[QUOTE=EastlakeHorndog;3520585]That's one of the reasons I usually won't see providers who primarily use TNA. There are too many TNA hobbyists and safety providers who ridicule BB providers to such a degree they either stop doing BB or in some cases quit the biz entirely. Most TNA providers are already overpriced; eliminating BB providers makes that site entirely useless IMO. I understand if a provider won't do BB because it's her business, but she (and hobbyists) should also respect the right of other providers who are willing to offer it.
I suspect many of the safety providers who deride BB providers do so for entirely selfish business reasons. The safety providers know that many of us hobbyists won't see them if there are other less restrictive providers available. There are enough hobbyists and providers of all stripes for everyone. Why fuck with someone just because you don't like what they do? It's their business.[/QUOTE]I know, right? A few years ago there were 2 groups, those who did and those who didn't. Now it's like 'those who don't' are afraid of the competition. Even Euro was requiring a cover for FS. And here we are. Only good news is that El Paso TX hasn't changed, can still BB multiple providers in a strip club. But yeah, Seattle has to step up its game. Don't get me wrong, I"m always ok with a provider saying "safe". I'll move on. But really? Dime'ing them out?
