Korean Agency BB

[SuperMan333]

Thanks for this. I hesitated to see Amy / Ara in the past cause of doubt. I may end up seeing them eventually as they keep rebranding. Luckily, bookers kept me on an enjoyable path so far.

No, the Amy that started at ktownkgirlz along with Suzy.

[BonerAppetitty]

Thank you for the accurate review, and likewise to Bastard Chorum for the review of Zoe. Both Bree & Zoe are USDA Prime to me. Bree looked happy to see me and I was in ecstasy with Bree.

She was the only girl this year who made me feel young again. I suppressed my desire to rec her in HYA thread cause it's bad luck for a girl if I am the first to review LOL.

Bree's contact: (click here) 5'3" 34 C 115 lbs.

Boner, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and one of our MVP's. Bree is young looking, sweet girl and I think you'd like her. Real pics but add 5 years and 15 pounds, same face if you like the pics but older, face is her best feature. Nice fake tits, soft but can feel the hard firm underneath, big brown areolas with lighter button nipples, large belly tattoo that's been photoshopped out, needs to lose that Covid weight (but I'm a thin chaser) although I could see the mongers that like thick girls, really like Bree and say she was prime. For me she was almost too heavy, but her face reminded me of someone. Nice personality, sweet and bubbly, likes to go at her own pace, takes slightly longer shower, acts young. BBBJ a little but toothy and not deep, BLS good, NO RIM, BBFSCIP, goes slow at first but can really get into it, won't complain, pussy feels good and soft, natural wetness, tired at the end but still a trooper, doggy looks good with thick ass to grab. I'll repeat after I've shopped around the new talent.

[BonerAppetitty]

Thanks for this. I hesitated to see Amy / Ara in the past cause of doubt. I may end up seeing them eventually as they keep rebranding. Luckily, bookers kept me on an enjoyable path so far.

This is Amy. I think he saw her before too so I'm not sure why he didn't disclose that.

[Jack926]

That's how many girls are currently listed on CGLA's website. There can't possibly be that many different girls currently available. I'm sure half if not more are just re-brands of the same girl.

It makes it just that more difficult to keep track of who's who. I'm starting to think this is by design sadly. I remember back when the agency just started there were only just 6-8 girls listed! The good ole days.

Now we live a world where we have to navigate the re-brands, fake pics, upcharges etc.

CGLA does have lots of talents and she does do a daily update on who is available and who is not-There are no duplicate girl or rebrand of the same girl but there are definitely some fake photos. The thing with CGLA booker is that she shoots straight with me. And if you treat her nice, she will give you great feedback.

All and all, she is very pleasant to deal with.

[KGirlAddict]

I created this thread (click here) for avoiding MILFs. When you guys make this claim without names, I am not sure if you guys are picky or my standard is too low LOL. I still TOFTT happily.

Boner, you're a gentleman and a scholar, and one of our MVP's. Bree is young looking, sweet girl and I think you'd like her. Real pics but add 5 years and 15 pounds, same face if you like the pics but older, face is her best feature. Nice fake tits, soft but can feel the hard firm underneath, big brown areolas with lighter button nipples, large belly tattoo that's been photoshopped out, needs to lose that Covid weight (but I'm a thin chaser) although I could see the mongers that like thick girls, really like Bree and say she was prime. For me she was almost too heavy, but her face reminded me of someone. Nice personality, sweet and bubbly, likes to go at her own pace, takes slightly longer shower, acts young. BBBJ a little but toothy and not deep, BLS good, NO RIM, BBFSCIP, goes slow at first but can really get into it, won't complain, pussy feels good and soft, natural wetness, tired at the end but still a trooper, doggy looks good with thick ass to grab. I'll repeat after I've shopped around the new talent.

[Toungsten]

No sir, I don't need to look at the comment in question as I did that prior to my most recent post. The only words you used quotations for were "earnest and trustworthy" and "possible". As I previously stated, you did not use quotations on the phrase No we do not agree at all, which is indicative of you missing the sarcasm when I wrote something about being glad that we could resolve this exchange in agreement. And respectfully, I don't skim over your reviews I simply ignore them, as I know what they will contain and, as should be quite apparent by now, it doesn't interest me. "If it's only YMMV then why bother to read reviews?" Head scratcher. If seeing providers is YMMV then why see providers? Obviously because for every provider (or monger's review of one) that you don't care for, there's some other provider (or some other monger's review of one) that you get something positive from.

That's correct. That is exactly where I put the quotation marks and it's obvious now that the sarcasm passed right by you. To answer your question why see providers if it is YMMV the answer is as I said earlier wait for several reviews. Read the reviews, compare them and do a little legwork as to who wrote them and who else they have reviewed. Also get clued in by some bookers before it became so open. It's pretty simple. That's why I'm not disappointed very often. And that's why BBFS was available to me with virtually every provider (not all) before it was part of the daily routine of hobbyists. No one even talked about it back then.

[SuperMan333]

OK this piqued my interest. I will report

.

This is Amy. I think he saw her before too so I'm not sure why he didn't disclose that.

[The Sexorcist]

Go back and see where my quotation marks are. You must have skimmed over it as you have skimmed over my reviews and don't think anyone is confused as to whom you are referring. If it's only YMMV then why bother to read reviews?

No sir, I don't need to look at the comment in question as I did that prior to my most recent post. The only words you used quotations for were "earnest and trustworthy" and "possible". As I previously stated, you did not use quotations on the phrase No we do not agree at all, which is indicative of you missing the sarcasm when I wrote something about being glad that we could resolve this exchange in agreement. And respectfully, I don't skim over your reviews I simply ignore them, as I know what they will contain and, as should be quite apparent by now, it doesn't interest me. "If it's only YMMV then why bother to read reviews?" Head scratcher. If seeing providers is YMMV then why see providers? Obviously because for every provider (or monger's review of one) that you don't care for, there's some other provider (or some other monger's review of one) that you get something positive from.

[PumpNDump]

LOL, hey you renamed al Bundy's private social club of "No Ma'am" (National Organization of Amazonian Masterhood).

But I dig your version too.

I created this thread (click here) for NO MA'AM club (National Organization of Men Against Asian MILFs). When you guys make this claim without names, I am not sure if you guys are picky or my standard is too low LOL. I am still very happy with new girls I saw.

[Toungsten]

53 girls available today and 13 more available next 3 days. Booker is good and that's why they book many girls. There are rebrands but only duplicate ads may be Aria = Vixen.

CGLA booker is the best at keeping the site updated. I like knowing when the girls are back so I can plan to see them. It would be more surprising to me if this booker has multiple ads for the same girl. Last time I raised that suspicion in this thread, the duplicate ad was gone the next day.

Easy for me to keep track because I know who I want to see. Booker is honest enough for me.

Here's a good riddle. How many bookers are needed to book for over 50 girls. The answer is too many.

[Toungsten]

Let's not state the obvious here. Talking about that proverbial box LOL. Didn't you build that box?.

I built that box to enclose the doubters.

[Toungsten]

I use this agency exclusively, you can see nearly every girl. Not sure why you guys think this is out of reach. Every girl is booked by nearly every booker these days.

What is strange about it is that the number of girls at this agency, if accurate, would be more than all the other agencies put together. With the lower volume due to the upcharge and the over abundance of girls being booked by these bookers why would any girl remain with them and not leave as they do in other agencies as a normal course of events? Bookers who book far fewer girls tell me there are slow times. Well, if you're competing with 50 or so other girls how would you have enough good and busy days? You can't be sure all the girls listed are actually available since you're only asking for one at at time and if they aren't available the booker can simply say she's booked for that time. Doesn't seem to compute.

[BonerAppetitty]

I created this thread (click here) for avoiding MILFs. When you guys make this claim without names, I am not sure if you guys are picky or my standard is too low LOL. I still TOFTT happily.

Recent transplant to this area but have traveled to LA for years. I understand this is a small sample size but in my last handful of visits, I had 2 borderline grandmas whose posted picture looked like they stole them from their granddaughters social media, 2 who were middle age but posted pics from their peak years, and then about 2 more who were pretty but looked nothing like their posted pics. Are all the cute and beautiful providers now non-bb or elsewhere? I remember last year going into appointments being shock and surprised for the best reasons possible and this last round has been a complete opposite experience. I use to book with confidence knowing I would get at least a fair version of what I was seeing but I'll likely not see anyone new unless I see a positive post. What's concerning is I come from the east coast in an area where the kgirls go to retire and I'm starting to see a troubling pattern. Hopefully it's just a bad run? Hopefully. Appreciate any feedback. I know I should have walked on some of these but driving a hour to the location and don't want be labeled as a last minute canceller.

[BonerAppetitty]

53 girls available today and 13 more available next 3 days. Booker is good and that's why they book many girls. There are rebrands but only duplicate ads may be Aria = Vixen.

CGLA booker is the best at keeping the site updated. I like knowing when the girls are back so I can plan to see them. It would be more surprising to me if this booker has multiple ads for the same girl. Last time I raised that suspicion in this thread, the duplicate ad was gone the next day.

Easy for me to keep track because I know who I want to see. Booker is honest enough for me.

That's how many girls are currently listed on CGLA's website. There can't possibly be that many different girls currently available. I'm sure half if not more are just re-brands of the same girl.

It makes it just that more difficult to keep track of who's who. I'm starting to think this is by design sadly. I remember back when the agency just started there were only just 6-8 girls listed! The good ole days.

Now we live a world where we have to navigate the re-brands, fake pics, upcharges etc.

[SharingHer]

I use this agency exclusively, you can see nearly every girl. Not sure why you guys think this is out of reach. Every girl is booked by nearly every booker these days.

CandyGirl girls listed are not duplicates and the girls are actually available if they are on the site. If they are on a brief vacation for a few days or have not started again, they write the date they will be back on the listing. If the girls are gone or on extended vacation, they are not even visible. Candygirl Booker is my go to. There are rebrands, but not duplicate listings for the same girl with different names. I think for the most part the girls are not really their girls, so sometimes quality control is not there. Had a forgettable experience with one of the new duos listed recently, but I know it is not the booker's fault. The CandyGirl booker is pretty close to perfect for me.