Here is a perfect place for everyone to talk about anything they want that doesn't contribute anything for helping others get laid.
Printable View
Here is a perfect place for everyone to talk about anything they want that doesn't contribute anything for helping others get laid.
Fucking Amen!
Thank you Getnati.
I wonder if anyone will listen Nati? LOL!
KG
[QUOTE=Getnati]Here is a perfect place for everyone to talk about anything they want that doesn't contribute anything for helping others get laid.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Nkykinkyguy]I wonder if anyone will listen Nati? LOL!
KG[/QUOTE]
Well, if my word is the "bible" lol. Now we can say what the fuck ever! Oh, by the way, I PM'd Kit E requesting a photo of her again with my name handwritten holding it up.....oh yeah, and asking if she wanted to fuck. I also posted a link to this funny ass video:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vawa2t1m5kI[/url]
Sorry to say that she declined both offers. Her loss.
[QUOTE=Getnati]Well, if my word is the "bible" lol. Now we can say what the fuck ever! Oh, by the way, I PM'd Kit E requesting a photo of her again with my name handwritten holding it up.....oh yeah, and asking if she wanted to fuck. I also posted a link to this funny ass video:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vawa2t1m5kI[/url]
Sorry to say that she declined both offers. Her loss.[/QUOTE]
I also sent her a PM with some advice. Also said if she decide to try to contact me. Never got a reply.
[QUOTE=Silverfly]I also sent her a PM with some advice. Also said if she decide to try to contact me. Never got a reply.[/QUOTE]
You actually took it literally what "it" was saying? Although if for some odd reason it was ALL true and she ended up fucking you, that would be the ultimate ownage. I still wouldn't put it past that it could be LE.
This section should be renamed "assman's section" since 99. 9% of what I post really belongs here. Thanks for the new section, I will use it alot.
Happy hunting brothers
[QUOTE=Sincy Assman]This section should be renamed "assman's section" since 99. 9% of what I post really belongs here. Thanks for the new section, I will use it alot.
Happy hunting brothers[/QUOTE]
If I could edit the name of the thread I would.
THANK YOU Getnati! for following through with this idea!
I would agree that it won't attract [b]all[/b] of the Rants, Raves, and Opinions, but hopefully it [b]will[/b] help. This was a suggestion that I made a while ago. Whether Getnati saw my post or not, I'm glad the thread is here.
There will always be those who want to reply "in-line" to a previous comment. That probably won't get [i]moved[/i] to this thread, if for no other reason than continuity or [i]convenience[/i]. Either way, it might alleviate some of the problem and the resultant complaints.
Thanks guys!
JR
[QUOTE=Randyman1501]I do like the idea. I fear it won't really attract all of it from the other threads, but you never know.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Getnati]Well, if my word is the "bible" lol. Now we can say what the fuck ever! Oh, by the way, I PM'd Kit E requesting a photo of her again with my name handwritten holding it up.....oh yeah, and asking if she wanted to fuck. I also posted a link to this funny ass video:
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vawa2t1m5kI[/url]
Sorry to say that she declined both offers. Her loss.[/QUOTE]
You should have just offered her a cheeseburger. Although in Cincinnati you might get a better response offering her a three-way.
Since, I don't want to clutter the "real" thread with this post.
This week's drama is about Sara's (Tonguetwister) screening and scheduling methods. Check out the Escort Reports thread.
Personally, based on her clarification reply, her process does not seem unreasonable. [u]As long as she is responding to emails[/u] (with the exception of the "Hey Baby, I want to see you" generic emails). I think she is perfectly in the right to screen as much as she wants and to decline anyone who doesn't meet her expectations. As long as those expectations are clear, there should be no drama at all.
Just my thoughts!
Go Sara!
Be well and safe,
JR
Excellent! Someone finally post this bullshit in the right spot!
[QUOTE=Jry Wild1]Since, I don't want to clutter the "real" thread with this post.
This week's drama is about Sara's (Tonguetwister) screening and scheduling methods. Check out the Escort Reports thread.
Personally, based on her clarification reply, her process does not seem unreasonable. [u]As long as she is responding to emails[/u] (with the exception of the "Hey Baby, I want to see you" generic emails). I think she is perfectly in the right to screen as much as she wants and to decline anyone who doesn't meet her expectations. As long as those expectations are clear, there should be no drama at all.
Just my thoughts!
Go Sara!
Be well and safe,
JR[/QUOTE]
Why is everybody so critical of everybody when people posts? Thought the escort report was to trade info on escorts not to hear peoples personal opinions on certain subjects. And nobody seems to have a sense of humor.
This is one of those occasions where I wish Jackson had secondary moderators, where they had the capacity to move the off-topic posts to a different forum, and possibly impose a cooling off period on posting for those that might be engaged in a flame war. Just those small things that would help keep the defined areas strictly for those topics only. Now, the random 1 post? No biggie. But when it's 3 pages of 2-3 guys going back and forth about nothing that that forum was set up for.. then it makes going back through posts to do research a real pain ni the arse for those that do it page by page, post by post, looking for that elusive piece on info that they need to make up their mind about.. whatever it is that they're pondering. Ah well, one can dream. :)
[QUOTE=Dillsborodave]Why is everybody so critical of everybody when people posts? Thought the escort report was to trade info on escorts not to hear peoples personal opinions on certain subjects. And nobody seems to have a sense of humor.[/QUOTE]
So happy not to be involved with the Tabby drama. It is a shame she hasn't learned from her previous issues. She seems like a very nice girl. Youth does have it's virtures but dedication to work doesn't seem to be one of them. Just another reason I gravitate towards more experienced providers these days.
KG
[QUOTE=Randyman1501]But something about the second paragraph of Bill's post below sounds like a Tom Waits song. About equally depressing.[/QUOTE]
I posted about Shay the first time I saw her; it was not a good experience. It was rushed, she got call after call on her cell phone, and I decided that I wasn't going to repeat. But I'd see her out on the street pretty often and we always waved to one another. One day I saw her just as a hard rain began and I let her ride around for a while to stay dry. A month or so back I'd see her on the stroll with her belly sticking way out from her pregnancy. Once, when she saw me driving by, she proudly pulled up her top to display her distended belly. And then I saw her no longer pregnant. You could hardly call us friends, but somehow I wanted to know how the birth had gone, so I picked her up. She told me that she had been before a judge earlier that day and that the judge had given her until the 26th of this month to enter a program (I forget the name of the program). I told her that if I saw her later in the month, I'd remind her of that date. I gave her the $10 and when she exited the car, she looked at me and said, "Thank you." I think that might have been the first genuine expression I'd ever seen from her.
I think the reason I made the original post was that it was a way to chronicle the birth of the baby, a way to report on an event in her life that I'm pretty sure has gone uncelebrated by most of those around her.
Sorry for the long and schmaltzy post, but I was sort of touched by my brief interaction with her and then touched again by the reference to Tom Waits.
I was on the Louisville site today and our little episodes of rants and raves are minor compared to theirs. WOW. I read for a little while and said to myself, "SELF, enough is enough." and headed back to our board. LOL!
KG
During the cool down session with one of the local providers she dropped a dime on a fellow hobbiest. Seems this fellow monger wanted her to scream his name during a moment of passion with me. Luckily this provider was nice enough not to go along with such a hanus plan. I will get even with the guilty party. As for everybody else beware, there are scoundrels afoot!!
This sounds like something that my old fire mates would opt to try to do to each other. Our favorite gag was when one of the guys was really getting on with a girl at a club/bar/wherever and was obvious that they were going to go back to the barracks or someplace and follow through on the handsieness. One of us would try and steal the lass away for a millisecond and tell her that the guy really liked being called something off-the-wall or kinky. Usually it wouldn't work, because the lass was way drunk or asked the guy about it, but every now and again.... *sly smile*. That one successful jab would keep the entire firehouse laughing for weeks. Ahh... the good old days. Anyway.. this reminded me of that.. so thought I'd share. Things are stressful/dangerous enough without monger-pranking, but, if it's a mate, then it can be in good fun too. :)
[QUOTE=Dillsborodave]During the cool down session with one of the local providers she dropped a dime on a fellow hobbiest. Seems this fellow monger wanted her to scream his name during a moment of passion with me. Luckily this provider was nice enough not to go along with such a hanus plan. I will get even with the guilty party. As for everybody else beware, there are scoundrels afoot!![/QUOTE]
I was told very bluntly not so long ago that I didn't understand, that it's all about getting layed. Now it's about dropping dimes and getting even. Damn, I must need to get a different hobby as I totally don't understand this one.
KG
[QUOTE=Dillsborodave]During the cool down session with one of the local providers she dropped a dime on a fellow hobbiest. Seems this fellow monger wanted her to scream his name during a moment of passion with me. Luckily this provider was nice enough not to go along with such a hanus plan. I will get even with the guilty party. As for everybody else beware, there are scoundrels afoot!![/QUOTE]
Well for me personally, it's not just about simply getting laid. I can get that anywhere. But the anticipation, the eroticism, the drama free encounters are what I am here for. I am not here to pound out as many as I can, or see how much I can spend either. Those who know me know how I am, and I must say a couple have come to my way of thinking. I respect the seniors here and value their opinon, if it is accurate. So to anyone here, if you have a problem stating the truth cause you don't like to give negative reviews, then don't give any reviews. That's why I am so comfortable stating my opinion all the time. I tell it like it is and don't care who likes it.
Happy hunting brothers.
[QUOTE=Nkykinkyguy]I was told very bluntly not so long ago that I didn't understand, that it's all about getting layed. Now it's about dropping dimes and getting even. Damn, I must need to get a different hobby as I totally don't understand this one.
KG[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dillsborodave]During the cool down session with one of the local providers she dropped a dime on a fellow hobbiest. Seems this fellow monger wanted her to scream his name during a moment of passion with me. Luckily this provider was nice enough not to go along with such a hanus plan. I will get even with the guilty party. As for everybody else beware, there are scoundrels afoot!![/QUOTE]
Sounds more like a practical joke being played by a friend of yours...
[QUOTE=WarlockKy]Sounds more like a practical joke being played by a friend of yours...[/QUOTE]
With friends like that who needs enemies. (lol)!!!!
I can't wait until Jackson works out all of these bugs. No photo gallery or chat seriously? These colors kind of blow too. It's about as disappointing as that Mya chick I posted about previously.
If you make an appointment
And can not keep it
Cancel it Don't just not show when someone has
Went to meet you.
Not Cool
And you know who you are
Disappointed
Lady
I agree Nati, thought it was just me. I am sooo underwelmed by the new site. Maybe I am just too old to appreciate change LOL! Maybe it will grow on me.
KG.
[QUOTE=Nkykinkyguy; 1073940]I agree Nati, thought it was just me. I am sooo underwelmed by the new site. Maybe I am just too old to appreciate change LOL! Maybe it will grow on me.
KG. [/QUOTE]Looks like Jackson is going to have some stuff in the future, such as a "real" photo gallery. Should be interesting.
[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1080795]If anyone actually wanted to find a review on one of the review sections of the Cincinnati board, God help them. I would point to the current BP review section as an example.
Obviously the various attempts to direct rants, raves and opinions here hasn't helped much. I'll offer a suggestion, but not sure it's possible.
1) Have a section for review requests. This is a place for newbies and the otherwise ignorant but curious to post their questions about providers. I guess you could have one for each type of request (BP, chatline, SW) but probably to save space better to have just one.
2) People can then scan this section if they're interested in helping these folks out and post on the review sections. All review requests will be here or deleted.
3) Have actual moderators move messages to the appropriate forums. Without that, none of this will ever work anyway. It would probably serve Jackson well, too, because frankly there's just not much reason to come here anymore and wade through all this s*t. [/QUOTE]I've only been here a short time, but I've thought having threads by providers might help. So under the provders reviews instead of one ginormous thread where a Provider could be reviewed in different spots have specific threads about a provider. It would help it stay on topic and if it were started with a link to the Provider then there would be no confusion with similar names. So for example, if Jane Doe were a provider, you'd find her section and there'd be her reviews. And to your point 3. Moderators could really help.
This thread is great if people choose to use and read it. However, I am sure that it is [B][I]much [/I][/B]easier to just post the rants, raves, and opinions in-line with whatever caused the rant, rave, or opinion to want to be expressed. That is partially why this thread has not been as effective as it could be.
I'm sure there are some logistics issues, but your idea is pretty good. I like it. While I agree that a lot of this has gotten way out of hand, I don't know that the forum is useless. I guess it depends on how you read and use the forum. The search works pretty effectively now and if you select to view your search results "showing posts", instead of "showing threads" it is much better. Now, if you are the type reading through each thread, it [B][I]can [/I][/B]get tedious. Obviously, you can skim and skip the erroneous posts or posts that are trying to guide the new members, or "ignore" certain members and help yourself out.
If the new members would just catch on to basic forum etiquette (reading the forum first, learning how and what to post, etc) it would help a lot. I've been trying to post some "tutorials" regarding respect and forum / posting "rules" to help the new members out. But, this only works if they read the posts. Your idea would at least move this stuff somewhere else, even if the new members don't learn better behavior. It would probably mean a lot of work for the moderators (at least right now) given the current state of the board.
I also like the idea posted by Ssimpson290, but that [B][I]could [/I][/B]end up taking a lot of space and "burying" a lot of other threads as the main page became multiple pages.
I'm open to these ideas. I would love for the board to quiet down. I'm sure it will in time, but it makes "right now" difficult.
Just some thoughts.
JR.
[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1080795]If anyone actually wanted to find a review on one of the review sections of the Cincinnati board, God help them. I would point to the current BP review section as an example.
Obviously the various attempts to direct rants, raves and opinions here hasn't helped much. I'll offer a suggestion, but not sure it's possible.
1) Have a section for review requests. This is a place for newbies and the otherwise ignorant but curious to post their questions about providers. I guess you could have one for each type of request (BP, chatline, SW) but probably to save space better to have just one.
2) People can then scan this section if they're interested in helping these folks out and post on the review sections. All review requests will be here or deleted.
3) Have actual moderators move messages to the appropriate forums. Without that, none of this will ever work anyway. It would probably serve Jackson well, too, because frankly there's just not much reason to come here anymore and wade through all this s*t. [/QUOTE]
Seeing these sorts of problems on other boards as well, late last year I asked Jackson about how one would become a moderator, and help out with the daily upkeep of a specific board. He stated to me that unequivocally, there are no moderators on this site but him, and never will be. I guess it's his thought that there's too many chances for misuse of the rights, and in some cases it's very true. I've seen hundreds of boards fail because moderators act like asses. Anyway. Just thought I'd mention that from my previous experience. One other thing to consider too, is that individual sections can be good, but with how some lasses go by multiple names or nicknames, it can be a real pain to consolidate, trust me. .
Jay.
[QUOTE=Ssimpson290;1081001]I've only been here a short time, but I've thought having threads by providers might help. So under the provders reviews instead of one ginormous thread where a Provider could be reviewed in different spots have specific threads about a provider. It would help it stay on topic and if it were started with a link to the Provider then there would be no confusion with similar names. So for example, if Jane Doe were a provider, you'd find her section and there'd be her reviews. And to your point 3. Moderators could really help.[/QUOTE]
Hey Randy,
I think the solution you are looking for is just a matter of time. With so many Seniors no longer posting reports the forum post are already being reduced drasticly. Look at the last two weeks and compare that to a year ago. Fewer actual post and fewer actual reviews.
A month from now I think it will be very easy for experienced Seniors to review and glean any real information from the board.
KG.
[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1080795]If anyone actually wanted to find a review on one of the review sections of the Cincinnati board, God help them. I would point to the current BP review section as an example.
Obviously the various attempts to direct rants, raves and opinions here hasn't helped much. I'll offer a suggestion, but not sure it's possible.
1) Have a section for review requests. This is a place for newbies and the otherwise ignorant but curious to post their questions about providers. I guess you could have one for each type of request (BP, chatline, SW) but probably to save space better to have just one.
2) People can then scan this section if they're interested in helping these folks out and post on the review sections. All review requests will be here or deleted.
3) Have actual moderators move messages to the appropriate forums. Without that, none of this will ever work anyway. It would probably serve Jackson well, too, because frankly there's just not much reason to come here anymore and wade through all this s*t. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Jry Wild1; 1081200]This thread is great if people choose to use and read it. However, I am sure that it is [B][I]much [/I][/B]easier to just post the rants, raves, and opinions in-line with whatever caused the rant, rave, or opinion to want to be expressed. That is partially why this thread has not been as effective as it could be.
I'm sure there are some logistics issues, but your idea is pretty good. I like it. While I agree that a lot of this has gotten way out of hand, I don't know that the forum is useless. I guess it depends on how you read and use the forum. The search works pretty effectively now and if you select to view your search results "showing posts", instead of "showing threads" it is much better. Now, if you are the type reading through each thread, it [B][I]can [/I][/B]get tedious. Obviously, you can skim and skip the erroneous posts or posts that are trying to guide the new members, or "ignore" certain members and help yourself out.
If the new members would just catch on to basic forum etiquette (reading the forum first, learning how and what to post, etc) it would help a lot. I've been trying to post some "tutorials" regarding respect and forum / posting "rules" to help the new members out. But, this only works if they read the posts. Your idea would at least move this stuff somewhere else, even if the new members don't learn better behavior. It would probably mean a lot of work for the moderators (at least right now) given the current state of the board.
I also like the idea posted by Ssimpson290, but that [B][I]could [/I][/B]end up taking a lot of space and "burying" a lot of other threads as the main page became multiple pages.
I'm open to these ideas. I would love for the board to quiet down. I'm sure it will in time, but it makes "right now" difficult.
Just some thoughts.
JR. [/QUOTE]I appreciate everyone responding. I plan on searching your posts for the tutorials!
I have out of town since I last posted and was a little surprised at the reaction my questions had when I logged in this morning. Like I said before I lurk here from time to time only.
I just wanted to say a big thank you to Wingman Todd. He sent me a message explaining how he works in the hobby. No yelling or cussing just good solid advice. Thank You. He was also right when he said that he thought I had some innocent questions. I have not tried anyone yet and who knows maybe I never will but I have a much better picture of how it works. At least from Wingman Todd's point of view. I know that his is not the only one so I will keep reading until I have more questions. I will message him so not to offend anyone else. I do not understand why I got dumped on so much just for asking the questions but that is water under the bridge. I got a big part of my answers from Wingman Todd. So the other stuff doesn't matter to me.
One other thing is DAMN those guys that cruise the streets are incredible. That is something I guarantee I won't be trying. I don't need a mug shot of me as a keep sake because I for damn sure would get caught up in a bust. Hats off to you guys.
Lurking Sometimes,
Shadow Lurker.
I hope I posted this in the right spot?
Just a rant here. Why is it that all the pictures I see from other cities show VERY HOT SW's, while here in the 'Nati we get stuck with mostly crack heads and worn out skanks. I have seen only a few sws that are on par with some of the pics I see coming from other cities. I have had the luck of hitting on a few gems, but they always disappear as soon as they get here. I guess LE has all the good ones on the run making it only a last chance thing for many of these meth addicts. I'm probably spoiled from my early days of mongering in LA, where the women were at awesome. Even the tranny's there were smoking hot. I need to take a road trip back to LA and see some hotties, but until then, there is always Google street view mongering while I'm here at work.
Randyman,
Glad to see you posted this here in the Rants, Raves, and Opinions Thread.
These are just my opinions and I'm only trying to provide constructive discussion.
In response to your points:
1) You are correct that some of the folks flaming are some of the one's responsible for "polluting" the review threads with asides and comments that are not strictly relevant or strictly review-oriented. However, I disagree that it makes finding useful information harder to find. The updated site has a much more powerful and usable search than it did before (more on that below). Even if you are just cruising the "last couple of days" for intel, you can pretty easily scroll past any "BS" that you don't want to read. And, it is not that hard to go through a couple of pages of posts pretty quickly.You can always use the "ignore list" feature to filter out posts by members that you consider "polluters".
2) I wholeheartedly agree that this site is for sharing information so that we [B][I]all [/I][/B]don't waste our money. But, as I mentioned above, I don't think it is hard to search this site for info. And, I [B][I]DO [/I][/B]feel that all members should at least [B][I]attempt [/I][/B]to find the information themselves [U]before[/U] asking for help. Ignoring the posts asking for information about previously reviewed providers doesn't help anyone (the person asking or the rest of the board). Just PM'ing them or posting useful info for them is also a bad choice. Why should you take your valuable time and do the work for them when they can easily do it themselves? Don't reinforce lazy behavior.
New (and some old) members need to learn how to do the research themselves or PM someone requesting help. These questions should not be taking up space on the board. We who have provided the intel by posting have already done our part. We have shared our information. After it is out there, it should be up to each of us to do our [B][I]own [/I][/B]research to find that intel and not expect it to be handed out on a silver platter.
[U]I agree that the members asking these questions do not deserve to be [B][I]flamed [/I][/B]either. They need to be [B][I]taught! [/I][/B][/U]
[B][I]How to Search USASG[/I][/B]
Rather than copy / paste my previous post regarding searching, refer to my post entitled "Searching Suggestions" in the General Reports thread (#1619 at this point in time) from 12/02/2010.
[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3977-General-Reports&p=1099627&viewfull=1#post1099627[/url] (link subject to change)
If you have a good search term, it is very easy to use this method to weed out all of the extraneous posts that you might otherwise have to scroll through to get to the posts you want. This method also gets you right to the posts and you can avoid the 60 second delay between searches. If you don't have a good search term, it can still be hard to find the intel you want no matter what.
Lastly, I want to say that there is nothing wrong with asking the board or specific members for help. Actually, I encourage that. I just believe you need to try to find the info yourself [B][U]first[/U][/B]. Search here; Search Indys or other sites; Search with Google; Check images with TinEye; and [B][U]then[/U][/B] ask for help or additional information if you can't find what you are looking for yourself.
Professor JRW1
[QUOTE=Randyman1501; 1112689]When folks ask questions about previously reviewed providers. I would just point out that:
1) The folks doing the flaming seem to be some of the very ones responsible for polluting the review threads with useless BS that makes useful information that much harder to find.
2) While I too used to get p*the off at people making these requests all the time, I have come to realize how hard it can be to find info here and that the people asking really may not have limitless amounts of money and would like to make the best use of it, which is kinda why this whole thing exists.
So just stop being whiny little be*s when someone asks and either ignore it, PM them some useful info, or post some useful info. [/QUOTE]
Members should remember post DILIGENTLY and not treat threads as their own personal "jungle gym". I'm tired of logging, excited to read new reports, only to find out someone is trying to receive a "pat on the back" or a "chuckle". Save it for Rants and Raves. I have to say I VERY glad the SW thread doesn't have these problems. I do like to read about the escorts and backpage advertisers as well, but the escort section has turned into a long list of senseless garbage. It's not worth it anymore. If you don't like the Rants and Rave section, go create your own. It's that easy.