Korean Agency BB

[DHorn420]

Nana for me is cuter, who I consider gnd. But I did think Milk had good service overall.

Thank you for the report Sir!

[DHorn420]

Nana for me is cuter, who I consider gnd. But I did think Milk had good service overall.

Was she BBFS?

[TickingTock]

How was she in terms of looks? Does she compare to Nana??

Nana for me is cuter, who I consider gnd. But I did think Milk had good service overall.

[DHorn420]

Saw Milk, and as others have said. Is really into dfk and will do it as long as you want to.

Puts alot of work in while on top, didn't get rim tho. Enjoyed her BBBJ, but no BBFS, I didn't push. She's the most GFE overall experience I've had so far, and even gave me her personal #. That's my first time with that, not sure what the end goal is for that.

How was she in terms of looks? Does she compare to Nana??

[DHorn420]

At least that's not on a daily basis and once again the exception to the rule. That's another reason I usually pick Tuesday when they have spent most of their day off rejuvenating for the upcoming week and these BF are on getting off for work. Better chance of that happening on the weekends.

IDK man, I think it could happen on any random day too.

[AsianBaller1]

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/mia-and-...ngelles-463767

Both mia and yuri pictures are not familiar to me. Anyone visits them somewhere before? Info is much appreciated.

[Blarharse]

Not putting me on the spot at all. You have to understand I don't make appointments unless I know what I'm getting into. No pun intended. Either from other hobbyists that I know and trust or from M herself. So I don't know how all the girls are and can't tell you who is the worst performer of them all. My only deviance from my normal way of booking is a couple of weeks ago when I showed up at the address of someone from another booker who I actually had seen before and was finally told, after waiting about a half hour for a text response, that she was not going to be available for another hour. I didn't want to waste any more time and TOFTT with Lia who just began that week. Knew hardly anything about her but hit a home run that day. As far as the ones that I have seen I have to say 1. Lucia (combination of looks and performance) 2. Lia (performance).

3. Lexi (performance) 4. BB who I haven't seen yet but was told by a very reliable source that she is very good and I will see her soon. And there's always Megan who I don't have to explain at all.

There is another factor to consider. Looks may be very subjective as performance can also be to the uninitiated. That being said we all get something different out of the girls we visit because of a variety of factors. Could be if they like you or feel a comfortable connection. Could be looks or age of the customer. Could be a lot of things and that's why when I read about mongers who say some providers that DEFINITELY do not offer BB when I know they do on a selective basis I know that you can't compare what each one of us gets from the girls we see.

I very much appreciate the detailed feedback and thanks for taking the time to provide it to us. Are there any current providers in M's stable with whom you would NOT repeat? Or, of the list of M's current providers, have you only seen the four that you mentioned? Thanks again!

[Toungsten]

Probably not in the traditional BF / GF sense, no. But I've been in some very nice FWB relationships with several KGirls. . And yes that can and has included making a morning deposit before the doors open. Just sayin'.

At least that's not on a daily basis and once again the exception to the rule. That's another reason I usually pick Tuesday when they have spent most of their day off rejuvenating for the upcoming week and these BF are on getting off for work. Better chance of that happening on the weekends.

[TickingTock]

Will report back later tonight. And added a pic that I didn't see the other person posted previously.

Saw Milk, and as others have said. Is really into dfk and will do it as long as you want to.

Puts alot of work in while on top, didn't get rim tho. Enjoyed her BBBJ, but no BBFS, I didn't push. She's the most GFE overall experience I've had so far, and even gave me her personal #. That's my first time with that, not sure what the end goal is for that.

[Dwaeji]

How many guys, even if they wanted free sex from a sex worker, would wait home every night for their cum dump girl friend to return from a days work of fucking and sucking a bunch of mongers just to get that freebie every night? Sure they may do it for that "NEW" freebie but once the NEW wears off they are out of there faster than cockroaches fleeing the light. And for those who they tell their BF that they always use a condom do you think they are any more honest with them than they are with us? For a freebie and some NEW maybe for a short while but a boy friend for any extended period of time I don't think so.

Probably not in the traditional BF / GF sense, no. But I've been in some very nice FWB relationships with several KGirls. . And yes that can and has included making a morning deposit before the doors open. Just sayin'.

[WildSeven]

How old was she? Rough guess would be fine, thanks.

I would say mid to high 30's.

[Toungsten]

I think that's putting T on the spot. He obviously has a good working relationship with M and her girls. I don't think you should ask him to jeopardize that since this is an open forum available to all (including bookers). Besides, people have varying experiences based upon expectations and other factors. As always, one man's heaven can be another man's hell.

Not putting me on the spot at all. You have to understand I don't make appointments unless I know what I'm getting into. No pun intended. Either from other hobbyists that I know and trust or from M herself. So I don't know how all the girls are and can't tell you who is the worst performer of them all. My only deviance from my normal way of booking is a couple of weeks ago when I showed up at the address of someone from another booker who I actually had seen before and was finally told, after waiting about a half hour for a text response, that she was not going to be available for another hour. I didn't want to waste any more time and TOFTT with Lia who just began that week. Knew hardly anything about her but hit a home run that day. As far as the ones that I have seen I have to say 1. Lucia (combination of looks and performance) 2. Lia (performance).

3. Lexi (performance) 4. BB who I haven't seen yet but was told by a very reliable source that she is very good and I will see her soon. And there's always Megan who I don't have to explain at all.

There is another factor to consider. Looks may be very subjective as performance can also be to the uninitiated. That being said we all get something different out of the girls we visit because of a variety of factors. Could be if they like you or feel a comfortable connection. Could be looks or age of the customer. Could be a lot of things and that's why when I read about mongers who say some providers that DEFINITELY do not offer BB when I know they do on a selective basis I know that you can't compare what each one of us gets from the girls we see.

[Toungsten]

I'm confused. It seems like Lia in LA is down in OC as well simultaneously?

http://happyangels.gfeincall.com/home

Bebe there looks remarkably like Lia. Maybe she's making an OC visit soon?

Not the same girl. BB who is listed as Bebe is in PV with M.

[Blarharse]

I think that's putting T on the spot. He obviously has a good working relationship with M and her girls. I don't think you should ask him to jeopardize that since this is an open forum available to all (including bookers). Besides, people have varying experiences based upon expectations and other factors. As always, one man's heaven can be another man's hell.

I just noticed that all of his posts are gone. I hope it doesn't violate any guidelines to mention this.

[CandyMan71]

Anyone know if Palace accepts Humaniplex references for verification? I've mainly been active on that.

First time posting. Thanks for sharing info. On your escapades.