Focusing on demand is wrong
[QUOTE=SuStar;6044802]The idea that legalizing or decriminalizing commercial sex would reduce its harms is a persistent myth.
Many claim if the sex trade were legal, regulated, and treated like any other profession, it would be safer.
But research suggests otherwise.
Countries that have legalized or decriminalized commercial sex often experience a surge in human trafficking, pimping, and other related crimes.
[URL]https://www.demandabolition.org/research/evidence-against-legalizing-prostitution/[/URL][/QUOTE]Having lived in a country were prostitution was legal I can tell you that they do not have our problems. They do not have prisons overflowing or hyper militarized police. A big part of that is not legalized or decriminalized prostitution or drugs but how different our cultures are. The failed Nordic Model can only be implemented through police surveillance, which harms society as a whole. People will say that in countries were prostitution is legal you have a surge in trafficking and that has been shown to be a lie. When studies are done it always comes back to a bad boy friend who lets his S / O do sex works and lives off the proceeds. All parties arrested in the Robert Kraft massage parlor joke were consenting adults and should not have been subject to any police action. Many of the Nordic Model lovers are feminist who want to harm men, and will sacrifice women to do so, and people who think they can control other people's behavior. It will never work and it will just cause harm.
Another understatement of the century Cleve
[QUOTE=CleveLoser;6045372] So is working at McDonalds and the vast majority of jobs.[/QUOTE]As a former low ranking employee and low ranking manager of various fast food joints and greasy spoons who slaved away for sometimes 65-75 hours a week, I can say for a fact this is 100 percent accurate. The legal system makes these hookers unemployable, when I can say for absolute fact that they would have been better employees then half of the mouth breathers that worked underneath my position and above my position. But as you said, why would they want to slave away for chump change when they can lay on their back for 100-200 an hour? Especially when, and I can speak from experience, if an idiot, that makes Beavis and Butthead look smart, but flukes into a high position sees you are intelligent, they will do everything they can to hold you back. Why would they want to deal with that shit when they can be self employed? I don't have a pussy, I have to work those type of jobs, they don't. But when I'm off work, I'd much rather spend my money and time on things I enjoy rather then being part an exploitative legal system in divorce court at this point in my life. Or married to some woman that fucks around on you while you're paying all the bills LOL. Got plenty of time for that when im old. At least hookers are honest about who they are, half of these broads even in high ranking positions marry dudes for money and divorce, that's prostitution when you boil it down, its just not as direct!
"Skipthegames" is a very fitting website name isn't it? Skip the games, of divorce court, strife, and being married to the wrong woman. The risk in return all depends on how you play your cards. Some end up in prison using the site, others, such as government officials and high ranking officers use it because they are either bored or have a sexless marriage and use it responsibly, and some just love the game in general and know how to play, and end up legends like myself and many of us in our community here in the bowels of the internet. Despite being a couple decades old and our country falling apart, this song still rings true today.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7raKBrwBvc[/URL]
C92.
Poor fellow is getting forced
[QUOTE=Mavrick62;6050639]Please take your nonsense out to the "News and Media Reports Forum . . . Just please don't force your BS on those of us that come to this forum for it's stated purpose.[/QUOTE]So the problem for you is not that some posts here keep you from reading what you want.
Nor is the problem that you are not able to ignore posts that you don't like.
The problem is that some of what's posted is annoying you.
Perhaps you should ask what about the content of those posts is so unsettling.
Perhaps you are loath to examine the possibility that buying sex may be harmful.
For the record, the purpose of this forum, per the FAQ, is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.
"Looking for sex" is not an endorsement of "buying sex".
"Buying sex" is prohibited by Ohio law.