the velvet rooms

Thread: Bareback Providers

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 451 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 6758
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #6758

    Jessica Crush

    Quote Originally Posted by DrtyHarry  [View Original Post]
    It really must be YMMV. I saw her right when she was new (to SA even before she joined TNA). She was exactly as Chewy described, including a very good time. I never did or heard of the duo. It was just 1:1 but a great, sweet lady and I really enjoyed for the great price of 3 + hotel room. Now I do believe there are reports, that she uses a female condom. Who knows. I wish I could see her again. But I would be hesitant to drop 4 for the meeting, especailly if it is YMMV.
    DrtyHarry, what's SA?

  2. #6757
    Quote Originally Posted by BBpornogeek  [View Original Post]
    Definitely not worth it anymore now. Earlier in the year she was big but at least not flabby. Now she's flabby and isn't as receptive to being slapped around. She used to get off hard on me shoving it into her ass mid stroking her pussy. Lately when she feels me pull out she quickly moves her ass out of the way.
    She has always been fat, ugly, smelly and had a AA baby daddy making her do this. Now she is really, fat ugly and smelly.

    No reason to see her unless you can do rape / abuse play.

    She is just disgusting.

  3. #6756

    SA or SB

    Which one do you recommend Secret arrangements or Secret Benefits?

    I created an account on both of them, on SB I have received a more messages of girls than SA.

    I want to know if is worth the upgrade or it's just spams from the site.

  4. #6755

    All have rob reports LOL

    Quote Originally Posted by Shifted316  [View Original Post]
    I haven't checked out STG in the past, so I'm trying to determine which ones are legit, and if anyone has details or experiences to share for the following:

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...u/799272936874

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...p/960551728041

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...i/564004807938

    Appreciate any information.
    All these girls have robbed guys many times so stay away.

  5. #6754
    Quote Originally Posted by Shifted316  [View Original Post]
    I haven't checked out STG in the past, so I'm trying to determine which ones are legit, and if anyone has details or experiences to share for the following:

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...u/799272936874

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...p/960551728041

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...i/564004807938

    Appreciate any information.
    The first two works together and a known rob! So wouldn't see them if I were you.

    The third not so sure LOL.

  6. #6753

    No Face Pics

    Quote Originally Posted by KenSee  [View Original Post]
    I agree no face pix is a reason enough to skip. Every time, I took the plunge and saw someone with no face pix, I ended up with a dog.
    I agree. I am okay with no face pics on SA or a non-pro site. But when I start texting with the lady I usually require one before I take the plunge. On TNA I complete agree. However I have noticed that a lot of ladies there do have face pics (if not at first then later or vice versa) I think the reason for that is that they get many pms a day requesting them. They finally break down and provide the face pics on the open board. Then there are some like Kya how are really hot and charge accordingly. They do not put face pics and do not care if you do not see them as they have a long line of admirers. So I have no golden rule, I have seem women with no face pics on TNA, but scrutenize them more. I do my research and if I find out she is hot, takes care of the customer and has good menu items. I will skip the requirement.

  7. #6752

    JPC Retiring?

    Saw her put up an ad about retiring. Has she finally gone off the deep end?

  8. #6751

    Looking for help

    I haven't checked out STG in the past, so I'm trying to determine which ones are legit, and if anyone has details or experiences to share for the following:

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...u/799272936874

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...p/960551728041

    http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...i/564004807938

    Appreciate any information.

  9. #6750

    SA- Seeking Arragnement

    Quote Originally Posted by Chewy67  [View Original Post]
    What does or is SA?
    SA is Seeking Arrangement. It's a site to match Sugar Daddies with Sugar Babies. The girls range from shy coeds to TNA pros, but lower rates are available. $300 for 3 or 4 hours is the standard. Most girls are okay with CIP, but may take a few dates.

    There's a separate thread on here that covers it.

    http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...0145-Non-Pro-s

  10. #6749

    Jessica Crush

    Quote Originally Posted by DrtyHarry  [View Original Post]
    Saw her when she was on SA. Very nice lady. She did not host then so I got a room and for 300 it was no restrictions. She is very cool and all holes are open bare.
    What does or is SA?

  11. #6748

    Duo

    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteJohnson  [View Original Post]
    Nice! Who did you and Jessica Fuck?
    She had a girlfriend at her place she was hot I don't think she's a TNA provider.

  12. #6747
    Quote Originally Posted by KenSee  [View Original Post]
    I agree no face pix is a reason enough to skip. Every time, I took the plunge and saw someone with no face pix, I ended up with a dog.
    As I've written a few times, I'm not particular about looks. But when there's no pic and the text is limited in my experience this makes it more likely things aren't on the up and up. That might not always be the case, but caution is advised.

  13. #6746
    Quote Originally Posted by MrDigBick  [View Original Post]
    I'll take two half hours please. Lmfao!
    Math is hard, okay? Laughs.

  14. #6745
    Quote Originally Posted by FastBreakJunk  [View Original Post]
    I don't have experience with her, but a couple things in the ad seems suspect. There's no list of menu items, no face pix, and the text is very limited. In my experience this warrants caution, but that's just my 2 cents.
    I agree no face pix is a reason enough to skip. Every time, I took the plunge and saw someone with no face pix, I ended up with a dog.

  15. #6744

    Loves the D

    Quote Originally Posted by PapaForMamma  [View Original Post]
    Hit up Sammy Banks the other night as I wanted to sample the VIP offering. Sammy did not disappoint. A lot for me to enjoy about Sammy. Tiny waist and the perfect back side for holding on to make her RIDE. She was wearing this tight one piece when I walked in the door and I was ready get the deed started. Loved her BBBJ for sure. Was pretty pleased when she mounted my little pony and was almost dripping wet! And when she did a reverse mount, I pretty much lost my and* watching her twerking fine Ass! Planning a return trip soon and going to take a partner with to double the fun!

    https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread....%26%2365039%3B
    Most TNA girls tolerate the D. Some like the D. A rare few LOVE the D. Sammy is one of those gems, and the more you are packing the more she loves it.

    I've converted to sugar babies for the most part but would get with Sammy again if opportunity presented itself, she's exceptional no doubt.

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 451 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape