she's long gone.
The photos do not do her justice. Amazing beautiful girl, perfect breasts and beautiful body. I was so shocked when open door! Very nice and friendly. Great GFE service. I highly recommend. See her soon.
[QUOTE=JoshLiban;5400777]Estelle. Very nice girl, nice butt and nice time (looks 8, performance 8).
Scarlett. No DFK, pictures are old, decent time, rushed me out after 35 minutes (looks 7, performance 6).
Nadia. Pretty girl with little bit attitude, vaginal odor DATY not recommended (looks 9, performance 6).[/QUOTE]Nadia is young and hot. She is the hottest MA girl IMO. She doesn't have any odor problems. She is fresh and clean. Her attitude is very good. She is totally involved. She is a nice girl, who is Vivid and smiling a lot. In fact talking with her is as much fun as any other things.
[QUOTE=Pepso;5403077]I was planning to see Kinga at ECE, but she disappeared from website. Anyone knows where to find her?[/QUOTE]She is on the schedule for today that I receive over Telegram so it seems all is OK.
Doe anyone remember Elaina from Michelles? Think she went independent but not certain. If she's still in the bus would like to know how to contact. Thanks in advance.