Printable View
[QUOTE=Zipp531;7120111]Laylarose - [URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5afcb9ca-16e6-4b08-9356-bc897a2e8bc5[/URL].
Also, talked to Sophia, she also has a WYP profile. No car, asks for a compensated public meeting. No intimacy on first date.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/348d81db-99e8-4e3d-a89e-6d1242f77a3d[/URL][/QUOTE]In minecraft, I saw her 1.5 years ago. 4 for 2 times BBFS, no CIP, can't host. Nice body. A bit shy. Nice body. Would repeat if I didn't have to get a room.
[QUOTE=Rambo21;7121673]I was on Seeking a long time until I got banned. For those of you currently browsing the site, what is your response rate like?[/QUOTE]What did you get banned for?
Response rate is really good. Actual legitimate potential connections, not as good.
[QUOTE=Pppeeter;7122017]What did you get banned for?
Response rate is really good. Actual legitimate potential connections, not as good.[/QUOTE]I think a sugar baby reported me for offering PPM.
When I was active I think it took contacting at least 50 sugar babies to result in an actual first meeting.
[QUOTE=Rambo21;7122163]I think a sugar baby reported me for offering PPM.
When I was active I think it took contacting at least 50 sugar babies to result in an actual first meeting.[/QUOTE]So basically she though you lowballed her, got mad about it and instead of negotiating, she reported you LOL. Sounds like she was going to be a scam anyways. And its easy enough to make a new account.
Did everyone get that email from seeking today / yesterday? How they are going to combat fraud and scammers by making everyone that creates a new account, (and in the future all existing members) to take a selfie and send it in to verify you are who you say you are? Well, if that's the case they are going to lose a lot of customers I think. I know I won't be submitting a selfie for them to "verify" its me. No thanks, aren't they aware guys that are on it and using it are looking for discretion? Seems like a good way to tank your site. Sure, getting rid of the scamming / fraudulent baby accounts would be great, but it seems like there should be a better way of doing that than also making the "daddy's" take verification pics as well.
[QUOTE=Pppeeter;7126669]Did everyone get that email from seeking today / yesterday? How they are going to combat fraud and scammers by making everyone that creates a new account, (and in the future all existing members) to take a selfie and send it in to verify you are who you say you are? Well, if that's the case they are going to lose a lot of customers I think. I know I won't be submitting a selfie for them to "verify" its me. No thanks, aren't they aware guys that are on it and using it are looking for discretion? Seems like a good way to tank your site. Sure, getting rid of the scamming / fraudulent baby accounts would be great, but it seems like there should be a better way of doing that than also making the "daddy's" take verification pics as well.[/QUOTE]Was with fraudulent females, not the guys looking for fun, but it may help. It was a shitshow.
[QUOTE=WoozerBuck;7126813]Was with fraudulent females, not the guys looking for fun, but it may help. It was a shitshow.[/QUOTE]What do you mean? I don't believe they are just making the female accounts do the verification selfie. I know a guy who tried to make an account just the other day and it wouldn't let him because he wouldn't take a selfie.
[QUOTE=Pppeeter;7122496]So basically she though you lowballed her, got mad about it and instead of negotiating, she reported you LOL. Sounds like she was going to be a scam anyways. And its easy enough to make a new account.[/QUOTE]If you have a premium account and get banned then the address you used for your credit card payment is banned. They also store the I'd of the device you are using to access the site.
Maddy on seeking is also on CC. Recently divorced, but you will get serviced very well. Loves everything about being a sub, and following directions. She will listen very well, and can take a pounding, say thanks you, and go again. (You can get her and her friend in Shakopee area to double team you as well, her friend also loves the backdoor. I will state when both are sucking the meat, one on the balls and one on the shaft it is exquisite. (Don't ask for what the going rate is. I don't know and don't pay.).
Ivy. Cute little nurse type, I like her look. Intelligent, tiny, good fun little nips, and can also take a pounding. Can be found on Fet as well, and tends to be a size queen. That I am not, but still can get the female squirt machine to fire. (lookin for some sugar, but not my thing).
Enjoy.
[QUOTE=WoozerBuck;7126813]Was with fraudulent females, not the guys looking for fun, but it may help. It was a shitshow.[/QUOTE]As long as the daddies can keep their verified picture (s) private, I am 100 percent in favor of this. This should make finding legit sugar babies less time-consuming.
[QUOTE=Pppeeter;7126927]What do you mean? I don't believe they are just making the female accounts do the verification selfie. I know a guy who tried to make an account just the other day and it wouldn't let him because he wouldn't take a selfie.[/QUOTE]It was whoever was posing as the female gathering scammer deposits etc. One billion in fraud accounts and growing.
[QUOTE=WoozerBuck;7128073]It was whoever was posing as the female gathering scammer deposits etc. One billion in fraud accounts and growing.[/QUOTE]The site was in a no win situation. There's no cost-effective way to fight the scammers / bots and using people to vet accounts is expensive and time consuming at best. They'll lose a large % of their male client base but even so, it's mostly salt daddies like me that sign up for a month at a discount, survey the bowl, pluck a few out, and cancel. While it will be good to lose scammers, I'm curious how it impacts the market. Those 6-7. 5's will see massive decrease in the number of messages fueling their GPS and even the hotties will have a slightly smaller pool.
It may bring back some of the wealthier SDs who gave up due to the slog but I don't see how it results in anything other than a smaller base and increasing ways to charge. They'll start with more tiers (though Diamond is a joke) and monetizing hidden pics, boosted messages a la Secret B.
WYP already requires a public pic (or at least hid my multi-year old profile and won't allow me to message or even favorite anyone) which is ridiculous while still having a 'seeking discretion' options. Same owners so not surprising they are trying it here.
Hopefully a competitor will show up and disrupt.
[QUOTE=WiseTraveler;7129679]The site was in a no win situation. There's no cost-effective way to fight the scammers / bots and using people to vet accounts is expensive and time consuming at best. They'll lose a large % of their male client base but even so, it's mostly salt daddies like me that sign up for a month at a discount, survey the bowl, pluck a few out, and cancel. While it will be good to lose scammers, I'm curious how it impacts the market. Those 6-7. 5's will see massive decrease in the number of messages fueling their GPS and even the hotties will have a slightly smaller pool.
It may bring back some of the wealthier SDs who gave up due to the slog but I don't see how it results in anything other than a smaller base and increasing ways to charge. They'll start with more tiers (though Diamond is a joke) and monetizing hidden pics, boosted messages a la Secret B.
WYP already requires a public pic (or at least hid my multi-year old profile and won't allow me to message or even favorite anyone) which is ridiculous while still having a 'seeking discretion' options. Same owners so not surprising they are trying it here..[/QUOTE]Just so I understand, all daddies and babies will need to provide an I'd for verification? Will the daddies be allowed to keep their picture private? If they can, then wouldn't most of the daddies stay and all of the fake baby profiles would go away?
On WYP, as a daddy can you post a fake public pic?
[QUOTE=LastsLonger;7127187]Maddy on seeking is also on CC. Recently divorced, but you will get serviced very well. Loves everything about being a sub, and following directions. She will listen very well, and can take a pounding, say thanks you, and go again. (You can get her and her friend in Shakopee area to double team you as well, her friend also loves the backdoor. I will state when both are sucking the meat, one on the balls and one on the shaft it is exquisite. (Don't ask for what the going rate is. I don't know and don't pay.).
Ivy. Cute little nurse type, I like her look. Intelligent, tiny, good fun little nips, and can also take a pounding. Can be found on Fet as well, and tends to be a size queen. That I am not, but still can get the female squirt machine to fire. (lookin for some sugar, but not my thing).
Enjoy.[/QUOTE]Do you have links for these? There's quite a few Ivy's, and that's pretty tough to search on fet.
[QUOTE=Mystery2022;7130410]Do you have links for these? There's quite a few Ivy's, and that's pretty tough to search on fet.[/QUOTE]Sorry for my ignorance what is fet.