Adult Vacation
Ava Escorts

Thread: Los Angeles County Asian Providers

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 284 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 4248
This blog is moderated by Christophe1
  1. #4248
    Quote Originally Posted by Humyiy  [View Original Post]
    And after each time of dating working girls I say adamantly "NEVER AGAIN". And then I forget a few months later and stupidly do it again and it gets worse each time when it inevitably comes crashing down.
    Only rookies will fall and get channel bag for them haha.

    It will not work out in a long run and I find it's too cringed. Get a real girl no offense whatsoever. Unless this is the only way for you to find a Korean girl then I dont blame you. Men got to survive somehow. A prey is still a prey

  2. #4247

    Chocolate / KTE

    I am super happy that Chocolate is back to KTE. Nice and Hot like before. I usually do not meet girls who do not BBFS, but I got to see her with the booker recommendation and been seeing her since. Smaller type girl with GFE service but one of my ATF and will be seeing her regularly until she leaves. Will upload pleaser review when have time!

  3. #4246
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I don't see where esle we can get honest reviews. With how things are going for awhile now, the only place to get any "recent" reviews are on the monkey which are filled with questionable reviews. TER was dead and full of shills. I have posted in the past about how before FOSTA, too many k-girls were 8-10 when in reality alot were jut 6-7 with a few 8's. Once in awhile, a 9 would appear but that was pretty rare. At the price point we pay, we won't get top shelf. I for one, welcome negative reviews. The scene needs to be more honest. I am just tired of too many bookers who can't give you any decent intel on the services / experiences because it goes against them trying to get you to book. To add, they usually lie so any info from them is probably not reliable. You text, get a list of girls with their stats and sometimes with a list of services they may or may not provide. Photoshopped pictures are all the norm, so the girl is rarely what is seen. I equate today's current climate in the scene as in being in a minefield. Sometimes you won't step on it (better than expected or good enough) to a dud (the mine).
    This is the freakin Yelp of mongering. I would agree though, both positive and negative reviews are beneficial to us. I haven't been around as long as some of you but after trying to book with girls who get positive reviews on here I do find it is much more likely her schedule gets full quick. Multiple bad reviews should be a red flag. But hopefully those negative girls and bookers start getting the message and improve their ways. I get it not every girl is going to be a 10 in looks and service but trying to improve is an admirable sign and the bookers and girls who constantly give poor service and completely misrepresented looks should get less money. Be well my friends.

  4. #4245

    Julia with Kakao / Top Girls

    Quote Originally Posted by TidyChemist  [View Original Post]
    So I decided to go on the lookout for something new; got to the wilshire location and met up with julia. Julia looks to be around 30 to mid 30's GND she speaks very little English just the basic phrases and yes she is bb but for a little extra. In terms of body julia isn't skinny but isn't fat either I'd say somewhere in between with a little pooch. By the way her description on the site lies; she is not near 103 pounds probably like 130 on the brink of being fat but not quite. Got a little preview in the shower for things to come, and overall she looked relatively enthusiastic to start the session got into a variety of positions and finished in doggy her pussy was pretty tight and she could definitely take a pounding she's got a nice ass to grab and a natural c cup rack. I left pretty happy overall but if spinners are more your thing I would skip.

    L: 6. 5/10.

    S: 9/10.

    Repeat: I don't think so, I rarely repeat. Was also put off in the beginning by her counting the money. She also has a couple of tattoos, 1 of a musical note on her left hand, another manuscript style tattoo on her back, and another one on her left shoulder blade.
    Tidy beat me to it. Booker said Julia's pics are real, and they are, 30 lbs & 10 years ago. Pretty face still, lots of booty to grab, needs to lose weight but some like it Thicc, DeepThroat, RIM, BBFSCIP, nice girl. Shoulder tat is a figure kneeling praying. Checking money is done to know what type service; covered or bare. Some girls are smart trying to avoid the No-Tip Bears, mongers want bare but then stiff them after. You can't blame her for counting.

  5. #4244

    Black Knights, White Knights, Same Team

    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.
    YMMV. It's all subjective. One mongers trash is another mongers treasure. White, Black, Shill, or Blind, in the end, I appreciate all your information, some more than others. Hell, I even welcome Bookers to post shit too, at least it's more intel. Like it or not, we're all on the same team. But you Lurkers out there. Yeah I'm talkin to you! Stop freeloading and help us out. You know who you are. Bros before Hoes, as they say.

  6. #4243

    Audrey at Eukgirls

    I haven't seen her because she is at the bottom of my to do. She changed names and agencies a few times but I remember she was Soo at SAG.

    First review

    Second review

    Then she left for the Bay and back to OC and now LA.

    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/raina-es...angeles-532833

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack926  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.

    Any info will be awesome.

  7. #4242
    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.
    I agree with you brother! That's why I need REAL pictures and not "representative" since other types might not be the same as mine. This is why I stopped with the Asian agencies and try the young college type Asians in the hx crews. At least the hx crew Asians show real pics of themselves without showing their face.

  8. #4241

    The scene

    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    I don't see where esle we can get honest reviews. With how things are going for awhile now, the only place to get any "recent" reviews are on the monkey which are filled with questionable reviews. TER was dead and full of shills. I have posted in the past about how before FOSTA, too many k-girls were 8-10 when in reality alot were jut 6-7 with a few 8's. Once in awhile, a 9 would appear but that was pretty rare. At the price point we pay, we won't get top shelf. I for one, welcome negative reviews. The scene needs to be more honest. I am just tired of too many bookers who can't give you any decent intel on the services / experiences because it goes against them trying to get you to book. To add, they usually lie so any info from them is probably not reliable. You text, get a list of girls with their stats and sometimes with a list of services they may or may not provide. Photoshopped pictures are all the norm, so the girl is rarely what is seen. I equate today's current climate in the scene as in being in a minefield. Sometimes you won't step on it (better than expected or good enough) to a dud (the mine).
    Yes!!! The TER days, everyone was "9" or "10" model material and what a Joke that thing was! We have more honest reviews here and I rather golf than fuck a girl that is a "5" or "4" and that is when the room is totally dark! Of course, there are couple shills here and there but I guess those reviewers are everywhere.

    I also welcome a GOOD, HONEST reviews.

  9. #4240
    Quote Originally Posted by AsianBaller1  [View Original Post]
    I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .
    I don't see where esle we can get honest reviews. With how things are going for awhile now, the only place to get any "recent" reviews are on the monkey which are filled with questionable reviews. TER was dead and full of shills. I have posted in the past about how before FOSTA, too many k-girls were 8-10 when in reality alot were jut 6-7 with a few 8's. Once in awhile, a 9 would appear but that was pretty rare. At the price point we pay, we won't get top shelf. I for one, welcome negative reviews. The scene needs to be more honest. I am just tired of too many bookers who can't give you any decent intel on the services / experiences because it goes against them trying to get you to book. To add, they usually lie so any info from them is probably not reliable. You text, get a list of girls with their stats and sometimes with a list of services they may or may not provide. Photoshopped pictures are all the norm, so the girl is rarely what is seen. I equate today's current climate in the scene as in being in a minefield. Sometimes you won't step on it (better than expected or good enough) to a dud (the mine).

  10. #4239
    Senior Member


    Posts: 203

    White Knight vs Black Knight

    Quote Originally Posted by AsianBaller1  [View Original Post]
    I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .
    I guess I would have to put myself in the WK category. If I have a good time with a gal even though she's not DDG, I'll write a positive but honest review. If the session is really crap because of the gal's attitude, I'll report that too. The one thing I have learned in my many years in this hobby is that beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I have looked at some websites where a hobbyist is extolling a extra large BBW and I have to say that I couldn't get it up no matter what her skills. Yet, for that individual she's a 10 in looks. The bottom line is that reviews are subjective and that one needs to find reviewers whose likes are similar to yours. And yeah, I know that's not easy.

  11. #4238
    Quote Originally Posted by ILoveKGirls  [View Original Post]
    The board is to keep the bookers honest and share intel on these hoes. These White knights do stand out.
    I think I'm a black knight since I only post negative and bad review of girls. Rarely post atf. Good stuff hit my pm box. .

  12. #4237

    Julia at thetopgirls (kakao girls)

    So I decided to go on the lookout for something new; got to the wilshire location and met up with julia. Julia looks to be around 30 to mid 30's GND she speaks very little English just the basic phrases and yes she is bb but for a little extra. In terms of body julia isn't skinny but isn't fat either I'd say somewhere in between with a little pooch. By the way her description on the site lies; she is not near 103 pounds probably like 130 on the brink of being fat but not quite. Got a little preview in the shower for things to come, and overall she looked relatively enthusiastic to start the session got into a variety of positions and finished in doggy her pussy was pretty tight and she could definitely take a pounding she's got a nice ass to grab and a natural c cup rack. I left pretty happy overall but if spinners are more your thing I would skip.

    L: 6. 5/10.

    S: 9/10.

    Repeat: I don't think so, I rarely repeat. Was also put off in the beginning by her counting the money. She also has a couple of tattoos, 1 of a musical note on her left hand, another manuscript style tattoo on her back, and another one on her left shoulder blade.

  13. #4236
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack926  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.

    Any info will be awesome.
    Her picture looks familiar. I think she was with J not too long ago. I forget under which name though.

  14. #4235

    Audry from EUK Girls

    Has anyone seen her? I wonder if her photos are real.

    Any info will be awesome.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Screen Shot 2020-02-13 at 12.17.50 PM.jpg‎  

  15. #4234

    Ummm.

    Quote Originally Posted by BoneRanger22  [View Original Post]
    Anyone have info for the booker for the Los Angeles area. I can't find on HX and they don't return messages with number on website. I've had good sucesss with the OC booker. I like this agency. Want to try a few LA ones.
    If you are good with the OC bookers, ask them for the LA Bookers number. It's a better number than the one on their website and letting J know that you were referred by the OC booker will make your vetting quicker and easier.

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 284 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape