Korean Agency BB

[Jim Thome]

These pics were used to advertise Sara / La Lina when she was with SFK this time last year. Considering the mixed reviews at the time, I understand why she re-branded. That she did so in less than a month and stayed with the same org was odd tho.

Was interested in the pics posted on this board and on her bay area ad being reviewed as real or representative and had to take a look for myself a couple of days ago. I booked an hour with Becky and when I saw her in person it was an easy decision to pay the upcharge for BBFS services since she's a light skinned beauty and was wearing a boner inducing tight fitting dress that showed off her slim figure. When the dress came off I was equally pleased looking at her youthful unblemished body with perky naturals as I was expecting based on reviews. I was in the mood for a new light skinned bb provider and left happy. She won't replace my ATF but I had a good time got along well with her and will repeat with her for sure. I think a very good solid option to have and keep around. Definitely worth checking out at least once if she's on your radar.

[GG1234]

Just wanted to update on this list since it changes so often. I will leave both active and dead ones so you can look at it for reference. As always, I probably missed some.

I have a few updates for you.

Add https://angelsinwla.wordpress.com/. It's just Hana for now.

Add http://preciousklove.com/. Currently, it's just Ara / Piper although Hazel's pics are still up.

http://twentyone.creatorlink.net/PORTFOLIO ((requies PW)).

The above is Booker Jewelry, and her new site is https://sixshop.com/star0082/home.

M's current album is https://myalbum.com/album/aKndu2KCPapj.

[PumpNDump]

Again as I have stated mr clifford needs to chime in on this and provide clarification to which girl or girls was it that he booked and to the his personal rating of 3. I am not the only who is curious about this. None of us here know for a fact whether if its bait and switch. Was he really screwed over by false advertisement? Did the booker switch the girl (s) on him? Who the hell really knows if he doesn't chime in.

How am I siding with the bookers or agency? I've been asking for clarity to his claim and I hypothesized the poster as having high expectations. I don't see how that can be construed as siding with the booker or blaming a person for a review and in this case there was no review.

And yes a client has the right to walk when there's legitimate issues. But in his case the pig in the poke that was chosen was just not ddg model enough for him. Has there been other complaints of switcheroo or false advertisement by other's here for j's girls? The way that a girl appears is just subjective to everyone. A girl that I see may be a 7 or 7. 5 or 8 and he grades her a 5 or 6 and it can be vice versa. Now if he is fickle and keeps canceling because the girl isn't ddg model enough for him then yes I think it would be fair to say it's his fault if he gets blacklisted by that booker.

If you advertise product that has pics that are completely different (ie, not representative at all) and the girl in reality a 3,yes that is considered bait and switch.

As such, the seller shouldn't be surprised the buyer will walk. When you sell a pig in a poke, but it ends up a cat, the buyer has a right to be mad. Blacklisting customers from walking from false advertisement is bullying and shit practice.

Unless you think part of the game is to indeed take it on the chin and brown nose bookers / orgs. Or think it's OK to threaten customers who don't think so with BL?

It's funny how the customer gets blamed for things the booker and the org should be blamed. It's your fault for walking from a someone you might not even get an erection with, and refusing to pay for b&s, and then getting BLd. Yeah, sure.

Maybe it's customers fault for writing honest reviews of product forums and then getting BLd too? Or is it the sellers fault for wanting to make more money and willing to employ false narratives, advertisement and bullying to achieve that?

[RocketManP]

Yes he graded the girls' appearance at "3 and not like the pics whatsoever". Honestly how is that bait and switch? That is his perspective. He made no accusation or claim to bait and switch. And if you do a little digging you would come to a realization that he is a newbie at the game so his experience in how the entire system works may be limited. Or like I stated I think his expectations are too high, thinking he is suppose to get model material like how the photos portray the girls.

Now we all know for a "fact" that the pictures are highly photo shopped and are "suppose to be a fair representation" of what you see behind the door. Now if you want an example of bait and switch it would be you making an appointment with let's say "Hana" and then getting a buck tooth horse named "Mana" at the last moment when you show up for your session and the booker plays dumb and tells you they made a mistake.

Perhaps the original poster should chime in and resolve whether there was bait and switch to finalize if the booker screwed him over purposely.

If you advertise product that has pics that are completely different (ie, not representative at all) and the girl in reality a 3,yes that is considered bait and switch.

As such, the seller shouldn't be surprised the buyer will walk. When you sell a pig in a poke, but it ends up a cat, the buyer has a right to be mad. Blacklisting customers from walking from false advertisement is bullying and shit practice.

Unless you think part of the game is to indeed take it on the chin and brown nose bookers / orgs. Or think it's OK to threaten customers who don't think so with BL?

It's funny how the customer gets blamed for things the booker and the org should be blamed. It's your fault for walking from a someone you might not even get an erection with, and refusing to pay for b&s, and then getting BLd. Yeah, sure.

Maybe it's customers fault for writing honest reviews of product forums and then getting BLd too? Or is it the sellers fault for wanting to make more money and willing to employ false narratives, advertisement and bullying to achieve that?

[Toungsten]

M. Chanel, Moni.

Sunny. Sandy, Niya, Lyn.

Newtopasian.

Sexy Angels. Fanny, Emma, Erica, Sophia, Helen, Jenny.

SFK. Viki, Jessie.

PKL. Ara.

Sesang. Hana.

Angelsinwla. Hana.

KGLA. Haper, Piper, Mimi.

[Frala]

That's why I always say YMMV. For me Viki was anything but fake. Of all the girls, what made her stand out to me was how real she always makes it feel. More real than even Hana. Yes I did just say that. Another one in that category is Moni whose service is similar to icons like Cona and Suri and as down and dirty as you can get.

I don't always agree with your reviews, but I definitely agree with this one. To me, Viki is top tier in service, and genuine is definitely how I would describe her. If anything I find Hana a bit fake, especially with that often annoyingly hyper-cute voice and demeanor (though still a great provider). She really makes you feel like she's been waiting to see you and unleashes her passion onto you as soon as you walk in. I've never gotten a vibe of fakeness, and I've never known her to watch the clock. In fact, when we stop, it's usually because I notice that we are running late. Admittedly, it's been over a month since I've seen her, but the only reason I don't see her very often is that, while Viki is by no means ugly, there are younger and prettier providers that offer me comparable service, though granted, only a handful. But all of them I have seen mixed reviews for as well. I have a girlfriend and a FWB, so realistically, I only see 1 or 2 providers a week max. If we're talking providers that do not upcharge, but give a similar level of service, then the options are even slimmer, and of the ones I have seen, I can only think of 3 off the top of my head currently working, and one of them is listed as an upcharge, but I suppose is variable, since after the first time, she's never reached for a cover. Not to mention that there's always my pesky desire to see new providers against my better judgement, as they are so often lackluster in comparison.

Speaking of new, that reminds me that I still haven't written a review on Jessie from SFK (Viki's agency), who I saw a few days ago. Maybe it doesn't belong here, but I won't go into detail, as she was not BB, at least not for me. She's cute, but not DDG, similar body type to Allie, though little to no plastic surgery on her face. Barely any kissing at all, but above average oral skills. The massage might have been the best part, actually, and probably one of the best I've gotten from a provider. Only one shot and massage before shower, which was disappointing obviously. But she did give me another BJ for a bit before finishing the shower. When we got out, I started putting on my clothes when she looked at the clock, looked at me, and then told me we have time if I wanted another shot. I did, of course, and afterward she told me in broken English that I was nice and that if the client is nice, she gives them 2 shots. Again, not BB, but since the agency has usually had no upcharge BB girls and I haven't seen a review on her yet, I thought I'd let people know in case they were expecting it.

[Toungsten]

Yes I honestly have no idea what the original poster is talking about vicki is a spinner yes and old, her service is above average but she is probably like a 6. 5 to 7 out of 10 in service, guy makes her out to be an 8 or higher only hana is in that category for me vicki is too robotic and fake tbh.

That's why I always say YMMV. For me Viki was anything but fake. Of all the girls, what made her stand out to me was how real she always makes it feel. More real than even Hana. Yes I did just say that. Another one in that category is Moni whose service is similar to icons like Cona and Suri and as down and dirty as you can get.

[PumpNDump]

If you are a good cliente and have dealt with the booker / agency for an extended time frame then yes, "I agree" the booker isn't going to just blacklist you for walking out. From the original poster's initial post he state's he thinks he's blacklisted, obviously that does not definitely mean he has been BL'ed. Now if he's new with the booker and is canceling repeatedly due to the lack of "ddg model appearance" which is what he's seeking in one of his other posts, then perhaps there is the possibility of getting kicked as neither the working girl nor the booker wants a fickle client like him.

In addition I would like to also know who he claims is a "3". According to rocket's interpretation by means of English reading comprehension, it was bait and switch and now also false advertisement by the booker.

You don't get blacklisted for walking out. I walked countless times.

[PsuGuy911]

I saw her a few months ago and I caught her watching the clock on me more than once. It was pretty distracting and morale killing for me.

Yes I honestly have no idea what the original poster is talking about vicki is a spinner yes and old, her service is above average but she is probably like a 6. 5 to 7 out of 10 in service, guy makes her out to be an 8 or higher only hana is in that category for me vicki is too robotic and fake tbh.

[IAmGib1]

Finally got 2 references my god. Candygirl & mkc.

Victoria I would say was about a 5.

Belle was about a 5 as well.

Who's DDG with model body?

I think I might be blacklisted off Kdolls for walking out on 1 girl & then the other one they offered me (both 3's not like pics whatsoever). So I don't think I can book Cami, but her hourglass figure or a big ass booty I would enjoy.

I have 3 questions for you;.

Are you grading on 10 point scale?

Why didn't you see Cami before the other two you booked at Kdolls?

I'm curious who have you seen that rates higher than a 5?

[Tsar1]

I'm guessing she's gone now from LA completely now?

She not in the country since late summer.

[TheAbc]

Just wanted to update on this list since it changes so often. I will leave both active and dead ones so you can look at it for reference. As always, I probably missed some.

Active.

https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/

https://www.candygirlla.com/

https://www.thetopgirls.com/los-angeles-1

https://ktownescort.com/home

https://www.ca-kdolls.ch/

https://newasianvibe.is/

http://sexyfunkgirls2.escorts.biz/home

http://sweetmoments.gfeincall.com/photos/ (not sure if this one is active, but website is working).

http://secretkgarden.escorts.biz/companions

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/

http://www.bookergray.com/

https://mykupcake.com/home

https://********.is/model/sugar/

https://sexyangels.site/sexy-angels

https://www.losangelesasian.com/

http://eukgirl.com/bbs/login.php (requies PW).

https://ktownkgirlz.com/home

M.

Palace (No Website, look up Pepsi).

https://fruitstore3.wixsite.com/mysite (not sure if it still updates or not).

http://twentyone.creatorlink.net/PORTFOLIO ((requies PW)).

https://www.kakao-girls.com/

https://www.sixshop.com/lamodel/home ((requies PW)).

https://ktowngfe.photo.blog/yeon-soo/





Dead:

http://january.escorts.biz/companions/

http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/

https://kbunnygirls.com/

https://acektownla.com/

https://hiddenmango.com/

http://cherrylove77.escorts.biz/secu...ceakacocolove/

[Im Yours]

What is the damage to see piper is there up charge fir BBFS? Also is she the type of girl that skips the first shower like Hana, I usually shower before coming if they are like Hana.

I didn't have upcharge with Ara. I don't know about her as Piper.

[Vibing13]

You should've met suzie she changed her name when she was with cakdolls but she was my first experience as a newbie and she would let you do anything and everything to her.

I'm guessing she's gone now from LA completely now?

[Leche]

Please tell me to whom that ass and pussy belong. I want to send a thank you card to her parents.

It's the famous Mimilax.