Printable View
[QUOTE=TomFordModel;7211131]It depends on the person. She was his type. But I looked at the pics. It's heavily filtered. She looks way older than 25. I can see the cellulite on her arms with the filter. I'm not into the short stocky line backer type of shape.[/QUOTE]She's a gym rat. She's got Zero fat on her.
[QUOTE=PhillYogynist;7211133]Agree. Looks like the intern got into the unsecured configuration files.[/QUOTE]What a mess. Such idiots. If UI is so fucked, security is not far behind.
Hello Ashley Madison.
[QUOTE=Arty33;7096958]Was on for a month, had a few encounters, the good the bad and every in between, the keeper from this one month is just one that is not listed here.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/dd0e4e85-12ad-40ea-a189-496cd8b29f2d[/URL]
Sugarsweet (and goes by other names too), she's a serial SB who rotates SD's I think, but is flaky and not easy to schedule. Done twice, 5 oo.
Ana, 26, I blocked her so no link. Scammer. You can read some of her reports in Charlotte board, went by Blond something.
She's actually cute somewhat in person, talks up a big game, asks for 1 k, settle for 500, comes for M&G and waste time coffee / talking / walking then expect to be paid full allowance money for "spending time" says going to FC location is "sex for money" - gave nothing and walked away (exchanged a few kisses under the trees on the side walk before than, glad I did before the money ask came up, she's a good kisser too shame she won't move forward).
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e2d31171-e57c-4ff4-b475-9fc997324596[/URL]
Shianne, went to texting, appears DTF, had a lot of questions on how this works, appeared wanting to meet soon, then radio silence.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e27ead72-e976-4aa1-a17f-a65708d8dceb[/URL]
Aura, exchanges messages, seems interested, then nothing.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/510a9643-f8bf-46d9-8c31-7ffb088eda88[/URL]
Elora, looks interesting, she seems legit and may be worth it, left me on read, anyone any luck lmk.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/885be60b-0ac4-4522-842a-d76619456b0f[/URL]
Peach, looks fake, talked about meeting, but won't exchange text, says too risky, asked me to come to telegram, denied.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/9bec59fb-76f9-4821-a6a0-c9372a3f7333[/URL]
Kittelova (also goes by other names) she's Faith, been discussed here before, done twice, 5 oo, young perky boobs and spinner body, will take a pounding, do not drive and is flaky.
Grace, 26, can't find her profile anymore, single mom, chubby but cute face, one and done, 4 oo. Open for anything, sometimes you have to scratch an itch and fat girls who comply are okay.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/60ea8216-eda9-4345-85ed-cba6a84dd256[/URL]
Gem55, I blocked her, she was mentioned before. She's pretty and in shape in the photos sent to me, make up girl from Towson. Talks vague about meeting and then moving to arrangement if chemistry good, ask 6 oo, but then expects pay for M&G if things don't work. Says all the dates I've been on were like that. Standard scam line for getting paid for M&G. Over their head these girls, I made her drive around a bit for a planned meet while I sat at home texting her. Teach her a lesson for being greedy.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8a204004-87be-44ad-a65a-fcde82358246[/URL]
Rain, 27, looks attractive, messaged me showing interest, then silence.
There were many others in between that were fakes, scammers, pic sellers, as usual a mess. But managed to laid a few times.[/QUOTE]Peach is real, she's also on CC. Ask is 1,500 w / condoms.
[QUOTE=DasHottCalla;7211781]Peach is real, she's also on CC. Ask is 1,500 w / condoms.[/QUOTE]That's wild. I'm from California and been here for a week. This place is a pussy desert with GPS everywhere.
The link didn't work last time. My apologies if you cannot access this time. What do you think about a 38 year for $600-$800 PPM?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/ad1d8e38-57c0-425c-aa8a-b8b43a10e134[/URL]
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/79889294-9b17-44bf-ae5c-99b2c7da3182[/URL]
Any info.
[QUOTE=GuardMan;7212404]That's wild. I'm from California and been here for a week. This place is a pussy desert with GPS everywhere.[/QUOTE]Yup, it's like all 5's thinking they're 9's. Ridiculous.
DC is GPS for sure.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/44a7e633-65cd-4fc2-82fe-614410166743[/URL]
I've spoken to some SF bay area girls that were super popular. With all the tech layoffs their work has dried up. The same will happen here soon. Just like in 09 asking prices will fall.
[QUOTE=GuardMan;7213277]DC is GPS for sure.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/44a7e633-65cd-4fc2-82fe-614410166743[/URL][/QUOTE]You can get her for less, dm me!
I logged into SA last night and got a pop-up that stated I'd broken the rule about discussing $$ for sex and that was solicitation and it's illegal. 99% of the time I'm adamant about not discussing those things in the chat and try and move the convo over to text as soon as I possibly can, but there are those few outliers where the gal won't budge about giving her number out without knowing what the compensation is so sometimes I have to break my own rule. Apparently one of those times came across their Mods radar and flagged me for it. I've had this happen a time or two before over the years and normally they completely ban me, shut down my account and I then have to wait 6 months for the coast to clear, then jump through 30 different hoops to try and get a new account created and slip it past their security and hope they don't recognize me. But this time all I had to do was watch a two minute video, which CLEARLY states they won't tolerate and kind of transactional talk or "spoiling" of any kind. Whether it be selling OnlyFans subs, they also specifically mentioned CashApp, Venmo or Zelle for transactional arrangements. As far as what they'll allow you to talk about it sounds like they are trying to completely remove themselves from the SD / SB conversation. But I found it interesting that this time all I got was a slap on the hand and had to "promise" not to do it ever again and then I was able get access back to my account.
But it's like they're talking out of both sides of their mouth. I just took this off their homepage.
"Seeking is the premier dating platform for "Success-Minded" singles. Those who possess the mindset tailored for success in life also possess the same mindset necessary for success in love. Our platform is designed to foster genuine and authentic connections between our members, leading to "The Good Life", lasting partnerships and love. Sugar dating and all forms of transactional relationships are strictly prohibited. You know what you want. Find it on Seeking. "
So they're using all these innuendos about sugar dating but then literally in the same breath they throw in that blurb about Sugar dating is prohibited. They want to have their cake and eat it too by gouging us for $100 bucks a month to be able to message these women, but want to act like now we need to approach these women as if they're not ****** looking for the highest bidder which they know that's the only reason they're on that particular site. It's hypocrisy at it's highest level LOL. They're trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube and it's too late. If they're doing this because they're catching heat from the Feds I think it's past the point of reversing the type of customer their site attracts, at this point it just is what it is. So I'm guessing if they don't completely turn it around then sooner or later the site will just be shut down.
[QUOTE=TomFordModel;7212952]Yup, it's like all 5's thinking they're 9's. Ridiculous.[/QUOTE]I spent a lot of time in the San Fran area. Too many hippies, etc. We used to say the women there were 49 ers. That's 4's who think they are 9's. LOL.
I am in southern Cali now, it is incredible here. The sorts of girls I have banged off of seeking, primo!
[QUOTE=GuardMan;7213277]DC is GPS for sure.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/44a7e633-65cd-4fc2-82fe-614410166743[/URL][/QUOTE]For "Platonic" no less.
[QUOTE=GuardMan;7213277]DC is GPS for sure.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/44a7e633-65cd-4fc2-82fe-614410166743[/URL][/QUOTE]300 probably for this type of SBs, agree, should be par. I won't though unless starving for it.
Just curious if anyone of you mongers have any experience with this one?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a7b641a3-1106-423b-b3d2-5ad8594d7460[/URL]