K-girls, pictures and videos
[QUOTE=Relahw;7525620]I saw "Amy 2" a while back and was wondering when someone would report on her. Her performance and effort was fantastic she really did all she could to please.
What I was a little taken back with was her apperance. I know all these BI photos are heavily edited but this girl didn't resemble them whatsoever. Her body was kinda frumpy, overweaght I just didn't find her that attractive or up to par with the rest of the offerings BI has. She did make up for it in service and I guess we all have different tastes.[/QUOTE]The reason K-girls use only fake photos on their profiles and are not camera friendly is because they have families back home who think they're working in convenience stores. At least that's what they tell me.
This "no pictures" rule translates to social setting. I suspect those of us who went out with them, or have them stay over in their homes either before or after their work stints in Boston, experience the same thing. At least I did. The minute I'd offer to take a picture of the two of us all clothed and kosher, whether at home or in a restaurant, I get the same no no no. You can swear up and down that it's for your consumption only and you'd think, they already trust you enough to crush at your place, but if you want to take pictures with their camera, that's fine, but not with yours. That's considering that they know that we're friends on FB, and I have plenty of access to their real photos in all kinds of non-work related settings. I found it really annoying.
If anyone had different experience, I know I'd be curious to hear it.
That being said, I remember how both BTT and Boston temptations used to advertise either modeling photo shoots with their "models" or filming sessions, for a fee of course. There is got to be somebody out there who took them up on it. Do you think you could you tell us what happened?