Cooperman is right. I pay Kelli $500 cash money to fuck me for 2 hrs and I do it alot. How you like them apples?
Printable View
Cooperman is right. I pay Kelli $500 cash money to fuck me for 2 hrs and I do it alot. How you like them apples?
[QUOTE=Hamrsblonz;1567478]Cooperman is right. I pay Kelli $500 cash money to fuck me for 2 hrs and I do it alot. How you like them apples?[/QUOTE]Seriously?
Yeah, I'm serious and I'm going to keep "paying her that" until she gives up the business. So, you liking them apples yet?
[QUOTE=Hamrsblonz;1567478]Cooperman is right. I pay Kelli $500 cash money to fuck me for 2 hrs and I do it alot. How you like them apples?[/QUOTE]Well when she returns to Florida because of your fucktard proclamation enjoy you time with Missy Squirtz.
[QUOTE=OneOfTheGuys;1569232]Well when she returns to Florida because of your fucktard proclamation enjoy you time with Missy Squirtz.[/QUOTE]That's why we lose so many of the best pretty & sexy girls from this business: because even if they like dick they hate having to put up with dickheads!
[b]I also don't believe (regardless of "Cooperman" being an attorney) that the limitation that "[u]they can only bring any charge for any misdemeanor if the cop actually witnesses the offense being commited[/u]" applies [u]if[/u] (1) [u]the perp' openly & publicly confesses to commiting it[/u]; or (2) the cops have other corroborating direct forensic evidence (DNA, electronic or financial records, fingerprints, [u]etc[/u]!) [/b]
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely antagonistic[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
Here we are in the MP forum bickering about an escort because of some legality of terms used in hobbying.
*insert reprimand about going off-topic in the wrong forum*
Alright can we go back to MP talk? Anyone have a chance to visit Katrina lately? Thinking of biting it soon if the fruit is juicy.
[QUOTE=Cooperman;1567359]As a lawyer, I can tell you "no". Prostitution is a misdemeanor. To arrest on a misdemeanor, a cop has to actually witness the crime. I can post on here day and night that I paid so-and-so $$$ to fuck the shit out of her and there is nothing LMPD could do about it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kyowa; 1569336]That's why we lose so many of the best pretty & sexy girls from this business: because even if they like dick they hate having to put up with dickheads!
[b]I also don't believe (regardless of "Cooperman" being an attorney) that the limitation that "[u]they can only bring any charge for any misdemeanor if the cop actually witnesses the offense being commited[/u]" applies [u]if[/u] (1) [u]the perp' openly & publicly confesses to commiting it[/u]; or (2) the cops have other corroborating direct forensic evidence (DNA, electronic or financial records, fingerprints, [u]etc[/u]!) [/b][/QUOTE]I agree with you here Kyowa. I wanted to question Cooperman on that when he wrote it, but was afraid of getting my ass chewed in half by him as I've seen him do with others. Truth is, a misdemeanor does not mandate an "in presence" requirement, meaning the officer does not have to witness it to have probable cause to charge a crime.
A side note: A first offense of prostitution is a misdemeanor. A second offense or more of prostitution is a felony.
I also can't help but recall that My1501 was investigated based on probable cause from this board's postings of "happenings at that location." If anyone wants to challenge this, I'll find the newspaper article to back it up. I would do it now, but I have a conference call any minute now and don't have time to fool with finding it.
[QUOTE=Ixmeofne; 1569425]Here we are in the MP forum bickering about an escort because of some legality of terms used in hobbying.
*insert reprimand about going off-topic in the wrong forum*
Alright can we go back to MP talk? Anyone have a chance to visit Katrina lately? Thinking of biting it soon if the fruit is juicy.[/QUOTE]This isn't bickering. This is discussing, educationg, informing and helping one another stay safe. I see it as necessary for the protection of everyone. If you don't understand that I am sorry, but for the sake and safety of others. Pleae let this information be posted and let others take caution and or necessary steps to be a safer player in the hobby. Thank you!
[QUOTE=Ixmeofne; 1569425]Here we are in the MP forum bickering about an escort because of some legality of terms used in hobbying.
*insert reprimand about going off-topic in the wrong forum*
Alright can we go back to MP talk? Anyone have a chance to visit Katrina lately? Thinking of biting it soon if the fruit is juicy.[/QUOTE]I fully agree with you. I have very little doubt that my phone number was among those found at my1501. Did it make me nervous, no. The number is a dead end and I have a new one now. I would have had a new one regardless, that's just what I do. Look, you guys can spend all day worrying about how to protect yourself from every conceivable outcome. OR you can take a few common sense steps and spend the time taking about getting some pu$$why!
I choose the latter. I have seen Katrina off and on for the past several years. She used to allow roaming, but now seems to limit to above the waist. She is still great, sensual, dirty talk and above all great natural titties. She is cool with Russian too. Still only does half hours. I can also highly recommend gabby and Mariah from the same shop.
Has anyone seen Ashley at bowman? I know it's Ivan's, but her pics look good.
[QUOTE=Ixmeofne; 1569425]Here we are in the MP forum bickering about an escort because of some legality of terms used in hobbying.
*insert reprimand about going off-topic in the wrong forum*
Alright can we go back to MP talk? Anyone have a chance to visit Katrina lately? Thinking of biting it soon if the fruit is juicy.[/QUOTE]The discussions are on topic about Massage. Some of us are still learning. We will be waiting for your report on Katrina.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were [u]largely antagonistic[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue]
[QUOTE=WindsorCash; 1569486]I agree with you here Kyowa. I wanted to question Cooperman on that when he wrote it, but was afraid of getting my ass chewed in half by him as I've seen him do with others. Truth is, a misdemeanor does not mandate an "in presence" requirement, meaning the officer does not have to witness it to have probable cause to charge a crime.
A side note: A first offense of prostitution is a misdemeanor. A second offense or more of prostitution is a felony.
I also can't help but recall that My1501 was investigated based on probable cause from this board's postings of "happenings at that location." If anyone wants to challenge this, I'll find the newspaper article to back it up. I would do it now, but I have a conference call any minute now and don't have time to fool with finding it.[/QUOTE]Adding to my own posting in further example. A cop can arrest based on a 'complaint" so again he DOES [b]NOT[/b] Need to actually witness it happening.
[QUOTE=WindsorCash;1569696]Adding to my own posting in further example. A cop can arrest based on a 'complaint" so again he DOES [b]NOT[/b] Need to actually witness it happening.[/QUOTE]Well, other than those constantly bashing on Missy Squirtz for no purpose, but anyway I am not wanting to or needing to argue about this. It is all written down.
KRS 529. 020 classifies prostitution as a Class B misdemeanor. Under no circumstances does it ever become anything but. There is a statute raising it to a class D felony is the prostitute knows she has HIV. But prostitution without any other aggravating factors is a Class B misdemeanor and nothing more. First arrest; second; third; etc.
KRS 529. 040 makes promoting prostitution (that would be us as well as Ivan) a Class A misdemeanor unless the promoting is tied to providing premises in which two or more prostitutes are active, then it becomes a felony.
KRS 529. 060 says no one can be convicted of prostitution based on the uncorroborated testimony of the patron and no one can be convicted of promoting based on the uncorroborated testimony of the hooker whose prostitution was promoted.
Finally, to be convicted, you first have to be arrested. KRS 431. 005 states that a peace officer may make an arrest when: " (the) Without a warrant when a misdemeanor, as defined in KRS 431. 060, has been committed in his or her presence". There are several attorney general opinions that a police officer cannot obtain a warrant for an arrest for a misdemeanor unless the act occurred in his presence. However, a private person in whose presence the act occurred could swear out the complaint causing a valid warrant to issue.
So, let's recap. Hooking and the hiring of hookers is a misdemeanor. It is only a misdemeanor. You can be arrested for the commission of a misdemeanor if you commit it in the presence of a peace officer or pursuant to a warrant. For a warrant to issue, either the cop, or a private person has to have had the act committed in his or her presence. But, if the private person who witnessed the act happens to be the chick you just banged, you cannot be convicted based solely on her testimony (and, likewise, you can't get her convicted based solely on your say so).
But, note that should your favorite turn on you a swear out a complaint, the cops could have her testimony and what you (or I) wrote here about your dream. Thus, her testimony would not be "uncorroborated". But, what you write here cannot form the basis for an arrest since you are writing in the past tense and the misdemeanor would not have taken place in the presence of the officer.
[QUOTE=Cooperman;1569752]Well, other than those constantly bashing on Missy Squirtz for no purpose, but anyway I am not wanting to or needing to argue about this. It is all written down.[/QUOTE]Sorry about offending you by bashing your wife. Happily ever after to both of you.