Harsh? Or simply accurate.
[QUOTE=Swcdt;6291220]Some pretty harsh words coming from a guy that can't get laid without paying a prostitute. Sweet Megan is a very nice lady who offers a unique session that is very sensual. She's super sweet until you piss her off, just like anyone else. She doesn't like it when guys kiss and tell. She just wants a little discretion. Yes, she's older than some providers but her services are still needed and appreciated. Take some of your own advice and 'Diversify'..[/QUOTE]Ok man. Your viewpoint is respected. It's just not shared by me. Nor many of the other pay-for-sex posters who frequent this board. We all have different reasons that we have pursued this hobby. Just because some of us have chosen to pursue it, doesn't mean we can't get laid the more traditional way. We just prefer this method, or we use this method in addition to the traditional way. Some of us have come from a background of drama and contentions and simply wish to avoid that now. Some of us are articulate and intelligent enough to have other options but have chosen this. And some of us are of certain age where we don't prefer the more age-appropriate women we would attract in a more traditional setting. And some of us are hurt from a prior relationship gone bad.
And then there is the large contingency here that can and does get laid regularly in a domestic setting, either marriage or a partnership. But this pairing has either grown stagnant or dormant. While that's not my situation, it is probably the most common one. So, there are a lot of settings that make for a man to pursue this avenue to enjoy feminine delights. I'm glad you enjoy the more matronly experience, but I believe most who have posted here haven't shared your affinity for a quinquagenarian (50-59 year old) especially when it is combined with negative outbursts when some pseudo "don't kiss and tell" standard is violated.
So I'd ask: what did I say that was incorrect, errant, or misleading? I believe I have summarized the majority of posted reviews about "Sweet Megan". And most of us here have read her gangrenous retorts on this very board. We know what we know. We are fairly intelligent.
I'm happy you have found your ATF in this mature provider. But please allow the rest of us to accurately assess our own conclusions about her.
Recapture.
G2.
Multitude of viewpoints is helpful.
[QUOTE=Tommey;6327059]Some people like to debate things they claim they won't debate.
Me, I just post my take. No argument, not pettiness. If you don't like an opinion, don't argue, just state your's.
IMHO.[/QUOTE]I, for one, was glad to hear your opinion. In my case, not having an SO, your viewpoint doesn't resonate as much. However, my assessment is that the majority of mongers here do have an SO. Therefore, your viewpoint is helpful to many members here. The debate / dismissive reaction to your viewpoint falls into the whole "Wizard of Oz" deity megalomania, when an opposing viewpoint is met with derision or needless debate. Once again, the median intelligence level of the monger population is above average compared to the general population. Meaning the majority of us can see clearly when we are being duped, or told to "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain," or expected to believe a cockamamie expression / opinion just because of its source. We are smart enough to know better. Times here have changed. It's good to keep up. Thanks for your posts.
Ponder.
G2.
