Korean Agency BB

[DHorn420]

Most active monger's are in their 40's-50's, some much much older into their 70's-80's, yes some of those are very well active here, so when it comes to describing looks on here, it's all going to be subjective, since beauty is in the eyes of the beholders. What you may see as hot, others may see as meh. Best practice is to follow certain mongers taste in women, it will help you as a guide to know which girls to book based on their looks.

But is that being honest? Are we not all here to share intel with each other? For some people, the age (or at the very least, PERCEIVED age) does matter. It's irrelevant what their real age is, but Hana looks / acts in her 20's while Allie looks / acts in her 40's or late 30's, and I don't think that's criticizing her to admit that. Whether or not that factor is important or not depends on each monger. You may be okay with either because you think they're both hot and equally experienced, and many others may and do agree. On the other hand, many others may not think that way. Personally, I've seen both Hana and Allie, and while service was basically the same for both of them, I am very attracted to Hana's looks (hence why I keep seeing her) and was not attracted to Allie (and never repeated despite how good the sex was), and most of that was because of her age. Another example, Lyn is around Allie's age, I still thought she was hot with great service, but again, the age was a factor for me on why I didn't repeat. I'm 27, and unless I was exclusively into older women, then no matter what, there's going to be a limit to how hot a 40-something year old woman can be to me even if she is objectively hot, which she is. I believe that mongers deserve to know what they're getting into, both good or bad, and what's good or bad depends on the individual. Who are we to say what should or should not matter?

[AlexisDavis]

You make my point. Hana is described as (young and beautiful) while Allie's age is the basic difference, (if it really makes a difference) regardless of her hotness. I know when I reviewed Hana I also mentioned her age and that's because I know that's what most mongers are looking for. When I reviewed Allie I said all that there was to be said about her hotness and never once felt it necessary to mention her age. A big non factor. Hana is an anomaly being, or at least looking so young while being so experienced, which deserves a mention of age because of that. Other than that if they have a pretty face and a good body and will fuck me to near death who cares what that number is?

But is that being honest? Are we not all here to share intel with each other? For some people, the age (or at the very least, PERCEIVED age) does matter. It's irrelevant what their real age is, but Hana looks / acts in her 20's while Allie looks / acts in her 40's or late 30's, and I don't think that's criticizing her to admit that. Whether or not that factor is important or not depends on each monger. You may be okay with either because you think they're both hot and equally experienced, and many others may and do agree. On the other hand, many others may not think that way. Personally, I've seen both Hana and Allie, and while service was basically the same for both of them, I am very attracted to Hana's looks (hence why I keep seeing her) and was not attracted to Allie (and never repeated despite how good the sex was), and most of that was because of her age. Another example, Lyn is around Allie's age, I still thought she was hot with great service, but again, the age was a factor for me on why I didn't repeat. I'm 27, and unless I was exclusively into older women, then no matter what, there's going to be a limit to how hot a 40-something year old woman can be to me even if she is objectively hot, which she is. I believe that mongers deserve to know what they're getting into, both good or bad, and what's good or bad depends on the individual. Who are we to say what should or should not matter?

[KnightScreen]

Hi just wanted to see if anyone got the chance to see Cindy yet from Candygirlla or booker?

[RocketManP]

Not unless you overestimate their age by more than a couple of years than they really are to their face, especially for Korean ladies. It's like a physical slap to their surgically enhanced face. Avoid answering that question if at all possible else just underestimate it.

LOL, I usually tell them the truth if they start playing the "guess how old I am" game. The older ones don't even try to play that tho.

The only question I've learned not to answer truthfully, aside from personal info, is whether I've fucked anyone else or jacked off today. Too many girls refuse msog after learning I've nutted multiple times on the same day.

[Toungsten]

I didn't criticize her, I'm just giving a third opinion. Some people said she was in her 40-50's, PsuGuy911 said she's in her 30's, I was trying to give a middle ground opinion. But even if I was criticizing her, that is some flawed logic there. Hana, for example, is also $300 and is young, beautiful, and well built, with similarly good service. A monger who has seen neither deserves to be aware of the differences between the two.

You make my point. Hana is described as (young and beautiful) while Allie's age is the basic difference, (if it really makes a difference) regardless of her hotness. I know when I reviewed Hana I also mentioned her age and that's because I know that's what most mongers are looking for. When I reviewed Allie I said all that there was to be said about her hotness and never once felt it necessary to mention her age. A big non factor. Hana is an anomaly being, or at least looking so young while being so experienced, which deserves a mention of age because of that. Other than that if they have a pretty face and a good body and will fuck me to near death who cares what that number is?

[Toungsten]

Literally NO ONE criticized her.

Stating a woman's age is not criticizing her.

Stating a woman's age here, if she is in her early to mid twenties, is certainly not a criticism but let's be honest. If we're stating that someone looks fortyish or even fiftyish on a board like this it certainly is meant as a criticism. Age mentioning usually comes along with lots of superlatives if she is young, while the older ones come with some negativity. Now that's not for everyone especially me since I don't mind 30's or 40's because the service is usually better. However, under 25 seems to be the "catch of the day" in this forum. So let's be honest when age is mentioned it comes with more than just the number.

[Bastard Chorum]

Literally NO ONE criticized her.

Stating a woman's age is not criticizing her.

Not unless you overestimate their age by more than a couple of years than they really are to their face, especially for Korean ladies. It's like a physical slap to their surgically enhanced face. Avoid answering that question if at all possible else just underestimate it.

[Bastard Chorum]

LOL, you sound like you're in the medical field.

Any and all observations, musings, opinions, etc. Are all for informational purposes only and not intended to be a substitution for professional medical advice. See your PCP folks if you feel ill or find something out of the ordinary. And for pete's (read: your) sake, get your annual physicals done regularly. Some people are just plain lazy and too carpe diem about their health. Catching things early significantly improves your prognosis down the line.

[NObserver]

Literally NO ONE criticized her.

Stating a woman's age is not criticizing her.

Agreed.

Pretty sure she wasn't lying when she said that we both born in the same year, which makes us both past our mid-forties.

Nevertheless, I think she looks fantastic. I've read that she's had a lot of work done to her face, but I still think her body (she also told me that she does a lot of swimming to keep trim) and attitude is stellar.

She is without a doubt an attractive woman, and I doubt there are many women out there at our age that look just as good as she does now.

I hope she comes back soon.

[RocketManP]

Literally NO ONE criticized her.

Stating a woman's age is not criticizing her.

[AlexisDavis]

Who really cares? She's pretty with a good body and a great fuck which even at 300 is still a bargain. You would think that those criticizing her are looking for young, beautiful and perfectly built. Well, if that's what you want you should be looking for the $1,000 and up girls.

I didn't criticize her, I'm just giving a third opinion. Some people said she was in her 40-50's, PsuGuy911 said she's in her 30's, I was trying to give a middle ground opinion. But even if I was criticizing her, that is some flawed logic there. Hana, for example, is also $300 and is young, beautiful, and well built, with similarly good service. A monger who has seen neither deserves to be aware of the differences between the two.

[Malloy15]

Is this photo real? If so, wow.

That's Casino.

[PsuGuy911]

Quote Originally Posted by BastardChorum [View Original Post]
With SA.

Looks: Very cute face, 4'10", amazing natural D's, OK ass, shaven pussy. Pale skin, short and stocky frame. IMO, she's quite chubby and borderline fat. I do love thick and curvy girls but she's out of my preferred rotundity profile. When your hands are beginning to plump up like hers, you are either pregnant, have periphery edema, or overweight..

LOL, you sound like you're in the medical field.

LOL that's why I take everything that toungsten says with a few grains of salt 😛.

[Toungsten]

M. Nari.

Sunny. Joy, Niya, Nuri.

Newtopasian. LA Sera, Min.

Sexy Angels. Sophia, Erika. Emma, Jool Gina.

SFK. Alyssa Viki.

PKL. Saki, Ara.

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper, Saki, Piper.

[MauiDiver]

Who really cares? She's pretty with a good body and a great fuck which even at 300 is still a bargain. You would think that those criticizing her are looking for young, beautiful and perfectly built. Well, if that's what you want you should be looking for the $1,000 and up girls.

Well said.