I remember back in the day
[QUOTE=DogginUSA;7457911]Bring some meat to the table. We'll see after that.[/QUOTE]Most of us have helped each other at times. I remember I had TOFTT A FEW TIMES. Then it was pretty easy. We all know there are bad folks in this board so you have to be careful. Especially if it UTR or a Golden Goose.
Moved to the bullshit thread
[QUOTE=Pajcje;7473791]New to the area so can't really do that rn.[/QUOTE]Didn't want to get in trouble by the admin for arguing in the review threads, so moved this here. And honestly not trying to start shit, but the whole point we're making is your entire post history on these boards is asking for info. Not one review. So our advice is to go see someone, come back here and write your review. Lather rinse repeat a few times. Build a reputation and people are more likely to share with you. Everyone was new at some point.
To review or not to review, that is the question
[QUOTE=JoeB119;7481444]Sharing the 3 laws on kgirl reviews which captures what I was trying to say.
[URL]https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?37254-Korean-Agency-and-Independent&p=7431891&viewfull=1[/URL]#post7431891.[/QUOTE]
I write this as a mostly informative piece so if it appears cold or condescending that may be due to issues with my writing style and please ignore anything that may come off that way. Now onto the real response.
haha he's giving a heads up to NY I don't think he was there at time of writing, just like how you can see me in the NY forum too. It's spreading the word. However, it's still true both places are still better than here. I want to be very clear, I am [b]not[/b] saying review less. By all means review more. I'm not going to go against the guy that has shared more advice and probably seen more girls than everyone in this thread combined lol.
But here's the disconnect. Unless we collectively here in Nashville go after a girl repeatedly, it doesn't really build their rep. People treat the Kgirls differently for one reason or another, I'll avoid speculating on that. I've reviewed every J-girl I saw on here, not necessarily in this thread because of [i]reasons[/i] but it was still between here and the escort thread. I'll admit not every review is a positive recommendation, but most are.
After August though it became increasingly hard to actually make a review that stuck as far as TER goes. Here on USASG? no problem.
[list]Nana, I review her, she leaves next day, becomes Momo elsewhere. No TER.[/list][list]Kara, the only one I'll mention that I didn't see, but an ally wanted to see her. She left before his weekend appointment and that's the last time I heard from him. No TER.[/list][list]Mika, I gave a mid review, she stays like a whole week. 2 TER. Took on many names on her way to California and back. They had no clue who she was. I dropped an appearance hint after one of them saw her but it was more so because I wanted to ensure my eyes weren't that bad haha.[/list][list]Erika, good-ish review, but only review. Forgot when she left but it was next day or two. No TER.[/list][list]Rumi, good-ish review, only review again. She left next day. No TER.[/list][list][b]Sena[/b], good-ish review, she actually stayed. She already had a TER, so she was worth leaving a review on(she got 4 from Nashville). She also represented a turning point when I think things started to get better again.[/list][list]Bobo, a rare double review in that thread, she left next day. No TER.[/list][list]Yoyo, good-ish review, she left next day. Although to be fair, she told me that herself. 2 TER.[/list][list][b]Momo[/b], good review, she stayed some days. Misleading TER because someone reviewed her under Otani Momo (2 reviews), and 1 for a duo. But it still counts in a way so whatever. However, she goes back to NY with her normal Hano name and of course no Nashville reviews factored into that.[/list][list][b]Riri[/b], good review, she stayed some days. 2 TER.[/list][list][b]Momoka[/b], good review, she stayed much less but still a few days. No TER.[/list]
What does this summarize as? I got a 50% shot of [b]sending a girl away the next day if I see her[/b] and review lol. Most of those girls you'd have no idea if anyone else saw them on here in the agency thread. The ones that leave fast means TER won't create a profile for them, so even if I am early, I just don't waste my time writing a TER profile for them because I don't always want to be the same first name. And well as you can see, half the time even if I did, the review would get rejected because they aren't listed on site by the time they check it.
The early girls did get reviews, here at least, but it might have been because new place so people were incentivized to do more, and the early girls stayed longer which factored into that since they were trying to get the place off the ground. But in reality on TER it's still been middling(counts are Nashville only), [b]Yaya[/b] - 3, Mary - 1, [b]Harusaki Mei[/b] - 1, Otani Momo - 3? (the two new ones again are really Momo, one review mentions Mei instead), [b]Viki[/b] - 1, [b]Grace[/b] - 4, Haru - 1, [b]Karen[/b] - 6(Nashville champion), [b]Yuria[/b] - 2, and [b]Aona[/b] - 3.
Excluding Otani who I did not see, and Yaya, none of those girls left the day after I reviewed. The girl names in bold are the only ones that carried their name forwards at least once or they brought a TER number with them. If they didn't appear elsewhere or pick up any TER reviews after Nashville with the same name, I don't bold them either. Karen, Momo, and Momoka are partial exceptions, the latter two changed names but they have used their respective names or something close so I am giving them credit. And Karen, well she tried to combine profiles and I tried to help but TER told me no.
I'm not doing the work to trace most the girls I didn't see but I doubt there's a unicorn that just got a ton of TER reviews and simultaneously no one talked about her in the agency thread. So I do think reviews matter, just not necessarily ours. Maybe it's my fault, maybe I need to write one liners that I saw I had the best time ever and leave it at that.
But I think we got reviewers that are trying to be cautious here and there's no helping that. It hasn't been a common occurrence, but there's been at least 2 guys that just basically told me their opinion on a girl and never wrote it in the thread. And one was for Sana (don't worry it wasn't even a bad review). However, I also saw a middling review for Sana, and it only shows up on TER. Even my own TER reviews are misleading I suppose, like I'll list flaws but generally have a good time so the score is probably higher than someone more critical.
But that's what I do, that should not factor into why someone else doesn't review. So all I can do is what I do, leave reviews. I encourage you and anyone else to leave more. But given my particular stats above, I believe fresh faces like yours are more necessary to get people to try the girls out. It wasn't exactly my intent to sit this month out but seems like that lead to Sana's success haha. I'd feel paranoid a bit about it but well the last 3 girls I saw didn't leave immediately so I'm probably not [i]always[/i] the problem lol.
So with that, this is the partial refutation of those 3 laws with respect to [b]small[/b] places like ours.
Quantity - if the girls are unhappy with [i]who[/i] visits them, the number of them won't matter and they will get out of there. They will also simply skip over us. I've seen girls who should have been free to hit Nashville next, choose Columbus, OH instead.
Quality - if there's only one guy reviewing the girl, the redundancy law cannot apply. Can't match a girl to the right guy if the guy never let's the board know who he does and doesn't like. Further killed by the girl changing her name before or after preventing redundancy checks.
Intel - this law stands as is, but is also clouded by the first two issues. If I'm the only one who reports on Momoka, nobody else knows if it is true if they don't go. If they do go and then don't report back or rely on TER to tell the truth, then no intel is gained with girls staying an average 5 days and TER delays being 3 or more. If they go to a new city and swap names, the new city doesn't get intel unless I go out of my way to tell them. Otherwise they start the process anew.
Remember, even in the reply you linked to from him.
[QUOTE=Download X;7431891]
[B]The Laws of Kgirl Reviews[/B]
One reason I point out the better girls it is the polite way to weed out the bottom tier girls. I always say the greatest injustice is being tricked into getting in bed with an old woman. MILFs will use HYA ads with PS, and the only way to solve this great injustice is by reviews. I don't even point out the MILFs, I just review the handful of HYAs or the exceptions who are older but still beautiful.
When guys get more value, they are happier and come back. Then more girls in quantity and quality come back too. To review, these are the three laws of kgirl reviews:
[/QUOTE]
He doesn't waste words on a MILF. He points out the girls he likes (which makes sense, pointing out an an average girl across America is just tiring). And not all of our girls are MILFS of course, most aren't. But what they are is often a girl that never got intel, so he might not see them anyway because he is patient. I don't often get this advantage. There have been exceptions for girls I did not see like Sana and Ami.
But where were reviews for Jia, Kara, Emma, Jolie, Elsa, Miyako, or Sai? I can put Qiqi in that bucket too really. She got a review that came out after she left. That's 8 out of 36 girls with no timely intel. 13 out of 36 if you include ones I'm the only reviewer for across both sites (Haru, Nana, Erika, Rumi, and Momoka). I'd bet the number is higher concerning TER review post times compared to when the girls left but unfortunately I cannot prove that one.
I don't believe many, if any, come to America and their first stop is Nashville and they saw no one else beforehand. So we stay blind because connections can't be made. Even when they can be made, if other places don't review, it's the same difference. Sana was in [url=https://seattlemeng.com/view/25502]Seattle as Ayomi[/url], [url=https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-hanna-j]California as Baby Hanna-J[/url] (also LA as "Nana"), [url=https://nycsmilingeyes.com/view/25375]New York as Hitomi[/url], and now currently as [url=https://nycsmilingeyes.com/view/27621]Kiko[/url]. Try to find intel on any of those visits. I do know of one Hitomi review that exists at least but that's all. However, do you think New York knows about your Sana review with relation to Kiko? That's what I am talking about. Tbh they might know about her, but that depends on if PokerBrah finally considered us a worthwhile addition to his tracker lol and since she wasn't in his initial post, I'd say that's still a no.
In short, the solution is still to review more. But the problem remains with getting people to review more. So I'm not silly enough to believe I'm the key reason they are still open, but I do believe if I sit back and wait for guaranteed verified high ranking girls, I'll probably never see anyone. This is why I am still soft on some criticism. If we don't make friends with the sorta ok girls, why would they tell their hot friends to come here? Remember, SSG had Koreans too? They disappeared.
