General Reports

[QUOTE=MrEntertainer;1292523]I haven't posted before just lurked, but I can definitely vouch for Juliette's. Juliette is working on getting some more spinner types, but slim pickins in Jax. I've seen Viola, Tina, and Bianca. Best body was Viola for me personally since I like a girl who is a bit curvy, but she's still small only about 125 pounds. Bad part was no DFK or BBBJ. Her looks made up for it to me but YMMV. Best performance was Bianca, she used to do porn so she knows what she's doing. She's bigger than the first pics that were up of her, quite a bit actually, but once she got to Jax Jules took new photos, and called me to tell me she was bigger, and see if I still wanted to see her or see someone else. I like curvy so was okay with it. Tina & Bianca both full GFE, don't know about the other girls, think Nicola does CBJ too, but she will probably be my next pick despite that.[/QUOTE]I really can't believe that I just read all this, but since this is the general reports section. I find it funny that this agency just started posting this week, yet this new poster has the low down on every single girl and has been with 3 of them. Must be nice to be able to pay the rates they are asking in a week. One would think that somebody who spends that type of money would be all over the review sites. A newb just doesn't go out there and throw $7. 5 around. Just saying.

I'm going to assume that 'MrEntertainer' is just Juliette's version of 'Mahaubb' for FCC. It turned out to be OK for Mahubb because he came clean with the board and was honest and now he is known as a forum advertiser. However, what I don't appreciate is someone insulting my intelligence and thinking that they can make a fake profile acting as a client, and gain the trust of other people on this board, just to gain some credibility. I already helped this agency out by my pointing out that Asian Tina no longer works with FCC and is with Juliette's. I had already done a thorough review on here in the escort reports section, that helps to let everyone know they are legit. Plus, they did do an excellent job on the website, so I pretty much believed they were legit from the get go.

MrEntertainer. If you want to keep you anonymity, then thats fine but I suggest you just come clean early. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and the truth will come out in the future when you become a regular contributing member to the board. If I'm right, then you will either never post again, or you will contribute your posts, and they will consist of bashing competition, or boasting about the girls at Juliette's. Just sayin.

[QUOTE=Rapidspender; 1293501]I really can't believe that I just read all this, but since this is the general reports section. I find it funny that this agency just started posting this week, yet this new poster has the low down on every single girl and has been with 3 of them. Must be nice to be able to pay the rates they are asking in a week. One would think that somebody who spends that type of money would be all over the review sites. A newb just doesn't go out there and throw $7. 5 around. Just saying.

I'm going to assume that 'MrEntertainer' is just Juliette's version of 'Mahaubb' for FCC. It turned out to be OK for Mahubb because he came clean with the board and was honest and now he is known as a forum advertiser. However, what I don't appreciate is someone insulting my intelligence and thinking that they can make a fake profile acting as a client, and gain the trust of other people on this board, just to gain some credibility. I already helped this agency out by my pointing out that Asian Tina no longer works with FCC and is with Juliette's. I had already done a thorough review on here in the escort reports section, that helps to let everyone know they are legit. Plus, they did do an excellent job on the website, so I pretty much believed they were legit from the get go.

MrEntertainer. If you want to keep you anonymity, then thats fine but I suggest you just come clean early. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and the truth will come out in the future when you become a regular contributing member to the board. If I'm right, then you will either never post again, or you will contribute your posts, and they will consist of bashing competition, or boasting about the girls at Juliette's. Just sayin.[/QUOTE]I called and was verified but for the price I had to wait. When I read his post that be had seen 3 in a week I thought to myself the same thing.

Viola certainly had my attention until I just read that she was not GFE.

[QUOTE=Rapidspender; 1293501]I really can't believe that I just read all this, but since this is the general reports section. I find it funny that this agency just started posting this week, yet this new poster has the low down on every single girl and has been with 3 of them. Must be nice to be able to pay the rates they are asking in a week. One would think that somebody who spends that type of money would be all over the review sites. A newb just doesn't go out there and throw $7. 5 around. Just saying.

I'm going to assume that 'MrEntertainer' is just Juliette's version of 'Mahaubb' for FCC. It turned out to be OK for Mahubb because he came clean with the board and was honest and now he is known as a forum advertiser. However, what I don't appreciate is someone insulting my intelligence and thinking that they can make a fake profile acting as a client, and gain the trust of other people on this board, just to gain some credibility. I already helped this agency out by my pointing out that Asian Tina no longer works with FCC and is with Juliette's. I had already done a thorough review on here in the escort reports section, that helps to let everyone know they are legit. Plus, they did do an excellent job on the website, so I pretty much believed they were legit from the get go.

MrEntertainer. If you want to keep you anonymity, then thats fine but I suggest you just come clean early. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and the truth will come out in the future when you become a regular contributing member to the board. If I'm right, then you will either never post again, or you will contribute your posts, and they will consist of bashing competition, or boasting about the girls at Juliette's. Just sayin.[/QUOTE]I thought the same thing, a bunch of useless / unreliable reports lately.

"Arrived on time and texted Juliette, and she gave me the room # to go right up. Knocked on the door and was very happy to see that the girl in the photos was the one who answered the door."

Now how can he tell if it was really her when the pix are not that clear? In the review, he not only saw 3 in one week but according to review below, he saw her for 2 hours! LOL.

The pix are not that clear! LOL LOL LOL.

[url]http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1151859[/url]

[QUOTE=Rapidspender; 1293501]I really can't believe that I just read all this, but since this is the general reports section. I find it funny that this agency just started posting this week, yet this new poster has the low down on every single girl and has been with 3 of them. Must be nice to be able to pay the rates they are asking in a week. One would think that somebody who spends that type of money would be all over the review sites. A newb just doesn't go out there and throw $7. 5 around. Just saying.

I'm going to assume that 'MrEntertainer' is just Juliette's version of 'Mahaubb' for FCC. It turned out to be OK for Mahubb because he came clean with the board and was honest and now he is known as a forum advertiser. However, what I don't appreciate is someone insulting my intelligence and thinking that they can make a fake profile acting as a client, and gain the trust of other people on this board, just to gain some credibility. I already helped this agency out by my pointing out that Asian Tina no longer works with FCC and is with Juliette's. I had already done a thorough review on here in the escort reports section, that helps to let everyone know they are legit. Plus, they did do an excellent job on the website, so I pretty much believed they were legit from the get go.

MrEntertainer. If you want to keep you anonymity, then thats fine but I suggest you just come clean early. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and the truth will come out in the future when you become a regular contributing member to the board. If I'm right, then you will either never post again, or you will contribute your posts, and they will consist of bashing competition, or boasting about the girls at Juliette's. Just sayin.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jax411; 1293895]"Arrived on time and texted Juliette, and she gave me the room # to go right up. Knocked on the door and was very happy to see that the girl in the photos was the one who answered the door."

Now how can he tell if it was really her when the pix are not that clear? In the review, he not only saw 3 in one week but according to review below, he saw her for 2 hours! LOL.

The pix are not that clear! LOL LOL LOL.

[url]http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1151859[/url][/QUOTE]Is it the first review for that person on The othER site?

[QUOTE=JaxFire912;1293580]I thought the same thing, a bunch of useless / unreliable reports lately.[/QUOTE]Wow, you guys really know how to make a fella feel welcome. For the life of me I can't imagine why more people aren't rushing over to give information that was directly asked for on here.

So lets recap:

1. I told you Viola had a great body, IMO, BUT she's not GFE (everything covered and no DFK). Did anybody give this forum that information? Not that I saw.

2. I told you that Bianca was bigger than in her initial pictures on the site. I also said she was bubbly and was full GFE.

3. I did see Tina, but since she had previously been reviewed on here, I didn't give much info; however, she gave a great BBBJCIM. Honestly, had she not been Asian, I wouldn't have seen her, because I don't care much for really skinny girls.

Now, instead of being praised for giving pertinent information that one may actually use to determine whether they want to see a provider (GFE or not, true to pictures or not, etc, etc etc) , I get blasted. I tell ya, it was sure worth the time posting it.

As to the timing, I came across the agency's website over a month ago, so yeah, I saw 3 of her girls in the span of about a month. Less than 1 girl per week. If that shocks your sensibilities, I'm terribly sorry.

Yes, I saw 3 girls from the same agency because I had already been screened. If you like getting screened by different people continuously, thats on you.

Not even worth commenting on how I have that kind of money to throw around. If you don't, perhaps you should reevaluate.

These are not the first girls I've seen, but there have been enough reviews on the others to choke a horse.

Keep treating new posters like this and it'll just be the 10 of you old bastards giving reviews to each other.

And for a group of grown men (and I know some of you have been grown a long time) to use terms like "newb"? Wow.

[QUOTE=Rapidspender;1294066]Is it the first review for that person on The othER site?[/QUOTE]Yes it is. The reviewer also posted a new review for the other girls from that agency. Its an obvious promotion by whoever is trying to drum up business for the girls.

Review for this provider and by the same reviewer on here. A mess isn't it!

[QUOTE=Rapidspender;1294066]Is it the first review for that person on The othER site?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MrEntertainer; 1294090]Wow, you guys really know how to make a fella feel welcome. For the life of me I can't imagine why more people aren't rushing over to give information that was directly asked for on here.

So lets recap:

1. I told you Viola had a great body, IMO, BUT she's not GFE (everything covered and no DFK). Did anybody give this forum that information? Not that I saw.

2. I told you that Bianca was bigger than in her initial pictures on the site. I also said she was bubbly and was full GFE.

3. I did see Tina, but since she had previously been reviewed on here, I didn't give much info; however, she gave a great BBBJCIM. Honestly, had she not been Asian, I wouldn't have seen her, because I don't care much for really skinny girls.

Now, instead of being praised for giving pertinent information that one may actually use to determine whether they want to see a provider (GFE or not, true to pictures or not, etc, etc etc) , I get blasted. I tell ya, it was sure worth the time posting it.

As to the timing, I came across the agency's website over a month ago, so yeah, I saw 3 of her girls in the span of about a month. Less than 1 girl per week. If that shocks your sensibilities, I'm terribly sorry.

Yes, I saw 3 girls from the same agency because I had already been screened. If you like getting screened by different people continuously, thats on you.

Not even worth commenting on how I have that kind of money to throw around. If you don't, perhaps you should reevaluate.

These are not the first girls I've seen, but there have been enough reviews on the others to choke a horse.

Keep treating new posters like this and it'll just be the 10 of you old bastards giving reviews to each other.

And for a group of grown men (and I know some of you have been grown a long time) to use terms like "newb"? Wow.[/QUOTE]I don't think I've EVER commented when I thought a review was bogus. I'm 61 and my olfactory sense has declined through time but even I can smell BULLSHIT (Jackson-am I allowed to say BULLSHIT without losing my senior designation?)

I will gladly post a positive review if one of those girls will meet me at the starbucks of THEIR choice. I seek nothing else from anyone but a coffee ON ME at starbucks. If you are not the pimp for that site please pass this message as a courtesy to me. REMEMBER: JUST A STARBUCKS COFFEE for "your" credibility. By the way, please spare me the "I'm not their pimp / manager" and forward my request to their "pimp"/"manager" since you are so familiar with all of them.

Mr Entertainer is an entertainer for sure.

[QUOTE=MrEntertainer; 1294090]Wow, you guys really know how to make a fella feel welcome. For the life of me I can't imagine why more people aren't rushing over to give information that was directly asked for on here.

So lets recap:

1. I told you Viola had a great body, IMO, BUT she's not GFE (everything covered and no DFK). Did anybody give this forum that information? Not that I saw.

2. I told you that Bianca was bigger than in her initial pictures on the site. I also said she was bubbly and was full GFE.

3. I did see Tina, but since she had previously been reviewed on here, I didn't give much info; however, she gave a great BBBJCIM. Honestly, had she not been Asian, I wouldn't have seen her, because I don't care much for really skinny girls.

Now, instead of being praised for giving pertinent information that one may actually use to determine whether they want to see a provider (GFE or not, true to pictures or not, etc, etc etc) , I get blasted. I tell ya, it was sure worth the time posting it.

As to the timing, I came across the agency's website over a month ago, so yeah, I saw 3 of her girls in the span of about a month. Less than 1 girl per week. If that shocks your sensibilities, I'm terribly sorry.

Yes, I saw 3 girls from the same agency because I had already been screened. If you like getting screened by different people continuously, thats on you.

Not even worth commenting on how I have that kind of money to throw around. If you don't, perhaps you should reevaluate.

These are not the first girls I've seen, but there have been enough reviews on the others to choke a horse.

Keep treating new posters like this and it'll just be the 10 of you old bastards giving reviews to each other.

And for a group of grown men (and I know some of you have been grown a long time) to use terms like "newb"? Wow.[/QUOTE]As one of the owners of FCC I find it strange that you never chose to see any our our ladies since we have been around for over 3 months now. Unless maybe you have and we just don't know. Also, as for timing you said you came across that agencies website over a month ago. Very interesting since the site was not created until September 17th. 2011 according to the WHOIS information. And when it first came out some of those ladies were not on that site? So feel free to check out FCC, unless you're not allowed too.

[QUOTE=Wwpfl; 1292457]I was in Wacko's yesterday late afternoon / early evening and in talking to a couple of the girls found out that they were going to court next Monday. I appears as if a couple of weeks ago there was a sting operation at Wacko's and 19 of the day shift girls got tickets (some for "strateling"). Two got arrested for outstanding warrants. They put an undercover cop in the club for multiply days then came back at a later date with cops to issue tickets for events the undercover cop "witnessed". What a waste of time. Surpisingly neither of the girls seemed upset about it just kind of accepted it as a cost of doing business. It would seem that there should be a couple of laywers in Wack'os customers base that would take the case with "future dances" as a form of payment. I think he could show live video of just about any non strip club dance floor showing public dancing with "stimulated sex acts".

I don't know about you but I feel safer now.[/QUOTE]Most of the clubs have the same lawyer that represent the majority of the clubs in Florida. Easier to use Larry the Lawyer to get the girls a light sentence or just a fine.

http://www.facebook.com/stagenametrouble1988

22 will turn 23 in December; 5'8 slender with very nice rack, face & personality.

904-461-9896 stagenametrouble1988@yahoo.com

Lives in St Augustine Beach off A1A behind Finnegan's Wake Pub & Grill.

At 1st meeting recorded the fastest version of a Woody Allen movie and

a Steve Miller Band song ever witnessed by human beings.

Had no such prior accomplishments recorded in Florida.

Pm me for details!