Correction. I was thinking of Rachael vs Meghan. Fat levers post reminded me
A little correction to my post follows. Fatlever reminded me of her name.
[QUOTE=ChaphillMan;2906434]I saw this young independent blonde Friday mostly because I had been thinking about the review on Rachael (vs Meghan) and wanting to see a young thin woman.
[URL]http://backpage.com.raleigh.hoxnif.com/post/15460726/[/URL]
Her body is excellent and she has the prettiest pussy I have ever seen. She is super clean rubbing but of us with sanitizer on a wipe. Alcohol on the genitals is not that comfortable. No touching inside. Straight to a cover no sucking on her firm little tits. She said that I could not go all the way in so dog on the edge of the bed with her holding me back. I had her do the work and control her own depth as I watched watched. Very nice ass and athletic body with smooth skin. Fun to watch. She eventually tired. Not someone to repeat with but nice to see and touch.[/QUOTE]
Same charge, over and over -- looks great for police drug related arrest numbers
[QUOTE=JonMr2015;2906814]Doing another photo shoot on Mother's Day. Too far gone now I am afraid.[/QUOTE]To me the criminal justice system wants to charge some of these people over and over and over and over for the same charge so that they can meet certain numbers to get certain levels of federal funding for drug related crime.
She's been arrested for the same charge 3 times now: possession of marijuana paraphernalia. She actually made the last trial date for this going through an ordeal to get ride but the judge issued a continuance meaning that the trial was postponed and another trial date was given. I mean WTF, someone who has issues, has no money, no transportation finally makes it in and you tell them, come back at a later time.
Seriously not making excuses for these people but feel like there is a vested interest in keeping people going in and out the revolving door when funding is giving for drug related arrests. Some of them have multiple charges, multiple FTAs, when you finally get them to trial it should be finalized and possibly not just one charge but mulitple similar or minor charges at the same time so you're not wasting our tax payer money for a never ending string of FTAs, visits to the detention center, trials, etc.
It seems cheaper to try to get them some help then criminalize them. Check out this article on the Netherlands which went soft on drugs and as someone pointed out in the comments there what they did there is "more acceptable than the alternative and our current system of prisons, gangs, more cops, broken families and overdoses".
[URL]https://news.vice.com/article/only-in-the-netherlands-do-addicts-complain-about-free-government-heroin[/URL]