Korean Agency BB

**WCornell** · 03-17-20 18:29

Originally Posted by IAmGib1 [View Original Post]

Wonder why all the inconsistencies in the reports of this agency's girls? The source seems to be a single individual that has intimate knowledge of this agency and sees only their girls. Food for thought.

It's like this. If I really like a girl, I see her a lot and over a long time. I only see 2-3 regular girls at a time. I usually book 2 hours every week or two. So many girls come and go so fast these days. Seems to be the new fashion. Bonnie's the first I've found in months that I really hope will stick around. So, I wrote the review and posted it on as many of these forums here as I could find. What I wrote is what happened, as vivid as I could make it. Where she works is incidental. If my review makes her busier, which she deserves to be, as far as I'm concerned, maybe she stays longer, and that's mainly what I'm interested in. That's all.

**HapaBoy86** · 03-17-20 17:15

Originally Posted by Humyiy [View Original Post]

If Asia is down to $$, I'd see her everyday! Now that is true return on investment worth every bit!

No, Asia is 300. It was a typo on my part.

Saw her earlier today and wonderful session as always.

**Toungsten** · 03-17-20 16:07

M. Love, Adah, Fox, Nuri, Mini, Jade.

Sunny. Glow.

Sexy Angels. Jessie, Luna, Chanel.

**Mintzpo** · 03-17-20 15:48

Originally Posted by Jack926 [View Original Post]

I am willing to bet that most Kupcake reviews are internal jobs for following reasons: A) The majority of reviews are fairly detailed by different mongers with less than 10 posts and all posts are about Kupcake, B) The language on all reviews are identical in writings (even though different posters, the content looks identical), C) it clearly indicates the upcharge of $ for BBFS as an extra option for all the girls, C) It praises the girl in same manner.

It is obvious that most likely that this is an inside job and it seems at the moment that it is the only agency that their girls are getting reviewed. If this does not look like someone is shilling for them, I don't know what then. I even saw one poster insisting that the proposed fake internet model was the girl that he actually met!

As long as I can slide my cock in without a condom, I'm in heaven.

**Toungsten** · 03-17-20 15:40

Originally Posted by SnowMaus [View Original Post]

Do you guys know which agency that Jenny SA is working with right now. She's not with SA right now, I think.

Long, long vacation.

**OldsklRedVibe** · 03-17-20 13:26

Originally Posted by HonghuBen [View Original Post]

www.lafantasy.live pw: watermelon.

Hi all. Hope everyone's doing well.

Long time lurker, posted in old boards and historically a NorCal native where I sampled sporadically due to finances. Moved down to SoCal and have tried a few but due to the higher rates, less appointments than I'd care for. Does anyone have passwords or text numbers for some of these links that need them. I got in with Tom and used to use the sawtelle and wla buildings for other bookers. Was looking to set something up possibly in the next few days. Thanks in advance.

**TD Leafs** · 03-17-20 13:21

Originally Posted by Humyiy [View Original Post]

If Asia is down to $$, I'd see her everyday! Now that is true return on investment worth every bit!

She's $$$ not $$.

**Jack926** · 03-17-20 12:41

Originally Posted by IAmGib1 [View Original Post]

Wonder why all the inconsistencies in the reports of this agency's girls? The source seems to be a single individual that has intimate knowledge of this agency and sees only their girls. Food for thought.

I am willing to bet that most Kupcake reviews are internal jobs for following reasons: A) The majority of reviews are fairly detailed by different mongers with less than 10 posts and all posts are about Kupcake, B) The language on all reviews are identical in writings (even though different posters, the content looks identical), C) it clearly indicates the upcharge of $ for BBFS as an extra option for all the girls, C) It praises the girl in same manner.

It is obvious that most likely that this is an inside job and it seems at the moment that it is the only agency that their girls are getting reviewed. If this does not look like someone is shilling for them, I don't know what then. I even saw one poster insisting that the proposed fake internet model was the girl that he actually met!

**WCornell** · 03-17-20 12:10

Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]

Booker sent me message on hx and $$ Since she was using same location as Aisa she sent over $$ But, few hours later she resent me a pm text that Bonnie is 2 seven zero. I guess she got.

Confused with Asia rate who is $$.

Yes, Bonnie's roses fee is 270 (370 for me). I don't mind at all. Considering how terrific she is and given all the time and $ I've more or less wasted these past few months looking for someone like her, it's more than worth it.

Also, thanks your earlier comment about the writing in Bonnie's review. I only write reviews about girls I really like, and I try to capture as vividly as I can what the experience was really like. I myself don't much enjoy reviews that are just a modified string of acronyms--DFK, DATY, etc.

**SnowMaus** · 03-17-20 09:07

Do you guys know which agency that Jenny SA is working with right now. She's not with SA right now, I think.

**Humyiy** · 03-17-20 09:02

Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]

Booker sent me message on hx and $$ Since she was using same location as Aisa she sent over $$ But, few hours later she resent me a pm text that Bonnie is 2 seven zero. I guess she got.

Confused with Asia rate who is $$.

If Asia is down to $$, I'd see her everyday! Now that is true return on investment worth every bit!

**IAmGib1** · 03-17-20 08:52

Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]

I thought I saw Bonnie listed as BBFS before. The reviewer said he "took the available option" and his review implied BBFS so I think he paid 100 more in addition to the standard rate. Not sure if the "monster tip" is in addition to the upcharge or not.

Also Miho was reviewed as BBFS at 270 with upcharge, then the next day Miho was replaced with Bonnie and both are A / B cup girls .

Another reviewer said Miho was first BBFS experience (here) but he also BB Pearl before Miho (here) so that was interesting LOL. By the way, Pearl uses real pics and looks better than pics. She is like an ATF for me and chose standard option.

Wonder why all the inconsistencies in the reports of this agency's girls? The source seems to be a single individual that has intimate knowledge of this agency and sees only their girls. Food for thought.

**IAmGib1** · 03-17-20 08:23

Originally Posted by RegStile [View Original Post]

Was hoping someone could leave a review of her since she seemed to be at KTE before. But could not find much on her so I just decided to TOFTT. She is actually a lot more petite then her pictures suggest which is a first for me. But she is a curvy petite. If that even makes sense at all. Don't know how to quite describe her body LOL. She is down to dfk and have fun. Services are great. I would say a solid 8 out of 10. Her attitude is what I liked most and she seems to be very willing to please you. After I was done, she even offered up a massage. She also offers BBFS which I switched to after I saw her. I would say pretty worth the time.

Find someone that you have seen before on TV, movies, News, in the hobby that has a body like hers and then give their name. Use Google?

**IAmGib1** · 03-17-20 08:20

Originally Posted by RegStile [View Original Post]

Anyone have any more info on her? She looks pretty amazing.

She is young but much thicker than her pics. They are not a close facsimile in any way.

**Slideryyz** · 03-17-20 06:24

Originally Posted by WCornell [View Original Post]

Sorry. Have to correct myself. The posted photos of Bonnie are Lee Chae Eun, but the real Bonnie, though older and not as slender, is a close-approximation.

If she is 85%closer to real Lee Chae Eun, I'd see her.