Streetwalker Reports

In all my years I have never know any SW to have drugs on her at the time she is standing around waiting to be picked up. This is my experience, and the only time I know of them having drugs on them, was early in my experience when I was dumb enough to have given them money in advance to get them a hit before doing the deed. Once I learned better and they began to know me, they learned I had a " NO DRUGS IN MY CAR POLICY" and they knew I was serious about it, PLUS I Never Ever gave them money up front.

Most SW's who are big drug user want that hit asap, thus they will almost never have unused drugs on them, just waiting & wanting to be used. Not hardly! Almost all the time the SW's you see are "JONESING" for a new next hit of whatever. They don't have the money nor support to keep extra drugs on them, waiting to be used. They will literally use up every last drug they have, getting high or share the remaining drugs with the users who have helped them, and any money made is taken by the pimp / protector, drug-boyz who they owe, and the drugs themselves.

You are more likely to have an Escort sitting around with extra drugs on hand than a street SW. Escorts use just as many drugs and have the very same drug problems. Because they charge more they can afford to buy more drugs and they possibly have fewer people they have to share them with. So the chance of them using more and more powerful drugs and getting ripped off or robbed is even greater, especially when you are going to an escort you don't really know and no one else does, and she is a traveling escort. So Beware Of That!

Now none drug users, and I mean those who just smoke weed may have weed on them, at anytime, but they don't often have that, because of course they use up everything they get, or share the rest. I am more worried about the arrogant attitudes of the CPD / Vice Squad / Task Force, in doing what they do. They know they are running over the line of what is legal but who is going to fight against them. Not on this subject. No one but "US" cares. And if they hassle or arrest the worry person the whole matter will disappear, and the records of everything deleted. Look at a few politicians / police officers, son & daughters & relatives, who have been caught, and never made headlines and if they were quickly silenced. Even some Officers have been caught and the event kept out of the public. Just ask Mona about giving Officers favors to stay out of jail, and left alone on the street at once time.

So there is always a risk of everything, but unless you allow any SW to pick up drugs before you do the deed with her, and keep them on her, then you run the risk. If she just got let off, by someone, and has money on her, she more than likely will bypass you and go to get her drugs and use them. If you take her to get drugs, then you deserve whatever you get.

You have too many men out there on the street action scene who are just too WIMPY, to be a street action person. You have to have a real back-bone, to be able to be aggressive and assertive, at the same time, and to be able to put any SW on her Azz if you need to, or to give the appearance that you will. These are the kind of people she is around everyday, and she is use to that type of treatment and person.

Showing her respect is a good thing, but she is Hard-boiled, and she will take advantage of you if she smells weakness, often because she can't help herself, she needs the money, and needs it quickly.

So being in a car with an SW, and her hiding her drugs in your car, is highly unlikely, and Never Ever Grant a Search of your vehicle. Let them force a search, and let their arrogant asses, violate your rights.

They really don't think you will pursue a suit against them, not if that means you will be connected to picking up an SW here in Cincinnati. Unfortunately they are RIGHT!

Be Safe, Reasonable, Use Uncommon Sense, and Especially Be Smart, and Don't Be Wimpy!

Lastly Where Is The Edit Button On Our Post. I Am Missing It, If It Is There?

[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1188093]But what Varoom has described is one reason I'm extremely reluctant to pickup SWs anymore. I never did much in the first place. At least until the heat dies down, it's getting a lot riskier than ever, and I'd have to think, as active as LEO has been over the winter, that they'll keep it up at least into the spring when the rain finally stops and the season really picks up.

Another reason is just information I've gotten at various places and times about how much heroin use has increased among SWs, and I think even escorts and users generally. I'm not sure exactly why, other than it's gotten cheap and plentiful. I suspect the pipeline created by the war in Afghanistan has something to do with that (ever see American Gangster?). You also can't tell by track marks, because the girls will shoot up all over the place to hide them (between the toes, etc.). I can't say that I'd trust these girls to be using clean needles, and the risk level of being with dogfood users is just a lot higher (condoms do break). I used to think I could easily spot a heroin user. I know that I'm wrong now, and I think it's a lot more common than some guys on here believe. I'm also not someone who believes any drugs should be criminalized, because it doesn't work. But heroin along with meth are two things that really ruin people's lives, and I don't want to fund the industry either.

Anyway, the guys still active on the street are a helluva lot braver than I am. And just out of curiosity, I can't get away from checking out the scene and providing any info I have that might be useful. But I'm kind of hoping I won't be tempted to be active in it again. [/QUOTE]

Mind you, I would never urge anyone to pick up this hobby if they have a weak heart or are obsessively risk averse. The risks are a plenty. The rewards are there too. You have to do your own risk/benefit analysis.

For some, cruising is like surfing the internet, hunting for the hot score. Or like fishing. A real thrill when you find one, but often the pickings are so slim as to be non-existent. If you rigorously follow the rules, the risk from either LE or SW/ripoffs are slim. (I have not had any problems worse than an unsatisfactory date for years).

If you can afford to pay out $$$ or more, and are willing to take THAT risk (LE is there, for sure) , you are more likely to get a decent looker on the escort scene, tho she may think more of herself than you do. If you go the SW route, results are more variable, but it is more likely that you will get a measure of gratitude with the service.

Me-I am of modest means, enjoy window shopping (tho today on the McM (Sunday 8 May) not so much) , and like to tell myself that I have developed an eye which can detect a sting, a wigged out junkie, or a decent girl who just wants to pick up some spare change and is willing to share her company with me for a bit. (BTW-if you think that an SW cannot be decent, you have not sampled enough wares yet.)

Study and memorize the rules (I posted them years ago before Jackson itemized them on a separate page)

I have attached a couple pix taken last month. Perhaps you recognize them from your cruising?

You can PM me if you know them. Of course, I have no idea if they are working girls or not...

I've taken to cruising Reading Road. Between Section and Galbraith. I have seen no less than 6 WSW'ers. I picked one up and gave her a ride. I didn't have time for a session. Her name was Sam. Late-20's with a phat ass. Said she can host after 10 pm at a local notel. Got digits and plan on trying.

[QUOTE=Mrrdfun;1190751]I've taken to cruising Reading Road. Between Section and Galbraith. I have seen no less than 6 WSW'ers. I picked one up and gave her a ride. I didn't have time for a session. Her name was Sam. Late-20's with a phat ass. Said she can host after 10 pm at a local notel. Got digits and plan on trying.[/QUOTE]all those girls are staying at the Drake Motel just before Galbraith Road. See tomorow's post under gerneral for my review on kim full service for. 55 nice looking lives out in reading I bet you could get a bbbjcob for. 30 to. 35 if you told her that Marmon sent you.

BTW the Darke Motel is a shit hole dirty stinks and a bunch of drugs.

How about a review on tonguetwister was that pussy really worth $$ Kim will give you a better BJ than sara for sure IMHO

Unfortunately I was sick last week and postponed my visit. Working on something this week. I will let you know.

There are a number of notels on that strip that girls work out of. The RPD cruises up and down Reading Road so you have to be careful but the girls look healthier than their OTR compatriots.

[QUOTE=Mr Boombastic; 1189954]In all my years I have never know any SW to have drugs on her at the time she is standing around waiting to be picked up.

So being in a car with an SW, and her hiding her drugs in your car, is highly unlikely, and Never Ever Grant a Search of your vehicle. Let them force a search, and let their arrogant asses, violate your rights.

(post edited)[/QUOTE]Probably an academic point here because I stopped hitting the brake over 10 yrs ago for SW's. I still like to peruse the neighborhood out of curiousity, kind of like voyering, I guess.

So where do these crack smokers hide their pipe when they take a ride? Also, if they have a pipe, it surely has residue on it, ever so slight but it still counts, or would in any indictment. As I stated earlier, at least this is my belief that 25% or more of these gals have something on them (paraphanalia at least) that could / would result in a chg if LE wanted to make one.

I always thought the same as Bombastic about these gals having more sense than to have drugs on them when being picked. Until the night a gal named "Angel" in Cov. Fired up her pipe in my car heading down Scott St. Wow. She said she was only taking a few hits off of it, no big deal. Screech, out her azz went. Unfreaking believable. As Earl Pitts used to say,"Wake Up America".

Regarding the search of your vehicle, permission or not, the law is pretty clear that if LE has stopped your vehicle with probably cause that you have, or about to commit a crime, they have the right to search you vehicle; w / o your permission. (not that I think it is right but the Sup Crt has ruled on this a few times, and it continues to muddle the line formerly known as your civil rights). It is the same rationale of how they can search your person, (pockets, purse, etc.) , that extends to your vehicle, like it or not, all presented under the guise of safety for the officer against hidden weapons or other contraband that may be harmful.

From Lawyer. Com. [url]http://criminal.lawyers.com/traffic-violations/Unlawful-Vehicle-Searches-and-Seizures.html[/url]

Fourth Amendment. The 'Automobile' Exception.

One of the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement is the so-called 'automobile' exception. When a car is stopped by police, a warrantless search of the car is proper under this exception if the police have probable cause to believe that it contains evidence of a crime in light of an exigency, or need for immediate action, arising out of the likely disappearance of the vehicle and the resulting destruction of the evidence.

In addition to exigency, the police must show that the vehicle was indeed mobile. All that must be shown to satisfy this requirement is that the vehicle is operational, or 'capable of being driven away. '

[b][u]EDITOR'S SUGGESTION[/u]:[/b] [blue]This is interesting, but you might consider re-posting it in the [u]Police Tactics and Legal Issues [/u] thread in the Special Interests section of the Forum where it will benefit the Forum Members who are specifically looking for this type of information. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

You're spot on with everything you've said. The only exception I'd make is that the percentage of girls with pipes is at least 50% and all the pipes have residue which will count as possession.

[QUOTE=Varoom; 1191046]Probably an academic point here because I stopped hitting the brake over 10 yrs ago for SW's. I still like to peruse the neighborhood out of curiousity, kind of like voyering, I guess.

So where do these crack smokers hide their pipe when they take a ride? Also, if they have a pipe, it surely has residue on it, ever so slight but it still counts, or would in any indictment. As I stated earlier, at least this is my belief that 25% or more of these gals have something on them (paraphanalia at least) that could / would result in a chg if LE wanted to make one.

I always thought the same as Bombastic about these gals having more sense than to have drugs on them when being picked. Until the night a gal named "Angel" in Cov. Fired up her pipe in my car heading down Scott St. Wow. She said she was only taking a few hits off of it, no big deal. Screech, out her azz went. Unfreaking believable. As Earl Pitts used to say,"Wake Up America".

Regarding the search of your vehicle, permission or not, the law is pretty clear that if LE has stopped your vehicle with probably cause that you have, or about to commit a crime, they have the right to search you vehicle; w / o your permission. (not that I think it is right but the Sup Crt has ruled on this a few times, and it continues to muddle the line formerly known as your civil rights). It is the same rationale of how they can search your person, (pockets, purse, etc.) , that extends to your vehicle, like it or not, all presented under the guise of safety for the officer against hidden weapons or other contraband that may be harmful.

From Lawyer. Com.

[url]http://criminal.lawyers.com/traffic-violations/Unlawful-Vehicle-Searches-and-Seizures.html[/url]

Fourth Amendment. The 'Automobile' Exception.

One of the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement is the so-called 'automobile' exception. When a car is stopped by police, a warrantless search of the car is proper under this exception if the police have probable cause to believe that it contains evidence of a crime in light of an exigency, or need for immediate action, arising out of the likely disappearance of the vehicle and the resulting destruction of the evidence.

In addition to exigency, the police must show that the vehicle was indeed mobile. All that must be shown to satisfy this requirement is that the vehicle is operational, or 'capable of being driven away. '

[b][u]EDITOR'S SUGGESTION[/u]:[/b] [blue]This is interesting, but you might consider re-posting it in the [u]Police Tactics and Legal Issues [/u] Thread in the Special Interests section of the Forum where it will benefit the Forum Members who are specifically looking for this type of information. [i]Thanks! [/i][/blue][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mrrdfun; 1190989]Unfortunately I was sick last week and postponed my visit. Working on something this week. I will let you know.

There are a number of notels on that strip that girls work out of. The RPD cruises up and down Reading Road so you have to be careful but the girls look healthier than their OTR compatriots. [/QUOTE]Correct. The Drake hotel is not the main hotel that these SW's on Reading stay at. Actually, after the Drake was busted a few years back, it's probably one of the lesser ones they use now. Not only does the RPD patrol, but a lot of Sheriffs. You have to be careful because there are tons of spots for them to hide on that strip (behind buildings and back parking lots). I too have found a cute young WSW recently in that area. She went by the name Sarah. Very soft spoken, cheap, agreeable, cute, young and most importantly good BBBJCIM.

Another one I've seen just recently is one who goes by the name Chrissy. Found her in the Walnut Hills area. She's a younger WSW who I'm afraid is fast on her way to being a strung out Mcmicken crackhead SW. I have to say it was by far the absolute BEST BBBJCIM I've ever had from a SW so far. It was like an art form, unrushed and complete with a little moaning. I've seen her twice now. First time I thought I found a permanent provider. Second time she had to get dropped off at her dealer's place first before we began. It's a shame she had to get me a little out of my comfort zone, but again it was a fantastic BBBJCIM afterwards. Here's her breakdown:

Looks. 7.

Attitude. 9 (minus one point for crack shenanigans)

BBBJCIM Performance. 10.

Smell. 10.

Hair. 9.

Cleanliness. 9 (again minus one for crack addiction)

There seems to be quite a few new faces out there including diamonds. Although they probably won't last long, others will be popping up here and there. You have to catch them when they first start out. They quickly become Mcmicken garbage.

Couldn't help myself and hooked up with Sam from Reading. This girl is better than a diamond in the rough. This chick is no SW. Very hot body once you strip the clothed off and the attitude, wow. Will be tapping this again. She's not going to take. 2. She wants no less than. 4 or. 5 and let me tall ya, I'm all over it. This girls is better than all but 1 or 2 escorts I've been with. I'm not kidding. She works a regular job ao only available nights and weekends. She's trying to get an apt. Trusted sr's pm me as I have digits and clothed pics. Others don't bother because I'm not going to risk this one.

Well, this didn't take long for her to make the jump from walking down Reading Road. To this:

[url]http://cincinnati.backpage.com/BodyR...718-23/7011255[/url]

I don't know what she's decided she's going to charge now but it seems that this changes everything. She's 28 BTW, not 23. I hate it when the pull this crap.

Special thanks to Ceenote for the heads up on the BP listing.

Didn't see where anyone reported this. Looks like they have nothing better to do.

[url]http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/local_news/police[/url]%3A-prostitution-ring-broken-up%2C-83-year-old-among-those-arrested.

With the weather I"m sure it's just the start.

With following rules you can avoid being among them.

Be safe.

MM

[QUOTE]2) It does look like Reading is a hot zone, and it has the advantage of having a lot of jurisdictions without as much experience and resources to be going after SWs or mongers. The other advantage is that there aren't many residents right along there, so not as much pressure to step up LE. One problem in McM and LPH is that there are residents and neighborhood associations who will keep bringing pressure for enforcement. And, let's face it, there is no organized opposition to enforcement really. I always thought maybe there should be a HO-PAC. Hedonists Opposed to Police ACtivity. [/QUOTE]Oh they know what they're doing and Hamilton County Sheriffs are wise to what is going on. True, hardly anyone lives on Reading there, however there are a lot of churches and those are almost worse. LE lack of experience with SWs and mongers is almost worse, because then they like to tack on charges like they just made their career. I don't like to fool around in Reading as LEOs are pretty much like the ones in Cheviot, if you don't live there obviously you shouldn't be there and they will find something to charge you with. I've had the old night stick broken taillight BS pulled on me there.

I made the cruise up and down around 9 last night, and saw absolutely nothing. Mind you, I usually cruise in daylight so that I can see the merchandise better, and do not like it when I cannot see LE more clearly as I case the layout. But all I saw was a possible SW in deep make out session with a brother in front of the Imperial Theater.

I have never seen it quite so empty.

[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1191664]First, on the news front, it looks like a big haul of SW and monger arrests early last night. I'm not sure where, but I think most of the girls are McM regulars, with at least one pickup from one who hangs more in Walnut Hills. I think. (More on that one later). All of them brought in between 6 and 9 it appears.

There were more guys taken, on a mix of soliciting and loitering to solicit, than girls it looks like.

One of the girls picked up was the HIV-positive SW from last year. She was Jean Settles, but was booked under the name Jean Coman this time. It's not clear whether she was picked up on old warrants or new paraphernalia charges. Looks like she was recently evicted. Sad story, but obviously stay away. Can't post the photo right now, but someone might want to.

On the other commentary:

1) Agree, they're not that likely to be carrying drugs when you pick them up. Because if they already had the drugs, they wouldn't be out usually. But your chance of them ditching paraphernalia in your car is significant. So many of them get arrested on the same charges so often and never show up though that I almost wonder if any of them care anymore.
[/QUOTE]

Greetings,

I did the stroll down Reading Road. On my way home from work yesterday and today, and I didn't see any girls out walking. I do believe that there are SW's that stroll there, as I've seen a few girls walking that stretch before I got into the hobby.

Anyway, I took a little drive up and down McM today, saw one SW and about 4 cops cruising through the area. Def too hot for my liking.

Also perused Linn. Saw one WSW doing her makeup, but all of the LE left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I ended up deciding to take my chances with a girl from craigslist and play it safe.