Thread Starter
Printable View
Thread Starter
This thread is dedicated to KAngels and all discussion related to KAngels. From now on please don't use the "bareback providers" thead for any discussion on KAngels.
[QUOTE=RedHot11;5138497]This thread is dedicated to KAngels and all discussion related to KAngels. From now on please don't use the "bareback providers" thead for any discussion on KAngels.[/QUOTE]Thanks for setting this up.
Copying Wong Hing's latest summary from the bb forum over here to start things off:
[QUOTE] Here are my opinions of the girls I've seen:
Face: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Julie, 4. Nina, 5. Lexy, 6. Venus, 7. Ivy, 8. Nikki.
Body: 1. Misty, 2. Angel, 3. Venus, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Nina, 7. Lexy, 8. Nikki.
Service: 1. Nina, 2. Venus, 3. Lexy, 4. Nikki, 5. Ivy, 6. Julie, 7. Angel, 8. Misty.
Personality: 1. Nina, 2. Venus, 3. Lexy, 4. Julie, 5. Misty, 6. Angel, 7. Nikki, 8. Ivy.
Massage: 1. Nina, 2. Venus, 3. Lexy, 4. Nikki, 5. Julie, 6. Misty, 7. Ivy, 8. Angel.
Overall: 1. Nina, 2. Venus, 3. Lexy, 4. Ivy, 5. Julie, 6. Angel, 7. Misty, 8. Nikki. [/QUOTE]
There are a couple of other K-Girl agencies that are active, and should be included here:
GSL. Gangnam Stle Ladies.
Luna.
Any mongers TOFTT with Tiana?
Saw Nina the other day. She was okay, felt rushed during the experience and afterwards gave me a massage. I'd give the service a 3/5 and looks / body a 4/5.
I feel like the caliber of GSl ladies are a cut above the KA lineup. But there's not guarantee of BB with them.
Anyone have any luck?
[QUOTE=LundonFrog;5141496]I feel like the caliber of GSl ladies are a cut above the KA lineup. But there's not guarantee of BB with them.
Anyone have any luck?[/QUOTE]GSL girls generally do not offer PSE. But YMMV.
Any interest in discussing other Asian providers here, even if not BBFS? I'm not interested in BBFS but I have crazy yellow fever.
[QUOTE=Coach808;5139625]Any mongers TOFTT with Tiana?[/QUOTE]I saw whoever they were calling Tiana back in early December. There's no guarantee whoever is playing Tiana now is the same girl.
She was ok, but I didn't repeat.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5143053]Any interest in discussing other Asian providers here, even if not BBFS? I'm not interested in BBFS but I have crazy yellow fever.[/QUOTE]Redhot set this up so it's his call but I would vote "Yes" to other Asian FS providers but "No" to Asian massage parlor discussions since there is already a separate massage parlor forum for that.
[QUOTE=LundonFrog;5141496]I feel like the caliber of GSl ladies are a cut above the KA lineup. But there's not guarantee of BB with them.
Anyone have any luck?[/QUOTE]Have had some great times at GSL with the ladies but it was always their call to so don't expect it. If you ask for it can almost guarantee it won't happen.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5143053]Any interest in discussing other Asian providers here, even if not BBFS? I'm not interested in BBFS but I have crazy yellow fever.[/QUOTE]Nope. And I think this board is needless as well. If a kgirl does bb it should be in the bb thread, not here.
Why stop there? Let's have a white girl thread and a black girl thread! How about a thread for every bra size?
Too many boards makes the information too spread out and hard to find. This thread is a hindrance not a help.
[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;5143420]Nope. And I think this board is needless as well. If a kgirl does bb it should be in the bb thread, not here.
Why stop there? Let's have a white girl thread and a black girl thread! How about a thread for every bra size?
Too many boards makes the information too spread out and hard to find. This thread is a hindrance not a help.[/QUOTE]Agreed. And a "toxic *****" thread. We could isolate Buffy, Asha, Peach and so on to that. Make it easier for novices to find who to avoid.
Of course we'd have to further delineate. Buffy and Asha would go into the holier-than-thou, block-you and alert-on-you category, while Peach, Crush, etc. Would go into the "fun ride if you can get it but utterly psycho and unreliable" category.
[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;5143420]Nope. And I think this board is needless as well. If a kgirl does bb it should be in the bb thread, not here.
Why stop there? Let's have a white girl thread and a black girl thread! How about a thread for every bra size?
Too many boards makes the information too spread out and hard to find. This thread is a hindrance not a help.[/QUOTE]I agree that a "Kangels" board is way to narrow in scope to be useful. But I disagree that a general "Asian" discussion board would be, as there are many in other geographic sections of this site that are very popular and useful.
Examples:
LA: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?30696-Asian-PLEASER-Reviews-only
Chicago: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?11059-Asian-Apartment-Girlsl
San Diego: http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31932-Asian-Providers
(and there are lots more)
So while I respect MC's opinion, I politely disagree. I think an Asian-only thread would be helpful if did NOT include discussion of any AMPs (massage parlors with a storefront that the public can walk into). I think it would be most useful for discussion Asian providers (on TNA, Eros, and the K-agencies) and AAMPs (private apartments that the public can't just walk into). I bet you could simultaenously open a "black girls only" and "white girls only" and "Asian girls only" threads and the Asian one would fill up quicker than the other two combined. Same thing about bra size. There's enough demand for Asian providers that their open discussion area is completely justified. I'd argue that there are more people looking for Asians than for BBFS.
Anyway, how I described above is how I'm going to use this thread: for AAMPs and Asian providers but not AMPs.
[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;5143420]Nope. And I think this board is needless as well. If a kgirl does bb it should be in the bb thread, not here.[/QUOTE]Sorry, cannot agree with that. A KGirl doing bb can be included in both threads. I see that as a positive benefit.
I appreciated the proactive work to create this thread. Perhaps we can rename to Agency? I think that was the stickler for some folks with no interest in Kgirls. My post in the BB thread pertaining to Kgirls was in regards to the repetitive info posted. It just seemed like we were bombarded with spam instead of useful info. Same handful of girls were posted with same reviews.
[QUOTE=FantasyManJ;5144307]I appreciated the proactive work to create this thread. Perhaps we can rename to Agency? I think that was the stickler for some folks with no interest in Kgirls. My post in the BB thread pertaining to Kgirls was in regards to the repetitive info posted. It just seemed like we were bombarded with spam instead of useful info. Same handful of girls were posted with same reviews.[/QUOTE]It seems a decision needs to be made as to what "type" of women should be discussed here. Here ism my perspective, along with some comments.
The initial objection was that gals from KAngels were being included in the Bareback Providers thread, along with repetitious posts about such women. Additionally, the gals who work there are Korean.
It was then "decided" to create this thread, and for the purpose of discussing KAngels. Given that most of the gals at KAngels allowed BBFS (for an extra $100), it seemed a "natural" way to "segregate" the gals at KAngels from other Bareback providers. However, that seemed counter-productive, and that is one reason why I made an earlier post that we should also include the agencies GSL (Gangnam Style Ladies) and Luna. Both of those agencies have Korean gals working there, although at Luna, apparently only Tia will allow BBFS (don't know too much about GSL gals).
So, it seems we need to agree on the primary purpose for this thread. Here are the choices I see:
1. Only discuss Korean gals from KAngels, whether they offer BBFS or not.
2. Only discuss the Korean gals from KAngels who offer BBFS.
3. Include Korean gals from other agencies, but again only discuss the ones that offer BBFS.
4. What about Asian gals who "work" at AAMPs, or are independent? If any of them offer BBFS, can they be included here?
[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5144458]So, it seems we need to agree on the primary purpose for this thread. Here are the choices I see:
1. Only discuss Korean gals from KAngels, whether they offer BBFS or not.
2. Only discuss the Korean gals from KAngels who offer BBFS.
3. Include Korean gals from other agencies, but again only discuss the ones that offer BBFS.
4. What about Asian gals who "work" at AAMPs, or are independent? If any of them offer BBFS, can they be included here?[/QUOTE]For whatever it's worth, my preference would be to see this thread be a resource to discuss any Asian provider who is not in a storefront AMP, regardless of whether they do BBFS. Those looking primarily for BBFS should be best served in the BB thread, especially since very very few Asian providers offer BBFS (not even all the Kangels do).
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5144525]For whatever it's worth, my preference would be to see this thread be a resource to discuss any Asian provider who is not in a storefront AMP, regardless of whether they do BBFS. Those looking primarily for BBFS should be best served in the BB thread, especially since very very few Asian providers offer BBFS (not even all the Kangels do).[/QUOTE]That sounds reasonable to me. But given some folks complained when gals from KAngels were discussed on the BB thread, and especially the ones who provided BBFS, this thread needs to include such gals, and they are not to be mentioned on the BB thread. And with your suggestion, the title of this thread would need to be changed.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5144525]For whatever it's worth, my preference would be to see this thread be a resource to discuss any Asian provider who is not in a storefront AMP, regardless of whether they do BBFS. Those looking primarily for BBFS should be best served in the BB thread, especially since very very few Asian providers offer BBFS (not even all the Kangels do).[/QUOTE]I agree. It would be nice to have this be a resource for Asian FS providers whether they do BBFS or not since the key is to have the information. It would be nice to change the name to take KAngels out so as not confuse anyone regarding the focus of the forum. Having said that it seems the other cities that have similar forums have just called them kgirl forums since the majority of the discussion has been on kgirls but I don't think they are so rigid as to preclude other Asian providers from being discussed on the kgirl forums.
[QUOTE=Twister100;5144622]I agree. It would be nice to have this be a resource for Asian FS providers whether they do BBFS or not since the key is to have the information. It would be nice to change the name to take KAngels out so as not confuse anyone regarding the focus of the forum. Having said that it seems the other cities that have similar forums have just called them kgirl forums since the majority of the discussion has been on kgirls but I don't think they are so rigid as to preclude other Asian providers from being discussed on the kgirl forums.[/QUOTE]Agree 99.9%. But using the name kgirl could be confusing to some folks, and lead to mentioning other Asian gals in other forums. I thing the name "Asian Providers" would be appropriate.
Remember a while back a dude named "creeper" posted about an indy Thai girl Julie (previously Zina) that had moved out here. I haven't been able to get a hold of her. Anyone know if she's still here?
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5145564]Remember a while back a dude named "creeper" posted about an indy Thai girl Julie (previously Zina) that had moved out here. I haven't been able to get a hold of her. Anyone know if she's still here?[/QUOTE]I believe I know who she is, but it has been a long, long time since I saw her. There actually used to be a good selection of independent Asian providers who had their own AAMP (basically a sensual massage and extras at their apartment), but now it seems there are only 2 of them: Gracee, and JoAnn (they are both located in the same apartment "complex" in Renton). The independent, mature Korean gal I have previously mentioned used to share the apartment with Gracee, and she was excellent. Unfortunately, she left on December 19,2019, and has not returned. Really miss her!
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5145564]Remember a while back a dude named "creeper" posted about an indy Thai girl Julie (previously Zina) that had moved out here. I haven't been able to get a hold of her. Anyone know if she's still here?[/QUOTE]I texted her two weeks ago, she says she would be back to Seattle in January.
Luna house (K-doll AAMP in Tacoma) booker replies "Vacation" every time I've texted over the past couple of weeks to see if new girls are coming. I wonder if their "experiment" of opening a K-house in Tacoma failed. The location was great and their eventual price drop to $320 was at least comparable to the Bellevue K-agencies, but their first two providers were significantly older and less physically attractive than the average K-girl at Kangels and far below the "top tier" GSL girls.
If they are closed or closing, it's a bummer. I was hoping to see Tia at least one more time.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5148793]Luna house (K-doll AAMP in Tacoma) booker replies "Vacation" every time I've texted over the past couple of weeks to see if new girls are coming. I wonder if their "experiment" of opening a K-house in Tacoma failed. The location was great and their eventual price drop to $320 was at least comparable to the Bellevue K-agencies, but their first two providers were significantly older and less physically attractive than the average K-girl at Kangels and far below the "top tier" GSL girls.
If they are closed or closing, it's a bummer. I was hoping to see Tia at least one more time.[/QUOTE]I tried setting up an appointment with them last weekend. I texted and was asked for references and when I sent them the only response I got was "vacation".
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5145564]Remember a while back a dude named "creeper" posted about an indy Thai girl Julie (previously Zina) that had moved out here. I haven't been able to get a hold of her. Anyone know if she's still here?[/QUOTE]She was on vacation and supposed to return 1st or 2nd week of Jan based on my last convo with her. She is a beautiful person. But no BBFS with her.
Anyone had the chance to check out SuzyDD?
[QUOTE=MrYoda;5153291]Anyone had the chance to check out SuzyDD?[/QUOTE]Link to her ad would be helpful.
[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5153466]Link to her ad would be helpful.[/QUOTE][URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/suzy-dd-2/[/URL]
Anyone seen Seven at GSL? Suzi is getting good feedback but I haven't heard ANYTHING about Seven. Strange.
Saw SuzyDD the other day. Looks reasonably like her photos, website stats seem about right. I'd guess late 20's, early 30's, a couple of tattoos, cute, friendly, accommodating, nice man-made DDs. Passable English. She's based on Vegas, said she'll be here a few weeks before returning to Vegas for a couple weeks then returning to Seattle. DFK was offered but I caught a hint of cigarettes after the first kiss so I didn't partake further. Excellent BBBJ, tight, multiple cups offered. Average massage.
[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/suzy-dd-2/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Twister100;5157910]Saw SuzyDD the other day. Looks reasonably like her photos, website stats seem about right. I'd guess late 20's, early 30's, a couple of tattoos, cute, friendly, accommodating, nice man-made DDs. Passable English. She's based on Vegas, said she'll be here a few weeks before returning to Vegas for a couple weeks then returning to Seattle. DFK was offered but I caught a hint of cigarettes after the first kiss so I didn't partake further. Excellent BBBJ, tight, multiple cups offered. Average massage.
[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/suzy-dd-2/[/URL][/QUOTE]Very good review. I assume you did not partake in BBFS, and thus the total donation was $350. Correct?
[QUOTE=Twister100;5157910]Saw SuzyDD the other day. Looks reasonably like her photos, website stats seem about right. I'd guess late 20's, early 30's, a couple of tattoos, cute, friendly, accommodating, nice man-made DDs. Passable English. She's based on Vegas, said she'll be here a few weeks before returning to Vegas for a couple weeks then returning to Seattle. DFK was offered but I caught a hint of cigarettes after the first kiss so I didn't partake further. Excellent BBBJ, tight, multiple cups offered. Average massage.
[URL]https://kangels.ch/korean-companions-seattle/suzy-dd-2/[/URL][/QUOTE]Thanks for the report. I hate when I can taste cigarettes. It seems to be more common among the slightly older K-girls. But at that donation level there should be zero cig taste. The smokers often take smoke breaks between clients, so chances are she was puffing a cig minutes before you arrived.
[QUOTE=MartyByrde;5157934]Very good review. I assume you did not partake in BBFS, and thus the total donation was $350. Correct?[/QUOTE]All the KAngels have the same rate structure: 270 hhr, 350 hr, +100 for PSE (BBFS).
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5157734]Anyone seen Seven at GSL? Suzi is getting good feedback but I haven't heard ANYTHING about Seven. Strange.[/QUOTE]I tried scheduling on 3 separate occasions but was hit with the 'day off' and tried to sell me on Suzi instead.
[QUOTE=Twister100;5158286]All the KAngels have the same rate structure: 270 hhr, 350 hr, +100 for PSE (BBFS).[/QUOTE]I know that. I was just hoping that possibly their rates went down. Happened at that place in Tacoma (donation went from $380 an hour to $320 an hour), although they are not operating now.
[QUOTE=AussieFury;5158175]Thanks for the report. I hate when I can taste cigarettes. It seems to be more common among the slightly older K-girls. But at that donation level there should be zero cig taste. The smokers often take smoke breaks between clients, so chances are she was puffing a cig minutes before you arrived.[/QUOTE]The main room did smell a little of smoke but the bedroom was fine. Her breath wasn't smokey but it was the smoke deep back of her throat that no amount of brushing or mouthwash is going to get rid of.