Escort Reports

[QUOTE=Drooo;6654529]Has anyone seen her? Her ad states she's back so maybe one of you hsd seen her before.

TIA.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/zo3y2.0[/URL][/QUOTE]Have not seen her but this is her menu.

Hey it's Zoey.

I'm 19, Athletic and natural.

I'm 5'5 & I weigh 105 lbs.

Rates.

250 - 30 min.

350 - 60 min.

550 - 90 min.

700 - 2 hours.

Services are GFE that includes.

BBBJ, lfk, dfk, cfs, daty, dato, cob, coa, multiple positions.

Cim / cof + 50.

Pics / video +100.

No's:

Greek or camel slides.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

Once you're ready send me a text.

Please include your handle and desired time when texting.

[QUOTE=Drooo;6654529]Has anyone seen her? Her ad states she's back so maybe one of you hsd seen her before.

TIA.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/zo3y2.0[/URL][/QUOTE]2/5 ratings are negative. So I'd be a bit cautious. Good luck.

Thanks she's pricy for me but l like her menu. It's a little difficult sometime to decide if these young providers are worth visiting. Their sessions are usually rushed or lackadaisical. In my 30+ years of hobbying, Ive found a couple of young gems but most still burn out after a short time. I've only had one that stuck around almost as long I have and she was fantastic. All 3 holes available, dfk, bbbj, daty, cim but always cfs, even after a decade she only allowed cfs. Too bad I outlasted her as she "retired" during the pandemic and she disconnected her phone.


[QUOTE=LostLimit;6654669]Have not seen her but this is her menu.

Hey it's Zoey.

I'm 19, Athletic and natural.

I'm 5'5 & I weigh 105 lbs.

Rates.

250 - 30 min.

350 - 60 min.

550 - 90 min.

700 - 2 hours.

Services are GFE that includes.

BBBJ, lfk, dfk, cfs, daty, dato, cob, coa, multiple positions.

Cim / cof + 50.

Pics / video +100.

No's:

Greek or camel slides.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

Once you're ready send me a text.

Please include your handle and desired time when texting.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=PogeyBait;6648869]Baby was nice. Got to the same house in Rosemead that I've now been frequenting this week and for the price of getting actual younger girls, it seems right. Was welcome in but Baby and she was easy on the eyes. Took my coat for me and hung it up once we were in the room. Held onto me as it was quite chilly as the ac was blowing and I much appreciated it as I told her we should turn on the hot shower and let it steam to get warm. She agreed and as we made light conversation, she let me lfk and the warmer air and feeling of her soapy tits managed to get me ready for action. We hopped out and I asked if we could stay in the bathroom since it was warmer and she giggled and said why not. She scampered off to get the condom and when she returned, she told me to sit on the bathtub edge so she could give me head. I couldn't lean back so I stood up and lightly face fucked her until I had her stand up and bent her over the kitchen sink. Great view and a cute ass which made it all seem very raunchy like a 90's shower sex scene. Took the length and girth of me pretty well until I popped in the bag. Would repeat for her looks alone as I'm a sucker for a pretty face.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/babychinese[/URL][/QUOTE]I don't recall that place having a bathtub. Was that the room on the left? I remember both of the bathrooms being not so clean.

I know they have a bad rep, but occasionally it's a win. I go to Ruby house, and they always honor 120 for 20 min. Recently saw Apple. What she lacks in looks, she makes up in service. Hands down the best service I've received so far. She a little thick and has huge nipples — pretty short too. Nice foreplay and Good moaning sounds and seems super into it. This chick was either super into me or just loves to fuck. Receptive to different positions, dfk, and didn't rush like other girls I've seen. Overall, great experience, even though her looks are just whatever. Probably late 20's early 30's if I were to guess. Pussy lips were a little weird looking, too, but still felt great. I never go down on these girls so it was a non-issue. No smell either.

[QUOTE=Rizzler808;6635483]Been mongering but not much posting so I thought I'd drop this one here. Normally I take c-orgs with a grain of salt but given there is a hybrid agency with both kgirls and some c-girls, I figured I'd give it a shot. Not a bad selection and in a sense, the selection is quite broad given that it isn't just one demographic. Asked the booker who had real pics and to my surprise, they only listed a few names. I asked what about the rest and they said they weren't sure or they thought it was heavily photoshopped. Honestly goes a long way with me so I TOFFT on Nancy given that my last Nancy (Greek homemovie queen of Ktown) was a solid choice.

Got to the place in Rosemead and was let in easy enough. Nancy's pics are definitely here and she's a younger girl for sure. Hard to pin point her age but I'm confident she's not older than maybe 27. Overall I was satisfied what was before me and ime, only younger girls refuse BBFS so it made sense she didn't have that on the menu given her age. She was partial to dfk which was a surprise as dfk isn't normally given by cgirls in my experience but this was a pleasant surprise with an ability to take a slightly larger than average package down the love tunnel. Hit all the positions I like to go through with an A+ in acg. She really threw herself down onto my spear and didn't leave anything on the table, nor in my balls. Would recommend and encourage a different stable of providers to keep doing what they're doing.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/nancy[/URL][/QUOTE]I agree, the profile listing for Nancy has an accurate photo (at least of her face). There are younger girls than her and she's probably not in her 20's. She her in good lighting and she's most likely in her 30's or early 40's but her body is very well maintained.

[QUOTE=KeepFishn;6664963]I agree, the profile listing for Nancy has an accurate photo (at least of her face). There are younger girls than her and she's probably not in her 20's. She her in good lighting and she's most likely in her 30's or early 40's but her body is very well maintained.[/QUOTE]I agree, she does look like the photo in the hx profiles, but she is not in her 20's. 30's for sure.

Also those HX bookers are charging a lot more than other bookers. I saw baby via K-Dreams on HX. It was $220 hhr and she was up charging for BBJ.

I saw Nancy via [URL]https://www.princehouse.info/[/URL], it was $150 for hhr and included BBBJ.

[QUOTE=IntoNOut;6662701]I know they have a bad rep, but occasionally it's a win. I go to Ruby house, and they always honor 120 for 20 min. Recently saw Apple. What she lacks in looks, she makes up in service. Hands down the best service I've received so far. She a little thick and has huge nipples pretty short too. Nice foreplay and Good moaning sounds and seems super into it. This chick was either super into me or just loves to fuck. Receptive to different positions, dfk, and didn't rush like other girls I've seen. Overall, great experience, even though her looks are just whatever. Probably late 20's early 30's if I were to guess. Pussy lips were a little weird looking, too, but still felt great. I never go down on these girls so it was a non-issue. No smell either.[/QUOTE]Where is this Ruby House? Thanks.

[QUOTE=Rizzler808;6635483]Been mongering but not much posting so I thought I'd drop this one here. Normally I take c-orgs with a grain of salt but given there is a hybrid agency with both kgirls and some c-girls, I figured I'd give it a shot. Not a bad selection and in a sense, the selection is quite broad given that it isn't just one demographic. Asked the booker who had real pics and to my surprise, they only listed a few names. I asked what about the rest and they said they weren't sure or they thought it was heavily photoshopped. Honestly goes a long way with me so I TOFFT on Nancy given that my last Nancy (Greek homemovie queen of Ktown) was a solid choice.

Got to the place in Rosemead and was let in easy enough. Nancy's pics are definitely here and she's a younger girl for sure. Hard to pin point her age but I'm confident she's not older than maybe 27. Overall I was satisfied what was before me and ime, only younger girls refuse BBFS so it made sense she didn't have that on the menu given her age. She was partial to dfk which was a surprise as dfk isn't normally given by cgirls in my experience but this was a pleasant surprise with an ability to take a slightly larger than average package down the love tunnel. Hit all the positions I like to go through with an A+ in acg. She really threw herself down onto my spear and didn't leave anything on the table, nor in my balls. Would recommend and encourage a different stable of providers to keep doing what they're doing.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/nancy[/URL][/QUOTE]Is screening easy? I don't really like my k-org booker and try to locate an alternative.

[QUOTE=Vince682;6667248]Is screening easy? I don't really like my k-org booker and try to locate an alternative.[/QUOTE]Same deal for Korgs but I've been verified with a few bookers now and just accept my information is going to be available and that's that. Figured one more couldn't hurt.

Another monger informed me that girls without the BBFS option are typically prettier or even younger since they don't want to get preggo so by that metric, I decided to pull the trigger on Una. Very sweet and objectively attractive. Pics were photoshopped but thought it was here based on facial structure. Took her for a spin for the hour and liked where it was headed as soon as she started the BJ and thought she had great technique. I opted for a cover this time to play it safe and the BJ didn't feel any worse since her technique was great. Unsure what she did but it worked and almost makes me wish I opted for the BBBJ upgrade but I didn't want to break the mood by renegotiating. She hopped on for cg and I filled the bag in doggy. Pretty young and tight and still had a lot of spunk which aligns that she's fairly new to this as advertised. Would recommend.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe[/URL]

[QUOTE=ItsNotNothing2;6671323]Another monger informed me that girls without the BBFS option are typically prettier or even younger since they don't want to get preggo so by that metric, I decided to pull the trigger on Una. Very sweet and objectively attractive. Pics were photoshopped but thought it was here based on facial structure. Took her for a spin for the hour and liked where it was headed as soon as she started the BJ and thought she had great technique. I opted for a cover this time to play it safe and the BJ didn't feel any worse since her technique was great. Unsure what she did but it worked and almost makes me wish I opted for the BBBJ upgrade but I didn't want to break the mood by renegotiating. She hopped on for cg and I filled the bag in doggy. Pretty young and tight and still had a lot of spunk which aligns that she's fairly new to this as advertised. Would recommend.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe[/URL][/QUOTE]If so, I think we saw the same girl. Una was a good find and their stable seems to be well, stable. Finally a young roster of c girls instead of grandmas. Took her for a spin and got a solid hour with her. Nothing about her was fake. Nice tits and seemingly stable stream of younger girls that seem to enjoy the work. Got to the house and had a nice girl greet me and provided above average service in terms of her BBBJ and riding rhythm. She could bounce it better than some kgirls imo. Would absolutely repeat should I be in the area.

If you daty with this one, would recommend to hit the underside of her clit. It'll do well to stimulate her and get her going for some quality O's from a young girl and boost your ego.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe[/URL]

Damage: three Benjamin's plus Andrew.

[QUOTE=PogeyBait;6674191]If so, I think we saw the same girl. Una was a good find and their stable seems to be well, stable. Finally a young roster of c girls instead of grandmas. Took her for a spin and got a solid hour with her. Nothing about her was fake. Nice tits and seemingly stable stream of younger girls that seem to enjoy the work. Got to the house and had a nice girl greet me and provided above average service in terms of her BBBJ and riding rhythm. She could bounce it better than some kgirls imo. Would absolutely repeat should I be in the area.

If you daty with this one, would recommend to hit the underside of her clit. It'll do well to stimulate her and get her going for some quality O's from a young girl and boost your ego.

[URL]https://www.sweetkgirl.com/products/una-gfe[/URL]

Damage: three Benjamin's plus Andrew.[/QUOTE]Concur on Una. She's probably in her 30's but has a nice slim figure. Photo is kinda representative of her facial features. If you're a fan of pencil eraser nips, you'll definitely be in for a treat. She's also pretty loud if you hit the right spots.

I've noticed that depending on the color of the text on the picture of the girl means something different for each girl. Example yellow means they look like they're picture where as red is very young. Can anyone confirm this or tell me what each color means for the fleet girls?

Hi was use telegram and saw "escort" girl on nearby me search. Lot them ask deposit upfront. I figure those scammers. Wonder any you have actually use telegram and actually meet any of them.