Your home for drama, ego trips, white knight stories, tales from the dark side, advice for the lovelorn, and anything else that does not belong up in the adult threads.
[blue]I'll go with this, fight thread rules apply
A2[/blue]
Printable View
Your home for drama, ego trips, white knight stories, tales from the dark side, advice for the lovelorn, and anything else that does not belong up in the adult threads.
[blue]I'll go with this, fight thread rules apply
A2[/blue]
What's so bad about someone trying to help a girl out. A little "white knighting" isn't all that bad from time to time if you are able and don't get all crazy about it. Can understand the married guys having to be little more hard core about their mongering, and not get very personal at all. But don't beat up the single guys too much, that have the time and freedom to be a little more friendly. There's no harm in being nice as long as you realize that the drugs and the money always come before you.
[blue]You are confusing white knights with Capt Save a Ho's. White knighting doesn't happen with the chicks, white knighting happens on the forum when guys tell other guys that they had a bad time with the chick because there is something wrong with them.
A2[/blue]
I stand corrected. Capt. Save a ho, is my middle name, and a constant struggle! LOL Problem is that I'm too lazy to be constantly on the hunt and tend to stick to a few favorites. Favorites become friends. Being friends causes you to give a shit. Giving a shit is really not the optimum frame of mind for this hobby. Probably should find a nice civvie and get married again, just to enhance the hobby, make it exciting and dangerous again! Lololol Is that fucked up?
You are confusing white knights with Capt Save a Ho's. White knighting doesn't happen with the chicks, white knighting happens on the forum when guys tell other guys that they had a bad time with the chick because there is something wrong with them.
[QUOTE=SAGuy17;3550016]She's a pro. Quoted me price three text messages in without me even asking. Pass. [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...f-383fea80f93e[/URL].[/QUOTE]You can tell because in order to fuck them you have to pay them. That makes them prostitutes. Not shaming them for being prostitutes, I fucking love prostitutes, just saying when you're paying, regardless of what you call it, you're a john and they are a hooker.
A2.
[QUOTE=OneAndDone;3823624]Man our hobby is Shit right now!! I had a few hours and couldn't find anything decent WTF man I hate to be the back in my day guy but I miss being able to text and get a answer from Vanessa and go bang the shit out of her I mean even the shitty girls I saw 5-6 years ago look good. Government crack downs, heroin have ruined the oldest profession should be able to get a good BBBJ if I want one! Any way just venting wanted to blow a load and ended up watching porn oh well! Good luck chasin pussy boys.[/QUOTE]Agreed. This government crackdown stuff is the worst. I echo Robert De Niro's sentiment.
[QUOTE=StaminaJim;3823947]I echo Robert De Niro's sentiment.[/QUOTE]Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3824437]Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault.[/QUOTE]Agree. Some people just can't hold back their political opinions and views forcing them on others any subtle way they can.
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3824517]Agree. Some people just can't hold back their political opinions and views forcing them on others any subtle way they can.[/QUOTE]Ya, I guess but Robert has it right FUCK TRUMP!
OK. So first MTV stops playing videos, then ESPN starts being about social commentary. Can we at least keep the forums about pussy and not about politics. I come here to escape reality. LOL!
[quote=pipefighter94;3825301]ya, i guess but robert has it right fuck trump![/quote]go trump 2020.
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3825422]go trump 2020.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you only say that because you're not a sissy boy.
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3825422]go trump 2020.[/QUOTE]Indeed, please just go!
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3824437]Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault.[/QUOTE]You are correct. And I believe there were only two senators against it. Rand Paul from the GOP who is really more of a libertarian than a Republican, and some Democrat whose name I forget. So it was a veto-proof bill that would be the law whatever Trump had done. I think it's the sort of bill that politicians were afraid to oppose because then an opponent could demagogue it and paint you as "pro-sex-trafficking". Maybe things will ease up in the future when they realize this law is making things more dangerous for women, but I won't hold my breath.
[QUOTE=PipeFighter94;3825707]Indeed, please just go![/QUOTE]LOL. Curious tho, how has your life changed at all in the last two years since Trump other than what CNN and NBC tell you how horrible things are? I mean, I was all for everybody letting off steam and moaning for a year after the election but we're almost two years in. The dude is President and theres nothing you can do. He's probably getting a second term. Why be bitter, negative and down?
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3825812]LOL. Curious tho, how has your life changed at all in the last two years since Trump other than what CNN and NBC tell you how horrible things are? I mean, I was all for everybody letting off steam and moaning for a year after the election but we're almost two years in. The dude is President and theres nothing you can do. He's probably getting a second term. Why be bitter, negative and down?[/QUOTE]I was going to.
But this isn't the place to discuss politics.
Providers are all in going to talk about.
Peace out.
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3825812]LOL. Curious tho, how has your life changed at all in the last two years since Trump other than what CNN and NBC tell you how horrible things are? I mean, I was all for everybody letting off steam and moaning for a year after the election but we're almost two years in. The dude is President and theres nothing you can do. He's probably getting a second term. Why be bitter, negative and down?[/QUOTE]Their political views are really religious views. You are wasting your breath, better to move the conversation back to pussy.
What you are stating is preferable. However, the government here wants to take the clock back to the inquisition period. So talking pussy have become a political matter. Thanks to A2, Netherlands, and the Republic of Bulgaria, we have the tools to circumvent inquisition. I think we need to add an amendment to the commerce clause of the constitution that does not allow illlegalizing many commodities including pussy. That will save us from Stormy type sagas. I think at heart, Trump will be for it.
[QUOTE=Jbobs1;3825333]OK. So first MTV stops playing videos, then ESPN starts being about social commentary. Can we at least keep the forums about pussy and not about politics. I come here to escape reality. LOL![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3824437]Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault.[/QUOTE]You do NOT get to do this. You do not get to try and deflect this off the Republicans. I am politically apathetic, I think both parties suck. Trump is an embarrassment and will go down in history as one of the worst 5 presidents the US has ever had and Obama signed the fucking NDAA 2012 they both fucking suck. But what you cannot say is that the Republicans are not responsible for Fosta / Sesta. When you control both houses, the Executive, and the Judicial then what the fuck ever happens is yours and ALL yours.
So if you're a monger and a Republican then the only thing you get to say is this. I hate the Democrats so much that I still support the assholes that are passing laws that force chicks back on the streets and will probably result in some of them dying even though they have access to all the research that shows this is a bad law.
You do not get to say it's not your teams responsibility.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3826010]You do NOT get to do this. You do not get to try and deflect this off the Republicans. I am politically apathetic, I think both parties suck. Trump is an embarrassment and will go down in history as one of the worst 5 presidents the US has ever had and Obama signed the fucking NDAA 2012 they both fucking suck. But what you cannot say is that the Republicans are not responsible for Fosta / Sesta. When you control both houses, the Executive, and the Judicial then what the fuck ever happens is yours and ALL yours.
So if you're a monger and a Republican then the only thing you get to say is this. I hate the Democrats so much that I still support the assholes that are passing laws that force chicks back on the streets and will probably result in some of them dying even though they have access to all the research that shows this is a bad law.
You do not get to say it's not your teams responsibility.[/QUOTE]So this is entirely Trumps fault? ... Despite not sponsoring the bill, despite not voting on the bill, despite the fact that ALL BUT ONE Democrat voted for it also (did they voice their opposition, were they forced to vote for it)? I'm politically apathetic as well, but I'm also honest enough to blame all but the 2 guys (1 from each party) who supported this. I am not letting the repubs off the hook, NOR am I letting the dems off the hook. They are BOTH responsible.
But, you're the admin, so you get to be right, I suppose.
My thing is although you may not like him why carry around all the hate and venom with you for four, and possibly eight, years? What good is that doing? Nothing he, or anyone for that matter, does is infuriating you as much as you think it is. Instead, you're LETTING it infuriate you. It's likely that your day to day life is not affected in the least yet you choose to be angry, bitter and waste energy on hatred. I didn't like Obama or his wife, but I'll be damned if I let his eight years ruin my mood, productivity or outlook. Ya dig?
[QUOTE=Admin2;3826010]You do NOT get to do this. You do not get to try and deflect this off the Republicans. I am politically apathetic, I think both parties suck. Trump is an embarrassment and will go down in history as one of the worst 5 presidents the US has ever had and Obama signed the fucking NDAA 2012 they both fucking suck. But what you cannot say is that the Republicans are not responsible for Fosta / Sesta. When you control both houses, the Executive, and the Judicial then what the fuck ever happens is yours and ALL yours.
So if you're a monger and a Republican then the only thing you get to say is this. I hate the Democrats so much that I still support the assholes that are passing laws that force chicks back on the streets and will probably result in some of them dying even though they have access to all the research that shows this is a bad law.
You do not get to say it's not your teams responsibility.[/QUOTE]He did not say "the Republicans are not responsible". What he said, entirely accurately, is that this bill was passed with overwhelming, veto-proof bi-partisan support in both houses of Congress. It passed 388-25 in the House of Representatives and 97-2 in the Senate (and 1 of those two Senators was a Republican).
Maybe you're not aware of this, but there are 44 Democrats in the Senate and 193 in the House.
So, no, it is not "ALL" on the Republicans. It is quite clearly ON both parties. And it would be the law today regardless of who was in the Oval Office.
You can spaz out all you want about what he does "NOT get to do" according to you (LOL), but all he did was state the truth. Which apparently you can't handle.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3826389]So this is entirely Trumps fault? ... Despite not sponsoring the bill, despite not voting on the bill, despite the fact that ALL BUT ONE Democrat voted for it also (did they voice their opposition, were they forced to vote for it)? I'm politically apathetic as well, but I'm also honest enough to blame all but the 2 guys (1 from each party) who supported this. I am not letting the repubs off the hook, NOR am I letting the dems off the hook. They are BOTH responsible.
But, you're the admin, so you get to be right, I suppose.[/QUOTE]No you are correct, not Admin2. And Admin2 can spaz out all he wants about you not being allowed to state the truth, but whatever at that. LOL.
You DO NOT GET TO DO THIS! YOU DO NOT GET TO STATE THE TRUTH. LOLOL.
Al he did was state the facts.
Let the politics die. The media is so far left that we will never get back to the middle in this country. The Dems were celebrating before Trump won, figuring a shoe in. They still haven't recovered, The repubs are shocked that he won, and still haven't figured it out, that hes in charge. The guy is a piece of work, but you have to admit, the economy is steam rolling right now, health care chatter has died down, and for christ sakes, hes actually made a little headway in peace talks around the world. And ISIS seems to have taken a back seat. Say what you want, where would we be with Bernie and Hilary though. More taxes and welfare? Alright. Lets get back to pink talk. Where's the pussy!
[QUOTE=SecondTimer;3826975]My thing is although you may not like him why carry around all the hate and venom with you for four, and possibly eight, years? What good is that doing? Nothing he, or anyone for that matter, does is infuriating you as much as you think it is. Instead, you're LETTING it infuriate you. It's likely that your day to day life is not affected in the least yet you choose to be angry, bitter and waste energy on hatred. I didn't like Obama or his wife, but I'll be damned if I let his eight years ruin my mood, productivity or outlook. Ya dig?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3826389]So this is entirely Trumps fault? ... Despite not sponsoring the bill, despite not voting on the bill, despite the fact that ALL BUT ONE Democrat voted for it also (did they voice their opposition, were they forced to vote for it)? I'm politically apathetic as well, but I'm also honest enough to blame all but the 2 guys (1 from each party) who supported this. I am not letting the repubs off the hook, NOR am I letting the dems off the hook. They are BOTH responsible.
But, you're the admin, so you get to be right, I suppose.[/QUOTE]When I'm speaking as the admin I post in blue and if I meant to say that you are not allowed to do this on the forum I would have removed the posts. What you were doing, what most of you one trick ponies do with Fosta / Sesta is find some way to deflect responsibility by pointing to the vote. I especially like the idiots that point out that more Republicans voted against it than Democrats voted against it.
My point is, and will continue to be that you don't get to deflect the responsibility. You can throw all the numbers you want to try and create a smoke screen but more Republicans voted for it than Democrats and it was a Republican President who signed it. This one, like the NDAA of 2012 was the responsibility of the Democrats, is the Republicans. I didn't say that President Trump was responsible I said the Republicans were.
For the record, I'm not a Trump hater, I think he's a buffoon but I've thought he was a buffoon since the 80's so that's nothing new. I don't think he's a great president, but I didn't think Obama was particularly great either.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3827206]When I'm speaking as the admin I post in blue and if I meant to say that you are not allowed to do this on the forum I would have removed the posts. What you were doing, what most of you one trick ponies do with Fosta / Sesta is find some way to deflect responsibility by pointing to the vote. I especially like the idiots that point out that more Republicans voted against it than Democrats voted against it.
My point is, and will continue to be that you don't get to deflect the responsibility. You can throw all the numbers you want to try and create a smoke screen but more Republicans voted for it than Democrats and it was a Republican President who signed it. This one, like the NDAA of 2012 was the responsibility of the Democrats, is the Republicans. I didn't say that President Trump was responsible I said the Republicans were.
For the record, I'm not a Trump hater, I think he's a buffoon but I've thought he was a buffoon since the 80's so that's nothing new. I don't think he's a great president, but I didn't think Obama was particularly great either.[/QUOTE] ...just to be clear, because I certainly would not want to misinterpret your obvious passion. If things were reversed, and either the House or Senate were dominated by Democrats, then you would blame THEM, because they were the majority party? And the Republicans would get off scott free for their approval of this awful law?
Just trying to understand your logic, and how you figure there is any "deflection" going on.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3826010]You do NOT get to do this. You do not get to try and deflect this off the Republicans. I am politically apathetic, I think both parties suck. Trump is an embarrassment and will go down in history as one of the worst 5 presidents the US has ever had and Obama signed the fucking NDAA 2012 they both fucking suck. But what you cannot say is that the Republicans are not responsible for Fosta / Sesta. When you control both houses, the Executive, and the Judicial then what the fuck ever happens is yours and ALL yours.
So if you're a monger and a Republican then the only thing you get to say is this. I hate the Democrats so much that I still support the assholes that are passing laws that force chicks back on the streets and will probably result in some of them dying even though they have access to all the research that shows this is a bad law.
You do not get to say it's not your teams responsibility.[/QUOTE]I might like that law, but Trump still will go down as one of the BEST presidents this country has ever had. We need more non politicians running this country. His mistake was hiring Sessions.
I love Trump. He's doing an outstanding job. Quit listening to the fake media who are in the Dems back pocket. They're the modern day Politburo. I love everything he's doing by shaking up the swamp. He needs to keep doing it. He's accomplished more than the socialist Obama did in 8 years. What a pussy he was on foreign policy selling our country out. Him and a dozen of his administration should be in jail plus people in the DOJ and the FBI. Don't get me started.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3827362]...just to be clear, because I certainly would not want to misinterpret your obvious passion. If things were reversed, and either the House or Senate were dominated by Democrats, then you would blame THEM, because they were the majority party? And the Republicans would get off scott free for their approval of this awful law?
.
Just trying to understand your logic, and how you figure there is any "deflection" going on.[/QUOTE]If this law was passed while the house, senate, executive, and judicial was (actually to be honest, just the congress and executive) I would absolutely 100% lay it at the feet if the democrats. I absolutely hold the Democrats responsible for the NDAA of 2012 which is an even more shameful bit of legislation. I hold them accountable for building the huge data center in Utah which the NSA is using to record ever phone call and email sent in the US.
What I loath is the dishonesty so closely associated with the Us v Them mentality in politics it's not a ball game.
It amazes me that people haven't figured out that none of those fucks represent you, they represent the money that gets them reelected.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3827878]If this law was passed while the house, senate, executive, and judicial was (actually to be honest, just the congress and executive) I would absolutely 100% lay it at the feet if the democrats. I absolutely hold the Democrats responsible for the NDAA of 2012 which is an even more shameful bit of legislation. I hold them accountable for building the huge data center in Utah which the NSA is using to record ever phone call and email sent in the US.
What I loath is the dishonesty so closely associated with the Us v Them mentality in politics it's not a ball game.
It amazes me that people haven't figured out that none of those fucks represent you, they represent the money that gets them reelected.[/QUOTE]I wish I could say it better but I cannot.
Politicians only concern themselves with two priorities.
1. To get elected.
2. To get reelected.
If you do not sign petitions and push for term limits you're part of the problem.
Corp welfare only exist because those who are elected by we the people are bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry, the oil industry and those in the top 1%.
Wrap your pea sized brain around this eye opening statistic:
4 out of 5 dollars generated in 2017 went to top 1%.
Wakeup MOFOs.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3827878]If this law was passed while the house, senate, executive, and judicial was (actually to be honest, just the congress and executive) I would absolutely 100% lay it at the feet if the democrats. I absolutely hold the Democrats responsible for the NDAA of 2012 which is an even more shameful bit of legislation. I hold them accountable for building the huge data center in Utah which the NSA is using to record ever phone call and email sent in the US.
What I loath is the dishonesty so closely associated with the Us v Them mentality in politics it's not a ball game.
It amazes me that people haven't figured out that none of those fucks represent you, they represent the money that gets them reelected.[/QUOTE]So then, just for clarity's sake, what if JUST ENOUGH Replicans had voted NO, so that the actual tally left the Dems with the most Yes votes, even though the Repubs physically outnumber them? Who would you blame then? The Dems for the most Yes votes, or the Repubs for being smart enough to get the most people elected in the first place? It could have turned out that way. So who would you blame then? The party with the majority of members in Congress, or the party that actually cast the most Yes votes, despite being in the minority?
And you still haven't explained how you ever figured I was "deflecting" anything on anyone.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3827917]So then, just for clarity's sake, what if JUST ENOUGH Replicans had voted NO, so that the actual tally left the Dems with the most Yes votes, even though the Repubs physically outnumber them? Who would you blame then? The Dems for the most Yes votes, or the Repubs for being smart enough to get the most people elected in the first place? It could have turned out that way. So who would you blame then? The party with the majority of members in Congress, or the party that actually cast the most Yes votes, despite being in the minority?
And you still haven't explained how you ever figured I was "deflecting" anything on anyone.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2011/h932[/URL] 190 republicans voted yes while only 43 democrats voted yes, So how is this the democrats fault.
[QUOTE=Roboguy;3828060][URL]https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/112-2011/h932[/URL] 190 republicans voted yes while only 43 democrats voted yes, So how is this the democrats fault.[/QUOTE]I didn't know that. Obama still signed it hoss.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3827917]So then, just for clarity's sake, what if JUST ENOUGH Replicans had voted NO, so that the actual tally left the Dems with the most Yes votes, even though the Repubs physically outnumber them? Who would you blame then? The Dems for the most Yes votes, or the Repubs for being smart enough to get the most people elected in the first place? It could have turned out that way. So who would you blame then? The party with the majority of members in Congress, or the party that actually cast the most Yes votes, despite being in the minority?
And you still haven't explained how you ever figured I was "deflecting" anything on anyone.[/QUOTE]"Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault. ".
Agreed, he had absolutely no responsibility in any way at all, unless you consider that he signed the bill into law. But I'm sure you're right, I'm sure you have a response to the fact that his signature was literally the thing that made it a law.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3828111]I didn't know that. Obama still signed it hoss.
"Why? The currrent situation with SESTA / FOSTA was voted for by an overwhelming majority of BOTH parties, and Trump neither introduced nor voted on the legislation. I don't agree with the prez all the time, but I don't see how this is his fault. ".
Agreed, he had absolutely no responsibility in any way at all, unless you consider that he signed the bill into law. But I'm sure you're right, I'm sure you have a response to the fact that his signature was literally the thing that made it a law.[/QUOTE]Do you not know how our government works? If Trump had REFUSED to sign it, it would have become law ANYWAY, due to the overwhelming support by both Republicans AND DEMOCRATS. And, had he not signed it, you know damn well the Democrats would have used that against him at election time. Seriously, is that the best case you can put forward?
And, for the third time, STILL WAITING for you to explain how you figure I was "deflecting" anything.
The bottom line is we need to stop electing politicians and lawyers in particular. Everyone else in our society needs to be represented. Doctors, business owners, engineers and on and on and less females. They're hurting our constitution and most cannot keep their emotions out of their decisions. The politicians don't care about this country and don't have a clue on how to deal with other countries regarding trade. We've been getting so screwed for so long we all have gotten used to it, but we're still pretty much a house of cards economically, because of the deficit. Trump is trying to reverse all these trends and trade deficits with other countries. If we don't do something now about China it is predicted they will pass us by 2030. Some say 2026. They've been stealing our intellectual property for decades now and the POLITICIANS have done nothing. Our intellectual property is our crown jewel of being a super power. China has a long term plan on world dominance and they stick to it. I fear after Trump another politician will reverse the direction we're going in on preserving our number one status. If not the dollar will be replaced by a world currency. Trump knows this and is doing something about it. Now if we could kick out the liberal republicans then I'm optimistic.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3828271]Do you not know how our government works? If Trump had REFUSED to sign it, it would have become law ANYWAY, due to the overwhelming support by both Republicans AND DEMOCRATS. And, had he not signed it, you know damn well the Democrats would have used that against him at election time. Seriously, is that the best case you can put forward?
And, for the third time, STILL WAITING for you to explain how you figure I was "deflecting" anything.[/QUOTE]Had he vetoed it then it would have gone back and needed a 2/3's majority which in the entire history of the US has happened less than 10% of the time. He didn't, he signed it.
As to the rest, I'm not going to continue answering the question over and over. I've done it twice. I know you think ignoring that I have and continuing to ask the same question qualifies as an argument but it doesn't. You're either being deliberately obtuse or you're just too fucking stupid to understand what I said and in either event I'm done with you.
[QUOTE=Mike7794;3828653]The bottom line is we need to stop electing politicians and lawyers in particular. Everyone else in our society needs to be represented. Doctors, business owners, engineers and on and on and less females. They're hurting our constitution and most cannot keep their emotions out of their decisions. The politicians don't care about this country and don't have a clue on how to deal with other countries regarding trade. We've been getting so screwed for so long we all have gotten used to it, but we're still pretty much a house of cards economically, because of the deficit. Trump is trying to reverse all these trends and trade deficits with other countries. If we don't do something now about China it is predicted they will pass us by 2030. Some say 2026. They've been stealing our intellectual property for decades now and the POLITICIANS have done nothing. Our intellectual property is our crown jewel of being a super power. China has a long term plan on world dominance and they stick to it. I fear after Trump another politician will reverse the direction we're going in on preserving our number one status. If not the dollar will be replaced by a world currency. Trump knows this and is doing something about it. Now if we could kick out the liberal republicans then I'm optimistic.[/QUOTE]As long as oil continues to be denominated in dollars there is nothing to fear. As to the rest I think you're buying into fear mongering. In any event the trade war he's kicking off will do more long term damage than good. I could be wrong though, I hold no economics degrees but the economists I read seem to think so.
[QUOTE=Admin2;3828825]I could be wrong though ...[/QUOTE]Ya think?
I'm done here, no point in arguing with you further. Enjoy your self-righteous victory.
I'm going back to talking about pussy.
[QUOTE=MisterJao;3828838]Ya think?
I'm done here, no point in arguing with you further. Enjoy your self-righteous victory.
I'm going back to talking about pussy.[/QUOTE]Nuff said!
[QUOTE=Admin2;3828825]As long as oil continues to be denominated in dollars there is nothing to fear. As to the rest I think you're buying into fear mongering. In any event the trade war he's kicking off will do more long term damage than good. I could be wrong though, I hold no economics degrees but the economists I read seem to think so.[/QUOTE]Who are these economists you claim to be reading?
I suppose we could refrain from imposing higher tariff's and continue to have other countries, especially the Chinese, steal our intellectual property and impose higher tariffs on us than we impose on them. If you are content to be taken advantage of and economically harmed, then we can maintain the unfair trade practices to our disadvantage. But, if you want freer and fairer trade, plus good paying American jobs, how do you propose we do it? Do we get down on our knees and beg the Chinese to treat us fairly and wait for them to have a change of heart?
Seems to me the sissy way will not work. Grow some balls, be a man about it and support the president. All these anti-Trumpers who call him a buffoon are ignorant and lack the testicular fortitude to do what is necessary to succeed in a tough world. The Chinese are tough. We need to be tough.
The Chinese have a saying that translates to: "If you can cheat, then cheat. " The dimocrats have a saying too: "We aspire to create an unaware and compliant citizenry. " Seems they have been successful with a number of posters here. Get your faces out Odumbo's marxist lap.