Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 10,636 to 10,650 of 32136
-
01-25-22 19:37 #21501Senior Member

Posts: 505Bri in Boston
Who had experience with this:
https://boston.skipthegames.com/fema...e/932289856197
I want to try but worth the cat date at buck forty?
-
01-25-22 16:38 #21500Senior Member

Posts: 232Bonnie
I have seen her a couple of times. Nice girl and try's hard. Small apartment in Lawrence. She is a good deal for the price. Like I said she is a sweet girl. I will repeat.
Originally Posted by Matty1169
[View Original Post]
Rac.
-
01-25-22 14:21 #21499Senior Member

Posts: 81Christina Waltham
https://privatedelights.ch/USA/Massa...tysdogsandcars
Nice GFE experience for 400 an hour. She is hosting in Waltham only on Tuesdays and is pretty chill. Experience seems to be what you make of it since she takes directions pretty well. Was a classic GFE with DFK, BBBJ and multiple positions.
-
01-25-22 12:19 #21498Senior Member

Posts: 40Bait and switch
https://www.eros.com/massachusetts/b...6224.htm?cat=1
Should have known but my little head talked me into hitting this one up. Went thru screening and such.
Opened the door and was greeted by a much larger blonde woman. Washed my hands and thought about what I was about to do. Turned around and walked out. If I wanted a bigger girl I'd go to a local pub and try my luck (and patience) at fishing.
Best,
BC.
-
01-25-22 10:33 #21497Senior Member

Posts: 80I Concur Win56!
Keep it moving everyone. These women are here today & gone tomorrow. Next!
Originally Posted by Win56
[View Original Post]
-
01-25-22 09:52 #21496Senior Member

Posts: 200Eva Nicole in Danvers?
Any reviews of this girl? Photos are from a few years back.
I will be in Danvers for a week due to work and couldn't find much in the area. Looking for FS and her ad is up but old.
-
01-25-22 06:57 #21495Senior Member

Posts: 304McKenna
I have seen her and I have to admit not sure what all the hype is about. She's not all that.
-
01-24-22 23:22 #21494Senior Member

Posts: 232Mckenna
If I recalled it right, I was the first a few to reviewed her in 2020 and I recommend her to everybody here.
And I was the first one to post her "new ads" here and wonder what the hell is going on.
I fully understand providers has preference, I also think her ads aren't pleasant.
She already have some loyal customers. So if her ads offended you, just move on. Take your money somewhere else, as I did.
-
01-24-22 21:00 #21493Banned Member

Posts: 968Let's finally Shift Gears. Any Info on that Bonnie Starr provider??
Who gives a shit about that other stuff now. That also applies to me. LOL.
Anyone on this Boston Forum know about that Bonnie Starr woman!? I've seen her ads recently, several of them. I've only really noticed 1 mention of her. Over on the Lowell Forum. I'm just wondering if her attitude in person and her Srvc is any good? She told me she's only willing to take on like 2-3 more new clients, that's IT.
I can't find her ads right now. I'll look and post it later, if I find it.
-
01-24-22 16:16 #21492Senior Member

Posts: 283McKenna
Enough already, why are we wasting so much energy on someone that doesn't want to see someone of a certain age who really cares she's the only one that I've ever heard that discriminates against that age group plenty out there I could care less about seeing her.
It's not uncommon to want someone of a more mature age. McKenna is the opposite of the norm. Let's go onto a more important topic like people's experiences with providers.
-
01-24-22 13:44 #21491Senior Member

Posts: 510If "this" was legal in Massachusetts, there would be an "escape hatch", like "at will employment". You can terminate any employee from "at will employment", as long as there's no reason at all, ie. "It is no longer the will of the company to employ _person_" (trust me, I was a engineering staff director for years and know Mass employment law very well). If, in the course of an at-will termination the company implies there are "reasons" for the termination, then it triggers legal requirements to produce records related to those reasons. At-will is an escape hatch designed to technically allow the option for both employee and employer to terminate a relationship "just because". It's insidious. So, back to my point: any legislation of such a profession would have to include escape hatches that allow providers the legal safety (for the purpose of personal safety) of declining service for a client "for no reason". So they'd likely have to change their ads and responses, but the net effect would be the same: they can decline for any reason, by way of "no reason".
Originally Posted by JrKoff
[View Original Post]
-
01-24-22 11:57 #21490Senior Member

Posts: 426Your missing the original point
If I read an AD that simply states that a provider does not see men over the age of 65 ! . No problem I move on! Mckenna went on to say how disgusted she was by the thought of a man 65 or older! That's the point. So it doesn't matter what age or ethnicity limits a provider prefers. It's the lack of professionalism and poor attitude with Mckenna that is insulting not her preferences in men.
Originally Posted by JrKoff
[View Original Post]
PL.
-
01-24-22 11:34 #21489Senior Member

Posts: 162It's a business
At its core, thls is a private business and they can impose any rules they want. If it were legal in Massachusetts, then laws against Dscrimination or ageism may apply. Alas, this isn't the case. As mongers we have our own personal set of rules of who to see. For me, I avoid providers in Lynn since several experiences not been good. I cross out bbw or MILF types because they are not attractive to me. It just my own preferences. If she wants to restrict her client base, it's her choice. She seems to have enough other interested and willing clients from a different deogaphic.
Originally Posted by Blately
[View Original Post]
-
01-24-22 11:08 #21488Senior Member

Posts: 77When one realizes that providers are actually human beings and puts a tiny amount of effort into trying to imagine and understand their perspective, setting such standards /boundaries is easily understandable.
Originally Posted by Matty1169
[View Original Post]
-
01-24-22 00:13 #21487Banned Member

Posts: 968I'll lean on the Neutral Side.
That's what I should've originally said. If guys don't want to see a provider based on the providers restrictions, then the client guy has the right to not Buy their Time.
Also if a provider wants to have restrictions in place, well then that's her Rights. Then you can know better first hand, so that you can move on to the Next Ad, that Tickles Your Fancy.














Reply With Quote








