Thread: Agency Discussion and Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 91 to 105 of 4417
-
11-15-23 10:14 #4327
Posts: 61Originally Posted by Derilious89 [View Original Post]
-
11-15-23 08:34 #4326
Posts: 6Boston Thread Perspective
The general consensus on the Boston thread seems to be that this will blowback harder than expected. Definitely recommend anyone involved stay up to date on the thread.
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...Boston-Top-Ten
-
11-15-23 02:12 #4325
Posts: 37If BTT group are found guilty of sex trafficking then all of the Korean, Chinese, Russian, Latina, Japanese, Vietnamese, White or Black or Brown or Pink or Rainbow escorts with their patronizing pimps and drivers and assistances are done. However, the federal court in MA hates this situation. This is exactly why, unlike HSI's ambitious affidavit, MA DOJ has intentionally been using such benign expressions as "high-end brothel", "commercial sex act", "commercial sex buyers", "prostitution" instead of "sexual exploitation", "sex trafficking". And now MA AG has to prove if there was any commercial sex act that was induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age to move forward with the full accusations of HSI. In any case, this is fucking bullshit bigotry, fuck BTT! Who cares?
-
11-14-23 23:34 #4324
Posts: 6Of Note
From the affadavid:
"23 Precise location information for Virginia Brothel Phone 2 received beginning on or about October 27,2023 through the date of this Affidavit placed it generally in a location other than Massachusetts. The location and holder of that device remains under investigation. While indeed Virginia Brothel Phone 2 is listed on Brown Eye Girl website, agents who interviewed customers who received prostitution services from the Virginia brothel locations learned that those customers communicated with Virginia Brothel Phone 1. ".
Sounds like the 2277 phone number was with someone other than the three people that got arrested. Possible the feds only got the 8262 phone.
-
11-14-23 22:39 #4323
Posts: 6Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]
I wonder what mongers who went to BEG should be rooting for.
A quick plea deal would draw less media attention.
But if this draws out, and states don't want to proceed until it ends, the statute of limitations would start to kick in for more people as the days go by.
-
11-14-23 20:19 #4322
Posts: 251All BS, but the real crime is.
Originally Posted by SaintPolycarp [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 20:06 #4321
Posts: 1734Originally Posted by SaintPolycarp [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 19:53 #4320
Posts: 173418 USC 2422 (among others)
Originally Posted by SaintPolycarp [View Original Post]
It doesn't matter what you or I think. It only matters what the feds can prove in court. The relevant statute reads, in part, as follows:
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
There are additional statutes in play (18 USC 1343/1952/1956/2421, etc.) but for the sake of brevity I chose just one. If you use the link above and plug in the different statute numbers you'll see more info. I've skimmed through the search warrant affidavit and, considering that it likely contains only a portion of the evidence gathered by the feds, it looks like a slam dunk case, IMO. As far as judges are concerned, I'll be highly surprised if this ever goes to trial. In the face of such strong evidence any competent attorney will try to negotiate a plea deal. If there's no trial, a judge's role will be limited to ruling on pre-trial matters like discovery, etc.
One thing to watch for is whether the defendants are permitted to proceed separately. Their lawyers will certainly request that and the feds will argue against it. If they're allowed to separate their cases from each other, things will get more complicated and take longer. I don't expect any charges against providers so, if they're involved at all, it'll probably be as witnesses. If that happens, the feds will carefully pick a woman who has a "coerced victim" story to tell. But I'm just thinking out loud because, as I said earlier, I doubt this will go to trial.
P.S. The individual providers will probably be referred to Victim / Witness Services. Some may be sent back to their home country while others might be allowed to stay. If any go back to being sex workers, the govt will simply say that they were offered legit alternatives. I highly doubt there will be any negative blowback on the feds. And, even if there is, they won't care.
-
11-14-23 19:26 #4319
Posts: 101Originally Posted by Max#01 [View Original Post]
". man up and vanished like a fart in the wind".
-
11-14-23 17:48 #4318
Posts: 72Originally Posted by Derilious89 [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 17:17 #4317
Posts: 964Originally Posted by JackRyan1 [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 16:10 #4316
Posts: 1493Originally Posted by JackRyan1 [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 15:17 #4315
Posts: 101Bravo echo golf Reviews
There are new reviews on the other site. How?
Are they open in va?
-
11-14-23 14:54 #4314
Posts: 103Originally Posted by Tophat31 [View Original Post]
-
11-14-23 14:45 #4313
Posts: 37Bullshit 2
We all know that none of the girls at BTT were trafficked! They all were as independent as the girls on Eros.com or Tryst, and all the so-called "indie" girls on those escort platforms have very organized pimps and / or security guards. Unfortunately, Feds' recent circus show ended short, too short! Federal judges hate prostitution cases, and now USA must be responsible for the victimless victims. If those arrested in MA reappear in this field as sex workers, USA will be blamed for its bullshit bigotry for letting these namely victims into the sexual exploitation by the US citizens!