What in the fuck are you talking about?

[QUOTE=Stormer91;6231209]No we are not the same, he is a good friend of mine and introduced me to this and Sammy. I am not as adventurous as you or he is I like Sammy and her style it is unfortunate that the providers go through situations but I guess that's like any other business you have to take the good with the bad. And again no we are not the same. Gofigure69 is a college buddy he is out there more than me.

Sorry.[/QUOTE][BLUE]You are Stormer91, GoFigure69, and BigHeart69 and you probably used to be that asshole Justin12 that I banned. I combined all your users and banned them.

A2[/BLUE]

Can anyone tell me how them works? How is a girl inactive but last seen in the current month? Or vice versa someone who maybe UTR or out all together not listed as inactive? Thanks in advance and.

Sorry for the stupidity.

I can't make sense of what you're talking about exactly. Do you mind clarifying or elaborating more?

[QUOTE=Clceent101;6241076]Can anyone tell me how them works? How is a girl inactive but last seen in the current month? Or vice versa someone who maybe UTR or out all together not listed as inactive? Thanks in advance and.

Sorry for the stupidity.[/QUOTE]

Hey man! I see that you stated that you merged the handles mentioned, but it's not showing up as a "Banned Member" like usual. It's still saying Regular Member. TIA

[QUOTE=Admin2;6239633][BLUE]You are Stormer91, GoFigure69, and BigHeart69 and you probably used to be that asshole Justin12 that I banned. I combined all your users and banned them.

A2[/BLUE][/QUOTE].

If you put this in grid you'll see 3 inactive on the front page, and the didn't go inactive until very recently like end of October. Whereas if you go to the last page I know at least one lady is out but not showing inactive.

I don't understand why the site works that way.

[QUOTE=KingEpqng;6241592]I can't make sense of what you're talking about exactly. Do you mind clarifying or elaborating more?[/QUOTE]

If you are talking about EM, I don't believe it means they are not taking clients; I'm assuming it means they haven't logged on recently if I was to take a guess.

[QUOTE=Clceent101;6241656]If you put this in grid you'll see 3 inactive on the front page, and the didn't go inactive until very recently like end of October. Whereas if you go to the last page I know at least one lady is out but not showing inactive.

I don't understand why the site works that way.[/QUOTE].

I think you are correct.

[QUOTE=KingEpqng;6241903]If you are talking about EM, I don't believe it means they are not taking clients; I'm assuming it means they haven't logged on recently if I was to take a guess.

.[/QUOTE]

What do you guys think about some of the verification practices out there? I am actually against providing any company info or a pic of my license, or work I'd.

I just don't any of my info to come back to haunt me!

They also don't take any STG or LC providers as a verification. So, just wondering what you all do about it!

[QUOTE=UrgeBurner;6243923]What do you guys think about some of the verification practices out there? I am actually against providing any company info or a pic of my license, or work I'd.

I just don't any of my info to come back to haunt me!

They also don't take any STG or LC providers as a verification. So, just wondering what you all do about it![/QUOTE]I have never seen a provider so hot that I would provide any of that info.

I won't do it but each his own. I will do without before I give out all that personal information.

[QUOTE=UrgeBurner;6243923]What do you guys think about some of the verification practices out there? I am actually against providing any company info or a pic of my license, or work I'd.

I just don't any of my info to come back to haunt me!

They also don't take any STG or LC providers as a verification. So, just wondering what you all do about it![/QUOTE]

[blue][Forum Complaint deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]The general posting sections of the Forum are not the place to voice your personal complaints about the Forum's rules or operating procedures. In the future, please send any complaints about the Forum to me personally by email or PM, or post them in the Comment on Forum Rules section. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue]

Dude, you haven't post in a week. Hope you are just taking time off the forum or found you a Brazilian UTR!

Good luck either way.

It's all about risk management but I would start by defining the risk. What are you giving them and what could possibly go wrong? For me, the level and type of provider makes a dramatic difference. I've had a few Craigslist, STG, type of encounters. For this level, I would not give them my real name verbally much less proof of it. And most of the time you wouldn't have to. Established, well reviewed, traveling girls are a little easier to give that to but I've never heard of a specific story that they gave up clients. I'm sure it has happened and I don't enjoy giving it out but I scratch out almost all the info but my name and it's rarely a problem. However, I would never provide access to Linknd In or social media just to prevent access to coworkers, friends, and family. By the way, that is more a concern for me with sugar babies that might get vindictive but pros kinda move on if you piss them off. If the concern is LEO, I keep everything very professional until we are in the same room. No mention of any activity. If I don't know what she offers or what it costs before I show up, I have to assume that risk. But I'd rather risk that than my info on a text chain with what I want to do for ex amount. Probable cause and entrapment are kind of sticky words that a good attorney can navigate the legal aspect. But can you survive the social and marital aspect if you were simply charged? Again, if this is a LEO operation you would likely be arrested just for showing up no matter how much info you did or didn't send and they would probably have what they need to arrest you. That said, there's no law against someone having your name, or photo I'd, phone number, or provocative texts, or whatever except $ for play. In the digital age where scams and I'd theft are rampant, about anything can be explained away if you handle it right.

[QUOTE=UrgeBurner;6243923]What do you guys think about some of the verification practices out there? I am actually against providing any company info or a pic of my license, or work I'd.

I just don't any of my info to come back to haunt me!

They also don't take any STG or LC providers as a verification. So, just wondering what you all do about it![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NCTransplant;6246727]Allie Vegas is the one that was linked before with the original poster.[/QUOTE]NC Transplant, it is obvious and clear that she was reported on by Klusk, WR and others.

It doesn't matter but it seems that Godzb post about seeing Allie Vegas two years ago in Charlotte seems like a case of mistaken identity, when you compound that with the whole thread dedicated to another allie that is BBFS also.

I wanted clarification if Allie Vegas has been here for two years or if it was just a lazy post.

With today online technology, it wouldn't take them much to find your social media which puts them a finger away from family or friends.