Korean Agency BB

[Toungsten]

Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.

Yes the mission is to contribute to the intel and have it read. If no one reads it then why would we bother. The mission is certainly not to make verbose diatribes to make one's self feel better.

[Toungsten]

Exactly! Why buy a used car from a dealer who is "possibly" selling you a lemon when you can eschew the guesswork and seek a more earnest and trustworthy purveyor of automotive transportation? Glad we can resolve this exchange in agreement. Good day.

We have found a need for lemon laws to protect us from those "earnest and trustworthy" purveyors of automotive transportation. Unfortunately with providers we have no laws to protect us from lemons so we have to go by recommendations. There are always lemons that are "possible" which by definition means that there are always diamonds when you think a lemon exists. You use the term possibly as if it means probably and even then there is no guarantee. No we do not agree at all. Caveat Emptor. Find another source of intel.

[FortunateSon01]

Hey all,

New to this forum, but not the hobby. I'm east coast and was hoping to check out the west coast business. Unfortunately, everyone I've contacted wants references and I don't have them. I contacted Gardenksecret and they told me name race age and TER or HX I'd if I had it. Then said 2 references by different bookers. So am I reading this as all of the above or have an I'd or two different references? Just trying to understand the rules.

Thanks.

[SsStuntCock]

I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".
(…)
Many over-the-top reviews, not all. But at least a majority. Sound more like pump-and-dump hype to me then actual attempts at objective evaluation.

This. It's the hyperbole for me. If one follows this board as much as I do -which is to say way too fkn much- one should know who's suspect for lacking objectivity. And they'll recognize how quick some will counterbalance a review that reads anything less than a strong recommendation. And in those cases, it's always the guy's fault for a poor session, never the girl. It's where 'YMMV' becomes weaponized ad nauseam.

It speaks volumes when one can predict how hyperbolic a review's conclusion will be by who the author is. "As good as it gets. " "Can't ask for more. " "You will get all you want and probably more than you expected. " "Can't be beat. " Are just a few random examples that sound awfully like that damn My Pillow Guy.

But who am I to talk. My writing approach always applies alliteration, like some horn dog high schooler in a creative writing class.

[LandOfKGirls]

M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf.

https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/ Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.

http://www.kgla.net/ Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/.

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Lucy, Dana, Tiana.

https://kbliss.net/ Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.

Looking forward to reading feedback on Paige. I won't TOFTT but may be an early adopter with a good review from a trusted handle.

[The Sexorcist]

That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.

Exactly! Why buy a used car from a dealer who is "possibly" selling you a lemon when you can eschew the guesswork and seek a more earnest and trustworthy purveyor of automotive transportation? Glad we can resolve this exchange in agreement. Good day.

[Toungsten]

Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.

Why do you think we write reviews? To be read which would be more appropriate on a Korean agency BB discussion board than your verbose response.

[Toungsten]

One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.

That was the key word you added in. Possible. Hmm. Possibly not.

[LoveAsianGirls]

I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.

I agree too. Saw Nicole recently. Cute face and hot body! Loved her big veiny boobs with big nipples! I liked her BBBJ too. Appreciated that she took time and effort to take me deeper and deeper into her mouth and throat. Not full on DT but she sure tries.

[RocketManP]

And at least they know you're reading their reviews. Mission accomplished.

Is the mission really to get someone to read the reviews? Well, personally I read (and scrape) all reviews and I think most people do too of a girl they're interesting in seeing. So that sounds a bit dubious. I think for a lot of the over the top reviews, the mission is to actually get people to buy in, not to just read the review.

Even tho many of them are very verbose, many times they actually tend to contain little actual description. A lot of them use verbosity and relative eloquence to obfuscate the lack of details and generic nature of the review itself.

I always say, if I take a review and it could apply to two-three completely different girls, this review is worth very little to me. It fails to paint a picture and to differentiate a girl from the rest. All it says is "go buy".

Imo, there's a pretty consolidated list that most mongers want to know about when a review is posted.

Are the pics true? If not, what does she really look like. Face, body and youth.

Is the age estimate correct? How older is she than pics. How does she look without a gallon of makeup in her. If pics aren't her, does she have specific SE features or Korean features.

How is her body, does she have a gut, does she have ink / metal, is her weight off by more than 15% of the pic.

How tight is she. How are her Kegels.

How good is she in services skills-wise. Does she has stamina to ride in acg long? Does she provide a deep BJ, does she dt, does she bls, does she rim.

How's her attitude, is she a porn actress, a shy collegemate, a goof fob or a dead fish with gps.

If she's BBFS, how's cip and msog. She allow FIA or DATY / O. Is she a clock watcher or a staller.

Each of these provide very specific information that can be used to make an evaluation of whether a girl is worth seeing.

Many over-the-top reviews, not all. But at least a majority. Sound more like pump-and-dump hype to me then actual attempts at objective evaluation. Again, not all. There are some super verbose over the top reviews that are exceptionally detailed and describe the girl to a tee, including specific tats and real age and her filling on her 29th tooth. Those are excellent. It's like reading a good Balzac novel. But I believe Mr Sexorcist wasn't talking about those, but rather about, well, IYKYK.

[SharingHer]

Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.

I agree with your assessment on Nicole's age and performance. She strives to make a great connection with me. Also, I am a huge fan of Nicole's BBBJ, lots of variety, very leisurely and lets me fuck her face a lot. In general she is way under-reviewed and under-rated here.

[The Sexorcist]

One man's house painter is another's Michelangelo. Just got to give them the tools, desire and inspiration to work with.

One man's lemon is another good used car salesman's excellent vehicle, if you buy what he's selling (both figuratively and literally). I trust my own perceptions much more than certain reviews I've read so I'll continue to be discerning and make the distinction between fact and possible fantasy. Good day.

[Toungsten]

She's pretty old. Might be around 45+. When she started in LA last year, she had tremendous breasts: round, bloated and veiny. Unfortunately, she went on a massive diet and shrunk them down a few cup sizes -- from DD to C+.

Her pussy remains shallow, however. Once you get her worked up, she will let you go full bore on her snatch. Her preference is to control the amount of penetration through CG.

She's around 4'10, 90 lbs. She's not beautiful, but I find her attractive for her age.

On top of that, she's pretty friendly and willing to let you guide the action.

Ps - Her BBBJ is horrible.

Don't let that age thing scare you away. I've been with her a number of times and she isn't one of the young providers but I think that 45 number is over the top. I only knew one girl who was about that age and that was Moli who was 43 when I last saw her a couple of years ago. At 43 she was still one of the hottest and most desirable Kgirls. Just look at Nicole's reviews. Plenty of 8's and 9' in looks with a body that a 20 year old would love to have to and that comes with her exemplary service. I would guess she's between 30 and 35 but it doesn't really matter. A woman is in her sexual prime in her 30's and isn't this all about sex. If you want a HYA that you can look at and not get the great sex that many of us want then that's a personal preference. For me give me a woman who is hot looking and can fuck me to death. That, among others, is Nicole.

[Toungsten]

M. Stacy, Ava (WLA). Aria Audrey (MW) https://myalbum.com/album/4j4zspr3tJSf.

https://preciousklove.escortbook.com/ Saige, Nicole (WLA). MW.

http://www.kgla.net/ Saige, Nicole (WLA) . MW.

Sexy Angels. https://sexyangels.site/.

SFK. https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/ Lucy, Dana, Tiana.

https://kbliss.net/ Jessica, Angel, Gigi, Lucy, Tiana.

[NObserver]

Side note: On this particular morning, the line-up of dudes outside the callbox was redics. Myself included, each one of us looking shady af and seedier than the next. We legit looked like all the bad guys from Robocop.

Excellent review! I like the self - depreciation and references to 80's stuff, especially the one about the assholes from Robocop. I was so happy when Alex Murphy stabbed Clarence Boddicker in the neck with his data spike.

Anyway, the part about eating out Hana and getting a face full of her pussy juice was also great.

Thank you for the intel.