Adult Vacation

Thread: Korean Agency BB

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 496 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 7433
This blog is moderated by Christophe1
  1. #7433
    Quote Originally Posted by Jbjb1983  [View Original Post]
    Saw her at the PV location, parking is bad during the morning! Anyways. Sasha is very cute looking, has a tattoo along her belly probably covering a scar or something. She has a nice body and with me she allowed BBFS and really got into it. She gets pretty vocal. She requested I nut outside, I obliged. She got me to cum twice. She does use a bit of teeth in her bbj and likes to bite, not hard, in a playful way. Overall Looks are good, service is excellent. Sucks she's leaving so soon.
    That picture you referred to in your review is actually her friend that she's going to San Jose to see and will probably return with her in a few weeks if all goes well.

  2. #7432
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyEm  [View Original Post]
    I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.
    This is why we must do our due diligence on writing and reading reviews. I rarely see a girl before there are more than a few reviews and also before I can see who the reviewer is and what his track record is. I don't dispute what you experienced with Cona, Lucia or Nikki. I haven't seen Nikki so I have no basis for comparison and there are very few reviews of her but they seem to be quite positive. As far as Cona and Lucia I'm surprised to hear you say that Cona has lost a step since her reviews seem to be as good as ever. As for Lucia being hit or miss all I can say that it's always a hit for me and apparently for most others based on her reviews. Looks are certainly YMMV but the reviews of Lucia's performance is usually off the charts. That being said just shows how important it is for reviews here where most of us are looking for the same thing. Whether it's good or bad it gives us a basis for comparison.

  3. #7431
    Quote Originally Posted by WoohooSoCal  [View Original Post]
    Speaking of Rain, whatever happened to her? Is she in No Cal? Back to Korea? NYC?
    As far as we know Korea.

  4. #7430

    Friday Aug. 23

    M.
    Lacey.......................................................... PV.
    Cona, Lucia, Nikki, Hannah, Serena, Honey......................... WLA.

    Sunny,
    Glow, Lyn. .....................................WLA.

    Newtopasian.
    Eden, Ruby, Min, June..................... WLA.

  5. #7429

    Rain

    Speaking of Rain, whatever happened to her? Is she in No Cal? Back to Korea? NYC?

  6. #7428
    Quote Originally Posted by HapaBoy86  [View Original Post]
    Come on T.

    Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

    This isn't kstyleblog. .
    What makes you think that I'm referring to anything besides BBFS? I want to see more reviews to let us know and that goes both ways. BBFS and not BBFS. Sometimes you can even tell by a non BBFS review if there is a possibility to get it. This is in keeping with the spirit of a BB thread.

  7. #7427
    Quote Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty  [View Original Post]
    Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

    Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

    You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.
    That's why I ended my post by saying YMMV when it came to Rain. Great fuck but just not my favorite. Lia, who was not the best looking and didn't have a great body, was probably one of the best fucks of a my life. Performance there was none better IMHO. I actually had the same experience with some of M's girls as to not wanting to see me because I made them work too hard. It kind of indicates how much I value performance.

  8. #7426

    I care about looks LOL

    I don't even like to review but didn't see enough guys sharing that I joined just to answer questions. You don't see me contributing much only because I prefer looks over BB at the moment. I have always mentioned girls I liked and tried to describe their looks. There were star performers like Miracle but I need to see more reviews from legit mongers to consider a girl as star performer. You guys should know which reviewers are reliable if you don't want to be disappointed.

    Sometimes I am pretty discouraged when thinking guys hide the good girls. Without reviewers like BC or T, I might have lost interests a while back. Only thing that keeps me going is I knew how bad things can get if nobody share anything.

    Quote Originally Posted by HapaBoy86  [View Original Post]
    Come on T.

    Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

    This isn't kstyleblog. .

  9. #7425

    Advocating M girls

    Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

    Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

    You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.

    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    Do you really find Cona, Lucia, Sasha and now Nikki, who I haven't seen but who has some pretty good reviews, to be very bad? We're here for the sex and those girls give some of the best sex that you will get including BBFS which you won't get from most of those who you consider to be "HOT". They offer great sex and are somewhere between cute, exotic and pretty with personalities that make for a good connection. What more are we looking for? I saw Rain when she came here with Cona, Grace and Kiss a few years ago and she was my least favorite in that group. Yes she was a sex machine but with absolutely no English skills that was all it was. Banging away for an hour with no real sensuality or connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again it's always YMMV. Don't know what you're not getting from the current crop but it has been pretty damn good for me.

  10. #7424

    Sasha

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    Is still BBFS still or not? Recent reports suggests no, but makes up for it in a fantastic CFS session?
    Saw her at the PV location, parking is bad during the morning! Anyways. Sasha is very cute looking, has a tattoo along her belly probably covering a scar or something. She has a nice body and with me she allowed BBFS and really got into it. She gets pretty vocal. She requested I nut outside, I obliged. She got me to cum twice. She does use a bit of teeth in her bbj and likes to bite, not hard, in a playful way. Overall Looks are good, service is excellent. Sucks she's leaving so soon.

  11. #7423

    M's girls

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
    I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.

  12. #7422
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
    Do you really find Cona, Lucia, Sasha and now Nikki, who I haven't seen but who has some pretty good reviews, to be very bad? We're here for the sex and those girls give some of the best sex that you will get including BBFS which you won't get from most of those who you consider to be "HOT". They offer great sex and are somewhere between cute, exotic and pretty with personalities that make for a good connection. What more are we looking for? I saw Rain when she came here with Cona, Grace and Kiss a few years ago and she was my least favorite in that group. Yes she was a sex machine but with absolutely no English skills that was all it was. Banging away for an hour with no real sensuality or connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again it's always YMMV. Don't know what you're not getting from the current crop but it has been pretty damn good for me.

  13. #7421

    Rain.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.
    I miss her. She was so fun. We laughed and banged fir 59 minutes straight every time.

    Haven't seen her in years. I wonder if she changed her name and moved to bay area or another city.

  14. #7420
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyEm  [View Original Post]
    Just to say out loud, M's girls have been disappointing for months. Not to name names but I know some of you advocate for M (possibly even working for?) and she's historically been great but let's be honest, they've been pretty bad of late. I think the only way she'll bring in better talent is if we go elsewhere until she brings in the level of talent we're accustomed to. I probably won't go back until Victoria is back, at least!
    I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.

  15. #7419
    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    I know you guys are seeing a lot of the girls that we talk about but I don't see many reviews or even mention of whether they are good looking or are all star performers. Sometimes I see remarks like worth seeing or not worth seeing. Come on guys. We need more than that. If we're going to make this board worthwhile then we need feedback from all of us.
    Come on T.

    Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

    This isn't kstyleblog. .

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 496 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
the velvet rooms
Ava Escorts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape