Printable View
[QUOTE=tedb141]Speaking of far east memories. Saw Yoyo at Krogers in Ferncreek on Saturday with 2 children. She acknowledged me and went on about her business. Same quirky attitude and goofy smile. Still has a great body.[/QUOTE]
If you see Yoyo again, PLEASE see if she'll tell you where her sister Linda is.
[QUOTE=Graf 61]If you see Yoyo again, PLEASE see if she'll tell you where her sister Linda is.[/QUOTE]Graf,
Saw them both about 8-10 months ago in the parking lot of Uno's in Fern Creek. Guess they must live in the area due to frequent sightings. Did not approach them since I was with someone, and did not feel like spending the rest of the day explaining previous habits. If I recall correctly wasn't it Linda who recently had a baby and was quitting soon before the crackdown?
[QUOTE=tedb141]Graf,
Saw them both about 8-10 months ago in the parking lot of Uno's in Fern Creek. Guess they must live in the area due to frequent sightings. . . If I recall correctly wasn't it Linda who recently had a baby and was quitting soon before the crackdown?[/QUOTE]
Linda had a baby a few years ago. She worked at Olympia until it closed.
I had one session with the two of them at Far East and one other with them and Cindy not to mention all the solo sessions, especially with Linda. Those were the days.
Recently went to see Amanda for the 1st time. Several points to be made about her, and it's a mixed review. Overall, not a bad value, I will say that up front...I've paid more for less.
First the good:
1) Huge, nice tits. These puppies are not only big, but they have good shape, not saggy like you sometimes see. Genuine (real) D cups.
2) Good technique. This gal knows her business, nuff said.
The bad:
1) Beer belly. I don't remember any of you guys ever reporting on this about her. Maybe it's a new development, but I doubt it.
2) Bad teeth. I had this vision in my head of a woman with her dental shit together. Sorry to say it's not true.
3) Not cute, even a little bit. Again, I had this vision of a cute/pretty gal since it's never been mentioned on here otherwise.
4) The non-stop talking. Now this has been reported on here, so it was no surprise. It wouldn't be so bad if it went from one subject to another, but it's just on and on about the same damn thing.
Maybe I'm just too picky. What do you guys that have seen her think? Am I wrong here?
Max
Hello All,
I searched through the forum archives on Amanda, and I see that bbbj has been had at least by two different mongers, back in 2003. Does anyone know about this happening in 2006? Repeat customers maybe?
Forgot to mention these earlier: my previous SW & SC stories were set downtown. Heh, the bouncer is willing to walk clients to the ATM for safety. Cool guy. This SC has never been mentioned here or on wsg dotOrg. Let's try to leave it at that.
Thanks!
Lope
I've never had more than a manual release from Amanda.
Hmm, beer belly. She wasn't a waif, to be sure, but I didn't notice a big gut. Of course her chest... Hmm. I don't know, if she had one, it didn't stand out to me.
I also didn't take much notice of her teeth.
As far as looks. Good point. She's not a beauty; I think she's not young, at least in her 40's, but possibly 50's. I didn't find her ugly, however.
The talking. Yep.
Amanda has some good qualities. She's reasonable and she's skilled. I saw Sara advertising in LEO again. She's a bit more expensive, but every bit as skilled and I think she actually is pretty.
Stuck on business for a couple of weeks in Bowling Green. Not much of a town except I need to be here! From VA/NC area, where I usually post.
Anything you all can help me with, I would be very appreciative. Sorry for the duplicative post. Indy's, basic locations? I have RTFF and can't find anything.
Mark
All the talk of the crew of the old Far East got me to thinking about how long it's been since I had anything worth posting. My last great time at a amp was at FE the day the roof blew off. Since then it's been lackluster hit or miss with what few mp remain, sc's aren't my thing and I'm to chicken to look for sw's. Hell fellows it looks like the hypocrites are winning.
Don't get me wrong guys, she's a good value and knows what she's doing. But, I generally don't like to pay for a gal (yes, there are exceptions) that I wouldn't pick up in civilian life, and I don't think I would go for her.
I wanted to let you guys know about bad as well as the good. Yes, the belly is pooched out there big time now. Maybe it's a new thing, but it's there. Someone told me she might have had another child not too long ago. That might explain it. And the teeth are definetely a mess...hard to miss.
Max
While I haven't been in there in several months, I can't say if this has been normal ---- but things at Bottoms up seemed to be getting back to the way they were a few years ago.
Meaning the ladies were rather forward, even on stage.
Unfortunatly I'm not so eager to get down there as I used to be, with all the talk about them having cameras even in those back rooms, and some of the dancers I know pretty well in other clubs telling me LE is still squezzing them pretty good --- I don't know whats true and what isn't as far as that stuff goes, but altogether its enough to make me think twice. Anybody else care to comment?
I believe that BU has returned in fine fashion. As for cameras, I don't put much stock in their use at BU. The attitude now is the same as it was before.
This is good news for us. You will see some reports from time to time of some of the new girls that don't play in the reindeer games but for the most part, all is good.
Speaking of cameras, some of the girls at GL were complaining that customers that were buying bottle after bottle were being monitored on camera and approached about their behavior. This is not surprising however because GL's management has always been intelligent challenged. Thank goodness for Amber, Pam and the other girls that have made GL worth it over the years.
Enjoy!
Glad somebody agrees with me.
One tell tale sign beyond my interactions with a couple of the girls, is simply some of them that were there. If you've been there over the years, like me I'm sure you've noticed some that are basically only there when things are good.
I agree with Username, it does seem some of the old favorites are back.
It makes me wonder where they have been hiding out?
I'd like to touch on enjoysthelife's statement about GL.
Basically I kinda agree that it doesn't seem like they know what they are doing.
Right after the crackdown in 04, the place got busier because they were basically the only place left in town with even hands on type dances.
It pretty much stayed with them busier than BU in terms of customers, and dancers, until recently it would seem --- now its the other way around, multiple girls and guys at BU, GL is a ghost town. Though I can't speak for amber and pam, since I usually go to these places in the day, I can assume they are night ladies because the names aren't ringing a bell.
Some of GLs problem currently is in recent months they have seemingly been discouraging activities in the back --- whilest BU obviously is back to letting it happen.
So, point is, for the time being make a point and don't go to GL, get to BU while the getting is good -- who knows how long it will last.
[QUOTE=Username]Though I can't speak for amber and pam, since I usually go to these places in the day, I can assume they are night ladies because the names aren't ringing a bell.
.[/QUOTE]
Amber is the blond bartender and Pam is the dark haired waitress. They have been working nights for 20 something years. The girls come and go but they stay.
SC management almost always seems to act in a way contrary to building business. If your club is busy then cut out what made it so (the extras, drive the girls away by taking more of a cut, etc.). if your club is dead, then raise bottle prices (a monumental tribute to TB). A lot of girls have been left town because of the enviornment.