Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 6,931 to 6,945 of 16356
-
01-09-22 09:45 #9426Senior Member

Posts: 55What Works Best For You?
I was wondering, how many of you guys on here do ppm vs. A weekly allowance? Also what's your rating on quality of SBs from ppm to weekly allowance?
-
01-08-22 23:32 #9425Senior Member

Posts: 352Glass Half Full
Her body is very tight. You will not be disappointed.
Enjoy her. She loves to get off and will want you to go down on her. She simply loves sex.
May the pussy be with you.
SD.
Originally Posted by LovePunnany
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-22 20:17 #9424Senior Member

Posts: 1160I wouldn't believe her. Don't get me wrong, there are dudes who are into fatties and dudes who will throw money around like that for no reason. But I can't imagine the intersection of those 2 groups is very large. I did catch one girl BSing me early on in my SA adventures. We met for coffee, we discussed how much, I did my standard offer, and she over-acted offended "oh that's way to low, I'm expecting $1 K a week at the least. " For a slightly chubby girl in her early-to-mid 30's. I just tilted my head, looked at her and straight up said "Did you learn to say that on Twitter or TikTok?" The look on her face was priceless, you'd have thought I'd just walked in on her finger banging herself. She finally mumbled Tiktok and half apologized, but she wasn't really pretty enough to justify the effort. I already paid for the coffee, so we exchanged good byes and I headed out, never to see or speak to her again.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
Point being, there's an entire "sugarbaby" social media support / tips presence online that a lot of these girls, ESPECIALLY the early 20's girls, follow and tells them all kinds of crazy shit. And it's not even that most of it is complete horseshit, it's just the girls consuming the content don't understand statistics. Yes, you saw 1 TikTok video where 1 girl says her "daddy" sends her $500 or $1000 a week just to text him and "be there", with no sex involved. That might even be true, but for every one girl who finds that one guy, there are literally millions of Tiktok girls who never see that type of relationship. But they make a very common mistake (as evidenced by this fake news age we live in): they mistake an outlier that reassures their pre-existing and more comforting world view (sugaring is easy and I can get lots of money from guys just by talking to them! Maybe occasionally I have to send a nude) for the reality (99.9999% of guys on there are going to pay you 200-300 if and only if you fuck them). But hey, why confront reality when social media algorithms will feed you things it knows you want to click on based on your previous clicks that you clicked because they made you feel better!
So much stupidity in our modern society could be easily solved IF people would just simply get their heads out of their asses and stop mistaking outliers for the norm if those outliers confirm their existing world view just because it confirms their existing world view.
-
01-08-22 20:07 #9423Senior Member

Posts: 238Muse
Any info on this Baby??
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...0-a443747e033d
-
01-08-22 19:56 #9422Senior Member

Posts: 238How is her body. I have a meet with her this week?
Originally Posted by SugarDaddio
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-22 19:03 #9421Senior Member

Posts: 1745If the prices are way high, it means that the high end players entered the game and raised the prices, for everyone. I was talking to a sb friend and she said some guy sent her $500, out of the blue, when they haven't even met and have immediate no plans to.
Originally Posted by PreferAnal
[View Original Post]
There are more multi millionaires on there, and o to them, sending $500 is like us sending $10. So the higher end girls are out of reach. Even worse,this one is actually a fat girl in her 20's. Pretty face, but obese. So if she is getting those kinds of handouts, can see how the rest get GPS very quickly.
Again, I am thankful that I really enjoy banging 6s, and the occasional 7. I haven't even gotten an 8 or 9 on there, for years, although I also just got back on the site.
-
01-08-22 10:20 #9420Regular Member

Posts: 13Re: The Good Old Days
Sugar Baby sites years ago were a gold mine years ago. The price of admission kept the riff raff out. I targeted that same age group. I had several long term babes like that. SA is insane now. The prices sky high and the quality way down. I'm done with them.
Originally Posted by JustMikey
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-22 00:45 #9419Senior Member

Posts: 238Check your inbox.
Originally Posted by PeteAppleSeed
[View Original Post]
-
01-07-22 10:47 #9418Senior Member

Posts: 329Help
Hi fellow SDs.
I'm temporarily off SA due to my current life / work situation.
I was wondering If any of you would care to share that digits of an SB (non pro) that would need some extra after Christmas $$.
I know this is a lot to ask, but I wouldn't do it if the provider scene wasn't so mediocre right now.
I really have no preference as long as she's mid 20's or younger. I can host as well.
I just need a good submissive SB that I can call and PPM with no drama.
PM me please.
Thank you.
-
01-07-22 06:26 #9417Senior Member

Posts: 1745Ummmm. Yes, of course. And also sexual assault or rape, because you know many of these psyscho girls would claim that, after the fact.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
I'm not saying it's a huge risk, but it's a significant enough that I have no problem asking them to use Signal or Session, which the majority of them will do.
Signal still uses their phone #. So you would still have that. And most of the girls send me their # before I even suggest Signal or Session. But I suggest using a burner phone with Signal on it, although I've been too lazy to do that lately. My regular phone is a prepaid one, not in my name, but still could be traced back to me, fairly easily. But will try to buy a burner soon. So do as I say, not as I do.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
01-07-22 06:24 #9416Senior Member

Posts: 1745ThikMommy1018.
https://members.seeking.com/member/8...f-ffee37c0ceb5
Just want to sell pics and videos.
----
Singlemingle222.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...f-1450005954ca
Asian girl who is probably DTF, but I know she wants more than 100, because that's all I offered her. I usually go with 200 for the white girls, but asian is just not my favorite flavor. She said she doesn't like being offered money, and feels too "transactional", so better to just ask her how you can help or pay some of her bills. That seems risky if she has a $300 bill, but that is what she said is the best approach, if anyone is interested.
-
01-05-22 23:55 #9415Senior Member

Posts: 159True that!
Originally Posted by Eslide3
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-22 18:07 #9414Senior Member

Posts: 3163I speak completely freely w / girls by GV. IDK what the legal grey area would be. Prostitution? Name a single example of someone convicted or even arrested or charged based on messaging w / a sugar baby / POT. And, there is no way that the messages I send on GV can be easily traced back to me personally. Of course the NSA could do that, likely in similar ways to how they caught David Petraeus. Google might know who I am when I am on GV b / c of other services they use to fingerprint me. My employer uses a Google server. But, someone would have to get a subpoena to get info out of google about me. No one would get that just b / c I am a SD. And I can tell you, the younger generation, they are text addicts, they are used to everything on their phone. And, if you play your cards right, you can get their identity information out of their phone use. Just to keep in your back pocket, not to threaten. But if someone were to come at you with blackmail material, you have things to push back with. Their real social media, etc.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-22 16:38 #9413Senior Member

Posts: 320Opera is my preferred browser for SA. I do use Signal as well.
Originally Posted by PeterJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-22 13:55 #9412Senior Member

Posts: 1745Two words: Edward Snowden.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
Google Voice is SMS. The NSA vacuums up all SMS. If you are fine not having any private conversations, then that's ok. I would never tell anyone they are wrong with that. It's a matter of personal preference.
However, I prefer a "private "conversation with another person to just be between themselves and myself...especially if we could be in a legal gray area. Plus Signal is free and not really any downsides to it, besides a few girls don't want to mess with it. So why not use it and speak more freely (without having to be in denial, at the same time).














Reply With Quote











