RE: Re: What’s the Criteria
[QUOTE=DukePV] The index is by no means meant to be comprehensive. In fact it is already getting bloated, and I considered cutting out all 2004 photos, but then oldtimers like Corrine and Krista started showing up!
Generally I like to include [b]young WSWs[/b] with a reasonably nice face & figure who work on the “K”. Naturally this involves a lot of subjective judgments…[/QUOTE]
The task you’ve set for yourself is truly a difficult one. Might I suggest that at some point, you archive a Photo Index? Then start a fresh index with girls active within the last three years, or some realistic time frame. The age of the picture shouldn’t matter as long as the girl has been spotted within the last couple of years or is known to still be active on the streets.
I would also suggest that you continue to include all races and nationalities. The girls on the avenue are mostly WSWers and HSWers. However, there are rare to be found BSWers. It would be more prudent to say a girl was excluded because of her appearance rather than her racial make-up. (If anyone knows of a cute BSW, with a nice personality, who works on Kensington Avenue, please point her in my direction.)
Keeping up with all of the Philadelphia photos can’t be easy. Even after doing my own search, though my own files, I over looked a couple of girls. I forgot to include Nelly (a long time provider) and Moyua (posted within the last year) in my list of missing girls.
You are so right, “this involves a lot of subjective judgments.” I, personally, have been happy with your selection up to now and will be happy with your future choices for inclusion, whoever the are.
CookyJar