Rants, Raves & Opinions

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5427152]Meh, its supply and demand. Record low unemployment rates combined with lots of money saved due to covid.

Another huge problem with PDX if you compare with Bay Area / Seattle is the lack of overseas talent that generally pushes rates down. Cost of living in San Jose is more than PDX, but you can get a good looking kgirl GFE hour for less than the cost of an average girl's HH here.

I will say that a lot of the new cgirls are CA refugees that wouldn't have bothered venturing north if it weren't for covid. I just wish more cgirl and kgirls would migrate over.[/QUOTE]I'd agree! Rates are joke right now! 5 bones for safety girl! And the reviews! What a load of crap! I done want a romance novel, the facts! Where did you stick it, dis she suc it? You know the facts!! LOL.

When I check out other cities, I can't help but notice that Portland has way too many fat providers. Sorry, had to rant.

[QUOTE=CreamPieSeeker;5440528]When I check out other cities, I can't help but notice that Portland has way too many fat providers. Sorry, had to rant.[/QUOTE]And they're asking for 200-300 hhr LOL WTF!

[QUOTE=CreamPieSeeker;5440528]When I check out other cities, I can't help but notice that Portland has way too many fat providers. Sorry, had to rant.[/QUOTE]Not enough overseas talent in PDX, see my post below. Got to convince those kgirl agencies to setup shop here.

I was watching some JAV and what they called BBW is what half the TNA girls call 'Slim and Curvy'.

[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;5437721]I'd agree! Rates are joke right now! 5 bones for safety girl! And the reviews! What a load of crap! I done want a romance novel, the facts! Where did you stick it, dis she suc it? You know the facts!! LOL.[/QUOTE]Bring your A game when visiting a provider and be a gentleman. I usually ask for regulars rate after third date. So far I gotten 3 bargain deal for full hour visit all under 200. One provider rate is 300 and I'm getting it for 140 bbfsciacipcof downside she flaky but fun af.

[QUOTE=CreamPieSeeker;5440528]When I check out other cities, I can't help but notice that Portland has way too many fat providers. Sorry, had to rant.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately these days 9 times out of 10 in pdx.

Bbw= fat.

Curvey= fat.

Hwp= soon to be fat.

Athletic= kinda fat.

Slim= meth head.

This is so true.

[QUOTE=Jumbotron;5441096]Unfortunately these days 9 times out of 10 in pdx.

Bbw= fat.

Curvey= fat.

Hwp= soon to be fat.

Athletic= kinda fat.

Slim= meth head.[/QUOTE]

All fat slobs who think they can charge $300 plus to throw flour on and look for the wet spot.

[QUOTE=Jumbotron;5441096]Unfortunately these days 9 times out of 10 in pdx.

Bbw= fat.

Curvey= fat.

Hwp= soon to be fat.

Athletic= kinda fat.

Slim= meth head.[/QUOTE]

I've been taking a lot of time away since Covid. Lurking around the boards, I've been following the trends.

I finally decided time were safe enough for me vaccinated. But the insane level of women asking for very high donations and yet are about as far from any "experience" a guy would want. Why would anyone want to spend any time with a woman who would recoil at the idea of even kissing? Well, I guess there are guys into being treated like shit. Maybe I am way off and the majority of guys prefer that?

Obviously there are still some good people to go see. I think if you removed all the rest from a site like TNA you would end up with maybe a half dozen ads on a good day.

Lately I've been thinking the women who want the money but also want to enjoy them selves are hanging out on sugar sites instead.

Obviously this is a bit of a rant with the theme that has been going on lately. I wish that ask the guys would stop seeing any of these cold fish women. Sure, if it's a QV I can see minimum interaction. But don't drop 300 to 400 for an hour of someone with a list of "No's" that rivals Apple's terms and agreements form. I know it's not realistic.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/member.php?534385-Kasey[/URL]

So basically you can kiss her and she'll pee on you. Everything else is off the table.

[QUOTE=QuickFoot;5463995]I've been taking a lot of time away since Covid. Lurking around the boards, I've been following the trends.

I finally decided time were safe enough for me vaccinated. But the insane level of women asking for very high donations and yet are about as far from any "experience" a guy would want. Why would anyone want to spend any time with a woman who would recoil at the idea of even kissing? Well, I guess there are guys into being treated like shit. Maybe I am way off and the majority of guys prefer that?

Obviously there are still some good people to go see. I think if you removed all the rest from a site like TNA you would end up with maybe a half dozen ads on a good day.

Lately I've been thinking the women who want the money but also want to enjoy them selves are hanging out on sugar sites instead.

Obviously this is a bit of a rant with the theme that has been going on lately. I wish that ask the guys would stop seeing any of these cold fish women. Sure, if it's a QV I can see minimum interaction. But don't drop 300 to 400 for an hour of someone with a list of "No's" that rivals Apple's terms and agreements form. I know it's not realistic.[/QUOTE]I think it depends upon your preferences. I tend towards mature. I have a lady I see a lot in spurts. It is almost a sugar deal. She's kind of been silent to me for about 2 months. But, when she is ready, it's fucking intense usually for about 6 weeks. Then, silence to me for several months to a year at times. It's been that way for about 8 years I think. When she's on, I am over there 2-3 times a week.

So, I decided to try the Sugar thing. I put up there I prefer 35 and older. Man, the 20 year olds. 5-6 a day either send messages or let me know they are interested. I haven't really even gone beyond setting up my account and messaging the mire mature ladies to see their hidden photo's. As luck would have it, right after starting, I got busy and haven't explored.

I know guys that Love that site. The younger ladies I have seen in this hobby are doing the best they can given their life experiences and sexual journey. But, the mature ones really light it up for me more. So, I went back and researched. I think I found a really great one. If so, I'm going to pursue the regular customer route. Luck will likely be that I lose that status to either my Long time on and off lady reappearing or busy life.

I think both avenues have advantages and disadvantages. I am just feeling like I know more going in on a verified Hobby Lady.

[QUOTE=EoCowbooy1;5467980]I think it depends upon your preferences. I tend towards mature. I have a lady I see a lot in spurts. It is almost a sugar deal. She's kind of been silent to me for about 2 months. But, when she is ready, it's fucking intense usually for about 6 weeks. Then, silence to me for several months to a year at times. It's been that way for about 8 years I think. When she's on, I am over there 2-3 times a week.

So, I decided to try the Sugar thing. I put up there I prefer 35 and older. Man, the 20 year olds. 5-6 a day either send messages or let me know they are interested. I haven't really even gone beyond setting up my account and messaging the mire mature ladies to see their hidden photo's. As luck would have it, right after starting, I got busy and haven't explored.

I know guys that Love that site. The younger ladies I have seen in this hobby are doing the best they can given their life experiences and sexual journey. But, the mature ones really light it up for me more. So, I went back and researched. I think I found a really great one. If so, I'm going to pursue the regular customer route. Luck will likely be that I lose that status to either my Long time on and off lady reappearing or busy life.

I think both avenues have advantages and disadvantages. I am just feeling like I know more going in on a verified Hobby Lady.[/QUOTE]Man I love the feel of a 20 yo puss, but you're on to something. A 35-40 MILF is typically such a better time. They love to fuc and know how to bring it. Not always, but more often than not. I'm going to try the sugar sites and see. Tired of the transactional nature of the " hobby. ".

[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;5476238]Man I love the feel of a 20 yo puss, but you're on to something. A 35-40 MILF is typically such a better time. They love to fuc and know how to bring it. Not always, but more often than not. I'm going to try the sugar sites and see. Tired of the transactional nature of the " hobby. ".[/QUOTE]The hobby is getting worst. Now that being a SW is a trend on Twitter. I no longer read reviews I just read the Twitter feed of some of these girls and wonder if they know what branding is. If your SW name is different than your real name maybe you should do that for your Twitter. God knows I will not see you if you come off as entitled and vitriolic.

Everytime I check the sites out for providers, it's always the same providers posting the same ad with the same outdated photos. Scrolling through the pages and you'll see the same providers ad on the next page or page after. And the specials? Is it really a special if it's the same donation you've had posted for the last several ads?! LOL!!

What's with the donation increase too! Well below average looks are seeking 200/ hh which is absurd. Let's all do our part and NOT see these providers with ridiculous rates, outdated photos and horrible service!!

Did I miss anything? LOL!! My. 2 just simply annoyed.

[QUOTE=MichaelNguyen;5515843]Everytime I check the sites out for providers, it's always the same providers posting the same ad with the same outdated photos. Scrolling through the pages and you'll see the same providers ad on the next page or page after. And the specials? Is it really a special if it's the same donation you've had posted for the last several ads?! LOL!!

What's with the donation increase too! Well below average looks are seeking 200/ hh which is absurd. Let's all do our part and NOT see these providers with ridiculous rates, outdated photos and horrible service!!

Did I miss anything? LOL!! My. 2 just simply annoyed.[/QUOTE]They advertise because they have to.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2236290-Since-when-did-it-become-normal-to%85[/URL]

Check out this thread by Daisy. She's a very refreshing voice. The funny thing is all the idiot white knights falling all over themselves to defend cancellation fees and alert extortion by toxic entitled providers.

BTW I'd like to nominate Bigbooblover83 for White Knight of the year.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5531568][URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2236290-Since-when-did-it-become-normal-to%85[/URL]

Check out this thread by Daisy. She's a very refreshing voice. The funny thing is all the idiot white knights falling all over themselves to defend cancellation fees and alert extortion by toxic entitled providers.

BTW I'd like to nominate Bigbooblover83 for White Knight of the year.[/QUOTE]I believe cuck is the more accurate word.

I don't even recall there being any cancellation fees before 2016 or so.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5531821]I believe cuck is the more accurate word.

I don't even recall there being any cancellation fees before 2016 or so.[/QUOTE]Payment should be for services provided, not promised.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5531568][URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2236290-Since-when-did-it-become-normal-to%85[/URL]

Check out this thread by Daisy. She's a very refreshing voice. The funny thing is all the idiot white knights falling all over themselves to defend cancellation fees and alert extortion by toxic entitled providers.

BTW I'd like to nominate Bigbooblover83 for White Knight of the year.[/QUOTE]She'll incur the wrath of the entitled and I'm sure she already has felt jealous rage from them. Good for her. When she is the victim of attacks (they will be coming) don't believe them. It's like 7th grade there.

[QUOTE=TryHard;5532144]She'll incur the wrath of the entitled and I'm sure she already has felt jealous rage from them. Good for her. When she is the victim of attacks (they will be coming) don't believe them. It's like 7th grade there.[/QUOTE]Seen a few girls turn jaded / toxic from being on TNA for too long.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5531568]BTW I'd like to nominate Bigbooblover83 for White Knight of the year./QUOTE]It's always kind of a race between all those boys to see who can be the first to post the.

"I'm so sorry he did that to you.

You shouldn't have had to deal with that.

You're the sweetest and don't deserve that.

Red dots for him".

Over the top please like me nonsensical garbage.

[URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2240327-Rob&p=13516137[/URL]#post13516137.

Seems like her laptop is used to record sessions. May have synced with the guys phone?

[QUOTE=EoCowbooy1;5542053][URL]https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?2240327-Rob&p=13516137[/URL]#post13516137.

Seems like her laptop is used to record sessions. May have synced with the guys phone?[/QUOTE]I'll take Blackmail for 1000 Alex.

Good looking out Cowboy! This is a chilling report. Of course the first White Knight already posted his skeptical response.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5542307]I'll take Blackmail for 1000 Alex.

Good looking out Cowboy! This is a chilling report. Of course the first White Knight already posted his skeptical response.[/QUOTE]If you are referring to Jake, I find him to be far from a WK. I've personally met him as well. I'll peek over as I'm sure more have answered. I didn't expect it to be up this long actually.

[QUOTE=EoCowbooy1;5542938]If you are referring to Jake, I find him to be far from a WK. I've personally met him as well. I'll peek over as I'm sure more have answered. I didn't expect it to be up this long actually.[/QUOTE]I don't know why this guy has so many guys questioning him as he spelled it out pretty well in his first statement. Interesting that no women have posted in this alert. More interesting is his comments on the back channel statements by other guys. One guy asked what she could possibly gain by accessing his phone? OMG what a dolt.

I'm with you in that I thought TNA would have nuked this thread by now. I can't personally vouch for any men on TNA so I'm going with the eyeball test on Jake. You may be right but.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5543948]I don't know why this guy has so many guys questioning him as he spelled it out pretty well in his first statement. Interesting that no women have posted in this alert. More interesting is his comments on the back channel statements by other guys. One guy asked what she could possibly gain by accessing his phone? OMG what a dolt.

I'm with you in that I thought TNA would have nuked this thread by now. I can't personally vouch for any men on TNA so I'm going with the eyeball test on Jake. You may be right but.[/QUOTE]I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.

[QUOTE=EoCowbooy1;5545451]I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.[/QUOTE]Isn't he the guy who had his garage burned down by Jessie (Cinder)? Because if he is, fuck you for sticking up for him!

[QUOTE=EoCowbooy1;5545451]I've known Jake since around the time CLRB became TNA. He and others were the first ones to vet a lot of the new ladies. They certainly had methods to vet a new lady. I appreciated the risks they took. He'll call out BS no matter if it is a lady or guy. Not always publicly. He never defended the lady IMO.

I never went back to the thread to see the comment about what the Gal could gain. I'm amazed that anyone wouldn't realize extortion. I never considered an open computer would possibly be taping a session. It's something I'll be on the lookout for from now on.[/QUOTE]White knighting the white knights! LOL.

[QUOTE=PriceIsRight39;5547573]White knighting the white knights! LOL.[/QUOTE]Hahaha nice! True though.

Skepticism isn't a bad word its a good word and skepticism don't make a wk a wk has no skepticism he always believes the woman even when faced with the facts.

[QUOTE=Boomer14;5542307]I'll take Blackmail for 1000 Alex.

Good looking out Cowboy! This is a chilling report. Of course the first White Knight already posted his skeptical response.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ShootingBlanks;5547939]Skepticism isn't a bad word its a good word and skepticism don't make a wk a wk has no skepticism he always believes the woman even when faced with the facts.[/QUOTE]There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)

Jake4 X challenged and cast suspicion on the OP right out of the gate without even enquiring about the details of what transpired. Basically, you're an alt so you're not to be believed and thus the lady must be right.

Yeah, white knight for sure.

[QUOTE=PoontangChaser;5548391]There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)

Jake4 X challenged and cast suspicion on the OP right out of the gate without even enquiring about the details of what transpired. Basically, you're an alt so you're not to be believed and thus the lady must be right.

Yeah, white knight for sure.[/QUOTE]So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5549226]So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.[/QUOTE]Ya the dude also said he never needed to be part of any forum as well. And he decided to post there to help others from the lady.

This thread is starting to sound like it on the board, maybe we should just send it over to TNA what happened to the girls man.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5549226]So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.[/QUOTE]Ya the dude also said he never needed to be part of any forum as well. And he decided to post there to help others from the lady.

This thread is starting to sound like it on the board, maybe we should just send it over to TNA what happened to the girls man.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5549226]So that makes you a hobbyist WK, blindly defending random hobbyists with no questions asked.

The dude wrote he'd been in the hobby since 2014. Profile was created a week before the alert. Jake asked a very valid question of what's his real handle.

As for video recording, there's loads of tricks and small gadgets to detect an active camera, but they're not 100% effective. If you're paranoid, only do outcalls, where you have control of the environment. Otherwise it's a trust issue with the provider.[/QUOTE]LOLOL I did not defend any hobbyist. OP writes an alert, Jake attacks the guy without considering that despite OP being new, the alert might still be valid. I CONCUR with PriceIsRight's comment about white knighting the white knights. Where's "blindly defending other hobbyists" here?

However, I do appreciate the passion with which YOU, sir, are defending Jake. Bravo! What was the term again? Ah, "hobbyist WK!"

Or is that you, Jake? SMFH.

[QUOTE=PoontangChaser;5550525]LOLOL I did not defend any hobbyist. OP writes an alert, Jake attacks the guy without considering that despite OP being new, the alert might still be valid. I CONCUR with PriceIsRight's comment about white knighting the white knights. Where's "blindly defending other hobbyists" here?
[/QUOTE]You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

[QUOTE=PoontangChaser;5548391]There are different ways of white knighting and attacking the hobbyist without explicitly taking sides with the provider is white knighting (passive white knighting?)
[/QUOTE]I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5550674]You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.[/QUOTE]So. Who exactly am I white knighting? And how?

And IDGAF to who / what you're sick of.

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5550674]You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.[/QUOTE]There was no white knighting and TNA was about reviews and not just.

Another board for ladies to advertise on? Well it's time for that board to return to it's roots!

[QUOTE=Dexxzy;5550674]You defined what White Knighting is and your actions clearly fall in the line of *your* own definition of White Knighting. Let me copy and paste your quote below.

I am sick of the TNA White Knights defending providers who do terrible sh1 t (which is why that place is so toxic), but I am equally irate at people like you who White Knight hobbyists as if they can do no wrong.[/QUOTE]I respectfully disagree with you that I'm engaging in any of that. I have already made my point in my last post and I don't think this is worth spending any more cycles on.

Happy pooning!

[QUOTE=PNWPlay;5551248]There was no white knighting and TNA was about reviews and not just.

Another board for ladies to advertise on? Well it's time for that board to return to it's roots![/QUOTE]Not only that, the reviews used to be HONEST, something you could rely on without thinking twice.

The review format was much better with explicit details of what the provider did and did not.

I miss those days.