Printable View
[QUOTE=Bowah57; 1655035]Hummm, must be Julie (Ichi). Wait, Viv (Hana). Oh wait, must be Joy (Nar) LOL.
Let me see, who else told me that.[/QUOTE]I vote for Viv, because she also told me exactly that this is just her job and we can only be friends, maybe even good friends but nothing more than that.
Patriot 1/2 time and Over.
49er 1/2 time and Over
[QUOTE=Bowah57; 1656505]Patriot 1/2 time and Over.
49er 1/2 time and Over[/QUOTE]I'm with you on the 49ers, but went the other way on the Patriots. How much are you in for this time?
[QUOTE=Bowah57; 1656505]Patriot 1/2 time and Over.
49er 1/2 time and Over[/QUOTE]U playing?
[QUOTE=WraithOfGod;1656506]I'm with you on the 49ers, but went the other way on the Patriots. How much are you in for this time?[/QUOTE]One week session worth. LOL
[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1656636]U playing?[/QUOTE]Yes.
Only got 5 min to make up my mind on the Over / under
Any local bookies can give us who they need?
AF
[QUOTE=DaViper;1654657]Be careful history shows both favorites do not cover on this weekend. Normally it's 1favorite 1 dog. I'm going with the brothers 49ers vs Ravens[/QUOTE]Like I said tread continues 1 Favorite 1 dog. Super Bowl should be a good one
[QUOTE=Bowah57; 1656505]Patriot 1/2 time and Over.
49er 1/2 time and Over[/QUOTE]I'm so sorry Bowah I didn't get back on my opinion. I haven't really been on the boards this weekend, so I never got to see your prediction. I played baltimore and the under and would have took SF and the over but couldn't get that one in time. I was real weary of those picks though and didn't want to influence you on something I was sure on. The strongest play to me would have been the over on the SF game. But hell, like I said I couldn't get that one in. I originally liked NE and he over but late sat night when I thought about it, I figured this postseason is the first time baltimore D is healthy, +8 got to take the points, and if you take baltimore pretty predicting and grind out game. But since you only play halfs I probably would only suggested SF. Halfs are real tough, and for the most part believe its a sucker bet. But I have already decided and will be taking baltimore this SB.
[QUOTE=Blade82;1657621]I'm so sorry Bowah I didn't get back on my opinion. I haven't really been on the boards this weekend, so I never got to see your prediction. I played baltimore and the under and would have took SF and the over but couldn't get that one in time. I was real weary of those picks though and didn't want to influence you on something I was sure on. The strongest play to me would have been the over on the SF game. But hell, like I said I couldn't get that one in. I originally liked NE and he over but late sat night when I thought about it, I figured this postseason is the first time baltimore D is healthy, +8 got to take the points, and if you take baltimore pretty predicting and grind out game. But since you only play halfs I probably would only suggested SF. Halfs are real tough, and for the most part believe its a sucker bet. But I have already decided and will be taking baltimore this SB.[/QUOTE]Thanks any ways. I eneded taking under for SF game so just pay the juice. Man, I am done with Football. Nea, JK. Be safe.
[QUOTE=Bowah57;1658334]Thanks any ways. I eneded taking under for SF game so just pay the juice. Man, I am done with Football. Nea, JK. Be safe.[/QUOTE]At first I kind of thought it was under too, but figured atlanta would still be good close to 20 points if they were to get smashed. This past weekend my mind changed a lot prior to the game, thats why I didn't want to give you anything cause I may tell you one thing and then change it the next day. But unless something major happens, Baltimore should be the play. Thinking over too, but thats just based on SB trends so it could change. I wouldn't plan on going to the bank for the half though, should at least have some backup play.
Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?
[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1661909]Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?[/QUOTE]I can't imagine picking between the two, especially with money on the line. I could see either team winning.
[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1661909]Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?[/QUOTE]Niners and the over. Ravens at the half. Don't take my advice though I am a Niners fan so my opinion is very biased
[QUOTE=Phreekstyle;1662033]Niners and the over. Ravens at the half. Don't take my advice though I am a Niners fan so my opinion is very biased[/QUOTE]You could be right looks like the public is on Baltimore and Under line has gone from Sf 5 to 3 1/2 and 49 to 47 1/2 so normally when public goes one way you know what happens
[QUOTE=Mogo Master;1661909]Who is the play for Super Bowl and what bar are you guys going to be at?[/QUOTE]Can't go wrong if you bet on Harbaugh!
LOL
This is the real super bowl-Nara vs. Channel.
What's similar-both are very popular, nice figure, fakies, curves, on the younger side, Korean. Both have nice meaty thick lips. Both really do not cum after the fist day or two back from vacation. So its all an act for both. Both only do covered FS. Both do not workout, so they don't have import, model skinny, hardbodies, but nice above average looks for both. Both will turn heads at the mall.
What's different-Channel is the girl next door cutie, bubbly, she will suck you hard if you like, all covered service, some DFK but not a lot. YMMV and maybe she is too wet, but her pussy is not as tight as Nara. Also, Channel has a smaller ass. Channel is a bit older, and has a 'sex is fun' attitude.
Nara has more "bad girl" looks. You know, the short black dress w no panties kind, hehe. A little more meat on Nara, but not even close to Joon like thickness. Nara has bigger fakies, and responsive nipples and she will let you suck them. Nice curves.
Both will suck and fuck you, even fuck you back hard. Channel seems to have more hip movement and will pork you with lots of energy.
You would be lucky to get "60 minutes" with either as both are busy. But its is well worth your time-quality time-with either one.
I haven't had a bad fuck with either one. If I had to make a choice, it would be Nara today. If Channel ever does BBBJ, I go see her everyday, LOL.
Kids, go fuck both and make your own comments and comparisons. I would pay to fuck both at the same time, LOL.
I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.
Nara wins the Superho Bowl with a field goal in the final seconds of the game when she's 2 points down. Her awesome BBBJ carries her to victory.
(However if Chanel did a comparable BBBJ to Nara, she would win by a touchdown).
[QUOTE=Jbravo; 1662534]Yo,
Dis is the real super bowl-Nara vs. Channel.
Whats similar-both are very popular, nice figure, fakies, curves, on the younger side, korean proes. Both have nice meaty thick lips. Both really do not cum after the fist day or two bak from bacation. So its all an act for both. Both covered FS. Both do not workout, so not import model skinny hardbodies, but nice above average looks for both. Both will turn heads at the mall.
Whats different-Channel is girl next door cutie, bubbly, she will suk you hard if you like, all covered service, some DFK but not a lot. YMMV and maybe she too wet, but her pussy is not as tight at Nara. Also, Channel has a smaller ass. Channel is a bit older, and has a 'sex if fun' attitude.
Nara is more "bad girl" looks you know, the short black dress w no panties kine, hehe. A little more meat on Nara, but not even close to Joon thickness. Nara has bigger fakies, and responsive nipples and she will let you suk them. Nice curves.
Both will suk and fuk you, fuk you bak hard. Channel seems to have more hip movement and will pork you with lots of energy.
You would be lucky to get "60 minutes" with either as both are busy. But its is well worth your time-quality time-with either one.
I haven't had a bad fuk with either one. If I had to make a choice, it would be Nara today. If Channel ever does BBBJ, I go see her everyday, LOL.
Kids, go fuk both and make your own comments and comparisons. I would pay to fuk both at the same time, LOL.[/QUOTE]
Is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on KHNL, Jennifer Robbins, I just think she's hot, kind of look like Tera Patrick.
I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.
[QUOTE=Van Deventer; 1663495]I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.[/QUOTE]Nice thought, but it'd be impossible to get each AMP to state which providers are working and when, each day, much less get the providers to update the "wait time" based upon customer experiences. And you never know what walk-ins will ask for.
[QUOTE=Van Deventer; 1663495]I had an idea for an AMP app that maybe someone out there can develop for us. It's based on the wait time apps that exist for amusement park lines. The app for Disneyworld shows all of the parks, and when you select a park, it lists all of the rides open that day. The good part about it is that app users constantly provide updated wait times for the various rides, so you can run over to rides with shorter wait times.
That same idea can be used for an AMP app. The app would list all of the parks (AMPs). Then you would select the park (AMP) you would like to go to, and it would show a listing of all of the rides (providers) that are open (working) that day. Then, based on user provided wait times, you could see what the current wait time is for that ride (provider).
It would make the search process much more high tech and save on gas, as we wouldn't need to drive from AMP to AMP, and it would increase the chances of getting the provider we are looking for.
Just a thought.[/QUOTE]This is one hell of an idea. I'm sure I'm not the only one who agrees with this.
[QUOTE=Millertime808; 1662557]I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.[/QUOTE]the public lose again as NFC and Over comes home. Superbowl is looking like 9ers and over since Public looks like on Ravens and Under
[QUOTE=Millertime808; 1662557]I normally check this site.
[url]http://www.scoresandodds.com/casinogrid.html[/url]
To see where the public is laying their dollas. Right now the general public 63% is going with AFC tomorrow and under 80 along with Ravens next week with over / under split pretty even at 47. 5.
Personally I like the general public's picks for tomorrow with AFC and I think going under as the commish was given shit about not playing hard. Plus might get flash flood and storm.
It's always a last minute decision before I call it in. Right now taking AFC giving 1, under, small kine, need bullets for Supa Bowl.[/QUOTE]If the #s are for real, I am quite suprised the public would go under on the pro bowl. Its the fricken pro bowl for gods sake, always no D. Anyway, personally I find the betting against the public philosophy a dud. I seen too many games work either way too much. Plus when the numbers are in the 60-65% range, that is almost like being 50. Trends too is another overrated / bogus philosophy. Although, I'm sure the % of the favorite covering in the SB isn't good at all, and the over usually hits. But I believe its a result of oddsmakers inflating a line for a televised game. Really have no feel on the total, but got to take the points. This will be one of the few times SF will play a decent D against the run.
[quote=miri kitani;1663400]is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on khnl, jennifer robbins, i just think she's hot, kind of look like tera patrick.[/quote]she's hot!
[QUOTE=Blade82;1663887]If the #s are for real, I am quite suprised the public would go under on the pro bowl. Its the fricken pro bowl for gods sake, always no D. Anyway, personally I find the betting against the public philosophy a dud. I seen too many games work either way too much. Plus when the numbers are in the 60-65% range, that is almost like being 50. Trends too is another overrated / bogus philosophy. Although, I'm sure the % of the favorite covering in the SB isn't good at all, and the over usually hits. But I believe its a result of oddsmakers inflating a line for a televised game. Really have no feel on the total, but got to take the points. This will be one of the few times SF will play a decent D against the run.[/QUOTE]Got lucky yesterday as our house wasn't taking action on ProBow or I would've lost both ways. I'm new at this posting; however, have been at too many KBs and AMPs over the past 20+ years. Just broke up with SO, and looking to find some fun and HE now. Finally "registered" after reading so many other postings throughout the years. Good stuff guys. After a round of golf on the Ewa Side, we went to KB "down under" Flamingos in PC for some grinds. Bar seats for Pro Bowl game was packed and even saw a H & W couple (tourist) walk in and sit in the forest after the game with red jerseys. WTF? Good Kalbi, Shrimp Tempura, and Mandoo with Miller Lites. Bought another block for SB. Also, have a block at Butterfly. BF daytime weekend bartender Yumi cooks good too. Casino got some good cooks too during happy hour. Deciding where to go to watch the SB at. Does anyone know a good place to go? Vegas III is big enough however their kitchen mama just okay. Most places are packed. Was at Islander last year and few H & W and couples; however, I won the half time block $1, 000 with a 20 buy in. There food was just okay.
Oh yeah, I been lookin for an AMP provider that look like Jenny baby. She reminds me of Emily at GB-busty nice curves, skinny arms, nice legs.
I would do Jenny and Tera.
[QUOTE=Miri Kitani;1663400]Is there a provider around that looks like the weather girl on KHNL, Jennifer Robbins, I just think she's hot, kind of look like Tera Patrick.[/QUOTE]
I would say bet the farm on the Ravens and Over, public had Ravens for championship and look how that turned out. I am getting out of the bay and coming home for Super Bowl, before they burn anymore muni busses.
[QUOTE=DaViper;1663525]the public lose again as NFC and Over comes home. Superbowl is looking like 9ers and over since Public looks like on Ravens and Under[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=PopoloGirl;1665042]I would say bet the farm on the Ravens and Over, public had Ravens for championship and look how that turned out. I am getting out of the bay and coming home for Super Bowl, before they burn anymore muni busses.[/QUOTE]True Ravens won that public bet but if I go w / them this week I would be going against my theory of betting against the public which has won me a lot of $$$. Not saying public never wins but I am saying long run this system wins
[QUOTE=DaViper;1665569]True Ravens won that public bet but if I go w / them this week I would be going against my theory of betting against the public which has won me a lot of $$$. Not saying public never wins but I am saying long run this system wins[/QUOTE]With you on this one.
[QUOTE=DaViper;1665569]True Ravens won that public bet but if I go w / them this week I would be going against my theory of betting against the public which has won me a lot of $$$. Not saying public never wins but I am saying long run this system wins[/QUOTE]I am a huge football fan, college and pros. One thing I've learned is that there are no guaranteed winners. College is more of a sure thing, but the NFL? There is much more parity there. Any team can beat any team on any given Sunday. Who thought the Giants four or five years ago (who are the team with the worst record to ever win the Super Bowl) would beat the undefeated Patriots with that year's MVP Tom Brady having just set the NFL season TD record?
Probably in the lower single-digit percentages. But, they did.
Be careful when betting on the pros. There are "NO" favorites to win in actuality!
[QUOTE=Hypo Luxa; 1665953]I am a huge football fan, college and pros. One thing I've learned is that there are no guaranteed winners. College is more of a sure thing, but the NFL? There is much more parity there. Any team can beat any team on any given Sunday. Who thought the Giants four or five years ago (who are the team with the worst record to ever win the Super Bowl) would beat the undefeated Patriots with that year's MVP Tom Brady having just set the NFL season TD record?
Probably in the lower single-digit percentages. But, they did.
Be careful when betting on the pros. There are "NO" favorites to win in actuality![/QUOTE]To be honest I put my money on the giants that year. If I remember correctly they also played the last game of the regular season and it was the giants who broke that perfect season. I felt after that the pats were exposed and vulnerable and it was only a matter of time before they lost another game. College regular season is more of a guaranteed, but not the bowl season. Especially this past bowl season, a ton of bs. I never seen so much sudden change in results. I kind of felt some were fixed. As mentioned before one thing people might want to look into is how many times the dogs ATS win in the SB. I don't the number myself, but do realize its not very often the fav covers. I am a believer that lines are inflated on the fav for tv games so that might be the reason.
[QUOTE=DaViper;1665569]True Ravens won that public bet but if I go w / them this week I would be going against my theory of betting against the public which has won me a lot of $$$. Not saying public never wins but I am saying long run this system wins[/QUOTE]Keep in mind now until the game is a lot of time for the numbers to change. When I checked today, at 3. 5 only about 53% of the public are taking the ravens. That can easily continue to go do as we get closer. Basically I wouldn't suggest being hastey on putting in your bet just yet if thats how you determine. Going down to just a fg could easily change the publics mind on either side.
[QUOTE=Blade82;1666062]If I remember correctly they also played the last game of the regular season and it was the giants who broke that perfect season. I felt after that the pats were exposed and vulnerable and it was only a matter of time before they lost another game.[/QUOTE]In the first super bowl between the two, the Pats were actually undefeated for the regular season (and of course playoffs). It may have been the second meeting between the two in the super bowl where the giants beat them earlier. Can't remember. But I do remember the Pats were going for the undefeated season record to share with the Dolphins of the '70s.
[QUOTE=Hypo Luxa;1666091]In the first super bowl between the two, the Pats were actually undefeated for the regular season (and of course playoffs). It may have been the second meeting between the two in the super bowl where the giants beat them earlier. Can't remember. But I do remember the Pats were going for the undefeated season record to share with the Dolphins of the '70s.[/QUOTE]Yes that year Pats were undefeated going into Superbowl but I also took the Giants cause Pats was giving a ridiculous number for a Championship game I think it was 15 or 16? I never give big points on title games too much incentive for the dog
[QUOTE=Blade82;1666083]Keep in mind now until the game is a lot of time for the numbers to change. When I checked today, at 3. 5 only about 53% of the public are taking the ravens. That can easily continue to go do as we get closer. Basically I wouldn't suggest being hastey on putting in your bet just yet if thats how you determine. Going down to just a fg could easily change the publics mind on either side.[/QUOTE]As long as line stays under 5 which was opening line and under 49 I'm on SF and over
Not to change the subject, but this being the General section:
[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/30/ron-jeremy-in-critical-condition-heart-aneurysm_n_2582953.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003[/url]
Not a good predicted outcome. This is about as high of a mortality rate problem as you can have!
Everyone get in an extra stroke with your next provider visit in honor or Ron! The man who has fucked more beautiful women than most of us have ever fantasized about!
[QUOTE=Hypo Luxa;1666091]In the first super bowl between the two, the Pats were actually undefeated for the regular season (and of course playoffs). It may have been the second meeting between the two in the super bowl where the giants beat them earlier. Can't remember. But I do remember the Pats were going for the undefeated season record to share with the Dolphins of the '70s.[/QUOTE]It was the first one, I couldn't remember if the Pats did win in the regular season or just barely got by. I remember the controversey on whether NE should have played their stars in the last game. At first I never think anything of the giants because they just barely got in playoffs and NE prob wasn't taking the game seriously. It wasn't until the playoffs progressed I realised they had a legit shot at winning the whole thing.
[QUOTE=DaViper;1666121]As long as line stays under 5 which was opening line and under 49 I'm on SF and over[/QUOTE]Beliefs are the line will go back up to 5. If I was to take SF and thats true, prob best to put in now. I think the o / you is really a toss, but with SB history and I think public is liking under, over might be the way to go. Kind of hard to imagine though as these are 2 defensive teams.