I'm not seeing the option to search a thread anymore. When I try searching a forum, a message comes up reading "searching has been disabled. " Any insight?
Printable View
I'm not seeing the option to search a thread anymore. When I try searching a forum, a message comes up reading "searching has been disabled. " Any insight?
[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7686166]I would say if she's frequenting the Art and clearly making transactions, that would be exposing. I think worst case is she would have to leave the theatre but no further altercation.
Simply someone being an escort doesn't make them an illegal person overall. I've hooked up with girls that were escorts but I wasn't doing a date with them. I wasn't aftaid of being exposed. Have to prove a transaction occurred. There has already been mention of certain escorts going to the Art already as well as swingers parties through Fetlife.
With that being said, I have never been to the Art but have considered in general and not as a short stay option.[/QUOTE]Hello, DonnnyBravo.
Allow me to elaborate.
Bringing a well-known streetwalker from the South End to The Art Cinema or any lifestyle venue risks putting the business in jeopardy. This practice is strongly frowned upon within the lifestyle community, and it is not acceptable regardless of whether others do it.
If the staff or owner discovers that you are attempting to bring a prostitute into the theater, you will be banned for life. I have seen this happen on numerous occasions, including individuals being removed for soliciting sexual services.
Additionally, escorts operating on FetLife risk having their accounts deleted, as this violates the platform's Terms of Service.
Furthermore, if you have never been to The Art Cinema, it is unclear why you are offering input on this matter.
Take care!
[URL]https://maps.deflock.org/[/URL]
For those of you that pick up streetwalkers or do car dates, it might be good to know where cameras are being installed. They'll know if you frequent the areas. LA is putting them up on Figueroa. Fun times.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MQLlMbS-Y[/URL]
Flock is such hypocrisy. This video showcases a journalist investigating Flock facilities and they didn't appreciate being surveilled yet run a company that surveils the mass public without consent. SMH.
Like it or not, Flock is another reality that is just growing around this country.
[QUOTE=DonnnyBravo;7689688][URL]https://maps.deflock.org/[/URL]
For those of you that pick up streetwalkers or do car dates, it might be good to know where cameras are being installed. They'll know if you frequent the areas. LA is putting them up on Figueroa. Fun times.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=KidPort38;7689770][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MQLlMbS-Y[/URL]
Flock is such hypocrisy. This video showcases a journalist investigating Flock facilities and they didn't appreciate being surveilled yet run a company that surveils the mass public without consent. SMH.
Like it or not, Flock is another reality that is just growing around this country.[/QUOTE]George Orwell 1984.
This is yet another example of the continuing trend of subtly stripping people of their rights / freedoms under the guise of "Your safety". Younger people (<30) probably don't even realize what they've lost.
It's a changing world and definitely NOT for the better (IMHO).
On a side note, I was in VT last week and visited an AMP that had a friggin camera INSIDE the massage room (it was somewhat inconspicuous but since I've seen them before I always look).
The girl said it was just for 'safety' reasons and everything is deleted every day.
Can you really be that F_ stupid?! I walked out.
[QUOTE=KidPort38;7689770][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MQLlMbS-Y[/URL]
Flock is such hypocrisy. This video showcases a journalist investigating Flock facilities and they didn't appreciate being surveilled yet run a company that surveils the mass public without consent. SMH.
Like it or not, Flock is another reality that is just growing around this country.[/QUOTE]Towns and Cities with Active or Recent Flock / ALPR Integration:
West Hartford, Cheshire (operates 12 units, currently facing local review) Milford, Clinton (features an active public transparency portal) Bristol (utilizes multiple intersection placements) Southington, Avon, Berlin, Bloomfield, Darien, East Lyme, Farmington, Monroe, Prospect, Putnam, Ridgefield, Simsbury, Waterford, and Westport.
[QUOTE=KidPort38;7689770][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3MQLlMbS-Y[/URL]
Flock is such hypocrisy. This video showcases a journalist investigating Flock facilities and they didn't appreciate being surveilled yet run a company that surveils the mass public without consent. SMH.
Like it or not, Flock is another reality that is just growing around this country.[/QUOTE]Found that WFSB did an interview with the Simsbury PD and they acknowledged having a half dozen of the cameras installed. Then, much like in the video. They refused to give their location for 'public safety' reasons.
LMFAO, so if they're only there to 'protect' the public, shouldn't be an issue letting the public know where they are now should it? Wonder if the residents of that town know their lowlife police are covertly monitoring them (likely not).
Ok. I'm off my soapbox for the day.
[QUOTE=PeckerPete13;7690318]I would recommend everyone stays away, I sent her a message asking how she was doing, and she told me she was going to share my text messages with the police and for me to stop texting her if I was smart. So take it for what it is, but I'm up going to be threatened.
Play at your own risk.[/QUOTE]I guess the reign has fallen for her pimp. Sad that she threatened to share texts with police. That would lead to the 130+ posts on here as her sole promoter as her ad to get dates. Good luck buddy.
Whether dudes be getting discounts or promo time with a girl for continuously posting and promoting them with fluffy fake reviews, is it really worth it in the end? Sucks in the end when they show no loyalty and kicked to the curb. Only recourse is be a p@$$y little B1tc& to whine and complain on the board hoping guys will no longer see a girl, not bc her service sucks, not because she robbed or scammed, but simply no longer favors you. Nice one bro. This reminds me of the dude complaining after giving a working girl rides to her dates. LOL.
P.S. I have never seen Tess nor do I ever desire to from the credible friends that have told me the real deal. I have nothing against PeckerPete despite his flagrant obvious pimping / promoting of her constantly and likely getting something of great benefit to him in return. Yea, I know, I have done my share in the past but no even to a 1/10th of his promoting.
[QUOTE=MaxThrust;7690126]Found that WFSB did an interview with the Simsbury PD and they acknowledged having a half dozen of the cameras installed. Then, much like in the video. They refused to give their location for 'public safety' reasons.
LMFAO, so if they're only there to 'protect' the public, shouldn't be an issue letting the public know where they are now should it? Wonder if the residents of that town know their lowlife police are covertly monitoring them (likely not).
Ok. I'm off my soapbox for the day.[/QUOTE]Big Brother is watching.
[QUOTE=LuvrOfWomen;7713327]I've been doing this since the 90's. Back then you could generally trust an escort to come to your house and not rob you. The escorts were the higher end girls in the business. They may have had their issues, but at least they would look good and have all their teeth. Most of the girls on STG would have been walking the streets, charging 20/40 back then.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Sutigel2;7713697]Most of the current crop have been (or currently are) street walkers. The invention of the cellphone has unfortunately allowed them to act like they are high end call girls. Allie Berry is one I'm thinking of![/QUOTE]I don't think I've ever referred to a girl on here as having GPS at least not in a serious manner. To me when someone says that, they're crying nc they can't afford the girl or pisses them off bc they just don't want to spend that. And that's all fine. I have a sweet spot which seems to be more than a lot or maybe some reviewers on here. If a girl quotes higher than I'm willing I move on 90% of the time. No point in haggling. Of that's what they think is their worth, go for it. They just won't see me and I'm not going to play guess the rate. One girl last year quoted 400 on the get go. I simply said I'm all set. She kept coming back till she got down to 120.
As for High end. Aliie's rates are not high end. Plenty of girls charging $1 k+ that are easily 9's and 10's that really cater to the client and do a lot of prep work ahead instead of getting multiple date in the same day. If 300 or 400 is "high end" in your mind it's just sounds like out of budgetary range.
Most of these girls are working to get rich and just trying to get there next hit and have a room another night. They don't need to be priced to see 10-15 dudes a day. Some girls only want to see 1-2, so higher rate reduces demand and gets higher quality clients that want low volume girls.
[QUOTE=MaxThrust;7690126]Found that WFSB did an interview with the Simsbury PD and they acknowledged having a half dozen of the cameras installed. Then, much like in the video. They refused to give their location for 'public safety' reasons.
LMFAO, so if they're only there to 'protect' the public, shouldn't be an issue letting the public know where they are now should it? Wonder if the residents of that town know their lowlife police are covertly monitoring them (likely not).
Ok. I'm off my soapbox for the day.[/QUOTE]Too much info for me to go thru, first link is associated to picture below, all other links are self explanatory, [URL]https://www.law360.com/articles/1450472/lapd-case-sheds-light-on-agencies-social-media-monitoring[/URL] [URL]https://connecthartford.org/[/URL] civilians cameras can register with, [URL]https://www.atlasofsurveillance.org/search?agency=Hartford[/URL]+Police+Department [URL]https://www.google.com/search?q=is[/URL]+there+a+site+that+shows+where+police+in+hartford+placed+cameras&oq=is+there+a+site+that+shows+where+police+in+hartford+placed+cameras&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCjcwMjc5 ajBqMTWoAgGwAgE&sourceid=chrome&source=chrome. Rb&ie=UTF-8.
Other than the AMPs and their solo careers, how many of these postings do you think are fake, enhanced, or bait & switch? Just curious. Again, I see these girls (8&9's) posting in Enfield and cannot believe they are living out of an undesirable hotel like that.
[QUOTE=UnionJack3000;7718580]Other than the AMPs and their solo careers, how many of these postings do you think are fake, enhanced, or bait & switch? Just curious. Again, I see these girls (8&9's) posting in Enfield and cannot believe they are living out of an undesirable hotel like that.[/QUOTE]" We are an agency and serve many cities. Photos are a likeness of the girls presented but may not be 100% accurate. ".
In other words. They look nothing like the pics, but they are asian so not 0% but not 100% either. Those ads aren't even posted locally. Prob a group posting all over the country. I've def seen the same pics in other cities and even numbers.
If you want girls like the pics, you're going to have to go to the agencies out of high end apts not the budget hotels or AMPs. You could also go to Flushing or Manhattan. Handful of us can attest to real 20's girls 9's and 10's down there. Check out the board. Nothing like walking into a house with 8-10 girls all 20s asian, euro, and latina. One I went to, a girl gave me her number to see on the outside so she wouldn’t have to pay the house fee.