LA LA Land Bullshit and Fight Club

**RocketManP** · 06-30-21 20:30

As far as I was told, the only things off limits in thi thread are doxxing and family members.

Maybe I took what admin said too literally but whatev.

The only issue in talking about it here is barely anyone, including people on the fence, reads this fight club subforum. If girls get business via shill reviews, that's a win for them. There's a reason shills and orgs and girls read active forums and indirectly advertise there. It literally brings them $. And a negative review will lose them $.

**SsStuntCock** · 06-30-21 09:43

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.

We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.

To be honest, I wasn't quite sure how this fight thread works. Didn't even realize it existed until just recently. But since it seems we have some latitude in here, my question was less rhetorical, and more like passive-aggressive shots fired. He doesn't have the balls to out himself and tell the truth, and would probably offer some lame excuse like it was an "accident" or some similar bs story, even if he did respond. With each attempt at playing this charade, he continues to sell his castrated soul to the devil.

**SsStuntCock** · 06-30-21 09:21

Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]

LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business. This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.

When he posted this, he essentially admitted to doing just that: Omitting negative experiences with girls.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

Anyone I've reviewed who opens the door with hardly any clothes on and her tits and ass hanging out and takes me in her arms for a DFK with her hands all over me would get no less than an 8 (really hot) from me. If I couldn't give that at least an 8 I wouldn't review them.

When he posted this 'less than stellar' take on Pink, he quickly attempted to do damage control on himself, and add on another one of his trademark.

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

I just wanted to add to my last post since when I read it it sounded kind of negative. Pink is still one of the best and busiest girls available to us. It's no secret why. She's one of the prettiest with a great natural body.

**RocketManP** · 06-30-21 05:24

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.

LOL, when he has subpar sessions, he doesn't post them publicly. God forbid some girl might get less business.

This is against these guys religion. Theyd rather have mongers waste their $. They. Just like people from the league and so on. Have put girls far above mongers.

**RocketManP** · 06-30-21 05:15

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Can someone explain why this review is virtually identical to the one on TER (see photo), even though these sessions are supposedly 5 months apart?

Despite this poster's countless contributions to LA's kgirl scene, there's still room for improvement.

Your question sounds like a rhetorical question to me.

We all know why these reviews are identical. The author is copying and pasting his ter review to advertise a girl. The author is too lazy to write up a new one to make it at least look like he actually has seen the girl recently. Just like photoshop people at orgs are getting lazier and lazier with their work.

**SsStuntCock** · 06-29-21 22:38

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

She's back and for how long I don't know but I made sure I took advantage of her being available as soon as I knew about it. What I love about Jenny is that everything is so sensual and hot with the perfect touch of GFE and PSE. Her DFK is as good as it gets as her tongue moves in and out of my mouth as she holds me like a long lost lover. She really knows how to hit all the hot spots. She loves being satisfied as much as being the satisfier. Her clit is like a magic button when she feels my tongue working it. She shivers and shudders as I suck and lick her clit and the surrounding areas. Her pussy gets so wet as I use my fingers to get her so crazy with loud screams and her pressing her pussy against my mouth. She speaks English pretty well and hearing her say fuck me is music to my ears. Jenny can fuck with the best of them and has the energy to keep fucking and sucking for as long as I want. She is never done with me. Her BBBJ is so good. Takes it pretty deep and knows how to use her spit to slobber all over my cock as she strokes it while stroking and sucking and moaning. When I told I would cum soon she goes at it even harder with her mouth wide open and moaning for my cum until she feels my cock pulsating and then takes it deep in her mouth and sucks me to the last drop. She loves to play with my cum and kiss and share it with a DFK which is passionate and sensual. Jenny is so hot and such a great fuck while she is still so much a GFE with deep kisses, sensual touching and holding and IMHO the complete experience.

Can someone explain why this review is virtually identical to the one on TER (see photo), even though these sessions are supposedly 5 months apart?

Despite this poster's countless contributions to LA's kgirl scene, there's still room for improvement.

**Atrr1** · 06-23-21 16:40

Originally Posted by BobLove [View Original Post]

Going along with your logic, here's a hot chick: https://www.eros.com/california/los_...427.htm?cat=54.

I've never tried but just wanted to share.

We are in year 2021, ad says Visiting until December 7th, 2020.

**BuddhaHead** · 06-23-21 04:52

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.

That's what shills do.

**SsStuntCock** · 06-23-21 03:05

Originally Posted by Atrr1 [View Original Post]

He is a stud muffin.

Neophytes of this cadre would likely concur.

**Toungsten** · 06-23-21 00:27

Originally Posted by Atrr1 [View Original Post]

He is a stud muffin.

There's a lot more to it than that.

**Atrr1** · 06-22-21 23:43

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.

He is a stud muffin.

**Toungsten** · 06-22-21 21:48

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.

Do you know the ones I don't review? And maybe I get more out of a session than others. Ya think? There are many girls that I read negatives about and found them to be not so negative. You get what you put into it.

**SsStuntCock** · 06-22-21 18:45

Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]

Mechanical? Just goes to show you we don't all get the same service. Viki is always over the top with me and the passion is second to none. Looks may be YMMV but great sex is great sex and that's what she always gives me. It's always crazy intensity and there is nothing mechanical for me with that.

To be fair, I don't recall a review when you've written anything less than positive about your experiences. It's like every session is a unicorn.