Thread Starter.
Printable View
Thread Starter.
[QUOTE=Runnow] I am pretty comfortable on the streets around K ave but I would not recommend hitting the back streets on foot at night too often.
I went for a second round with Jackie. She is a slim red head who I have seen before mostly south of Lehigh. She has a cute face and a nice body but her fingers look like she has been smoking for a few years. She has some tattoos on her neck. I did not bother to read what they said. I have seen her out before anytime between 11am and 11pm. I told her that I do not do anything in the car or on the street so she called one of her girl friends with a house. I know some of you would never go into a house down here but I have never had a problem as long as I go with my instinct.[/QUOTE]Runnow,
Small world isn’t it. It seems like we have a mutual friend. She doesn’t know it, let’s keep it that way. Hope you don’t mine my borrowing your review of Jackie.
Cool! I don’t have to do a review on Jackie. I’ll just ditto Runnows’ review. My two encounters with Jackie were nearly the same as Runnows’. Right down to the hands.
Runnow, did you get to meet her roomie? Unfortunate that she was too out of it to be included in Jackie and my plans. I do believe Jackie has received mixed reviews on this forum. However, my time with Jackie was pleasant and rewarding. This only goes to prove that YMMV. Would I see Jackie a second time? I already have.
Hey Runnow, the last time I attempted to contact Jackie her roomie said she was not there. I was park right down the street and observed a nice looking, thin, fairly nicely dressed Black girl enter the building. She had the look of a SW. You wouldn’t know her, would you? A nice looking BSW is rare on the K.
[QUOTE=Jasman84] Anyway I had to warn you to stay away from red-haired Jackie. She is about a 13 on a SW scale but the personality is -6. It really sucks that bad, it was just terrible. Shes thin about 110 pounds, if that, cute face, hot body, walks with her best freind between lehigh and york on K. As the saying goes all that glitters isn't gold. I have never seen her beofre but she kept smiling at me so I decided to give it a shot. So she gets in and is nice at first, she says she has a room for 10 like most girls do. We get the small talk over with she says she's 23, and she looks every bit of it. So we get there and ofcourse she wants the money up front telling me she always gets the money up front, and I'm like I never give all the money up front. Well she kept fussing and carrying on about we can't do anything unless she has all of it upfront. So I already paid for the room and I was tired so I gave in and paid her upfront. I now realize my biggest mistake. Well after all this fuussing and her getting an attitude with me I am totally turned off from her so ofcourse I'm soft as cotton now. I try getting it up and nothing works, she then says after about 30 seconds (you would think 2 hours had passed) "If you can't get it up no refunds your loss" so I'm like you gotta be kidding me, she then gets up and puts her clothes back on and at the point so do I after being that disgusted with her and her terrible attitude. So it was a perfectly fine waste of 50 bucks. Don't make the same mistake I did, eventhough I'm sure your experienced vets won't, but for any other newbies on here like myself watch out for Jackie and never pay everything up front.[/QUOTE]Jasman84,
Is this the same girl? As always, YMMV
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Hortense]
Even the Supreme Court had trouble with this definition, but two components seem to jump out in the above arguments:
1) Multiple photos of the same woman, which might imply they are intended for sexual gratification rather than identification.
2) Nude photos of women's body parts.
[/QUOTE]
I am not suggesting that I have the answer. Something has to be said about intent and the eye of the beholder. I don't see my pictures as being porn (well, at least not hard porn). Porn is not my intention. There are guys out there that beat off to the Mona Lisa. If the Supreme Court cannot decide, what makes anyone think that a decision can be determined on this site?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Any good professional photographer will tell you that it is better to take as many shots, in as many poses as necessary to insure that you got the best possible picture. Often a pro photographer will bracket a pose, taking three different exposures of the same model in one position. This is done in accordance with the belief that it is better to take more and get the shot you want then to chance missing it by taking not enough pictures. I am not claiming to be a professional photographer, or even a good one. I do have a back ground as an amateur, and old habits die hard. So I tend to take to many pictures. I try to limit it to ten, however; I often go overboard, especially if my subject is interesting. What to do with the extra pics? Post them? Why not?
I know somebody is going to comment that 10 or 20 pictures of the same girl are too much. Why? After all no one is obligated to look at all of the pictures. There isn’t a charge for having them appear in here (and there seems to be an infinite amount of room).
This second set of pictures was taken in Jackie’s house. I wouldn’t recommend that anyone make it a habit of going to a SWs location. I still have enough ghetto in me to believe that I can hang out where I shouldn’t. Going to any location with a known SW is risky; going to her home is a big risk.
Again, let me state that Jackie is a good one, in my book. But, YMMV.
CookyJar
I do have contact information for Jackie. This information will only be given to Senior Members who post reviews. As other mongers seem to have had no problem meeting up with Jackie the fact that contact information will not be given out willy nilly should not bother anyone.
I apologize in advance if any of my pictures, there content or quanitity offenses anyone. I also apologize if any thing that I've said offends anyone, that is never my intention.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=JNimble]Melissa caught my eye at the south end of the K and I looped around. At first, I wasn't sure if she was working, but she came right over when I passed her and pulled to the curb. She's about 5' 6" with reddish hair pulled back into a short ponytail. What caught my eye was that she had a pretty good body with GREAT tits. Nice combo!
First of all, she was about the nicest and most easy-going SWs I've ever met. She was truly pleasant, although a little slow talking which may have meant she was loaded on something.
We found a good spot for some privacy and negotiated 1/2 & 1/2 for $40 plus a tip if the service was good. The first half was great, but the second was so-so. She was pretty docile and there was a, let's say pungent, aroma wafting up from the playground. That pretty much killed the mood for me and all I wanted was to finish and get out.
Afterwards, I took her back to her neighborhood and dropped her off. As I mentioned, she's a sweet girl. I'd pick her up again for a BJ, although would probably pass for anything further.
Stay safe,
Jack[/QUOTE]JNimble's original report was made on 10/05/06.
Jack, Runnow and Davey - is this the same girl, I don't want to be bad mouthing the wrong Melissa.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A girls named Melissa has recently been reviewed in the Streetwalker Reports Thread. I am not sure whether this is the same girl. However the description seems to fit. Even the details about her personality seems to fit. I am sorry but I cannot comment on her talents as a provider. For reasons that I will explain later, I did not partake of her gifts.
I agree with all that has been said about Melissa (if this is the same girl). She is friendly, responsive, and cute as a button and an otherwise nice girl. But, at the risk of having another less then favorable review reported back to the girl, I must report that the odor reported in previous reviews has become over whelming. There is an air of uncleanliness about Melissa. This goes beyond not being fresh. Her outer coat, clothing, shirt, pants and her socks and sneakers were all filthy. You will note that Melissa choose to remove her socks before having her pictures taken, even the ones taken outside standing in the cold were taken bare footed. I cropped her sneakers out of the pictures, but you can take my word, they were a mess.
I sincerely liked Melissa. Without the odor, I’d have to believe that she would have been a great date. I’d also have to believe that the other mongers that reviewed Melissa must have gotten to her prior to her decline. This often happens. A girl starts off fresh and after a week or two out there on the streets she declines into a mess. Two or three weeks ago her boobies were probably perky, her body firm and her pussy fresh. That was then, this is now.
Would I stop again for Melissa? Actually, yes I would. That is provided she has cleaned up, taken a bath and changed clothing. (I have seen Melissa twice, on two different days, since these pictures were taken and she was in the same outfit.)
I hate posting a negative review. I don’t want to hamper a nice girl from doing her thing. Melissa has a great personality. Perhaps she has cleaned up and no longer deserves a negative report. Also, I know now that I am at risk of having my words printed out and shown to the provider. However, I believe this type of information should be passed on.
CookyJar
PS: Another reason I'd stop again for Melissa: You will notice that Melissa has what we black guys like to call, "A nice gap." This is a very desirable trait.
[QUOTE=Admin][blue]Gentlemen,
Beginning today, I will delete every report that isn't directly about sport fucking in Philadelphia.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.[/i]
Let's get back to the subject.
Thank You,
Jackson[/blue][/QUOTE]I know that Christmas is more then two weeks away but I finished my shopping early and I was saving this for later, but. Darn it Jackson you've been such a good boy this year, I am giving you your present early. The rest of you will have to wait until next week.
Carrie was a lot of fun. One of the best times I’ve spent on a car date in a long time. She’s cooperative in every aspect. There were a couple of moments when I forgot who she was; it was almost like being on a real world date. It was like I was coaching my girlfriend into taking naked picture. Once we started giggling it was hard to stop.
After taking the pictures we decided to move to a better location. As we drove around looking for a little privacy, Carrie continued to act sexually playful, teasing and keeping me aroused. Jackson, don’t let a few stretch mark deter you, Carrie had a nice body to go along with her GFE personality. Pound for pound, dollar for dollar and all things being considered, Carrie was an excellent all around date. Of cause, as always, YMMV.
Heads up fellows the snitch cams are here. And they will be coming to a nieghborhood near you, soon.
Other then the mention of some traffic light cameras on the Blvd, I don't remember any advance notice on these spy in the skys. Beside these, I seen them on Broad St, near Erie Ave. They have a bright blue light on top and at night they are visable for miles.
They remind me of the cameras in that old movie. Not 1984, but the other one with the firemen.
I would not be surprized if they don't have less comspicuous models already planted about the city.
So there they are, be careful, Big Brother is watching.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar]I know that Christmas is more then two weeks away but I finished my shopping early and I was saving this for later, but. Darn it Jackson you've been such a good boy this year, I am giving you your present early. The rest of you will have to wait until next week.
Carrie was a lot of fun. One of the best times I’ve spent on a car date in a long time. She’s cooperative in every aspect. There were a couple of moments when I forgot who she was; it was almost like being on a real world date. It was like I was coaching my girlfriend into taking naked picture. Once we started giggling it was hard to stop.
After taking the pictures we decided to move to a better location. As we drove around looking for a little privacy, Carrie continued to act sexually playful, teasing and keeping me aroused. Jackson, don’t let a few stretch mark deter you, Carrie had a nice body to go along with her GFE personality. Pound for pound, dollar for dollar and all things being considered, Carrie was an excellent all around date. Of cause, as always, YMMV.[/QUOTE]WoW !! I'm impressed. Great pics. I've dated Carrie quite a while ago and totally forgot about her. Haven't seen her in ages. Although I do have to say that last time I saw her she was a bit more groomed. Guess I'd have to do the CVS stop for a cheap razor and a travel size shaving cream (total damage about 2.50) and leave her in the Patio Bathroom for a bit. LOL
Think I'm gonna ask Santa for a small digital camera that I can fit in my
shirt pocket and get into the swing of things taking pics. My old faithfull 1.0 meg camera died and don't want to take out the Rebel XT on the ave.
Nice seeing that after all this time though she still looks pretty good. Too many of these girls literally deteriorate overnight.
This is one of those occasions when a picture is worth a thousand words. I did a name search in both the General and Streetwalker Threads and came up with a number of references to a girl named Angie. However, many of the references did not contain a review and those that did were vague and varied. Now that there is a picture to go with a name, it would help if the members who have dated this Angie would chime in to clear things up.
This Angie, the one I dated, was definitely my type of girl. I am going to go out on a limb and say; the impression I got was that she’d been around for awhile. Yet, she came off fresh as a daisy. That is; she’s a pro but you’d never know it from her personality. She took care of the formalities first, made the deal and then got down to business. Don’t get me wrong; after the prelims were done she was straight GFE.
Angie’s body is soft, no jiggle, no flab, just easy to the touch. Get this! Her breath was minty. No, I didn’t kiss her, but; I was close enough to smell a hint of mint. The hair around her pussy was light and furry, the kind you wouldn’t mind sticking your face in. (No, I didn’t do that either.) What I did do I enjoyed and would gladly do again.
From the reviews that I read that described a girl similar in appearance; I’ve concluded that not everyone is going to agree with my assessment of Angie. This just goes to prove, like always, YMMV.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Phillyewe]There is no need to clear things up. Angie has been around for a long time and she is well-documented. There have always been pictures to go with her name, for example, please RTFF.
Also please note that the reports give specifics on what type of sex the reviewer had with her, what she charges, her technique, where she was found, and when she was out. In other words, information that is helpful to men seeking women for sex.[/QUOTE]Really great research. Sorry I didn't go further back. I only checked 2006.
There were reports of a bleached Blonde Angie, a Angie with long dark hair and a heavy Angie. Many of the references were in a list and copies of other list. Time did not allow me to go thought all of the post that mentioned a girl named Angie.
I am sorry that I cannot give out more info then I do. But, if you've been reading the current post you know that I was recently burned for information post on this thread. I will provide information that is helpful to men seeking women for sex, to certain members by PM. For the most part, regulars like Angie are easy enough to find.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Skrit]Nice girl all the same. Agreed. Treat her nice, she treats you nice. Saw her today. Said I saw her pics, thinking she would like that.
But Cookiejar treated her like a piece of shit! She said he told her he would not put her pics on the internet. I said you sure? She said yeah. So he puts 10 pics on the internet. I guess you pay $30 per pic you get to lie? I say bullshit. You need to apologize CJ. I told her I would ask the moderator to delete the pics.[/QUOTE]Here we go again. Except, this time I don't believe a word. I don't have to lie. There are plenty of girls willing to have their pictures shown on the internet. Angie is a regular and knew her picture had been shown before.
Are you out of your mine? $30 buck per picture? Come on? That's $300 for a set of ten. Do you really believe that I gave Jackie $780 dallors for the 26 pictures I posted of her. I post two sometime three girls a week. Do the math. My name is CookyJar, not Bill Gates.
This from a guy who counts I's, rants about rants, but has never posted a review. (I still cannot believe you counted my I's.) Sorry I don't believe a word you said.
CookyJar
Wasn't sure who was telling the truth so since I see her just about every day I asked her. Angie told me that not only was Cookie a very nice guy but she is suppossed to see him again sometime this week. She told me she hasn't discussed those pics with anyone since they were taken. Hope this puts that to rest! Keep up the good work my man. She not only didn't care that they were posted she said she hopes to see him soon.
T
P. I talked to her today at 3:15 pm
Wow - a new Streetwalker Photos Thread, how cool.
CookyJar
Merry Christmas and A Happy New Years
From Christine and CookyJar
Good Luck and Good Hunting in the New Year
B4N
Hmm, let me see. Who should I believe. A senior member with 200+ posts or someone with 11 posts with an apparent axe to grind. Skrit, you may want to think about what you are posting before attacking a senior member who has been one of the most prolific contributors (if not the most prolific) in the Philly forum. Oh wait, maybe you obtained your information from the only streetwalker out there who tells the truth! That must be it. Silly me! Skrit, either you are naive, or you are dishonest in your report. You should be thanking cookyjar for his reports, instead of spreading be. S. On this board. Get a clue. Thank you cookyjar for your continued, valuable contributions.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Merry Christmas and A Happy New Years
From Christine and CookyJar
Good Luck and Good Hunting in the New Year
B4N[/QUOTE]Good pics CJ..If only you got these pics about 6 months ago. Prior to her having her jaw wired (as in your pics) she had a much cuter look to her. Busted jaw has definetely changed her appearance quite a bit.
Nice girl and a decent piece of ass if you catch her on the right day. Unfortunately she can't really give a BJ now with the jaw situation. She was actually pretty darn good at that.
[QUOTE=Davey1965]Good pics CJ..If only you got these pics about 6 months ago. Prior to her having her jaw wired (as in your pics) she had a much cuter look to her. Busted jaw has definetely changed her appearance quite a bit.
Nice girl and a decent piece of ass if you catch her on the right day. Unfortunately she can't really give a BJ now with the jaw situation. She was actually pretty darn good at that.[/QUOTE]LOL, I remember Christine calling me the morning after her jaw was busted and thinking, "well, that's no fun." If I recall you ended up being next on her list and came away not exactly thrilled that day. I haven't seen her or spoken to her since, because she was getting that annoying "he's a regular I can take advantage of" mentality going and I can't stand that. But it is a relief to know she's not dead or anything.
I've been pretty exclusively with Yvonne since I recovered from surgery, since she actually maintains a number, calls me if she loses her phone with a usable number, and likes to fuck me as much as I do her. But of course, the lure of strange pussy is always calling. Maybe I'll find her cousin next time I actually scout for someone new.
I believe that would be Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury.
It's getting creepy out there.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Heads up fellows the snitch cams are here. And they will be coming to a nieghborhood near you, soon.
They remind me of the cameras in that old movie. Not 1984, but the other one with the firemen.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]
My Disclaimer: The pictures I post are of girls from the Philadelphia Pa. area. When possible I will provide contact information to senior members who post regularly. I provide these pictures for entertainment only.
Hi fellow mongers. I am just a visitor to you fair forum. I use to post in the Philly forum. Please forgive me for this intrusion. I will not be posting here on regular bases. My intentions are just to post a few pictures from time to time in different forums. I may make a comment here and there, but nothing to be concerned about.
Now about Lisa,
A SSW I meant a few weeks ago. Should any of you mongers find yourself near Kensington and Lehigh Ave in Philadelphia, and you see this lovely lady, don’t pass her up. Talk about full service, this girl offered everything. She even had her on spot. Like most girls, she really got into having her pictures taken. While posing for the pictures, she told me what she liked; she told me what I could do and what she could do. The dirty talk got to me. Then she proceeded to do what she promised. No rush, just good old GFE, like with a fresh young thing out for a good time. I love it when they call me poppy.
The BBBJ was sweet. She took her time. I rolled her on stomach so I could lie on her soft ass and hit it from the back. No anal. She offered, but I just wanted to lie on her juicy ass and whisper in her ear while she talked dirty back. I pulled her up on her knees, gripped her hips and hit it doggy style. Another flip and I lifted her legs and got it mish. She wrapped her legs around my back, arms around my neck and licked my ear and said, “dick me poppy, dick me.” I shot off so hard I thought I’d popped the rubber.
For $50, plus tip, I was lucky to find Lisa. Would I hit it again? Damn right.
My Disclaimer: The pictures I post are of girl from the Philadelphia Pa. area. When possible I will provide contact information to senior members who post regularly. I provide these pictures for entertainment only.
Hi fellow mongers. I am just a visitor to you fair forum. I use to post in the Philly forum. Please forgive me for this intrusion. I will not be posting here on regular bases. My intentions are just to post a few pictures from time to time in different forums. I may make a comment here and there, but nothing to be concerned about.
Now about Stacy,
It was one of them dark cool nights. I was just driving though the K, not planning on stopping for anybody. I spotted Stacy, all bundled up head to toe, waiting near an El stop near Kensington and Lehigh. We did the touche, touche thing, but I was sure she wasn’t a decoy, not standing in the cold, freezing in the dark. Truth is I just wanted to check out the fullness of her boobs before starting to bargain. In the bra, her boobs didn’t feel too bad, so I went into my normal routine.
The biggest problem I have with mongering at night is that you cannot get a good look at what you are getting. This is a special concern when car dating. It is especially problematic when taking pictures in car. I could not see anything in the view finder. Usually, I just ask the girl to tuck in her tummy, take a breath and smile – then I hope for the best. All in all Stacy was not a bad find. She may not have the body of a porn star, but it ain’t that bad. It could have been worst.
Car dating is not my favorite mongering activity. Especially on a cold dark winter night, in a high risk neighborhood, parked with the engine running. So I finger played with that thing for a minute, let her put on the rubber and pulled her over to the drivers side, with the seat back and let her ride em cowgirl. (I did it in this position thinking that with the car running I could drive away in a hurry if undesirables appeared.) I could not have been more pleased with Stacy. She was tight and wet, a nice fit, and she did all the work. I wanted her to come back to my place but she refused because it was to far away.
Hopefully, Stacy and I will meet again. Maybe by then she will have had a couple of good meals, and her boobs will have filled out a bit. The jest of it is; Stacy has a good attitude, a tight pussy, soft butt and a good fuck. I cannot speak on her BJ, a couple of licks are all I wanted, to harden up a bit – time was of the essences. Would I stop for Stacy again? Sure, I would love to try her FS. She offered a fairly good price, which I bumped up with a nice tip for her stepping outside in the freezing cold. But, as always, YMMV.
CookyJar
I have had to resign myself to some hard truths. One of them is, I like doing what I do. Taking pictures is my thing. While I don’t jerk off to the pictures, I do get a kick from the process. I enjoy talking with the girl, plotting out a plan and negotiating a decent price. The fact is, I like the whole thing. Weird? Maybe. But no more or less then some of the other activities taking place out there in the real world. Another shocking aspect of the taking pictures fetish is: it is more fun when the pictures are shared. It is similar to any photo venture, whether it be family, pets or nudes, it is better when others get to see your effort. I had thought I would be able to continue taking my candid shots of various streetwalkers, download them to my hard drive and move on. Where is the fun in that? Sure, I got a couple of good nuts and the fun of the chase is always a factor, but something was missing.
I still do not see the need for having a separate photo section. I do believe I had a valid point of view. And yes, I do feel like I am being treated like a step-child. However, I missed the old gang. I missed being part of a group. I missed not being able to share my adventures with fellow members who understand the nature of the hobby. So with some reservations, I am coming out of my self imposed exile.
One of the objections I have to a separate photo thread is that it places a lot of focus on the individuals who provide pictures. Pictures placed in the general or like threads are soon buried among the other post. Over time they are soon forgotten and dismissed. It takes a small amount of search effort to locate the many photo contributions made over the pass year. On the outside, this is no big thing. On the other hand, placing all of photo in what amounts to a public folder could be useful to LE or others who we may wish to avoid. As the resent honorable mention in the Philly Paper would seem to suggest, this forum is not unknown in the community. This easy access My Picture folder might end up in the wrong hands. Never the less, if I wish to get my jollies off, this is where I will have to post.
Flamers, nay sayers and the like were never the issue for me. Yes, I did and will still sometimes object to some of what is implied. They had a right to their opinion. I just wish that I had had a right to mine.
Enough said. Let me move back on topic. Which bring me to?
Melissa,
Oh, shit. Here we go again. I know I have said this in the pass. It does bear (she's a bear) reminding. I show what is out there. Not just what I like or what I would like to be out there. I show what is actually on the streets. Good, bad or indifferent, whether you agree or not, whether you like it or not, Melissa is a streetwalker plying her trade on the streets of Philadelphia. Do not let these pictures fool you; Melissa knows something about being a good streetwalker.
Other then the CBJ, Melissa is a streetwalker who provides good full service. Her claim was that she does nothing without protection. All things being considered, this was a good thing, right? For a big girl she was very clean and fresh. Although, I personally prefer BBBJs to the covered type, I was pleased with her performance. She never rushed and was willing to provide any act that ended in a climax.
In my opinion, Melissa knew she was not the best looking girl on the block and attempted to compensate for this lack of looks, with good strong talents. I especially liked her ball licking technique and the way she tightened up her ass when getting it doggy style. She also provided a nice nipple nibble and belly licking. I suspect her was into salad tossing, but I am not, so I did not asked.
Do not let the looks fool you. If all you want is a good fuck? I suggest you grab a pillar or paper bag, or just close you eyes, give the girl her $30 (which included pictures and tip) and lay back and let her do her thing. If you are seeking a wife or girlfriend to take home to the family and friends – you might want to keep on searching. Would I stop for Melissa again? On another cold dark night, when there is nothing else happening, sure, why not – I already have a wife and girlfriend – all I need is a quickie. As always YMMV.
One more thing and this is important. Melissa is not a K Ave girl (her looks would be so out classed on the K that she’d never get a date). I picked her up on one of those cold nights walking on Board St near Erie Ave, in view of the blue lights. She was all bundled up under a big hooded jacket. It was like the Gumper said, “Life is like a box of chocolate, you never know what you’re gonna get.” Hummm! I wonder, was F. Gump a monger?
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Runnow] My last trip was the best this year so far. I got some inspiration from some of the other photo takers on the board and decide I would try some experimentation. I went shopping. I wish I could find clothes for myself that looked this good when I put them on. The total shopping bill was $23 including shoes. I asked Melissa, a real solid girl that I have picked up a few times, to be my model. This probably would not have worked with some of the money first girls on the Ave but she was game and had fun.
She got to keep the clothes so the next guy to see her will probably get a very appealing young lady. When things go this right it makes me wonder how the $$$ girls stay in business! [/QUOTE]
Runnow, IMHO, you have alot of class
I have often thought of doing something similar. Fact is, I did once help purchase a Bra Set for a girl. Problem was that I let her pick it out and it turned out to be way to big.
Just yesterday a girl named Ashley suggested that we get a school girl outfit for her to pose in. She wears glasses and said the nerdy school girl look turns lots of guys on. I told her maybe next time. (I will post Ashley's pictures in the near future.)
Here a tip for you. I know for a fact that a lot of the girls like to shop at the neighborhood thrift stores. Not just because it's cheap, but because they can often find off beat cool retro stuff.
Thanks again for taking things to a different level. Viva la difference.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Runnow]The report is in the SW section.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Runnow] I asked Melissa, a real solid girl that I have picked up a few times, to be my model. This probably would not have worked with some of the money first girls on the Ave but she was game and had fun. [/QUOTE]
Damn! I just noticed. Back to back Melissas, a very poplar name this season. And both girls with good attitudes, what are the odds. Yours does seem to be the more desirable of the two. LOL
CookyJar.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]I have had to resign myself to some hard truths...So with some reservations, I am coming out of my self imposed exile.[/QUOTE]C'mon, admit it. You missed me.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]Taking pictures is my thing...I do get a kick from the process. I enjoy talking with the girl, plotting out a plan and negotiating a decent price. The fact is, I like the whole thing. Weird? Maybe. But no more or less then some of the other activities taking place out there in the real world. Another shocking aspect of the taking pictures fetish is: it is more fun when the pictures are shared.CookyJar[/QUOTE]
CookyJar --- Do NOT be discouraged if you don't receive universal praise for your...no pun intended..."body of work." The fact is, you've assembled a rather impressive collection of the streetwalkers in the Philadelphia area. At the present time, the photos you have may seem insignificant. However, given the passage of time, these may become one of the definitive works in the art world about everyday life (or, maybe I should say, everynight life) in a major American city. Think of past photographers, who documented other venues --- the Dust Bowl era, the Depression, the waves of immigrants and their tenament housing. None of this was considered glamorous or important at the time, but such works now occupy volumes in libraries or art museums. Will yours? I can't say, but who else has recorded this aspect of the more mundane part of life in Philadelphia.
Here's another thing to consider: In one respect, by recording the images of these women, you've given them a measure of imortality and, for lack of a better word..."fame." The truth is, many or even most of these girls will probably not even be alive in 5, 10, or 20 years. While the photos do not show them in a dignified light as society would judge that, it is no less dignified than some of the slave photos that exist from the Civil War era. The images allow the subjects of the photos to live on, in a sense.
As for my two words, above: Elmer Batters was the photographer largely responsible for "leg" magazines. His work was banned in the 1950s and 1960s. Few people viewed his work as definitive then. Nowadays, he has gained a measure of respect for the genre in which he worked. Check out some of work, via Google or other avenues, when you get a chance. And then take solace that your work may not be as insignificant as some may try to make it out to be.
From my perspective, I'll say "Keep up the good work!"
[B]Have fun at the Forum
R::R[/B]
[QUOTE=Ri Designer]You have finally gotten me to hate a set of your photos. What a pig this girl is.[/QUOTE]
I thought she was fuckable, but that's just me.
And I'm a big fan of Cookyjar and all his photos. I hope he ignores the haters and keep doing what he loves and what we love him doing....sharing his adventures with us in words and pictures.
CookyJar,
Your pictures are great. You provide us a view into the Philadelphia street life. Sometimes you find a pretty girl and somtimes a hard girl but I always find the photos interesting.
I am glad you gave up on retirement. Keep on posting your photos.
I stopped at the dunkin donut just to use the rest room. While there I purchased a hot tea and two muffins. I had decided to eat a little something before my trip to NJ and Delaware. I often go this route when I’m leaving the city just so I can see what happening on the K. Not planning to do anything, I sat in my vehicle and ate and drank before my trip south. That’s when I spotted Marcella and she spotted me.
She came over to the drivers’ side window and gave me the look; I offered her a seat and a change to get warm. From the start we had some minor differences. I did not want to car date. She did not want to ride to far from the K, so going back to my hideaway was out of the question. I do not like taking pictures at night and she did not want her face in any pictures. It seemed like we had reached unsolvable impasses. As I ate and drank, she warmed up. We talked and laughed, getting pretty friendly, until she remembered what she was out there for and decided she was warm enough, she got out and walk away from the DD towards the K. In maybe ten minutes she was back. That’s how I meant Marcella.
Like I told Marcella, I don’t like taken night pictures. In the dark of an unlit car you cannot see anything in the cameras view finder. Although I have agreed that she could drape her hair, sexy like, across her face; I had expected better pictures. I figured she’d pose openly. I also told her I didn’t feel comfortable car dating at night in these unfamiliar surroundings. The dark lots and streets seem to be teeming with exploratory highwaymen. A quick BBBJ, on a public street, was not to my liking so I passed.
This does not mean I did not have a good time while with Marcella. She was pleasant company while I snacked. We discussed and joked about life on the Avenue. Would I stop for her again? Yes, I planned to – unfortunately she had no phone. If anyone can farther elaborate on Marcella’s talents, please do. I’d like to know what I missed.
CookyJar
PS: Look hard and you’ll see the famed Dunkin Donut in the background.
[QUOTE=La Paz]Sorry, I really have to call you down on this BS line, because you've used it before, and it's becoming increasingly obvious that the previous reports on your Catherine Street activities are true.
Here's the problem. When the cop car pulls up behind you, which is faster and easier to do:
*pull her head up and zip up your pants from a BJ, or
*put every article of her clothing (bra, panties, pants top) from a nude photo shoot back on?
The answer's obvious, and it once again begs the question of why the artist doesn't partake of an activity this forum was primarily intended to inform about.
No knock on the photos, just think there's no harm in being a little more honest.[/QUOTE]
I have been an active poster in the suburbs and AC boards for sometime now and often check out the Philly site just for CJ's pics. here are just a few reasons why CJ may not want to partake.
1) The girl may not seem clean enough for his taste. He is a man of quality, and this girl was not quality
2) Diseases - I have passed on many SW for fear of what I may catch
3) LE - the only legal issue with taking photos may be indecent exposure, but if busted in the act would not be considered prostitution.
4) He may not be in the mood, may just want to window shop. I have driven the K about 25 times in the last year, and never picked up a girl, I just enjoy the shopping. I guess it's just different strokes for different folks.
CJ, glad your retirement didn’t last. Keep up the postings, some of us love your work.
[QUOTE=jacken]LE - the only legal issue with taking photos may be indecent exposure, but if busted in the act would not be considered prostitution.
[/QUOTE]
You sound so sure of that. Do you really think if LE catches with with a naked known prostitute in your car on a public street that they are not going to assume that prostitution was involved? Or at least try to bust you for this?
I am a CJ fan and I believe his reports, but I agree that taking naked pics of a chick is more dangerous (in terms of LE) than a BBBJ where you can just quickly pull up your pants as the previous message pointed out.
[QUOTE=Peter Johnson]You sound so sure of that. Do you really think if LE catches with with a naked known prostitute in your car on a public street that they are not going to assume that prostitution was involved? Or at least try to bust you for this?
I am a CJ fan and I believe his reports, but I agree that taking naked pics of a chick is more dangerous (in terms of LE) than a BBBJ where you can just quickly pull up your pants as the previous message pointed out.[/QUOTE]
All Cj would need to do is claim that it's an Art project or reseach for a report and he'd be home free. Hell he may even be eleigable for a goverment grant for his Art Work.
Truthfully either way if LE wants to get you they will, which is why I try and stay off the sw sceen.
Either way, we both agree that CJ is the Man.
[QUOTE=jacken]All Cj would need to do is claim that it's an Art project or reseach for a report and he'd be home free. Hell he may even be eleigable for a goverment grant for his Art Work.
Truthfully either way if LE wants to get you they will, which is why I try and stay off the sw sceen.
Either way, we both agree that CJ is the Man.[/QUOTE]
By that logic, you should just say you were doing "research" whenever busted with a known streetwalker, and LE would merrily send you on your way. But I do agree with you that LE will bust you if they want...they don't really even need evidence or probable cause if they are in the mood to fuck with you. That is the main reason why I haven't done the SW thing yet, but every post of CJ's tempts me more and more.
[QUOTE=CookyJar] I also told her I didn’t feel comfortable car dating at night in these unfamiliar surroundings. The dark lots and streets seem to be teeming with exploratory highwaymen. A quick BBBJ, on a public street, was not to my liking so I passed.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, maybe I didn't make myself clear. I have said this before, but it bears saying again, especially for those novice mongers who may not be knowledgeable about the Kensington Ave area. It is a very dangerous place. There are lots of crappy things that can happen to you on the K. LE is the least of your worries, IMHO. What's the worst? There are a bunch of characters out there that would take a life for enough money to buy one drug hit. Some of the same locations used by SWers for dating are also used for other illegal activities.
Here is a case in point. Huntington Park was a known pickup and dating location. There are parking areas in the park with vantage points where you can see, day or night, approaching LE way before they get close enough to determine what you are doing. Lately, SWers in that area will not date in the park after dark, not because of LE, but because they and their dates were being robbed by the locals. Now they use the area inside the park for pickups but date outside of the park, after dark. Did I forget to mention that a couple of known SWers have been found died in the park.
Whether I am taking pictures or getting my rocks off, I like a clear view of my surroundings. If you are parked on some out of the way lot, in a dark alley or secluded driveway and some asshole walks up to your vehicle with a gun in his hand, you better hope he is a cop.
(For what it's worth; it is much easier to check out what's going on around you when you are just taking pictures. It is pretty hard to check out what's happening, in the darkness of the shadows, while some SW is chomping down on your wiener, the nature of the act makes it a little hard to concentrate.)
So I passed one up? Does that make me queer? You have to use the big head sometimes, right?
CookyJar
Well, there was his 8/28/06 post basically calling CookyJar gay (one of a number if you look at the history) which would seemingly, and especially in combination with others of the same ilk, violate the guidelines on flaming, trolling and "hateful" and "discriminatory" posting.
Hey, I gave it a shot. What's most offensive is the way he essentially does nothing but flame, but acts as if he's "moderating" the board. It's almost always the ones who constantly have something to say about a particular member and the content of his posts. As if criticism of content of actual provider reviews has a legitimate purpose here. I have the guy in my ignore list but the problem is that you still end up reading his damn nonsense because everyone quotes it when they justifiably jump on his ass!
I can understand the singling out of a member for repeated criticism if it's someone who contributes nothing of substance and we have a number of them. Unfortunately pics tend to bring them in from all over this genius-ridden country of ours. But let's face it, the great majority of La Paz's posts do nothing but attempt a takedown of CJ and call him gay despite the fact he's got about a zillion pics of chicks in his ride posted all over the place...I may not always approve of the idea of pics, and yes some are heinous, but it's not as if he isn't a legit contributor.
And Chuckle, you already used that one almost verbatim. Come back with a story about a chick or something. Hell, make one up.
From the start, let me make one thing clear, I had no problem with Roxies preformance. I was from the beginning to the end satisfied with her skills. This report is a positive one. With that having been said, I’d like to pose a question. How does one rate a Blow Job?
Because I am a firm believer in the YMMV theory, I do not give out bad reviews, willie nillie. The experience must have a discernible flaw in order for me to negate it. For example, if a SW were to grab money out of my hand, kick me in the balls and run – she’d get a bad review. Similarly, I don’t like teeth scraping, biting, nibbling or other forms of torture. And, if I wanted a hand job, I’d ask for a HJ not a BJ. I can give myself a hand job, so why would I pay some stranger to stoke it? I know what I do like and what I don’t like when it comes to a BJ. My question is; how do you rate a BJ on a scale? Is there a BJ scale? There is a scale which applies to a female’s general appearance. I have even heard of guys referring to a special SW scale (though I don’t get the difference). I have even read reports that refer to an attitude scale. Is there a scale, numeric, alphabetic or symbolic which properly rates BJ technique?
Usually, if I bust a nut I’m happy. What I mean is; if the girl does what’s necessary to make me cum, I am usually pretty much happy with her. Let’s face it, that is what it is all about, right – getting our rocks off? I don’t know about you guys but if I don’t get off, I consider the experience a dud. Beyond that, it’s all gravy. Deep throating, licking, spitting are all extras. Sure we do appreciate the extras, but, how do they figure in to rating. What I mean is; if a girl does not deep throat should she drop down in the ratings? What about catching vs. spitting? Should a swallow out rate a spit? Whether she swallowed or spit it out, she obviously got the job done.
There is no questioning the benefits of deep throating and swallowing. Most mongers have experienced the provider who withdraws way to early, spilling globs of sticking mess. And there is the catch and spitter who leaves a wad of cum sliding down the outside of the passenger door. The SWer who deep throats and swallows is a rare fine indeed. Even rarer is the gagger deep throater, who can catch and swallow. Don’t forget ball licking, tonguing, juicy lips, eyes open dirty talk and etc, etc, and etc, and all the things that makes a mongers eyes roll back and moan, “damn baby suck that thing.” Should allowing cumming in her face be included in a girl skills list? And let us not forget head bobbing. I like it when they start off slow and gentle with a purpose, at maybe sixty BPM (Bobs Per. Minute). I also like it when I can grab the hair in the back of her head and bounce her face up and down on my dick, upping it to 75 BPMs. If she is really good, she’ll taper it down to a slow 10 BPMs, sucking gently, while I pump it up – ya’ll know what I mean. I say all this while fully understanding that the Mileage May Vary from experience to experience. And things get even more complicated when you add BBBJ vs. CBJ. How does one rate a good BBBJ against a good CBJ?
Back to Roxies review. It’s a good one. No she didn’t deep throat or gag. A catch and spitter, she just got right down to the job at hand and did what she had to do. I was satisfied. I was happy in fact. There was nothing special, nothing notes worthy. Roxie is a nice quite girl with nice quite blow job techniques. Would I stop for her again? Yeah, I would – I got the feeling she could be wild given better circumstances (our session was interrupted a couple of times by nearby civilians, which accounts for there being only 6 pics). Besides, as always, YMMV.
I have seen her alot at Cambria but I know her a shavanna ? hmm I always wated to pick her up but she always has a mean looking face when I see her on the Cambria corner, The I hate this shit face. CJ how willing was she to take the pictures? That was another reason I never stopped for her I never thought she would agree ! As USUAL CJ's post was very informative. I seen her this morning but passed her by because again she just looked very un-interested in a date. DAMN I should have stopped anyway. LOL. Next time I see her I'm stopping. And CJ I kinda agree with you on the rating , But I do try to convey the attitude meaning did she seem like she was ok with what she has chosen to do, I have had girls get in and not want to chat other then the $ .
I have had girls get in and after all the usual stuff required say to me ok you ready lets go ...Get 2 minutes into it and start the are you ready yet stuff, I like to make sure I report on the attiude not sure I would put a number on it but I would report good - bad - and stay away. Does that make any sense?
KAM
[QUOTE=CookyJar]From the start, let me make one thing clear, I had no problem with Roxies preformance. I was from the beginning to the end satisfied with her skills. This report is a positive one. With that having been said, I’d like to pose a question. How does one rate a Blow Job?
Because I am a firm believer in the YMMV theory, I do not give out bad reviews, willie nillie. The experience must have a discernible flaw in order for me to negate it. For example, if a SW were to grab money out of my hand, kick me in the balls and run – she’d get a bad review. Similarly, I don’t like teeth scraping, biting, nibbling or other forms of torture. And, if I wanted a hand job, I’d ask for a HJ not a BJ. I can give myself a hand job, so why would I pay some stranger to stoke it? I know what I do like and what I don’t like when it comes to a BJ. My question is; how do you rate a BJ on a scale? Is there a BJ scale? There is a scale which applies to a female’s general appearance. I have even heard of guys referring to a special SW scale (though I don’t get the difference). I have even read reports that refer to an attitude scale. Is there a scale, numeric, alphabetic or symbolic which properly rates BJ technique?
Usually, if I bust a nut I’m happy. What I mean is; if the girl does what’s necessary to make me cum, I am usually pretty much happy with her. Let’s face it, that is what it is all about, right – getting our rocks off? I don’t know about you guys but if I don’t get off, I consider the experience a dud. Beyond that, it’s all gravy. Deep throating, licking, spitting are all extras. Sure we do appreciate the extras, but, how do they figure in to rating. What I mean is; if a girl does not deep throat should she drop down in the ratings? What about catching vs. spitting? Should a swallow out rate a spit? Whether she swallowed or spit it out, she obviously got the job done.
There is no questioning the benefits of deep throating and swallowing. Most mongers have experienced the provider who withdraws way to early, spilling globs of sticking mess. And there is the catch and spitter who leaves a wad of cum sliding down the outside of the passenger door. The SWer who deep throats and swallows is a rare fine indeed. Even rarer is the gagger deep throater, who can catch and swallow. Don’t forget ball licking, tonguing, juicy lips, eyes open dirty talk and etc, etc, and etc, and all the things that makes a mongers eyes roll back and moan, “damn baby suck that thing.” Should allowing cumming in her face be included in a girl skills list? And let us not forget head bobbing. I like it when they start off slow and gentle with a purpose, at maybe sixty BPM (Bobs Per. Minute). I also like it when I can grab the hair in the back of her head and bounce her face up and down on my dick, upping it to 75 BPMs. If she is really good, she’ll taper it down to a slow 10 BPMs, sucking gently, while I pump it up – ya’ll know what I mean. I say all this while fully understanding that the Mileage May Vary from experience to experience. And things get even more complicated when you add BBBJ vs. CBJ. How does one rate a good BBBJ against a good CBJ?
Back to Roxies review. It’s a good one. No she didn’t deep throat or gag. A catch and spitter, she just got right down to the job at hand and did what she had to do. I was satisfied. I was happy in fact. There was nothing special, nothing notes worthy. Roxie is a nice quite girl with nice quite blow job techniques. Would I stop for her again? Yeah, I would – I got the feeling she could be wild given better circumstances (our session was interrupted a couple of times by nearby civilians, which accounts for there being only 6 pics). Besides, as always, YMMV.[/QUOTE] Nice to see a report of this girl. I always wondered but never picked her up as she can be seen standing for an hour or more at Cambria without ever being picked up. Clothed she is a very attractive girl for the K, so it makes one wonder when nobody ever seems to stop that often for her.
Usually when a girl doesn't seem to get picked up it's because she has been giving bad service or no service and mongerers caught on and pass up for future dates.
I respect your opinion and would give it a try based on your review of her, but does make one wonder. Do like the nice big pussy lips on her though. Might have to take her to the book store for a quick FS session.
I wish some of the slim model types had Diana’s attitude. Diana is a cute, honest, sweetie with lots of talent. I meant her a month or so back on one of them cold nights when nothing much was happening. She was walking down away from the DD on her way home to get warm. It was dark and she was really bundled-up, I really did not get much of a look at her, but while doing the LE check I did notice she had some big’ems.
While driving around looking for a spot she confided, “I’m a big girl.” She also added, with a bit of real confidences, “I do it all well. I will make it worth you time.” I am sure that you have all heard this type of stuff before. But, it wasn’t to be, as I’ve said before I’m not big on dark places, late at night. So after we had driven around for about ten minutes, I decided it was a no go and I gave her a ten spot and she gave me her number and we called it a night.
As it turned out, girlfriend wasn’t lying. I ran into her again, near Lehigh Avenue. Yeah, she is a big girl. A lot of woman, but she knows how to work it. After watching her move around in the front seats, my curiosity was peaked. This was one big girl who could move. So I took a chance and took our relationship to the back seats. She was right again. This girl could work it. I was holding on for dear life, hoping the rocking didn’t draw to much attention. I had to stop her, I did not want to bust a car shock or spring, so we ended it up with a BBBJ. She worked her tongue ring like it was a massaging aid. Diana made a believer out of me – big girls need love too.
Would I stop for Diana again? You betcha. Tain’t nothing wrong with a little extra meat on the bone. I got away with the normal K avenue price, plus a nice tip for the workout. Of course, as always, YMMV
CookyJar
She a hottie Cookyjar. I like them thick white girls. And she got some booty on her too. Thanks for the pics.
Be safe out there.
[QUOTE=CookyJar]I wish some of the slim model types had Diana’s attitude. Diana is a cute, honest, sweetie with lots of talent. I meant her a month or so back on one of them cold nights when nothing much was happening. She was walking down away from the DD on her way home to get warm. It was dark and she was really bundled-up, I really did not get much of a look at her, but while doing the LE check I did notice she had some big’ems.
While driving around looking for a spot she confided, “I’m a big girl.” She also added, with a bit of real confidences, “I do it all well. I will make it worth you time.” I am sure that you have all heard this type of stuff before. But, it wasn’t to be, as I’ve said before I’m not big on dark places, late at night. So after we had driven around for about ten minutes, I decided it was a no go and I gave her a ten spot and she gave me her number and we called it a night.
As it turned out, girlfriend wasn’t lying. I ran into her again, near Lehigh Avenue. Yeah, she is a big girl. A lot of woman, but she knows how to work it. After watching her move around in the front seats, my curiosity was peaked. This was one big girl who could move. So I took a chance and took our relationship to the back seats. She was right again. This girl could work it. I was holding on for dear life, hoping the rocking didn’t draw to much attention. I had to stop her, I did not want to bust a car shock or spring, so we ended it up with a BBBJ. She worked her tongue ring like it was a massaging aid. Diana made a believer out of me – big girls need love too.
Would I stop for Diana again? You betcha. Tain’t nothing wrong with a little extra meat on the bone. I got away with the normal K avenue price, plus a nice tip for the workout. Of course, as always, YMMV
CookyJar[/QUOTE]
Ain"t nothing never wrong with big gurls cuzz. They can get you out of most binds when needed.